Comment On More Like Didgeridon't!

If you were tasked with building a time zone synching application, you could probably do it in less than 1MB. Maybe you Linux guys could write it in one line of Perl (or at least brag about having the ability to write it in one line of Perl). Hell, maybe you'd just use the built-in synching functionality in your favorite OS. Anyhow, I can't imagine the crazy Western Australian rules for calculating time that make this software baloon to 4GB. [expand full text]
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2 | Page 3Next »

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 10:03 • by tharfagreinir
Those damn Aussies ... they always have to outdo everyone else.

"That's not a time zone synching application - THIS is a time zone synching application!"

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 10:06 • by Bill (unregistered)
142001 in reply to 142000
tharfagreinir:
Those damn Aussies ... they always have to outdo everyone else.

"That's not a time zone synching application - THIS is a time zone synching application!"


Thanks for the laughs!! Boy, I really needed that this morning...

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 10:12 • by LazySod (unregistered)
142003 in reply to 142000
tharfagreinir:
Those damn Aussies ... they always have to outdo everyone else.

"That's not a time zone synching application - THIS is a time zone synching application!"


Brillant!

captcha: tacos -> hey, that's a good idea, I was thinking about what to eat today

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 10:24 • by dont_feel_like_logging_in_at_work (unregistered)
Maybe you Linux guys could write it in one line of Perl (or at least brag about having the ability to write it in one line of Perl).


Damn right I could!

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 10:25 • by A Nonny Mouse
everything is bigger in autralia. but everything is *biggest* in texas! ph33r the Houston Time Zone Update...

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 10:34 • by karnokd (unregistered)
I don't want to disappoint you, but this is a somewhat-uninstaller bug. If the install metadata of each line is incorrect, lets say points to an invalid or nonexistent directory, the program tries to find an appropiate parent directory. In this case, the whole Program Files. Then it counts all the files' size. This is why it takes so long to show such a simple list of installed programs. As far as I know.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 10:41 • by dnm (unregistered)
142009 in reply to 142008
Yea, cus that's sane.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 10:43 • by Tatiano
142010 in reply to 142008
karnokd:
I don't want to disappoint you, but this is a somewhat-uninstaller bug. If the install metadata of each line is incorrect, lets say points to an invalid or nonexistent directory, the program tries to find an appropiate parent directory. In this case, the whole Program Files. Then it counts all the files' size. This is why it takes so long to show such a simple list of installed programs. As far as I know.


And if the metadata points it to the c:\
it tries to find the parent and crashes!

(ok... maybe not... but i'm hoping it does it!)

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 10:47 • by Mcoder
142012 in reply to 142006
dont_feel_like_logging_in_at_work:
Maybe you Linux guys could write it in one line of Perl (or at least brag about having the ability to write it in one line of Perl).


Damn right I could!


Yeah... I see you can brag.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 10:48 • by rmr
142014 in reply to 142008
karnokd:
I don't want to disappoint you, but this is a somewhat-uninstaller bug. If the install metadata of each line is incorrect, lets say points to an invalid or nonexistent directory, the program tries to find an appropiate parent directory. In this case, the whole Program Files. Then it counts all the files' size. This is why it takes so long to show such a simple list of installed programs. As far as I know.

I thought the reason that it takes so long to load the list of installed programs was that the icon data was embedded in the .exe, so the Add/Remove programs dialog has to run through all of them to extract it.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 10:48 • by KNY (unregistered)
Can we start a new rule that all screenshots need to be in PNG? I mean, even Paint can save in PNG so you have no excuse ...

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 10:52 • by Alex B (unregistered)
I say it's simply negative.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 10:53 • by CA (unregistered)
142017 in reply to 142008
karnokd:
Then it counts all the files' size. This is why it takes so long to show such a simple list of installed programs. As far as I know.


I wondered why it took Windows so long to load that stupid list up.

CAPTCHA: Speaking of tacos, YUMMY

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 10:54 • by Generic Phil (unregistered)
I hate the way it takes so long to bring up the Add/remove software dialogue in Windows >2K. Say what you like about Windows 9x, but at least you could uninstall things quickly.

I don't know how it calculates the file sizes, but the 4GB mark puzzles me - "surely" Windows XP should be able to anticipate apps being over 4 gig. I wonder if it might be a function returning -1 somewhere?

Oh, and +1 on the PNG screenshots - When will people realise that JPGs just aren't suitable for some image types?

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 10:57 • by Not First (unregistered)
142019 in reply to 142015
KNY:
Can we start a new rule that all screenshots need to be in PNG? I mean, even Paint can save in PNG so you have no excuse ...

I demand WBMP! How am I supposed to read this site on my nokia without it!

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 11:00 • by KattMan
I bet that time zone updater has one hell of an easter egg ala Excell 95 with it's 3d fly around. Except this has full network capability, multi-player communications and really cool BFG's!

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 11:07 • by Watson (unregistered)
142024 in reply to 142008
karnokd:
I don't want to disappoint you, but this is a somewhat-uninstaller bug.


No shit, Sherlock.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 11:10 • by Izzy (unregistered)
Don't forget Windows Genuine Advantage, because Time Zones (R) are a Microsoft product and you wouldn't want anybody pirating them and setting up their own time zones. If everybody did that there'd be no standards at all and it would be impossible to make the trains run on time.

Nah, that couldn't be it. It probably includes the Austrian (!) language pack because some programmer misread the spec.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 11:14 • by William (unregistered)
142026 in reply to 142018
Generic Phil:
I hate the way it takes so long to bring up the Add/remove software dialogue in Windows >2K. Say what you like about Windows 9x, but at least you could uninstall things quickly.

I don't know how it calculates the file sizes, but the 4GB mark puzzles me - "surely" Windows XP should be able to anticipate apps being over 4 gig.


http://blogs.msdn.com/oldnewthing/archive/2004/07/09/178342.aspx

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 11:26 • by Thief^
142028 in reply to 142026
It probably doesn't help the calculations that this is probably no more than an uninstaller and a changed registry key, with no actual program to calculate the size of.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 11:28 • by Ancient_Hacker
Windows XP roots around all your mounted disks to look for uninstall info I guess.

Once I had a CD with 50,000 small files on it. bringing up the Add/Remove control panel took about three days.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 11:30 • by mare
142031 in reply to 142019
Not First:

I demand WBMP! How am I supposed to read this site on my nokia without it!
I want 'em in ascii. My good ol' Lynx aint got no support for those fancy... whatcha call 'em? images? pfff

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 11:31 • by KattMan
Perhaps the size was calculated with the OMGWTF winning calculator?

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 11:34 • by ParkinT
Why was he Uninstalling the Synching application in the first place? Don't we need to know what time it is in Australia?

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 11:34 • by Danga (unregistered)
142034 in reply to 142015
KNY:
Can we start a new rule that all screenshots need to be in PNG? I mean, even Paint can save in PNG so you have no excuse ...


JPG is more standard than PNG so what is the benefit of moving to PNG?

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 11:35 • by KattMan
142036 in reply to 142033
ParkinT:
Why was he Uninstalling the Synching application in the first place? Don't we need to know what time it is in Australia?


Don't know know that all aussies can tell time by looking at the sun?

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 11:36 • by KattMan
142037 in reply to 142034
Danga:
KNY:
Can we start a new rule that all screenshots need to be in PNG? I mean, even Paint can save in PNG so you have no excuse ...


JPG is more standard than PNG so what is the benefit of moving to PNG?


Yeah, and the last thing we need is more rules.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 11:40 • by Raggles
142038 in reply to 142036
KattMan:
ParkinT:
Why was he Uninstalling the Synching application in the first place? Don't we need to know what time it is in Australia?


Don't know know that all aussies can tell time by looking at the sun?


Maybe it was a 4-gigapixel image of the sun, taken by the Hubble telescope, with an astronomical simulator to move it about on the screen. You know, for cloudy days.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 11:42 • by Quietust
142039 in reply to 142034
Danga:
KNY:
Can we start a new rule that all screenshots need to be in PNG? I mean, even Paint can save in PNG so you have no excuse ...


JPG is more standard than PNG so what is the benefit of moving to PNG?


Because screenshots of user interfaces (which generally only have a few colors and lots of empty areas) compress significantly better with PNG than with JPG, and without any loss in image quality (i.e. no blurring).

Is that a good enough reason?

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 11:58 • by Bob (unregistered)
142042 in reply to 142039
Quietust:

Because screenshots of user interfaces (which generally only have a few colors and lots of empty areas) compress significantly better with PNG than with JPG, and without any loss in image quality (i.e. no blurring).

Is that a good enough reason?


Well, it would be if it weren't for one problem - almost every single time I've ever encountered a PNG screenshot on a web page it was uncompressed and as huge as a BMP. Most programs that create JPGs apparently compress them by default but that doesn't seem to hold true for most programs that create PNGs.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 12:14 • by Michael (unregistered)
142046 in reply to 142000
tharfagreinir:
Those damn Aussies ... they always have to outdo everyone else.

"That's not a time zone synching application - THIS is a time zone synching application!"


That's not a time zone synching application, that's a spoon.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 12:15 • by anonymous (unregistered)
142047 in reply to 142039
Quietust:
Danga:
KNY:
Can we start a new rule that all screenshots need to be in PNG? I mean, even Paint can save in PNG so you have no excuse ...


JPG is more standard than PNG so what is the benefit of moving to PNG?


Because screenshots of user interfaces (which generally only have a few colors and lots of empty areas) compress significantly better with PNG than with JPG, and without any loss in image quality (i.e. no blurring).

Is that a good enough reason?


Its a 40-something kilobyte joke image. Who cares?

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 12:16 • by tharfagreinir
142048 in reply to 142046
Michael:
tharfagreinir:
Those damn Aussies ... they always have to outdo everyone else.

"That's not a time zone synching application - THIS is a time zone synching application!"


That's not a time zone synching application, that's a spoon.


There is no spoon.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 12:24 • by SomeCoder (unregistered)
142049 in reply to 142046
Michael:
tharfagreinir:
Those damn Aussies ... they always have to outdo everyone else.

"That's not a time zone synching application - THIS is a time zone synching application!"


That's not a time zone synching application, that's a spoon.



I see you've played time zone synchy/spoony before!

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 12:25 • by Random832
142051 in reply to 142042
Well, it would be if it weren't for one problem - almost every single time I've ever encountered a PNG screenshot on a web page it was uncompressed and as huge as a BMP. Most programs that create JPGs apparently compress them by default but that doesn't seem to hold true for most programs that create PNGs.
I doubt that. Maybe it was a bmp that got renamed to a png. And, "almost every single time" could be selection bias - you don't notice the format if you don't say "this is loading slowly, wtf is going on"

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 12:46 • by silent tone (unregistered)
142053 in reply to 142039
Quietust:
Danga:
KNY:
Can we start a new rule that all screenshots need to be in PNG? I mean, even Paint can save in PNG so you have no excuse ...


JPG is more standard than PNG so what is the benefit of moving to PNG?


Because screenshots of user interfaces (which generally only have a few colors and lots of empty areas) compress significantly better with PNG than with JPG, and without any loss in image quality (i.e. no blurring).

Is that a good enough reason?


++

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 12:56 • by pitchingchris
142054 in reply to 142026
Then why don't we just go inside the registry and put in a size on the Esitmated... and then our Add/Remove programs would not take so long to load. Or better yet, unless it expects programs to grow (log or user files) why not just store it the first time and then it loads quick every other time? Guess we like waiting on MS to look everything up.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 13:05 • by Top Cod3r (unregistered)
Maybe he should have clicked Custom and only chosen the components that he needed.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 13:09 • by Vance (unregistered)
142057 in reply to 142034
Danga:
KNY:
Can we start a new rule that all screenshots need to be in PNG? I mean, even Paint can save in PNG so you have no excuse ...

JPG is more standard than PNG so what is the benefit of moving to PNG?

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 13:22 • by Doh (unregistered)
142058 in reply to 142049
SomeCoder:
Michael:
tharfagreinir:
Those damn Aussies ... they always have to outdo everyone else.

"That's not a time zone synching application - THIS is a time zone synching application!"


That's not a time zone synching application, that's a spoon.



I see you've played time zone synchy/spoony before!


you got me in trouble for suddenly laughing in the workplace. but thanks just the same.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 13:26 • by Mcoder
142059 in reply to 142018
Generic Phil:
I hate the way it takes so long to bring up the Add/remove software dialogue in Windows >2K. Say what you like about Windows 9x, but at least you could uninstall things quickly.

I don't know how it calculates the file sizes, but the 4GB mark puzzles me - "surely" Windows XP should be able to anticipate apps being over 4 gig. I wonder if it might be a function returning -1 somewhere?

Oh, and +1 on the PNG screenshots - When will people realise that JPGs just aren't suitable for some image types?


Except that on Windows 95 you were never able to completely uninstall a program... Things were better at the old DOS days when everything was on a single dir :)

Besides, nice blog entry, Willian. Microsoft never ceasses to amuse me! How far they can go to get backward compatibility... And never ever thinking about telling the user that a program's size is unkown if Windows doesn't knows it. The User can't stand that, the User can't stand to know.

And +1 for PNG images.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 13:38 • by spoon (unregistered)
142061 in reply to 142048
tharfagreinir:
Michael:
tharfagreinir:
Those damn Aussies ... they always have to outdo everyone else.

"That's not a time zone synching application - THIS is a time zone synching application!"


That's not a time zone synching application, that's a spoon.


There is no spoon.

I am the spoon. FEAR ME!

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 13:59 • by Theo (unregistered)
142065 in reply to 142018
Generic Phil:
I don't know how it calculates the file sizes, but the 4GB mark puzzles me - "surely" Windows XP should be able to anticipate apps being over 4 gig. I wonder if it might be a function returning -1 somewhere?


That would be lame. I have some games on my computer that are above 6 or 7 Go.

The solution would be to find the real size it takes, and if you don't find it, you don't try to guess. You simply don't display any dodgy size at all.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 14:06 • by xyz (unregistered)
man you'd need at least a few dvds for that software

also typo: baloon is spelt balloon :)

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 14:26 • by Frank Wilhoit (unregistered)
When New Zealand is on summer ("daylight saving") time, they are Greenwich + 13 hours.

You'd be surprised at the number of platform and API specifications whose conventions for representing time zones assume that the absolute value of the offset from Greenwich can never exceed 12 hours.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 14:35 • by anon (unregistered)
142071 in reply to 142036
KattMan:
ParkinT:
Why was he Uninstalling the Synching application in the first place? Don't we need to know what time it is in Australia?


Don't know know that all aussies can tell time by looking at the sun?


It's easy to tell the time in Australia - it's either beer o'clock or snooze o'clock. If you can see a beer in front of you or you can get to a beer, it's beer o'clock. If you can't see anything anymore, it's snooze o'clock.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 14:37 • by AdT (unregistered)
142072 in reply to 142015
KNY:
Can we start a new rule that all screenshots need to be in PNG? I mean, even Paint can save in PNG so you have no excuse ...


What's so bad about JPEG artifacts? I learned from Indiana Jones that artifacts are something precious!!!!

PS: Isn't ignorance a fine excuse?

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 14:37 • by Someone You Know
142073 in reply to 142067
xyz:
man you'd need at least a few dvds for that software

also typo: baloon is spelt balloon :)


Last time I checked, 4095 MB will easily fit on one DVD. The blank DVDs you buy in the store can hold about 4800 MB.

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 14:43 • by Bob (unregistered)
142074 in reply to 142051
Random832:
I doubt that. Maybe it was a bmp that got renamed to a png. And, "almost every single time" could be selection bias - you don't notice the format if you don't say "this is loading slowly, wtf is going on"


Of course you doubt it - because it opposes your own biased opinion. Why else would you attempt to explain the huge PNGs away with an excuse like them being renamed BMPs.

Now, I will agree that there is considerable selection bias because I typically only notice slow downloading images. For that reason I just checked my internet cache. 2367 JPG images, 431 GIF images, 7 PNG images, and no BMPS. Of the 7 PNGs all have PNG headers to match their extensions, all are simple web page graphics, five are under 1K, one is 9K and the last 15K. The latter two reduced to under 1k when loaded and resaved with Paint Shop Pro so they obviously were not compressed.

YMMV

Re: More Like Didgeridon't!

2007-06-21 14:43 • by Southern (unregistered)
Really looking forward to getting one of those Time-synching installation DVD. Sounds like a must-have.
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2 | Page 3Next »

Add Comment