Comment On Departing in 9999 Minutes

  Wout van Poppel remarked, "Yesterday's newspaper didn't really contain any interesting news, but at least the photo captions were interesting." [expand full text]
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2Next »

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:03 • by barenaked (unregistered)
It's been one week since my train arrived...

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:09 • by RuBen (unregistered)
Thank you for reading this null

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:10 • by BentFranklin (unregistered)
Fascinating! The cloud-database URL is really really deep, but not infinitely so. But I bet each time I refresh it gets a little deeper.

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:11 • by Nagesh-saki (unregistered)
Comment Informatio always read

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:12 • by DD (unregistered)
[b]Frist![\b]

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:17 • by JP (unregistered)
> Thank you for allowing us to provide your continued identity theft protection.
> Your null null

Looks like someone stole THEIR identity...

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:19 • by Recursive Reclusive (unregistered)
TRWTF is Samsung KIES; horrible, horrible piece of crapware. Adds nothing and just gets in the way. Plain folder access is better in every way.

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:20 • by JiP
At least the jackpot amount is accurate to 100000 currency units...

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:22 • by DonaldK (unregistered)
And one that note, I trust that you all will enjoy your weekend!

Your null null

515_Caption

2012-02-17 09:23 • by Bert Jansen (unregistered)
Those xyxyxyxyxyxyxyxyxxy risk their lives every day! Don't mock them!

strawbucks

2012-02-17 09:26 • by ishmael (unregistered)
Is Starbucks setting itself up now as an ostaria?

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:26 • by Anketam
How is it possible that no one has made the one comment that must be made. I guess the responsibility falls to me:

It's over 9000!!!

Re: 515_Caption

2012-02-17 09:28 • by Barteke (unregistered)
374783 in reply to 374780
lol @ your null null

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:28 • by Kevin D (unregistered)
Well, now we know where this guy works... http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/The-Applet-Redirect.aspx

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:33 • by Steve The Cynic
What I find concerning is that the newspaper uses Wikipedia template syntax for its captions... (Or, perhaps it doesn't, but the editor of the caption thought it did.)

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:34 • by PedanticCurmudgeon
I just accidentally null the whole thing. What should I do?

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:35 • by Master Chief
Welcome to the Enrichment Center! Your train will depart in nine, nine, nine, nine, nine...nine, nine...

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:39 • by null (unregistered)
null null

null

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:47 • by golddog (unregistered)
How could Scott even consider turning down that agreement? It's like gold!

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:48 • by oh yeah (unregistered)
9999th post!

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 09:49 • by dbk (unregistered)
overcast database FTW

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 10:02 • by RichP
It's clouds all the way ...up?

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 10:07 • by Parliamentary Train (unregistered)
Must have gone to the wrong station - clearly "St Pancrs" has a much worse service than St Pancras itself.

Captcha: suscipit - I suscipit a typo....

Re: Jackpot

2012-02-17 10:14 • by Bernard Mergendeiler (unregistered)
The 0.0 jackpot looks like some kind of shenanigans to me. A perod is the German thousands separator, not the decimal point. The decimal point in German is a comma. One million Euros would be written: 1.000.000,00 or more likely 1.000.000,--

Also the banner is much narrower than a reasonable length for the horizontally-displayed number field.

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 10:21 • by airdrik (unregistered)
And that is why you should put your databases on Sun servers: The clouds just get in the way!

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 10:24 • by PedanticCurmudgeon
So if I get 30 stars on my Starbucks card, can I also expect infinite free coffee (hopefully it's not NaN free coffee)?

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 10:28 • by Synchronos (unregistered)
Do you Brits really say "train AT St. Pancras" when you are heading TO St. Pancras? If not, you know TRWTF (tm): telling people at platform which is the station they are at, rather than telling where the train is heading.

Re: Jackpot

2012-02-17 10:32 • by foo (unregistered)
374798 in reply to 374794
Bernard Mergendeiler:
The 0.0 jackpot looks like some kind of shenanigans to me. A perod is the German thousands separator, not the decimal point. The decimal point in Switzerland is a comma. One million francs would be written: 1.000.000,00 or more likely 1.000.000,--

Also the banner is much narrower than a reasonable length for the horizontally-displayed number field.
FTFY.

Also "Mio." means million, so they'd write "Mio 4.2" or so. Most players don't care so much for the lower digits ...

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 10:32 • by nimis (unregistered)
374799 in reply to 374774
DD:
[b]Frist![\b]


So, you're great mind also...

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 10:34 • by foo (unregistered)
374800 in reply to 374797
Synchronos:
Do you Brits really say "train AT St. Pancras" when you are heading TO St. Pancras? If not, you know TRWTF (tm): telling people at platform which is the station they are at, rather than telling where the train is heading.
Or, more likely, bad editing.

EULAs

2012-02-17 10:35 • by Sparr
I usually amend EULAs before agreeing to them, getting rid of objectionable parts and such. A blank one is refreshingly acceptable, and I see those more often when installing software via WINE.

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 10:38 • by foo (unregistered)
374802 in reply to 374775
JP:
> Thank you for allowing us to provide your continued identity theft protection.
> Your null null

Looks like someone stole THEIR identity...
Feature please!

This will be my new reference for "identity theft". (Until xkcd does one, of course. ;-)

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 10:44 • by Chris (unregistered)
374803 in reply to 374800
The photo is taken at St Pancras. So the poster was rushing to catch the train at St Pancras to somewhere (like Sheffield).
Why the departure board needs to tell you that, I really don't know.

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 10:44 • by anon (unregistered)
Hey, stop whining, out here in the sticks we only get buses every 19999 minutes.

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 10:45 • by null (unregistered)
null null null null null null null null. null null null null null! null.

null

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 10:55 • by Rich (unregistered)
Seems like Stack Builder needs the Applet Redirect Pattern from a few days ago

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 10:59 • by John (unregistered)
374807 in reply to 374806
Rich:
Seems like Stack Builder needs the Applet Redirect Pattern from a few days ago


Or maybe we've found the actual location of that code!

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 11:00 • by Aidan (unregistered)
374808 in reply to 374807
John:
Rich:
Seems like Stack Builder needs the Applet Redirect Pattern from a few days ago


Or maybe we've found the actual location of that code!


Also, it seems that Stack Builder is very good at building a stack...of directories at least.

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 11:07 • by Bananas (unregistered)
374809 in reply to 374775
JP:
> Thank you for allowing us to provide your continued identity theft protection.
> Your null null

Looks like someone stole THEIR identity...

Nay, they are simply providing a powerful demonstration of their superior identity protection technology.

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 11:29 • by Jeff (unregistered)
374810 in reply to 374776
Recursive Reclusive:
TRWTF is Samsung KIES; horrible, horrible piece of crapware. Adds nothing and just gets in the way. Plain folder access is better in every way.
It is astonishing how many people think they have to buy a "package" to do something their OS already does.

For example, digital cameras with (Windows only, of course, or maybe fortunately) crapware to "download" your photos (copy them from USB media) "organize" them into "collections", view slideshows, resize, crop, print... and usually the vendor written junk does a much worse job than what you already have built-in to your system.

Re: strawbucks

2012-02-17 11:31 • by Fred (unregistered)
374811 in reply to 374781
ishmael:
Is Starbucks setting itself up now as an ostaria?
1. Starbucks is not just in Australia.
2. That's not how you spell it anyway.

Re: Jackpot

2012-02-17 11:35 • by James (unregistered)
374812 in reply to 374798
foo:
Also "Mio." means million
Well if they mean million, why don't they say million? Fucking foreigners!

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 11:37 • by PiisAWheeL
374813 in reply to 374797
Synchronos:
Do you Brits really say "train AT St. Pancras" when you are heading TO St. Pancras? If not, you know TRWTF (tm): telling people at platform which is the station they are at, rather than telling where the train is heading.

After you get on a train TO St. Pancras, The train well then be AT St. Pancras.

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 11:38 • by Larry (unregistered)
374814 in reply to 374803
Chris:
The photo is taken at St Pancras. So the poster was rushing to catch the train at St Pancras to somewhere (like Sheffield).
Why the departure board needs to tell you that, I really don't know.
If you are at St Pancras, there won't be a train that goes from there to St Pancras. Ever. But the database doesn't have a flag for "never", so they just used the maximum value they could store.

Not a WTF. User error.

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 11:39 • by Not Surprised (unregistered)
374815 in reply to 374806
Rich:
Seems like Stack Builder needs the Applet Redirect Pattern from a few days ago
So the Stack Builder built a stack. Of redirects, or crap, your choice. But, really, are you surprised? That's what it's designed to do!

Re: Jackpot

2012-02-17 11:53 • by PiisAWheeL
374816 in reply to 374794
Bernard Mergendeiler:
The 0.0 jackpot looks like some kind of shenanigans to me. A perod is the German thousands separator, not the decimal point. The decimal point in German is a comma. One million Euros would be written: 1.000.000,00 or more likely 1.000.000,--

Also the banner is much narrower than a reasonable length for the horizontally-displayed number field.


So what, There is clearly no numbers to the left of that 0.0. It could be 0.000.000.000.000.000.000,00 and it would still be 0, regardless of how many comma's or decimal points or whatever is being used to format the number. So unless you 0-pad your numbers, I think the ad is broken.

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 11:59 • by Synchronos (unregistered)
374817 in reply to 374814
Larry:
If you are at St Pancras, there won't be a train that goes from there to St Pancras. Ever. But the database doesn't have a flag for "never", so they just used the maximum value they could store.


So, you mean, that if there's no train leaving from the platform, the destination string of the departure board defaults to current location, rather than empty string? Well, interesting design choice, but you could say it works. "Hey, this must be wrong platform, I wanted to Ashford, but this train only gets me back to where I left."

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 11:59 • by Anketam
374818 in reply to 374790
oh yeah:
9999th post!
I hate to break it to you but you are actually the 352,553rd* post

The actual 9999th post would have been by Fregas:
"oh god kill me now!"

http://thedailywtf.com/Comments/Party_Like_It_0x27_s_1969.aspx#32236

* Assuming linear and incremental usage of post numbers and factoring in that the first post started at 22,237 (minor WTF there).

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 12:02 • by Synchronos (unregistered)
374819 in reply to 374817
Synchronos:
Larry:
If you are at St Pancras, there won't be a train that goes from there to St Pancras. Ever. But the database doesn't have a flag for "never", so they just used the maximum value they could store.


So, you mean, that if there's no train leaving from the platform, the destination string of the departure board defaults to current location, rather than empty string? Well, interesting design choice, but you could say it works. "Hey, this must be wrong platform, I wanted to Ashford, but this train only gets me back to where I left."


Or, do you mean that when the wrong destination was somehow set, the system could not find any train leaving to St. Pancras, because being at St. Pancras, it defaulted to maximum value. 'k, now I understand.

(Sorry, haven't bothered to register, so cannot edit.)

Re: Departing in 9999 Minutes

2012-02-17 12:24 • by JoeCool
Number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine
Number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine
Number nine, number nine, number nine, number nine
Number nine, number nine, number...
...Then there's this Welsh Rarebit wearing some brown underpants
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2Next »

Add Comment