| « Prev | Page 1 | Next » |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 10:13
•
by
wolf
(unregistered)
|
|
IM IN UR INTERNETS BLOKNG UR BNNERS
|
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 10:18
•
by
vt_mruhlin
|
|
I'm not at all surprised to see this kind of idiocy from somebody who believed that, "OMG, they're censoring the 'Mission Accomplished' banner," crap.
The fact that he heard it on "the news" amuses me too. Some Guy's blog post on the front page of Digg does not count as "the news". |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 10:33
•
by
TraumaPony
(unregistered)
|
|
What's ironic is the banner ad above the article.
|
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 10:49
•
by
popoppo
(unregistered)
|
|
what banner ad ?
|
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 10:59
•
by
dlikhten
|
|
I love the irony... Good job writing the story...
Why was the office vacant? |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 11:14
•
by
German B.
(unregistered)
|
|
So his pointy hair was completely revealed...
|
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 11:35
•
by
Rookierookie
(unregistered)
|
|
Did he keep his job after that?
|
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 12:33
•
by
SoloSalsa
(unregistered)
|
|
Google ought to read this, give them a few LOLs.
|
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 12:35
•
by
The Truth
(unregistered)
|
|
"Neal paused a moment before a eye roll with a wry smile and then asked again."
Rolling your eyes and smiling "wryly" in response to anything is really ugly and stereotypical nerd behavior. I was hoping his boss would fire him on the spot to teach him a lesson. I would've. |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 12:46
•
by
erissian
|
They were all watching the boss freak out. |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 13:05
•
by
"nerd"
(unregistered)
|
and cussing like that around employees is not? you must be a pointy haired boss that doesn't like your pride injured by a 'nerd' that tires of answering the same question by idiots. Instead of firing competent people, why don't you try to teach yourself and employees not to be idiots. oh wait.. stupid is forever. I am very kind to users despite the questions that exist because they refuse to think. Still it is hard not to gasp or show signs of incredulity when they do idiotic stuff at times. I wouldn't want to work for someone who punished people for stupid reasons instead of something of substance. I am sure people that do that are really surrounded by competence! I guess PC behavior at all times from 'underlings' is more important than having people that aren't idiots to some... no wonder the business world is a mess. |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 13:31
•
by
The Truth
(unregistered)
|
What a nasty attitude. You wouldn't make it past the first interview with me. |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 13:42
•
by
"nerd"
(unregistered)
|
And there are great things to be thankful for! No one complains about my attitude here at work because we are nice to each other. If I encounter jerk, I have no problem letting them know and I certainly am not going to cower before them for a job. |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 14:09
•
by
v
(unregistered)
|
|
<em>Rolling your eyes and smiling "wryly" in response to anything is really ugly and stereotypical nerd behavior. I was hoping his boss would fire him on the spot to teach him a lesson. I would've.</em>
Nice. So people who move their eyes when they think (it's not all voluntary), as well as anyone who either holds their own opinion or has a sense of humor won't last long in your employ. Which is just as well, since you sympathize with the man throwing a temper tantrum. <roll eyes>Hope that works out for ya.</roll eyes> |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 15:34
•
by
bighusker
(unregistered)
|
Who fucking cares? Even if you have hiring power in the real world and aren't just blowing smoke up our asses, there are plenty of other jobs waiting for *competent* developers. The position you're hiring for isn't the end-all be-all of careers. Get over yourself. |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 17:13
•
by
Flurgh
(unregistered)
|
Sarcasm detector. At home. Forgot. You. |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 19:33
•
by
David Larsen
(unregistered)
|
You're the boss in question, aren't you? *rolls eyes and sniggers* |
|
I like the title, but the story line sucks air..
|
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 20:37
•
by
bighusker
(unregistered)
|
If that was sarcasm, then it wasn't obvious at all. Unless it's referencing some relatively obscure saying, then it doesn't even make sense to claim those remarks were sarcastic. |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-24 23:13
•
by
google
(unregistered)
|
we did.... |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-25 01:40
•
by
Terry Smith
(unregistered)
|
|
Because everyone was in the President's office watching him rant.
|
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-25 02:00
•
by
k
(unregistered)
|
Oh I totally missed this part in the dictionary where it says sarcasm has to be obvious! How have I gone all these years being subtly sarcastic? I'm blushing! |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-25 02:11
•
by
whatever
(unregistered)
|
|
This is soooooo old .. i must have read this like 1.5-2 yrs ago-- right here on this website .. are u like running out of content or something?
|
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-25 02:16
•
by
Your Name
(unregistered)
|
|
It took me several minutes to figure out why Opera was refusing to load this article. I think you can figure out why.
|
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-25 03:08
•
by
008
(unregistered)
|
|
Why the f--- does hitting f---ing comment not do a f---ing thing except make my URL flash?
(Note: "comment" is blocked content) CAPTCHA: Completely disappointing. |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-25 05:32
•
by
captain obvious
(unregistered)
|
Read the title again: "Classic WTF". Let the guy have a fucking Christmas break. |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-25 12:02
•
by
Pete
(unregistered)
|
|
Read the title again: "Classic WTF".
They're getting to be a bit like M*A*S*H though. Seems like the same "classics" get repeated time and time again. |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-25 12:51
•
by
vanekl
(unregistered)
|
|
That wasn't sarcasm. It was a PHB who thought he clicked on the W.orld T.aekwondo F.ederation google-link but instead ended up here. Believe me, there are a /lot/ of people out there that are this ignorant (and like Taekwondo).
|
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-26 09:26
•
by
KenW
|
Maybe you'll get reading comprehension classes in your Christmas stocking. Read the post title - it clearly says "Classic WTF", which explains why you probably read it before. |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-26 12:40
•
by
CodingForPretend
|
PHB + Troll = PHT? Maybe he came here on purpose. Did TopCod3r change his sign on? |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-26 15:53
•
by
ChZEROHag
|
Well yes, they're classics. That's kind of the idea. |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-27 07:14
•
by
budets
(unregistered)
|
|
How exactly was Google putting him out of business?
|
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-27 08:12
•
by
Ikke
(unregistered)
|
|
The story explains it... People couldn't find any other bannerservices, so the would chose for google-ad.
|
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-27 16:16
•
by
Nameless
(unregistered)
|
He's on vacation, so this is a "Best Of" week. |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2007-12-28 12:32
•
by
clively
|
I nominate the above post as the Real(tm) WTF. Dude, get a sense of humor. |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2008-01-06 23:49
•
by
3.14159265358
(unregistered)
|
|
One word: PEBKAC
|
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2008-02-10 04:14
•
by
bighusker
(unregistered)
|
You must have also missed the part where it actually has to make sense for something to be "sarcastic" in order for it to be...well "sarcastic." Clearly, those remarks don't fit that criteria, and you're going to have a hard time convicing anyone but yourself of that. |
Re: Classic WTF: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy
2008-02-10 04:15
•
by
bighusker
(unregistered)
|
What in the fuck are you even referencing? How were the comments I responded to "sarcastic" or "humorous" in any way? |
| « Prev | Page 1 | Next » |