Comment On The Ralph Code

Ralph's rage was the stuff of legend – and it was equaled only by his anal-retentiveness. [expand full text]
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4Next »

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 11:39 • by snoofle
When you say "let go", was it while hanging him, by his toes, over the side of a - preferably - very tall building?

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 11:43 • by Steve (unregistered)
Kudos to the poster for using the proper terminology -- brillant!

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 11:44 • by shinobu
first?:
First???


Mac Gyver most likely dies in 2030
Luke Skywalker in 2031
Knight Rider in 2032
Mr. T in 2032

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 11:46 • by kc (unregistered)
Printer running out of ink whilst psycho Ralph is in the middle of printing out his Ink Cartridge Labels = priceless.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 11:48 • by krupa (unregistered)
Gloves

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 11:49 • by bc (unregistered)
Wow, can not even imagine this happening in any of the environments that I have worked in. In one place HR had walked people to the door with a 1 day suspension for "making others uncomfortable". On the first you had to retake the initiation "class" on business communicate that covered harassment and other like subjects. Second time you were asked to look into external help via the benefits program and the suspension was a week. Never heard of anyone coming back on the third instance.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 11:53 • by TimmyEvil (unregistered)
225226 in reply to 225216
shinobu:
first?:
First???


Mac Gyver most likely dies in 2030
Luke Skywalker in 2031
Knight Rider in 2032
Mr. T in 2032


Raul Paul will be coming to get you very shortly...

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 11:54 • by shMerker (unregistered)
Well of course you can't move any icons. Don't you know how long it took Ralph to get them in his favorite shape? They don't have an "arrange by" command for that.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 11:58 • by Charles400
Tormenting people like Ralph is good office sport. He will be missed.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 11:58 • by alphager (unregistered)
225231 in reply to 225228
shMerker:
Well of course you can't move any icons. Don't you know how long it took Ralph to get them in his favorite shape? They don't have an "arrange by" command for that.


KDE will have it one day: http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=165501


:-)

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 12:01 • by RBoy (unregistered)
225232 in reply to 225216
shinobu:
first?:
First???


Mac Gyver most likely dies in 2030
Luke Skywalker in 2031
Knight Rider in 2032
Mr. T in 2032


Oh, I get it. It's funny because you saw it on XKCD just a few days ago.

I LOVE regurgitated comedy.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 12:02 • by Jake Grey
I'm betting Ralph is suffering from a combination of Asperger's Syndrome and massive sexual frustration.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 12:04 • by RBoy (unregistered)
225235 in reply to 225226
TimmyEvil:
shinobu:
first?:
First???


Mac Gyver most likely dies in 2030
Luke Skywalker in 2031
Knight Rider in 2032
Mr. T in 2032


Raul Paul will be coming to get you very shortly...


That's even better, because it was on XKCD today!

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 12:05 • by Montoya (unregistered)
The Real WTF (tm), and always the Real WTF (tm), is that people like Ralph always manage to reap so much havoc before someone finally fires them.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 12:06 • by James Stanley (unregistered)
New Irish girl advert. Excellent. If only all sites did advertising this way...

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 12:08 • by Montoya (unregistered)
225239 in reply to 225236
Montoya:
The Real WTF (tm), and always the Real WTF (tm), is that people like Ralph always manage to reap so much havoc before someone finally fires them.


*wreak havoc. I knew that seemed wrong :(

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 12:13 • by Alan (unregistered)
My girlfriend had a boss scream at her for using tabbed browsing instead of having seperate browser windows and using the startbar to do the same thing.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 12:16 • by Mike (unregistered)
I don't see why anyone bothered with the light trick at all. Just take the actual cartridge out of the box and see what kind it is.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 12:18 • by Dirk Diggler (unregistered)
If left unchecked every LAN tech, DBA, or System Administrator eventually turns into a martinet. They may start out of college/tech school all helpful, but it doesn't take long before they abuse the little power they have. Read the article, how much are you like Ralph? Ask the people you're supposed to support, they might not think there's much difference.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 12:19 • by A Gould (unregistered)
225245 in reply to 225232
RBoy:
shinobu:
first?:
First???


Mac Gyver most likely dies in 2030
Luke Skywalker in 2031
Knight Rider in 2032
Mr. T in 2032


Oh, I get it. It's funny because you saw it on XKCD just a few days ago.

I LOVE regurgitated comedy.


Actually, I think that should be the required response to all "First" posts. (bonus points if you research the posters childhood idols)

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 12:22 • by No one you know (unregistered)
225246 in reply to 225243
Mike:
I don't see why anyone bothered with the light trick at all. Just take the actual cartridge out of the box and see what kind it is.


and then write what kind it is on Ralph's label with a sharpie if it isn't the one you need. kek.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 12:22 • by Soviut (unregistered)
225247 in reply to 225223
bc:
Wow, can not even imagine this happening in any of the environments that I have worked in. In one place HR had walked people to the door with a 1 day suspension for "making others uncomfortable". On the first you had to retake the initiation "class" on business communicate that covered harassment and other like subjects. Second time you were asked to look into external help via the benefits program and the suspension was a week. Never heard of anyone coming back on the third instance.


Harassment? This is pure comedy. I couldn't see anyone in the studio I work at taking a guy like this seriously. They'd just laugh as he melted down.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 12:25 • by yah (unregistered)
225251 in reply to 225236
Montoya:
The Real WTF (tm), and always the Real WTF (tm), is that people like Ralph always manage to wreak so much havoc before someone finally fires them.


FTFY

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 12:32 • by Frank Illium (unregistered)
Hehe, we all know one.

On the moving icons on the desktop - I would be annoyed by somebody moving my icons and would move them back anyway.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 12:37 • by JD (unregistered)
Well, at least we have the satisfaction of knowing that Ralph was ultimately fired. So many of these horror stories end up with the socially inept Ralph character still having a job at the end of them, which is generally a bigger WTF than the one on show.

I think there is a lesson here for employers too. Employees like Ralph are a burden to the entire team no matter how strong their skills may be. If anyone on my team reduced a co-worker to tears they would need an exceptionally good reason to escape disciplinary action - or worse.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 12:49 • by PotatoEngineer (unregistered)
225254 in reply to 225252
Frank Illium:
Hehe, we all know one.

On the moving icons on the desktop - I would be annoyed by somebody moving my icons and would move them back anyway.
It sounds like the issue was that Ralph didn't like other people to their icons into any non-approved configuration---and there was only one approved configuration.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 12:49 • by WC (unregistered)
I can't believe that anyone would have put up with this. It wasn't -that- long ago that HP started using the shortened numbers, either... So almost every company already have 'no harassment' rules in place.

In that situation, I'd have had to let him attack me, so I can report him. Obviously everyone else was too afraid for their jobs to report him.

That, or this was all made up and just a lie.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 13:01 • by mauhiz (unregistered)
DONT YOU POST A COMMENT WITH A NAVIGATOR I DO NOT APPROVE OF!

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 13:06 • by Anon (unregistered)
225257 in reply to 225243
Mike:
I don't see why anyone bothered with the light trick at all. Just take the actual cartridge out of the box and see what kind it is.


Because if you open the box, find it's the wrong one, and then put it back Ralph will hit the roof!

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 13:10 • by Addison (unregistered)
225259 in reply to 225255
WC:
I can't believe that anyone would have put up with this. It wasn't -that- long ago that HP started using the shortened numbers, either... So almost every company already have 'no harassment' rules in place.

In that situation, I'd have had to let him attack me, so I can report him. Obviously everyone else was too afraid for their jobs to report him.

That, or this was all made up and just a lie.


better then the opposite. I had a female co-worker once file a harassment claim because I told her she was being stupid. After interviewing my co-workers the management apologized to me and moved her to a simpler job- data entry.

A note on icons: I once arrived at a new job and did what I normally do on my first day- delete all the icons off my desktop. After all, as a pure developer how many times do I need to use Word? Is it really necessary to have an icon on my desktop devoted to it? I would much rather use that space for scripts/code snippets/to-do lists. So when a technician came in and saw that there were no icons she did what any good technician would do. Assume someone else had made a mistake somewhere. She spent 5 minutes manually putting all the icons back. The second she was gone I deleted them all again.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 13:10 • by Phiu-x (unregistered)
225260 in reply to 225233
It could be. Otherwise what a poor human being. I would have so kick his ass. Yeah I know its contradictory but sometimes these "nutcase" have to meet their man.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 13:13 • by Zylon
225262 in reply to 225252
Frank Illium:
Hehe, we all know one.

On the moving icons on the desktop - I would be annoyed by somebody moving my icons and would move them back anyway.

Look, I'm sorry, but there's no "Arrange Icons by Penis".

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 13:15 • by Me (unregistered)
225263 in reply to 225244
Dirk Diggler:
If left unchecked every LAN tech, DBA, or System Administrator eventually turns into a martinet.


True, but only because we have to continually deal with schmucks like you who "can manage their own computer" until a problem occurs and is made worse due to your inability or unwillingness to read log files, proactively deal with problems, patch, backup, etc, and then you just dump the problem off on us. As a bonus, we get to deal with your whining about how important your work and data is.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 13:19 • by Fedaykin (unregistered)
Personally, I would have just started opening cartridge packages until I found the correct cartridge (as labeled directly on the cartridge) for the printer that was out of ink. Any open items which were not correct I would deposit on Ralph's desk.

Sure, Ralph would be pissed, but it would hardly be difficult to convince Ralph's supervisor that his system was unnecessary, inefficient, and a total waste of company time.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 13:21 • by Dirk Diggler (unregistered)
225266 in reply to 225263
Me:
Dirk Diggler:
If left unchecked every LAN tech, DBA, or System Administrator eventually turns into a martinet.


True, but only because we have to continually deal with schmucks like you who "can manage their own computer" until a problem occurs and is made worse due to your inability or unwillingness to read log files, proactively deal with problems, patch, backup, etc, and then you just dump the problem off on us. As a bonus, we get to deal with your whining about how important your work and data is.
Why make a personal attack? I wasn't being personal. You have no idea what I do or don't do. Are you channeling Ralph right now?

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 13:23 • by Just Some Guy (unregistered)
I worked with Ralph's brother once. There are certain advantages to being 6 feet tall and un-scrawny (real-life question presented to me: "are you a football player?"):

Ralph's brother: Do it this (stupid, illogical) way or else.
Me, standing up: Or else what, little man?
Ralph's brother: [remembers that he's urgently needed somewhere]

That wasn't our first go-round and I decided I'd had enough.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 13:24 • by bongai (unregistered)
225268 in reply to 225216
shinobu:
first?:
First???


Mac Gyver most likely dies in 2030
Luke Skywalker in 2031
Knight Rider in 2032
Mr. T in 2032


No way Mr. T lives until 2032. I give him until 2018, tops.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 13:39 • by iToad (unregistered)
I've seen management discussions referring to people like Ralph as corncobs. This is because dealing with people like them is like using a corncob for toilet paper.

A lot of companies do not like corncobs, in either worker or management positions. They have noticed that any value added by these people is more than offset by their bad behavior.

Ralph probably believed that he had unique skills and couldn't be replaced, right up until the moment that he was fired. Unfortunately, conditions are changing in the programming business. With the way things seem to be going, we will probably be returning to the days of the early 80s, where it was not unusual for a company of any size to get hundreds of resumes for any programming opening.

The bottom line: Don't be a corncob.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 13:44 • by convicted felon (unregistered)
225271 in reply to 225263
Me:
Dirk Diggler:
If left unchecked every LAN tech, DBA, or System Administrator eventually turns into a martinet.


True, but only because we have to continually deal with schmucks like you who "can manage their own computer" until a problem occurs and is made worse due to your inability or unwillingness to read log files, proactively deal with problems, patch, backup, etc, and then you just dump the problem off on us. As a bonus, we get to deal with your whining about how important your work and data is.


My work and data is the reason you have a job.

IT is a service industry. If you aren't willing to serve your customers, you shouldn't be in the industry.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 13:52 • by John (unregistered)
Too bad Lyle wasn't around. He'd have used a letter AND a number for his codes and HIS decoder would have been database-driven.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 13:56 • by Me (unregistered)
225276 in reply to 225271
convicted felon:

My work and data is the reason you have a job.

IT is a service industry. If you aren't willing to serve your customers, you shouldn't be in the industry.


This is point, though.

Too many users want to be in control of their data and their computer, and those of us that have the experience and the job duties to ensure system and data reliability are labeled as control freaks and martinets for wanting to be proactive and have some controls over what people do (or in some cases we might be enforcing policies or rules from higher up in the food chain). Granted in this case, "Ralph" went way, way overboard, but you can't have it both ways. Either let your IT admin staff do their jobs, or stop whining when your unwillingness to do so blows up in your face.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 14:06 • by Mark (unregistered)
225279 in reply to 225259
Addison:
WC:
I can't believe that anyone would have put up with this. It wasn't -that- long ago that HP started using the shortened numbers, either... So almost every company already have 'no harassment' rules in place.

In that situation, I'd have had to let him attack me, so I can report him. Obviously everyone else was too afraid for their jobs to report him.

That, or this was all made up and just a lie.


better then the opposite. I had a female co-worker once file a harassment claim because I told her she was being stupid. After interviewing my co-workers the management apologized to me and moved her to a simpler job- data entry.

A note on icons: I once arrived at a new job and did what I normally do on my first day- delete all the icons off my desktop. After all, as a pure developer how many times do I need to use Word? Is it really necessary to have an icon on my desktop devoted to it? I would much rather use that space for scripts/code snippets/to-do lists. So when a technician came in and saw that there were no icons she did what any good technician would do. Assume someone else had made a mistake somewhere. She spent 5 minutes manually putting all the icons back. The second she was gone I deleted them all again.


Consider yourself lucky. Here, we don't have admin accounts on our machines. And all the icons they put on our desktops are put on by the admin accounts. Therefore, you can't delete the icons because you don't have permissions. Furthermore, the ones that you ARE able to delete, get put back on. The next time you reboot they're all restored.

Damn you Citrix!

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 14:09 • by Uber
225280 in reply to 225276
Me:
convicted felon:

My work and data is the reason you have a job.

IT is a service industry. If you aren't willing to serve your customers, you shouldn't be in the industry.


This is point, though.

Too many users want to be in control of their data and their computer, and those of us that have the experience and the job duties to ensure system and data reliability are labeled as control freaks and martinets for wanting to be proactive and have some controls over what people do (or in some cases we might be enforcing policies or rules from higher up in the food chain). Granted in this case, "Ralph" went way, way overboard, but you can't have it both ways. Either let your IT admin staff do their jobs, or stop whining when your unwillingness to do so blows up in your face.


If I could have a dime for every time someone in my dorm asked me to help fix their computer and I found they had Bonzai Buddy and Gator installed because they "Thought it was cute." I'd probably have enough money to buy a gallon of gas. These people rarely change once they get into the working world either, so you can only assume it's gotten a lot worse.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 14:10 • by Mark (unregistered)
225282 in reply to 225271
convicted felon:
IT is a service industry. If you aren't willing to serve your customers, you shouldn't be in the industry.


"Desktop support is a service industry. If you aren't willing to serve your customers, you shouldn't be in the industry."


There. Fixed it for you.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 14:13 • by MM (unregistered)
225283 in reply to 225255
WC:
I can't believe that anyone would have put up with this. It wasn't -that- long ago that HP started using the shortened numbers, either... So almost every company already have 'no harassment' rules in place.
Nearly every company has 'no harrassment' rules that say you can't harrass anyone based on their gender, race, religion, etc., but I've never heard of one that said you couldn't harrass someone based on their preference in ink-cartrige labeling.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 14:14 • by sewiv (unregistered)
225284 in reply to 225268

> No way Mr. T lives until 2032. I give him until 2018, tops.


Have you seen Mr. T lately? He's in great shape for his age.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 14:18 • by sf (unregistered)
225286 in reply to 225233
Jake Grey:
I'm betting Ralph is suffering from a combination of Asperger's Syndrome and massive sexual frustration.

And ass-burger syndrome if he worked at our company, because he'd get is ass chewed off if he tried that behavior here.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 14:25 • by convicted felon (unregistered)
225287 in reply to 225282
Mark:
convicted felon:
IT is a service industry. If you aren't willing to serve your customers, you shouldn't be in the industry.


"Desktop support is a service industry. If you aren't willing to serve your customers, you shouldn't be in the industry."


There. Fixed it for you.


No need to correct me. I was right the first time.
Regardless of the company, its internal IT department is in the business of serving the company's goals.

Maintaining servers is as much of a service as maintaining desktops. It is not an end in itself.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 14:25 • by Steve (unregistered)
225288 in reply to 225235
RBoy:
TimmyEvil:
shinobu:
first?:
First???


Mac Gyver most likely dies in 2030
Luke Skywalker in 2031
Knight Rider in 2032
Mr. T in 2032


Raul Paul will be coming to get you very shortly...


That's even better, because it was on XKCD today!
This always happens to me in family Scrabble games.

Re: The Ralph Code

2008-10-28 14:27 • by SarcasmFTW (unregistered)
225289 in reply to 225284
People still use desktop icons?

Launchy or similiar such programs are so much faster for accessing programs, data, etc...
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4Next »

Add Comment