Comment On We're not a software company

Today's Best-of-the-Sidebar was originally posted by "aikimark." [expand full text]
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2Next »

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 10:06 • by joe (unregistered)
What is a floppy disk?

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 10:23 • by Jimmy (unregistered)
Its amazing how simple operations aren't grasped by certain individuals. How hard is it to understand SELECT statements in SQL?

Also performens, did the developer even test his/her own code? I mean which developer have the time to wait several hours to see if the code performes as planned. Also the project manager most of the time thinks operations takes too long even when the client doesn't...oh wait did they even have a project manager that tested the program...

I myself am in a project where several seconds of operations might be too long, fortunatly we have good methods to test and possibility to increase performes too.


Captcha: ullamcorper??? what the heck is an ullamcorper...

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 10:25 • by Lysis
J. Walter Weatherman:
Boring.


Agreed. I think that Rat guy deserves a fist page rather than this boring story. So people who aren't proficient in database design hire someone and he makes it efficient. Like duh.

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 10:26 • by snoofle
Since it's the customer service reps that give us developers constantly changing requirements, without regard to time, space and the laws of physics, it seems quite reasonable that us developers should have no regard for time, space and performance of the stuff we produce. Let those same customer service reps deal with the unhappy customers; it is, after all, their job! </smirk>

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 10:29 • by sir_flexalot (unregistered)
171383 in reply to 171381
Lysis:
J. Walter Weatherman:
Boring.


Agreed. I think that Rat guy deserves a fist page rather than this boring story. So people who aren't proficient in database design hire someone and he makes it efficient. Like duh.


Interesting notion... have we exhausted the exploding server type stories?

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 10:29 • by Dean Menezes (unregistered)
All the MS Access solution needs is a wooden table. Very enterprisy!

Oh yeah, and SEVVUNTH!

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 10:43 • by vt_mruhlin
Was this originally posted in 1995? Where 90MB is considered big, and people still use floppy disks?

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 10:46 • by Loren Pechtel (unregistered)
I would guess the programmer did test his code: Just on a small database and not a production database.

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 10:51 • by Kederaji (unregistered)
171390 in reply to 171373
joe:
What is a floppy disk?
An ancient, arcane technology that was common in the days when using MS Access 97 was actually somewhat acceptable.

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 11:02 • by Ubersoldat (unregistered)
171394 in reply to 171390
Kederaji:
joe:
What is a floppy disk?
An ancient, arcane technology that was common in the days when using MS Access 97 was actually somewhat acceptable.


Yeah... I remember those days and was then when my first career decision was made: "No! I Won't Learn Visual Basic". And look at me now, happily developing in Cobol... now my mantra is "no regrets, the past is gone"

BTW, I'm starting to change my perception about MS. Today at the coffee shop with the strange name (we make bucks, from stars) I saw this incredible hot chick with a MS batch, oh! I was so tempted to ask her when Vista was going Open Source =) Because that's what you'd talk about with a hot chick that works at MS, right?

Have the captchas changed language?

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 11:02 • by Patrick (unregistered)
I didn't know that Helio wrote software now.
"Don't call it software...don't call us a software company."

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 11:03 • by KattMan
Ahh, bone density scanners with bad software. Perhaps this is why the pursuit of happiness has become no more than a legend.

Software Schmoftware!

2008-01-16 11:06 • by Lars Vargas
At least the bone density scanner company is honest about not being a software company. Their crazy lack of procedural efficiency rather proves that.

Just because you can write a little code or SQL doesn't mean you're a software developer. Or a DB architect.

The thing that makes me nervous is if they claim that they're not a hardware company, either.

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 11:20 • by Michael (unregistered)
171401 in reply to 171380
Jimmy:

ullamcorper??? what the heck is an ullamcorper...


It's Latin for "anybody", I think - it comes from the Lorem Ipsum text, which is used by typesetters etc. when they need some example text. The original text came from a Latin text, but has been mangled: e.g. the first word "Lorem" actually is the word "dolorem" ("of pain") with the beginning chopped off.

Ah good - 8 years of Latin wasn't in vain, after all....
;o)

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 11:27 • by Dude (unregistered)
And they complain about long waiting time.


CAPaTCHA: Ideo......Whats that?

Re: Software Schmoftware!

2008-01-16 11:29 • by SF (unregistered)
171404 in reply to 171399
Lars Vargas:
Just because you can write a little code or SQL doesn't mean you're a software developer. Or a DB architect.


This site is here to prove that the reverse is also true.

Re: Software Schmoftware!

2008-01-16 11:48 • by CodingForPretend
171407 in reply to 171404
SF:
Lars Vargas:
Just because you can write a little code or SQL doesn't mean you're a software developer. Or a DB architect.


This site is here to prove that the reverse is also true.
Well said!

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 12:01 • by RandomWTF (unregistered)
"we're not a software company."

A common attitude, unfortunately. The quality of software often seems to be treated as a secondary concern, even if it's a critical part of the products function.

I've closed accounts with banks and credit card companies for this very reason. I don't care if they don't think they are 'software companies', the fact of the matter is that 99% of my interaction with them is through software and if they can't get it right I'll simply go elsewhere.

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 12:13 • by dtech
We must come up with a name for this. It could be How 'bout "Reverse Query Sub-Optimization" (RQSO), or... "Inverse Real-time Scanning" (IRS, so people can be happy about at least a IRS). Marketing will be totally happy, and we can even make a nice amount of money with it! (just add a usefull select statement before copying and apply same principle)

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 12:39 • by Lysis
171417 in reply to 171409
RandomWTF:

A common attitude, unfortunately. The quality of software often seems to be treated as a secondary concern, even if it's a critical part of the products function.


But...but....for $25 I can get a whole web app from a guy named Mohammed from rentacoder! Surely from all his high outsource ratings his code must be impeccable and it's cheeeap!

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 13:04 • by Mohammed (unregistered)
171423 in reply to 171417
Hey now, I don't pick on your code, and at least my ratings are publicly available.

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 13:24 • by IvyMike (unregistered)
171427 in reply to 171396
KattMan:
Ahh, bone density scanners with bad software. Perhaps this is why the pursuit of happiness has become no more than a legend.


It's a time machine... I know it's a time machine...

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 13:25 • by Frenchier than thou (unregistered)
171428 in reply to 171409
Don't get me started!
"We can't change the name on your account. To do that we have to close the account then open a new one, and there is a 80$ new account fee"
"That's stupid, don't expect me to pay the equivalent of 4 months' subscription for a name change"
"It's the software's fault, it won't let us do that."

My final answer: "Stop the bullshit, I make software for a living and I can assure you that it doesn't let you do it because your company doesn't want to. And good luck trying to collect any money from THAT name."

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 13:44 • by GalacticCowboy
171432 in reply to 171380
Jimmy:
Its amazing how simple operations aren't grasped by certain individuals. How hard is it to understand SELECT statements in SQL?

Also performens, did the developer even test his/her own code? I mean which developer have the time to wait several hours to see if the code performes as planned. Also the project manager most of the time thinks operations takes too long even when the client doesn't...oh wait did they even have a project manager that tested the program...

I myself am in a project where several seconds of operations might be too long, fortunatly we have good methods to test and possibility to increase performes too.


Captcha: ullamcorper??? what the heck is an ullamcorper...


But it worked on my machine when I tested it with my 3MB "development" database...

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 13:46 • by GalacticCowboy
171433 in reply to 171394
Ubersoldat:
BTW, I'm starting to change my perception about MS. Today at the coffee shop with the strange name (we make bucks, from stars) I saw this incredible hot chick with a MS batch, oh! I was so tempted to ask her when Vista was going Open Source =) Because that's what you'd talk about with a hot chick that works at MS, right?


Based on what a couple of present and former MS employees have told me, she probably worked in either marketing or HR.

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 13:53 • by KattMan
171434 in reply to 171433
GalacticCowboy:
Ubersoldat:
BTW, I'm starting to change my perception about MS. Today at the coffee shop with the strange name (we make bucks, from stars) I saw this incredible hot chick with a MS batch, oh! I was so tempted to ask her when Vista was going Open Source =) Because that's what you'd talk about with a hot chick that works at MS, right?


Based on what a couple of present and former MS employees have told me, she probably worked in either marketing or HR.


No, she's just dating one of the executives there and wearing his shirt.

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 14:02 • by wiregoat (unregistered)
171436 in reply to 171434
KattMan:
GalacticCowboy:
Ubersoldat:
BTW, I'm starting to change my perception about MS. Today at the coffee shop with the strange name (we make bucks, from stars) I saw this incredible hot chick with a MS batch, oh! I was so tempted to ask her when Vista was going Open Source =) Because that's what you'd talk about with a hot chick that works at MS, right?


Based on what a couple of present and former MS employees have told me, she probably worked in either marketing or HR.


No, she's just dating one of the executives there and wearing his shirt.


Yeah, next time check for pants

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 14:11 • by ParkinT
So, when the customer saw that Jake's solution was faster and simpler did they...
Have a bone to pick with the Manufacturer?

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 14:12 • by ParkinT
171440 in reply to 171394
Ubersoldat:
Kederaji:
joe:
What is a floppy disk?
An ancient, arcane technology that was common in the days when using MS Access 97 was actually somewhat acceptable.


Yeah... I remember those days and was then when my first career decision was made: "No! I Won't Learn Visual Basic". And look at me now, happily developing in Cobol... now my mantra is "no regrets, the past is gone"

BTW, I'm starting to change my perception about MS. Today at the coffee shop with the strange name (we make bucks, from stars) I saw this incredible hot chick with a MS batch, oh! I was so tempted to ask her when Vista was going Open Source =) Because that's what you'd talk about with a hot chick that works at MS, right?

Have the captchas changed language?

Why was a woman "wearing an MS batch"? Did she have DOS commands printed on her shirt?

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 14:23 • by jimi (unregistered)
Step 4. Stop using Access.

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 14:48 • by T $
171445 in reply to 171387
vt_mruhlin:
Was this originally posted in 1995? Where 90MB is considered big, and people still use floppy disks?

I'd agree to this, get with the times. I'd recommend the cutting-edge technology of the Iomega 100 Zip Drive You can get about 70 floppies worth of space with this, it's the wave of the future!

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 14:53 • by Zygo (unregistered)
171446 in reply to 171373
joe:
What is a floppy disk?


A rare orthopedic disorder of the vertebrae of the spine. Diagnosis usually requires specialized instruments, such as a bone density scanner.

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 14:59 • by Joon (unregistered)
171447 in reply to 171396
KattMan:
Ahh, bone density scanners with bad software. Perhaps this is why the pursuit of happiness has become no more than a legend.


OMG, That is so funny, I happened to watch that movie the other day...

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 15:32 • by Pitabred (unregistered)
171450 in reply to 171380
Jimmy:
Its amazing how simple operations aren't grasped by certain individuals. How hard is it to understand SELECT statements in SQL?

Also performens, did the developer even test his/her own code? I mean which developer have the time to wait several hours to see if the code performes as planned. Also the project manager most of the time thinks operations takes too long even when the client doesn't...oh wait did they even have a project manager that tested the program...

I myself am in a project where several seconds of operations might be too long, fortunatly we have good methods to test and possibility to increase performes too.


Captcha: ullamcorper??? what the heck is an ullamcorper...

Ok, I hate being an asshole, but seriously... you're a developer! Use some spell-checking software if you can't figure out how to spell "performance" or "fortunately"! Hell, new versions of Firefox have it for all forms.

That said, it's hard for a lot of people to understand SQL, even some developers. Or proper sorting. Or much of anything at all... they just know more than the people around them.

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 16:28 • by m0ffx
171453 in reply to 171445
T $:
vt_mruhlin:
Was this originally posted in 1995? Where 90MB is considered big, and people still use floppy disks?

I'd agree to this, get with the times. I'd recommend the cutting-edge technology of the Iomega 100 Zip Drive You can get about 70 floppies worth of space with this, it's the wave of the future!
It probably did happen a long time ago, but the submitter didn't share it with anyone until recently. Don't assume that everything you hear happened happened yesterday.

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 17:06 • by whicker (unregistered)
Instead of asking what the real wtf is, I find myself asking what the original WTF was...

So what if there was candid honesty overheard with a speaker phone. The real WTF would have been if the technician (i assume?) said "we are a software company, and our hardware is designed and built in [[shoddy country]]".

When it's one tech speaking to another, I would hope that conversations would not take on the over-positive sales-droid manner of speaking. You can call tech support, marketing, or sales for a friendly voice.

Professionalism includes not lying (but I agree in also not bashing your own company every chance you get).

So, a little scripting solved the problem. I commend the submitter. What I do not commend is hiding behind bureaucracy. Now, the real question, did the submitter tell the manufacturer about his (excellent) solution? What would the manufacturer say? I would have laughed if it was, "sorry, we're not a software company" again.

See? Lack of punch line makes meh.

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 17:27 • by SidTheSexist (unregistered)
171459 in reply to 171434
Yeah, an attractive woman with a good job either a) slept her way there, or b) is only there for eye candy.

We may not even be human

2008-01-16 18:55 • by real_aardvark
171464 in reply to 171459
SidTheSexist:
Yeah, an attractive woman with a good job either a) slept her way there, or b) is only there for eye candy.

I see where you're going with this one -- an excellent deduction, my dear Watson.

That would mean that butt-ugly men such as yerself are employed largely on the grounds that they have huge, bulbous, green, glowing heads?

No, wait: that's not it. Gorgeous, pouting, men such as yerself have a good job because a) they haven't slept their way there (I'm just guessing, but this does refer to sex rather than the more obvious interpretation of dozing off during the cab ride to the interview, right?), and b) nobody in their right mind would consider you eye-candy.

Was Mommy nasty to you when you went poopy in your diapers?

Just asking.

Re: We may not even be human

2008-01-16 19:50 • by Watson (unregistered)
171469 in reply to 171464
real_aardvark:
SidTheSexist:
Yeah, an attractive woman with a good job either a) slept her way there, or b) is only there for eye candy.


Was Mommy nasty to you when you went poopy in your diapers?

Just asking.


Let's try that again:
SidTheSexist:
....

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 21:02 • by Grassfire (unregistered)
*cough* Access *cough*

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-16 21:13 • by magetoo
171478 in reply to 171401
Michael:
Jimmy:
what the heck is an ullamcorper...

It's Latin for "anybody", I think - it comes from the Lorem Ipsum text, which is used by typesetters etc. when they need some example text. The original text came from a Latin text, but has been mangled: e.g. the first word "Lorem" actually is the word "dolorem" ("of pain") with the beginning chopped off.

Ah good - 8 years of Latin wasn't in vain, after all....
;o)

Eight years of Latin, and you're reading and posting on TDWTF? That's quite the contrast. Of course, perhaps you're not making a career out of working as a code monkey either; I know I'm not.

Plus, I only took two years of Latin...

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-17 00:06 • by Lynx@Work (unregistered)
171485 in reply to 171436
wiregoat:
KattMan:
GalacticCowboy:
Ubersoldat:
BTW, I'm starting to change my perception about MS. Today at the coffee shop with the strange name (we make bucks, from stars) I saw this incredible hot chick with a MS batch, oh! I was so tempted to ask her when Vista was going Open Source =) Because that's what you'd talk about with a hot chick that works at MS, right?


Based on what a couple of present and former MS employees have told me, she probably worked in either marketing or HR.


No, she's just dating one of the executives there and wearing his shirt.


Yeah, next time check for pants

Hey, the comment just said she had a MS batch (sic). Nothing said about her wearing a shirt or pants..

But, to be totally off-topic, I've seen some hot-looking ladies in IT who are quite proficient in what they do, so it's not always sleeping your way to the position or being eye-candy. Sometimes it's really about capabilities.

Get ready to be EMP'ed

2008-01-17 02:57 • by Black Hat (unregistered)


In Case you don't understand:
STOP THE SEXIST COMMENTS!

Really, I am not joking, this is disgusting :-(

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-17 02:59 • by csb (unregistered)
Nice way-of-working in such a sensitive area.
We copy a database full of data including patient names, diagnoses, etc., seemingly remove some data, and send the stuff to QC ...
- full size (yeah, I know, that's part of the WTF)
- still having all the sensitive data we went out to remove in the first place, in the "deleted" records.

Highly illegal in any country that has laws about data privacy ... though I'm not sure whether the country this WTF comes from qualifies as such ;-)

Did some stuff for a similar purpose some time ago ... different medical field, using XML(!) to export and transfer QC data from a database(!), with a programming language(!), in a software company(!).
Doesn't QC usually use a standardised format?

Whatever.
Sebastian

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-17 03:02 • by csb (unregistered)
171507 in reply to 171506
Oh, sorry, I forgot to mention my several female colleagues who really know how to do their (IT) jobs :-)
Sebastian

Re: Get ready to be EMP'ed

2008-01-17 03:37 • by DOA
171509 in reply to 171505
Black Hat:


In Case you don't understand:
STOP THE SEXIST COMMENTS!

Really, I am not joking, this is disgusting :-(


And now I'm tempted to ask for naked pics...

Mean streak? me?

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-17 03:52 • by someone (unregistered)
171510 in reply to 171457
The real WTF is they're using MS Access for this!

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-17 05:10 • by TC (unregistered)
Such a remark is a non sequitur designed to absolve the company and those involved of responsibility. Unfortunately its a sign of the times...

Re: We're not a software company

2008-01-17 05:14 • by Dave (unregistered)
171516 in reply to 171409
RandomWTF:
I've closed accounts with banks and credit card companies for this very reason. I don't care if they don't think they are 'software companies', the fact of the matter is that 99% of my interaction with them is through software and if they can't get it right I'll simply go elsewhere.


Where the f*** are you now then?

Re: We may not even be human

2008-01-17 05:30 • by Dave (unregistered)
171517 in reply to 171464
real_aardvark:
SidTheSexist:
Yeah, an attractive woman with a good job either a) slept her way there, or b) is only there for eye candy.

I see where you're going with this one -- an excellent deduction, my dear Watson.

That would mean that butt-ugly men such as yerself are employed largely on the grounds that they have huge, bulbous, green, glowing heads?

No, wait: that's not it. Gorgeous, pouting, men such as yerself have a good job because a) they haven't slept their way there (I'm just guessing, but this does refer to sex rather than the more obvious interpretation of dozing off during the cab ride to the interview, right?), and b) nobody in their right mind would consider you eye-candy.

Was Mommy nasty to you when you went poopy in your diapers?

Just asking.


Why do butch, ugly lesbians never understand sarcasm?
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2Next »

Add Comment