Comment On The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

In Leon's country, most government institutions are legally obligated to disclose certain data on the internet — their structure, responsibility, public competitions, general announcements, and so on. Leon worked for a company that did government work exclusively, and during a lull in their normal projects, they noticed an unfilled niche — software designed specifically to make sharing of this information easy. [expand full text]
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2 | Page 3Next »

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 10:09 • by Hans (unregistered)
Yeah, IT processes are messed up badly. I was just talking to a friend about the same thing, actually: IT in general is too often considered to be "the problem" rather than "the solution". It doesn't make for a very nice working environment.

I've noticed that a lot of IT people in their mid-thirties to early forties are leaving IT (or considering it), and moving to completely unrelated industries. Is that just in my environment, or does it happen everywhere?

What are your experiences?

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 10:11 • by some idiot (unregistered)
Seriously? So there was a project that had some (not especially interesting) development problems and had to work hard to deliver a buggy product? I'm on the edge of my seat!

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 10:14 • by snoofle
182714 in reply to 182709
Hans:
Yeah, IT processes are messed up badly. I was just talking to a friend about the same thing, actually: IT in general is too often considered to be "the problem" rather than "the solution". It doesn't make for a very nice working environment.

I've noticed that a lot of IT people in their mid-thirties to early forties are leaving IT (or considering it), and moving to completely unrelated industries. Is that just in my environment, or does it happen everywhere?

What are your experiences?
It's not you - it happens everywhere. People get tired of being treated as cost-centers that add no value, called in at the last second to save inept management, mandated to work 90+ hour weeks, and then tossed aside without loyalty just to save a few bucks to compensate for management's mismanagement of pretty much everything.

If I had it to do over, I would definitely have gone another career route, but I'm now at the point where I do things my way whether management likes it or not (I can usually back it up, so I tend to get away with it) - because I just don't give a **** any more.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 10:31 • by Mutant (unregistered)
This is a WTF? I would have called it a BAU.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 10:32 • by Anon (unregistered)
182725 in reply to 182711
some idiot:
Seriously? So there was a project that had some (not especially interesting) development problems and had to work hard to deliver a buggy product? I'm on the edge of my seat!


Yeah, I think they left the punchline off this one?

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 10:34 • by WhiskeyJack
That Irish girl is distracting. Reading, reading, scroll up the page and - BAM!

Anyway, as soon as I saw this:

The general attitude was that it'd get done sooner, but it'd be nice to have some breathing room.

I'm sure we all knew where this was going.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 10:35 • by AbbydonKrafts
This type of crap just pisses me off. Seriously.. how do these people do it?! I have a hard enough time getting my foot into the door at half (or less) of regular developer's pay, yet my work is magnitudes greater than this garbage. Damn I wish I could change industries. This one is too dependent on who you know and how well you can con people.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 10:40 • by Stupidumb
182728 in reply to 182726
WhiskeyJack:
That Irish girl is distracting. Reading, reading, scroll up the page and - BAM!

I would do everything to her.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 10:41 • by DeLos
182729 in reply to 182726
WhiskeyJack:
That Irish girl is distracting.


She's subpar at best. It'd take some drinking and some convincing.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 10:44 • by Zoner (unregistered)
182731 in reply to 182709
I've noticed that a lot of IT people in their mid-thirties to early forties are leaving IT (or considering it), and moving to completely unrelated industries. Is that just in my environment, or does it happen everywhere?


Happened to me. Left IT 2 years ago at 32 for medical school. Of course, the medical field has its own huge WTF, but school is great. Just didn't like the career paths and options in IT. I still consult for side money, but usually it just makes me very glad I left. Med school is quite a lot of fun - new challenges and interesting stuff every day. And hey, the great looking women around me every day helps too!

- The Zoner

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 10:48 • by Anon (unregistered)
182732 in reply to 182729
DeLos:
WhiskeyJack:
That Irish girl is distracting.


She's subpar at best. It'd take some drinking and some convincing.


You have never been laid before, have you?

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 10:49 • by Neil (unregistered)
Huh - some WTF. Seems like the SOP of the IT world. And a designer working on the front end not getting bonus or credit? Wow, what a terrible injustice. :P

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 10:54 • by Russ (unregistered)
182737 in reply to 182727
AbbydonKrafts:
This type of crap just pisses me off. Seriously.. how do these people do it?! I have a hard enough time getting my foot into the door at half (or less) of regular developer's pay, yet my work is magnitudes greater than this garbage. Damn I wish I could change industries. This one is too dependent on who you know and how well you can con people.


If you have trouble getting work at half the regular developer's pay, then either your work sucks, or your interviewing skills. You need to figure out which one and work at it.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 10:56 • by Chris Ridenour (unregistered)
182738 in reply to 182729
DeLos:
WhiskeyJack:
That Irish girl is distracting.


She's subpar at best. It'd take some drinking and some convincing.


This is today's real WTF.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:00 • by Stupidumb
182739 in reply to 182737
Russ:
AbbydonKrafts:
This type of crap just pisses me off. Seriously.. how do these people do it?! I have a hard enough time getting my foot into the door at half (or less) of regular developer's pay, yet my work is magnitudes greater than this garbage. Damn I wish I could change industries. This one is too dependent on who you know and how well you can con people.


If you have trouble getting work at half the regular developer's pay, then either your work sucks, or your interviewing skills. You need to figure out which one and work at it.

I think his problem is that he is performing correctly during interviews. That is a huge mistake. You have to make yourself out to be the biggest fucking hotshot in the world and claim to have 85 years experience using ever programming language and tool. Basically: lie; lie harder than everyone else.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:01 • by chris_s (unregistered)
182740 in reply to 182729
DeLos:
She's subpar at best. It'd take some drinking and some convincing.


You found this link on Fark didn't you?

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:06 • by mentor (unregistered)
"negotiations"

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:07 • by AbbydonKrafts
182743 in reply to 182739
Stupidumb:
I think his problem is that he is performing correctly during interviews. That is a huge mistake. You have to make yourself out to be the biggest fucking hotshot in the world and claim to have 85 years experience using ever programming language and tool. Basically: lie; lie harder than everyone else.


I think that's the problem. I tell the truth in interviews. Even if I put aside my morals, I'd end up worrying the whole time that I'd be caught.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:08 • by merreborn
The real WTF:

They pretty much could have had an intern set up a wiki in one day, and been done with it.

There wasn't really any call for a custom application.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:11 • by Henrik (unregistered)
182745 in reply to 182726
WhiskeyJack:
That Irish girl is distracting.


Damnit, I don't get to see the Irish girl. I guess that's the downside of Adblock.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:13 • by AbbydonKrafts
182746 in reply to 182738
Chris Ridenour:
DeLos:
She's subpar at best. It'd take some drinking and some convincing.


This is today's real WTF.


Obviously. Who can deny the firecracker?

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:14 • by Fishcake (unregistered)
182747 in reply to 182726
WhiskeyJack:
That Irish girl is distracting. Reading, reading, scroll up the page and - BAM!


But has anyone actually bought a t-shirt?

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:15 • by sweavo (unregistered)
TWENTYSCEOND

(yay, my captcha is autocompleting now!)

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:17 • by AbbydonKrafts
182751 in reply to 182747
Fishcake:
But has anyone actually bought a t-shirt?


They are cheaper in a department store.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:17 • by sweavo (unregistered)
182752 in reply to 182748
damn, too slow

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:20 • by Stupidumb
182753 in reply to 182743
AbbydonKrafts:
Stupidumb:
I think his problem is that he is performing correctly during interviews. That is a huge mistake. You have to make yourself out to be the biggest fucking hotshot in the world and claim to have 85 years experience using ever programming language and tool. Basically: lie; lie harder than everyone else.


I think that's the problem. I tell the truth in interviews. Even if I put aside my morals, I'd end up worrying the whole time that I'd be caught.

I know how you feel. I have a suggestion that may help: lie just enough that you would be able to bullshit your way out if you needed to. Like, push it as far as you think you can, after all, it seems that extra edge is needed nowadays.

The way I see it, these under qualified people keep getting the jobs because they don't know what they don't know, i.e. they don't understand how under qualified they are. So, this leads them to believe they are appropriate for the job and it gives them confidence, and the confidence shines through on the interview. They appear adept, and if the screening process isn't thorough, the interviewer will see them as competent workers.

Generally, IMO, smarter people have the blessing/curse of knowing their limits. Just don't let the interviewers think you have any.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:23 • by MadJo@Work (unregistered)
182755 in reply to 182747
Fishcake:
WhiskeyJack:
That Irish girl is distracting. Reading, reading, scroll up the page and - BAM!


But has anyone actually bought a t-shirt?

Only if she came with it.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:24 • by AbbydonKrafts
182756 in reply to 182753
Stupidumb:
Generally, IMO, smarter people have the blessing/curse of knowing their limits. Just don't let the interviewers think you have any.


Thanks for the advice. I'll keep it in mind when I'm ready to jump this ship.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:24 • by Stupidumb
182757 in reply to 182755
MadJo@Work:
Fishcake:
WhiskeyJack:
That Irish girl is distracting. Reading, reading, scroll up the page and - BAM!


But has anyone actually bought a t-shirt?

Only if she came with it.

DOUBLE ENTENDRE

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:35 • by OriginalPseudonym (unregistered)
182760 in reply to 182755
MadJo@Work:
Fishcake:
WhiskeyJack:
That Irish girl is distracting. Reading, reading, scroll up the page and - BAM!


But has anyone actually bought a t-shirt?

Only if she came with it.


I would come if she came in it.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:47 • by AbbydonKrafts
I'm mildly amused that the comments are swaying towards Irish Girl instead of the article.

A sweet piece of Irish lass!

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 11:59 • by KT (unregistered)
TRWTF is the .gif

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:01 • by LKM (unregistered)
182774 in reply to 182726
WhiskeyJack:
That Irish girl is distracting.

Yes, she certai

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:03 • by SomeCoder (unregistered)
182776 in reply to 182767
AbbydonKrafts:
I'm mildly amused that the comments are swaying towards Irish Girl instead of the article.

A sweet piece of Irish lass!



I think it's because, while there definitely was a WTF in the article, it was a pretty weak one and there's nothing really to say about it. I mean, how much can you say about a development project that was over budget and buggy?

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:04 • by Stupidumb
182778 in reply to 182774
LKM:
WhiskeyJack:
That Irish girl is distracting.

Yes, she certai

I think something went wrong while you were comm

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:05 • by AbbydonKrafts
182780 in reply to 182776
SomeCoder:
I think it's because, while there definitely was a WTF in the article, it was a pretty weak one and there's nothing really to say about it. I mean, how much can you say about a development project that was over budget and buggy?


True. Might as well put the comment space to some use.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:06 • by AbbydonKrafts
182781 in reply to 182778
Stupidumb:
LKM:
WhiskeyJack:
That Irish girl is distracting.

Yes, she certai

I think something went wrong while you were comm


Having Premature Ejac.. err.. Submit problems?

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:06 • by NCBloodhound
182783 in reply to 182756
AbbydonKrafts:
Stupidumb:
Generally, IMO, smarter people have the blessing/curse of knowing their limits. Just don't let the interviewers think you have any.


Thanks for the advice. I'll keep it in mind when I'm ready to jump this ship.


You can also brush your limits aside and say "yeah, i don't have experience doing 'x', but I am sure I could pick it up."

That is how I got my first IT related job. I was in college, it was part time working for the school, and I wasn't the most qualified candidate. I didn't know everything listed on the job posting, but I did my research and told them I didn't have that particular skill set, but that I had already started looking into it. I got the job and did very well. My boss told me when he hired me that I wasn't the most qualified, but he knew that I could pickup whatever skill set I needed and hired me because of the initiative I showed.

It doesn't always work out this way, but I think it is important to be honest. Why would you want the stress of working for a company where all you did was struggle with your deficiencies?

I make some of the hiring decisions at my company. I usually know when a candidate is BSing me on stuff and embarrass them in the interview for doing it. I won't be a jerk about it. I just let them know I caught them in their lie. I try to ask questions that will help me gain insight into how a person thinks. When hiring employees, I look for the following:
1. Do they show initiative?
2. When faced with a technical problem, do they give up, BS completely, or do they admit they aren't sure and try anyway?
3. Are they moldable into the type of employee we need?
4. Do they have the skills we are looking for or similar skills?
5. Will their personality fit in with the team?

There are very few companies in our industry, and few that are as advanced as ours, so we aren't going to find people who know 100% of what we need, or even 50%. In this scenario, I would rather have the honest employee.

</rant>

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:09 • by ben (unregistered)
So what was our hero Leon doing this whole time? What's his job, anyway? Is he a programmer or some sort of very, very bad manager who can't outsource a simple task to save his life?

Anyone with a smidgen of web development experience could have *done* this job in a month. The fact that the protagonist can't do that, and can't even find someone who can do it properly after four attempts, and expects gratitude or credit for whatever role he played in inefficiently getting a pathetic implementation of a simple project to market, late, doesn't win him any sympathy from this quarter. He's so stupid he can't even tell his *fourth* contractor to use HTML instead of text in GIFs.

Either that or he didn't actually have any role in anything at all, and got thanked for making the tea.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:19 • by Stupidumb
182790 in reply to 182783
NCBloodhound:
AbbydonKrafts:
Stupidumb:
Generally, IMO, smarter people have the blessing/curse of knowing their limits. Just don't let the interviewers think you have any.


Thanks for the advice. I'll keep it in mind when I'm ready to jump this ship.


You can also brush your limits aside and say "yeah, i don't have experience doing 'x', but I am sure I could pick it up."

That is how I got my first IT related job. I was in college, it was part time working for the school, and I wasn't the most qualified candidate. I didn't know everything listed on the job posting, but I did my research and told them I didn't have that particular skill set, but that I had already started looking into it. I got the job and did very well...
...

</rant>

Great advice, providing, of course, that the interviewer is someone that has the same hiring strategy as your boss. (I'm not being sarcastic, btw)

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:27 • by Barf 4Eva (unregistered)
182796 in reply to 182714
snoofle:

If I had it to do over, I would definitely have gone another career route, but I'm now at the point where I do things my way whether management likes it or not (I can usually back it up, so I tend to get away with it) - because I just don't give a **** any more.


Right on brotha. Been through the same shit where I'm at.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:30 • by Barf 4Eva (unregistered)
182798 in reply to 182746
AbbydonKrafts:
Chris Ridenour:
DeLos:
She's subpar at best. It'd take some drinking and some convincing.


This is today's real WTF.


Obviously. Who can deny the firecracker?



HOLLLLA

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:36 • by AbbydonKrafts
182804 in reply to 182790
Stupidumb:
Great advice, providing, of course, that the interviewer is someone that has the same hiring strategy as your boss. (I'm not being sarcastic, btw)

That's usually the problem I've run into. I rarely know the language before getting the job, but it's convincing them that I can pick it up that's the hard part. I tend to get the Well we need someone who knows it right now routine. The others sling the "corporate policy" excuse at me. So far I've only been hired by very small, private companies because the owners were willing to risk it (especially at the reduced pay I previously mentioned). The only reason I make it to mid-range public companies is because said small fish end up getting eaten by the larger ones.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:37 • by Zebra (unregistered)
182805 in reply to 182746
Ah well, she has a bit of a pointy chin, a stuck eyebrow and a nose you would really have to see from the side to able to give a true judgement.

But besides that, a real sweet and sensual girly face.
A+ material.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:41 • by Anon (unregistered)
182806 in reply to 182746
Hmmm..redheads...

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:46 • by Harrow (unregistered)
182807 in reply to 182747
Fishcake:
But has anyone actually bought a t-shirt?
If I wanted to celebrate the well-known Irish facility with intoxicating liquors, I wouldn't spend $14.99 on this dumb shirt. I'd spend it on a bottle of Jamieson's.

-Harrow.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:47 • by AbbydonKrafts
182809 in reply to 182805
Zebra:
Ah well, she has a bit of a pointy chin, a stuck eyebrow and a nose you would really have to see from the side to able to give a true judgement.

But besides that, a real sweet and sensual girly face.
A+ material.


The chin is a big pointy, but hey.. everyone has at least one flaw. It's not that big of a deal.



Is this the same girl? The lighting differences between the three pics is throwing me off if it is.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:48 • by WhiskeyJack
182810 in reply to 182805
Zebra:
But besides that, a real sweet and sensual girly face.
A+ material.


Anyone else get pissed off when they clicked the ad and got to the men's shirt page by default?

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:50 • by AbbydonKrafts
182813 in reply to 182807
Harrow:
If I wanted to celebrate the well-known Irish facility with intoxicating liquors, I wouldn't spend $14.99 on this dumb shirt. I'd spend it on a bottle of Jamieson's.

-Harrow.


Amen! The only shirts we (my wife and I) have bought are ones that simply state "Ireland" and have the Irish flag and a clover on them. The styling is different enough to make them unique from each other. Also, mine's gray and her's is white. We got the shirts because we both have Irish heritage.

Re: The Sub-Sub-Sub-Subcontractor

2008-03-11 12:50 • by YetAnotherTomSmith (unregistered)
182814 in reply to 182726
I absolutely love that Irish girl.
This WTF put me to sleep.
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2 | Page 3Next »

Add Comment