Comment On Loyalty Rewarded

"This coupon increased the chances of me trading in my car by about 0.79%," Josh notes. [expand full text]
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2 | Page 3Next »

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:01 • by ParkinT
That is funny stuff.

--Poster's Name

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:07 • by PKM (unregistered)
I think part of the Dumb Test is whether you give the Dumb Test your real address.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:09 • by amischiefr
And Andrew apparently failed the Dumb test by not even being able to get past the login screen.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:15 • by Yeah (unregistered)
The first time I bought a new car I marched right in to that sales office and announced "I'll pay $12,000 for this car and not a penny more!" The sales guy went to work with his discounts, talked to his manager a couple times, and finally came back with "this is the best I can do". It was $12,000.79.

Of course I had to walk away. If only I had that coupon.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:16 • by Densa (unregistered)
271887 in reply to 271885
amischiefr:
And Andrew apparently failed the Dumb test by not even being able to get past the login screen.

Actually if you can get past the login screen, you're too smart for the Dumb test.

Not to worry, we have plenty of candidates where I work.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:19 • by Warren (unregistered)
Damn, would have been first, but the comments system didn't like my surname

- Warren Young

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:19 • by Landlord (unregistered)
The deposit has to be enough to cover any damages you might do to the property as a renter. Otherwise I could end up losing money on the deal.

I also find a high deposit helps to keep out the riff-raff who play music all night and can't be bothered to pay on time, if ever.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:20 • by Duhh (unregistered)
Obviously, "young" is a porn word. I mean, why else would anyone search for "young"?

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:22 • by Dumb? Dumber? (unregistered)
271891 in reply to 271884
PKM:
I think part of the Dumb Test is whether you give the Dumb Test your real address.

I'm pretty sure part of the WTF test is not giving TDWTF your real e-mail address.
Maybe. I'm not gonna try it; maybe it was a fake e-mail address. It doesn't look particularly fake, and the domain name googles up real (and with a RL resume for Andrew "Fake Last Name" Young.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:22 • by The Boss (unregistered)
I expect everyone on my team to give 120% -- why not my laptop battery too?

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:22 • by Trevel (unregistered)
I really wish people would stop making fun of Miss Name. She's done quite well for herself, all things considered, and I think deserves respect for succeeding despite her truly horrific name. Fortunately, after she marries her fiance, she'll be much better off as Presenter Tyme.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:24 • by Steve (unregistered)
Perhaps it's because I didn't have my coffee today yet, but the Popular Science subscription renewal isn't clicking for me.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:25 • by Coward (unregistered)
Where is the WTF with the Popular Science Magazine?
The discounts are write if you take the result of: Floor("Annual Cover Price"*(100-Discount))

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:25 • by Coward (unregistered)
271896 in reply to 271895
right not write you idiot!

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:26 • by Uhm.. (unregistered)
I think the Mac OS X printer error is normal. You have to read it like "This isn't possible on the client side".

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:29 • by Coward (unregistered)
271899 in reply to 271898
Depends how you define normal. In the case of MAC users you need to be more liberal with the usage of the word normal.
Uhm.. :
I think the Mac OS X printer error is normal. You have to read it like "This isn't possible on the client side".

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:32 • by Random832
271900 in reply to 271895
Coward:
Where is the WTF with the Popular Science Magazine?
The discounts are write if you take the result of: Floor("Annual Cover Price"*(100-Discount))


Except both the "your price" and the cover price by use of the term "annual" are presented as being per year (meaning that with an annual cover price of 179.64 you would pay 538.92 for the three years - or with the 28/year you would be paying $84 for the three years, a much worse deal than three separate 12-month subscriptions for a total of $36)

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:33 • by Josh (unregistered)
How many points does Andrew get on the dumb test for posting his email address on TDWTF?

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:35 • by Math Whiiiiiiz (unregistered)
271902 in reply to 271900
Random832:
with the 28/year you would be paying $84 for the three years, a much worse deal than three separate 12-month subscriptions for a total of $36)

... and if you needed this explained to you, YRTWTF (You are the WTF).

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:36 • by JoLoCo (unregistered)
I like how the apartment info shows "1 Bed" but "1.00 Bath" - can an apartment have a fractional bathroom?

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:40 • by dkf
I don't know about you, but I'm keen on influencing the purchase of spyware and malware. Though to be fair, I'd be influencing it in a very strongly negative direction.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:42 • by Math Whiiiiiiz (unregistered)
271905 in reply to 271903
JoLoCo:
I like how the apartment info shows "1 Bed" but "1.00 Bath" - can an apartment have a fractional bathroom?

Real estate is frequently listed with "1 1/2 bath" and even "1 3/4 bath". The particulars escape me, but they are very important to a girlfriend, which you would know if you had ever had one.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:42 • by SCB (unregistered)
271906 in reply to 271900
Random832:
Coward:
Where is the WTF with the Popular Science Magazine?
The discounts are write if you take the result of: Floor("Annual Cover Price"*(100-Discount))


Except both the "your price" and the cover price by use of the term "annual" are presented as being per year (meaning that with an annual cover price of 179.64 you would pay 538.92 for the three years - or with the 28/year you would be paying $84 for the three years, a much worse deal than three separate 12-month subscriptions for a total of $36)

It doesn't say anything about "three years".
Presumably you have a choice between 12 issues per year, 24 issues per year or 36 issues per year.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:43 • by Anon (unregistered)
271907 in reply to 271903
JoLoCo:
I like how the apartment info shows "1 Bed" but "1.00 Bath" - can an apartment have a fractional bathroom?


Yes, it's called a half bathroom. Usually a toilet and sink but no tub or shower. My house is 1.5 bath.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:52 • by Genius (unregistered)
The print server is, well, a server. That means a Mac trying to print is a client. As we all know, Macs never have errors, so, client-error-not-possible. Makes perfect sense.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:53 • by @Deprecated (unregistered)
271909 in reply to 271907
Anon:
JoLoCo:
I like how the apartment info shows "1 Bed" but "1.00 Bath" - can an apartment have a fractional bathroom?


Yes, it's called a half bathroom. Usually a toilet and sink but no tub or shower. My house is 1.5 bath.


That place looks like it has 10 or 20 half baths. How does that work into print? I want a place with pi baths.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:53 • by AdT (unregistered)
I guess former president Bush wrote a memo to the DHS instructing them to put "Kim Young-Ill or however this freaky dude's name is spelt" and all his relatives on the watchlist of nuclear terrorists. The second part must have got lost somehow.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:53 • by Ethan Qix (unregistered)
271911 in reply to 271903
JoLoCo:
I like how the apartment info shows "1 Bed" but "1.00 Bath" - can an apartment have a fractional bathroom?


Yes. However, the downside is frequent flooding thanks to that blasted half-bathtub.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:54 • by galgorah
271912 in reply to 271903
yes it can have a half bath.

definition from answers.com:
A room in a residence that contains a toilet and wash basin but no bathing facilities, such as a bathtub or shower stall. A three-quarter bath contains a shower but no bathtub.
Example: The two-story home has two full baths upstairs and a half bath downstairs

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 09:54 • by Coward (unregistered)
271913 in reply to 271900
Random832:
Coward:
Where is the WTF with the Popular Science Magazine?
The discounts are write if you take the result of: Floor("Annual Cover Price"*(100-Discount))


Except both the "your price" and the cover price by use of the term "annual" are presented as being per year (meaning that with an annual cover price of 179.64 you would pay 538.92 for the three years - or with the 28/year you would be paying $84 for the three years, a much worse deal than three separate 12-month subscriptions for a total of $36)


So the only WTF is that they put the word Annual where it did not belong. Truly a WTF of the most glorious kind.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 10:00 • by Coward (unregistered)
271914 in reply to 271913
Fixed:

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 10:10 • by Andreas (unregistered)
271915 in reply to 271914
Coward:
Fixed:


No, it isn't (hint: /yr)

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 10:13 • by JuanCarlosII
271916 in reply to 271912
galgorah:
yes it can have a half bath.

definition from answers.com:
A room in a residence that contains a toilet and wash basin but no bathing facilities, such as a bathtub or shower stall. A three-quarter bath contains a shower but no bathtub.
Example: The two-story home has two full baths upstairs and a half bath downstairs

So TRWTF is calling a room, which does not contain a bath, a bathroom.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 10:14 • by coward (unregistered)
Annual cover price is just the amount that would be paid annually for N*12 issues..? Why does anyone have a problem with that?

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 10:17 • by Falcon (unregistered)
They interpreted the deposit value as an unsigned integer instead of signed - it's meant to be $-1. Gotta wonder about the apartment, then, if they feel they have to pay someone to take it.

And if there was a previous resident who got the same deal, they might have deliberately damaged it in order to forfeit their negative deposit!

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 10:20 • by Georgem (unregistered)
271919 in reply to 271885
amischiefr:
And Andrew apparently failed the Dumb test by not even being able to get past the login screen.


Or would that mean he'd passed it, since it was testing for dumbness?

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 10:27 • by Voodoo Coder
271921 in reply to 271917
coward:
Annual cover price is just the amount that would be paid annually for N*12 issues..? Why does anyone have a problem with that?


OK Seriously?

Looking at the chart, which is a better deal...buying a 3 year subscription, or 3 separate 1 year subscriptions?

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 10:30 • by Daniel (unregistered)
"Such a deal," Angus Scott-Fleming said, "Pay $12/yr for 1 year, or $20/yr for 2 years, or $28/yr for three!"

Couldnt this just be they are planning to raise the standard prices before the third year?

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 10:34 • by KattMan
271923 in reply to 271917
coward:
Annual cover price is just the amount that would be paid annually for N*12 issues..? Why does anyone have a problem with that?


The math wizards here amaze me.
The annual cover price is not a problem, the problem is your price.
If I want a 1 year subscription (12 issues) I will pay $12 the first year.
If I want a 3 year subscription (36 issues) I will pay $28 the first year and every year after that. That is more than double the price.

With this, I know I will simply buy a 1 year subscription and do that for the next three years paying only $36 total instead of $84 total.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 10:48 • by kastein
271926 in reply to 271903
JoLoCo:
I like how the apartment info shows "1 Bed" but "1.00 Bath" - can an apartment have a fractional bathroom?
My parent's place is 1 3/4 bath - there is a full bathroom with toilet/sink/shower, a half bath with sink/shower, and a quarter bath in the basement with just a 1920s-era overhead-tank toilet. I'm still kinda confused as to why they used the numeric format they did, but it does sorta make sense.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 10:52 • by Charles400
The real WTF is the weather girl on the BBC. Glam her up a bit, at least. Who the hell is responsible for wardrobe and make up? Sheesh!

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 10:56 • by Neil (unregistered)
271930 in reply to 271926
kastein:
JoLoCo:
I like how the apartment info shows "1 Bed" but "1.00 Bath" - can an apartment have a fractional bathroom?
My parent's place is 1 3/4 bath - there is a full bathroom with toilet/sink/shower, a half bath with sink/shower, and a quarter bath in the basement with just a 1920s-era overhead-tank toilet. I'm still kinda confused as to why they used the numeric format they did, but it does sorta make sense.

So, if you have a house with 16 overhead toilets setup here and there, you can call it 4 baths?

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 11:01 • by What (unregistered)
I guess this will do until Jay Leno comes back this fall with more "Headlines."

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 11:10 • by pjt33
271932 in reply to 271923
KattMan:
The math wizards here amaze me.
The annual cover price is not a problem, the problem is your price.
If I want a 1 year subscription (12 issues) I will pay $12 the first year.
If I want a 3 year subscription (36 issues) I will pay $28 the first year and every year after that. That is more than double the price.

With this, I know I will simply buy a 1 year subscription and do that for the next three years paying only $36 total instead of $84 total.

No, they're both wrong. Unless you think it's not a problem that the total cover price for 3 years is about 9 times the total cover price for 1 year.

Fractional Bathrooms

2009-06-29 11:14 • by JohnFx (unregistered)
271933 in reply to 271903
JoLoCo:
I like how the apartment info shows "1 Bed" but "1.00 Bath" - can an apartment have a fractional bathroom?


Actually it can. A 1/2 bath is standard lingo in real estate for a bathroom without a shower or tub.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 11:25 • by Eh (unregistered)
271934 in reply to 271898
It's a CUPS error - http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22client-error-not-possible%22&aq=f&oq=&aqi=g10 - and isn't OS X specific.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 11:26 • by merpius
271935 in reply to 271916
JuanCarlosII:
galgorah:
yes it can have a half bath.

definition from answers.com:
A room in a residence that contains a toilet and wash basin but no bathing facilities, such as a bathtub or shower stall. A three-quarter bath contains a shower but no bathtub.
Example: The two-story home has two full baths upstairs and a half bath downstairs

So TRWTF is calling a room, which does not contain a bath, a bathroom.


It is simply a euphemism to save us all from having to call it the shitter. Maybe you prefer comfort room? water closet? rest room?

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 11:30 • by nui (unregistered)
because nobody else said anything about it:

i think the Paperback edition (2007) from For Dummies is way better than the Paperback edition (2007) from For Dummies.

Re: Loyalty Rewarded

2009-06-29 11:34 • by dkf
271938 in reply to 271935
merpius:
It is simply a euphemism to save us all from having to call it the shitter. Maybe you prefer comfort room? water closet? rest room?
The best term I've come across is “Grand House of Easement”, which was apparently used in Tudor England to refer to the shared facilities…

Re: Fractional Bathrooms

2009-06-29 11:34 • by vulputate (unregistered)
271939 in reply to 271933
JohnFx:
JoLoCo:
I like how the apartment info shows "1 Bed" but "1.00 Bath" - can an apartment have a fractional bathroom?


Actually it can. A 1/2 bath is standard lingo in real estate for a bathroom without a shower or tub.


As long as you stick to english, yes. No such equivalent in swedish. And the fact that it is commonly used doesnt make it the least bit more sensible.
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2 | Page 3Next »

Add Comment