| « Prev | Page 1 | Page 2 | Next » |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-08 11:50
•
by
Ralph
(unregistered)
|
Yeah, so I guess you're one of those people who thinks everyone runs Windows. And it's a joy to test and deploy those "compatibility" patches on the umpty-leven versions of Windows still hanging around with those users who don't send Redmond more money every time a pop-up tells them to. And the web, with the genius concept of everyone can talk to everyone, will never really take off, because, frankly, who needs it when you can just email Word documents to anybody who matters? |
|
I just think if you are considering upgrading your version of Teamviewer in order to establish some sort of connection with your partner - then the relationship is already over.
|
Software I support (I assume you mean Snapfish) is featured here - Do any of the rollouts go without issue?!! And, why oh why oh why - for the love of god, is this site done in Java. </rant> |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-09 13:02
•
by
Jay
(unregistered)
|
Good point. That's why it is absurd to say, "This book is written in English", when there are many people in the world who don't speak English and have never been to an English-speaking country. Ummm ... the fact that not everyone has the software to read a particular data format does not mean that that data format does not exist. The fact that a data format is proprietary does not mean that it does not exist. The fact that you don't like a data format does not mean that it does not exist. The fact that a format is known by the name of the product it was intended to be used with does not mean that it does not exist. I don't like Word format either. But the reality is that it DOES exist and that LOTS AND LOTS of people use it. You can't wish it out of existence. |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-09 21:29
•
by
Mick
(unregistered)
|
I once heard someone say that "Nagesh is Insightful". Some time later, I realised Insightful is not a word. |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-09 21:40
•
by
William the Second
(unregistered)
|
So it's more important to be pedantically correct than understood? |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-09 21:42
•
by
Joh
(unregistered)
|
I rection you miss his point.... I think he's saying the standard (if we can call it that) is DOC not Word. Word just happens to be the program that created the DOC standard. That said, I think Ralph's being a pedantic knob-jockey, FWIW |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-10 02:35
•
by
Randy Snicker
(unregistered)
|
I am not familiar with this unit. What is the size of "teen quantity of PB"? |
|
TRWTF is gun and ammo prices at Gander Mountain.
|
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-10 14:01
•
by
Zunetang
(unregistered)
|
It's not a very precise amount, as teens grow different sizes of Public Bush at different points in adolescence. |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-10 14:02
•
by
Zunetang
(unregistered)
|
Today, I feel like such an asshat that I must be wearing a cockscarf. |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-17 14:26
•
by
sc517
(unregistered)
|
|
HFS+ is not supported by Windows (at least not without installing an extra filesystem driver). It's Apple's FS for Macs.
|
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-18 14:02
•
by
pewee herman
(unregistered)
|
|
Man, I've got to get me some of that public bush...
|
| « Prev | Page 1 | Page 2 | Next » |