Comment On Gosh Darn Computer

Jonathan Z. sent in this gosh darn screenshot: [expand full text]
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2Next »

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 13:19 • by bryan986
I guess the 3rd time is not the charm in this case...

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 13:25 • by FredSaw
Nice of them to supply the cursing so the user doesn't have to make up his own.

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 13:31 • by pitchingchris
The reqirements one is gosh darn funny. Looks like they have more requirements than they list on the screen.

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 13:33 • by LiquidFire
It's probably not like that, but could they be using the checkmarks as bullets?

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 13:36 • by Joe {jafm} (unregistered)
Nice, as if it's not hard enough being taken seriously as a professional in this field as it is, we have that sort of offensive language presented to the public.

(appropriate) captcha: doom

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 13:47 • by Coincoin
What's sad in the first shot is the poor C++ programmer is probably only receiving an integer as the exception from a module which is obviously not written by him, hence the cursing.

Gotta love your predecessor when you have to write code like:

catch(int exception)
{
}

or worse yet:

catch(bool exception)
{
}

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 13:57 • by Vechni
155441 in reply to 155429
LiquidFire:
It's probably not like that, but could they be using the checkmarks as bullets?


heh yeah, whenever i write a todo list i always use checks instead of bullets. it gives me that false sense of accomplishment.

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 14:00 • by ParkinT
Wow! An error dialog that can READ MY MIND!!

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 14:05 • by FredSaw
The requirements error is probably choking on a version number. I remember some installation programs from years gone by which thought I didn't have IE installed because it was IE6 and they were checking for version 5.

In more up-to-date WTFery, MusicMatch Jukebox sold out to Yahoo, which replaced MMJB with the Yahoo player. For about six weeks every time I started MMJB it would ask if I was ready to update to Yahoo. If I said yes, it would abort the install, telling me that I needed Windows XP. Apparently Windows Server 2003 is too much OS for Yahoo Player.

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 14:28 • by Sigh (unregistered)
155450 in reply to 155441
Vechni:
LiquidFire:
It's probably not like that, but could they be using the checkmarks as bullets?


heh yeah, whenever i write a todo list i always use checks instead of bullets. it gives me that false sense of accomplishment.


If you did the opposite, I would think you were one of our programmers.... (bah, image hosting blocked from work, here is a text version of the dialog)

-----------------------
... other options...

Display grid
-------------------
( ) Reset
( ) Save

( ) Default
-------------------

[Close]
-------------------------



Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 14:30 • by iMalc (unregistered)
A transparency setting on a find tool!?!?

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 14:36 • by SkittlesAreYum (unregistered)
155453 in reply to 155451
Pretty sure that's Notepad++, and yes, it has transparency settings for the find tool.

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 14:38 • by SpComb
155454 in reply to 155451
It's a feature of Notepad++ . A very important one.

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 14:40 • by James S (unregistered)
155455 in reply to 155451
iMalc:
A transparency setting on a find tool!?!?


That control sets the transparency of the search tool window, to allow one to see the material that is being searched, which is nice when the highlighted match is *under* the search tool window.

This looks just like the find dialog in NotePad++.

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 14:41 • by Franz Kafka (unregistered)
Transparency is actually a reasonable idea - you don't have to move the dialog away from the text you're reading as you go through the document.

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 14:59 • by 1337 (unregistered)
There're??? really?? now thats the real wtf...

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 15:22 • by gary k (unregistered)
after seeing that exception and reading the comments to find out it's Notepad++, I have immediately downloaded it. Time to spend the rest of my day trying to get that message.

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 15:25 • by Guruman (unregistered)
It's Notepad++ alright, see file winmain.cpp.svn-base line #296 for the gory details...

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 15:27 • by poochner
155467 in reply to 155459
1337:
There're??? really?? now thats the real wtf...


That parses fine for me. "Hey, at least there are birds." What am I missing? It says they have bird watching, so I presume that they do in fact have birds from time to time.

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 15:28 • by Whitey (unregistered)
155468 in reply to 155459
1337:
There're??? really?? now thats the real wtf...

I had trouble with that as well. Of course they intended it to be the contraction of "there are" but this isn't one.

CAPTCHA: "tastey" and yes they spelled that incorrectly also...

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 15:55 • by Brandon (unregistered)
155473 in reply to 155443
FredSaw:
The requirements error is probably choking on a version number. I remember some installation programs from years gone by which thought I didn't have IE installed because it was IE6 and they were checking for version 5.

In more up-to-date WTFery, MusicMatch Jukebox sold out to Yahoo, which replaced MMJB with the Yahoo player. For about six weeks every time I started MMJB it would ask if I was ready to update to Yahoo. If I said yes, it would abort the install, telling me that I needed Windows XP. Apparently Windows Server 2003 is too much OS for Yahoo Player.


Actually I got this error before with BBC's online player. I found out it is due to my being in the State's. Due to the laws governing show distribution, the online player only allows IP addresses from the UK and Ireland, so it errors out with the helpful message that your computer meets all requirements for play the file, but forgets to tell you that the reason why is that you are not in UK or Ireland.

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 16:04 • by mr_ed (unregistered)
The WTF on the BBC one is that it requires Windows and IE.

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 16:07 • by Ben Olive
Gaim has a "static int goddamnicq" in there source code.

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 16:12 • by emurphy
155476 in reply to 155467
poochner:
1337:
There're??? really?? now thats the real wtf...


That parses fine for me. "Hey, at least there are birds." What am I missing? It says they have bird watching, so I presume that they do in fact have birds from time to time.


The notes.

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 16:13 • by akatherder
I deal with the god-damned exceptions so the users don't have to!

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 16:32 • by misha
155482 in reply to 155474
mr_ed:
The WTF on the BBC one is that it requires Windows and IE.


Mac/Linux support is almost certainly going to be in the full version, after the Beeb got flamed to a crisp for their XP-only approach. I'll be interested to see how they do it though, seeing as their current system relies heavily on PlaysForSureIfYouRunWindows DRM, and proprietary windows based P2P software (Kontiki).

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 16:46 • by Zylon
155488 in reply to 155473
Brandon:
Actually I got this error before with BBC's online player. I found out it is due to my being in the State's.

The State's what?

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 17:02 • by Herohtar (unregistered)
Lol, that first one sounds like something my Data Structures professor would say...

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 17:07 • by rank this (unregistered)
155493 in reply to 155488
Zylon:
Brandon:
Actually I got this error before with BBC's online player. I found out it is due to my being in the State's.

The State's what?


LOL. Not what state, but which state.

CAPTCHA: darwin

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 17:22 • by purge
155500 in reply to 155477
akatherder:
I deal with the god-damned exceptions so the users don't have to!


My users deal with their own god damned exceptions!

"He who generates the exception should handle it"

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 18:42 • by Pirate Programmer (unregistered)
155514 in reply to 155488
Zylon:
Brandon:
Actually I got this error before with BBC's online player. I found out it is due to my being in the State's.

The State's what?


I assume the apostrophe was an error, and he mean "in the States", that is, "in the United States of America".

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 18:53 • by Eternal Density
i've been writing an n++ plugin (for a university project and at one point I managed to cause that exception to be raised. Actually, I found the source code for that exception.

Actually, the code for producing this error is:

if (!_hSelf)
{
throw int(666);
}

Addendum (2007-10-01 19:01):
BTW, this code appears in staticdialog.cpp which defines the class StaticDialog which is the base class for DockingDlgInterface (which is a class) which is the base class for (naturally) all the docking dialogs in n++ (including mine, of course).

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 19:54 • by 008 (unregistered)
lol

if(user.isIdiot()&&satan==666){
throw new GodDamnException("God damn exception!");
}

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 21:48 • by Lynx (unregistered)
Hmm, that's 3 God Damn Exceptions, how many non-God Damn Exceptions would there be?

CAPTCHA: burned. Oooh, how appropriate.

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 22:10 • by Shadowman (unregistered)
155530 in reply to 155443
FredSaw:
The requirements error is probably choking on a version number. I remember some installation programs from years gone by which thought I didn't have IE installed because it was IE6 and they were checking for version 5.


Then why the green checkmarks?

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-01 22:33 • by Jonanthan.z (unregistered)
Ah..Nice to see that my screenshot got in!.

Anyway, the exception only happens if you search alot of files through network drives using the "find all" function. And there's no sure way of replicating it.

Have fun looking for the exception in NotePad++ though :)

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-02 01:38 • by random_garbage
155535 in reply to 155514
Pirate Programmer:
Zylon:
Brandon:
Actually I got this error before with BBC's online player. I found out it is due to my being in the State's.
The State's what?
I assume the apostrophe was an error, and he mean "in the States", that is, "in the United States of America".
And I assume that he realised that, and was asking the question to point out the error... :-)

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-02 02:33 • by Daniel Beardsmore
155538 in reply to 155475
Ben Olive:
Gaim has a "static int goddamnicq" in there source code.


It's been Pidgin for a while now, but yeah, I can imagine why they might write something like that ;-)

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-02 03:09 • by CJ (unregistered)
Is 'God Damn' seriously so offensive in the US that you have to make it 'Gosh Darn'? Considering 'Fuck' and 'Shit' are so common one of them was once part of the name of the site I find it totally bizarre..

(from the UK - where 'damn' is considered innocuous, and Randy isn't something you want to hear your daughter called)

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-02 03:26 • by Synonymous Awkward (unregistered)
155544 in reply to 155468
Whitey:
1337:
There're??? really?? now thats the real wtf...

I had trouble with that as well. Of course they intended it to be the contraction of "there are" but this isn't one.

What isn't what? "There're" is certainly a contraction of "there are", and it's even being used halfway correctly ("At least there are birds") which I suppose is above average. If you could dereference that sentence into something readable then maybe we could clear up any remaining problems for you.

Whitey:

CAPTCHA: "tastey" and yes they spelled that incorrectly also...

FACT: none of the captcha texts are ever cultural references.
BONUS FACT: everyone is interested in your captcha

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-02 03:35 • by ssanchez (unregistered)
155545 in reply to 155482
misha:
mr_ed:
The WTF on the BBC one is that it requires Windows and IE.


Mac/Linux support is almost certainly going to be in the full version, after the Beeb got flamed to a crisp for their XP-only approach.

In fact it has become a requirement of their licence following a petition on the Downing St. (UK equivalent of the White House) website, though no commitment on the timescale.

http://www.pm.gov.uk/output/Page13090.asp

Incidentally, whilst I did sign the petition, I had noted that the BBC had always committed to supporting other OS's "in the future"

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-02 07:09 • by Anonymous Coward (unregistered)
see http://xkcd.com/75/

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-02 07:29 • by Rich (unregistered)
155564 in reply to 155468
Whitey:
1337:
There're??? really?? now thats the real wtf...

I had trouble with that as well. Of course they intended it to be the contraction of "there are" but this isn't one.



Not sure what language you're speaking, but this is perfectly valid English.

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-02 07:50 • by Matt (unregistered)
I HATE exception 3.

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-02 09:09 • by ParkinT
The often misstated expletive is "God Damned".
This falls into a category including:
"I could care less", "irregardless", "Supposively", "Safety Deposit Box".
All illustrated here

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-02 09:09 • by fist-poster (unregistered)
155573 in reply to 155474
mr_ed:
The WTF on the BBC one is that it requires Windows and IE.


I suppose THAT is the reason why they are apologizing!

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-02 09:57 • by googler (unregistered)
155576 in reply to 155466

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-02 11:15 • by Ed (unregistered)
155581 in reply to 155542
CJ:
Is 'God Damn' seriously so offensive in the US that you have to make it 'Gosh Darn'? Considering 'Fuck' and 'Shit' are so common one of them was once part of the name of the site I find it totally bizarre..

(from the UK - where 'damn' is considered innocuous, and Randy isn't something you want to hear your daughter called)


The US is funny like that, like the uproar about Grand Theft Auto, go gun down all the ho's and n**gaz you want in stunning graphic detail, while peds shout "f**k you" and "Motherf**ker" while driving, and it hardly merits mention. But god forbid there's even a hint of sex in it and the company is nearly torpedoed. (Oh, and to actually use the N-word in conversation would make one an instant pariah...unless of course one is African-American, then there's no problems, mate.)

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-02 11:24 • by Sean (unregistered)
155583 in reply to 155500
I love you. I wish we could always use that as a rule for user's generating an exception :( Specially those ones that are assholes and go digging...

Re: Gosh Darn Computer

2007-10-02 11:49 • by FredSaw
155588 in reply to 155542
CJ:
Is 'God Damn' seriously so offensive in the US that you have to make it 'Gosh Darn'? Considering 'Fuck' and 'Shit' are so common one of them was once part of the name of the site I find it totally bizarre..

(from the UK - where 'damn' is considered innocuous, and Randy isn't something you want to hear your daughter called)
The "damn" is not the offensive part. The expression as a whole is considered by Christian conservative types (of which we have a surplus) to be a transgression of Deuteronomy 5:11, "Thou shalt not take the name of the Lord thy God in vain: for the Lord will not hold him guiltless that taketh his name in vain."

The fact that biblically speaking, this is part of the law given to the nation of Israel which passed away with the arrival of the messiah's "new covenant" and now has no application other than as history, seems to escape them.
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2Next »

Add Comment