Comment On Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

I can't imagine a world without content filtering. Just think of all innocent children, parents, and grandparents that would be irreparably harmed from seeing those certain vile combinations of letters that we call "swear words." While I've been forever changed by seeing such words, I long for the days when I thought that "f...ing" was just a short way of writing floccinaucinihilipilificating. And I truly believe that it's my duty to protect the innocent from being exposed to those dastardly words and let them believe that an f-bomb simply refers to a friendly-bomb, as in, a shower of hugs and kisses. [expand full text]
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2 | Page 3Next »

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 09:05 • by Mark34625
F*****G First!

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 09:07 • by Jerf (unregistered)
Floccinaucinihilipilificating Second!

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 09:10 • by ekolis
222528 in reply to 222527
F**kin' KICK! Oh wait, I mean Falcon Third!

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 09:11 • by amischiefr
222530 in reply to 222526
Somebody sounds a little disgruntled. Maybe its time for a change in carriers. When you are that pissed off about actually having to do some work, you need a new job.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 09:14 • by JoelKatz (unregistered)
A fairly-well-known newspaper (whose name shall not be mentioned to protect the guilty) once accidentally left an automatic profanity filter that they were testing on. They published a condolence for the death of "Myra Lip****z". Followed the next issue by an apology.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 09:19 • by spxza
Nice history of profanity in Linux kernel:
http://www.vidarholen.net/contents/wordcount/

I think there's more profanity in win32 code than anywhere else.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 09:25 • by Code Dependent
Before long I expect to see a joke about fokkers flying Messerschmidts.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 09:29 • by weirded verber (unregistered)
222537 in reply to 222533
spxza:
Nice history of profanity in Linux kernel:
http://www.vidarholen.net/contents/wordcount/

I think there's more profanity in win32 code than anywhere else.


"penguin" is a profanity?!? wtf? suggested new site name- the daily WTP

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 09:30 • by dkf
222538 in reply to 222530
amischiefr:
Maybe its time for a change in carriers.
What, from 100MHz square wave to USS Enterprise?

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 09:41 • by bazza (unregistered)
*grin* I think I recognise that system as well. Every now and again a couple of years back we'd spend 10 minutes a week adding new words to the filter. I wonder if my ones are still there.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 09:47 • by pitchingchris
222540 in reply to 222537
weirded verber:
spxza:
Nice history of profanity in Linux kernel:
http://www.vidarholen.net/contents/wordcount/

I think there's more profanity in win32 code than anywhere else.


"penguin" is a profanity?!? wtf? suggested new site name- the daily WTP


Maybe the word penguin was like a control test. That way if the code doing the measurement was skewed, you can see if the control test actually matched up.

Re: "friendly bomb"??

2008-10-13 09:51 • by AF (unregistered)
Surely an F-bomb is one using fluorine, as an H-bomb uses hydrogen.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 09:57 • by weirded verber (unregistered)
222544 in reply to 222540
pitchingchris:
weirded verber:
spxza:
Nice history of profanity in Linux kernel:
http://www.vidarholen.net/contents/wordcount/

I think there's more profanity in win32 code than anywhere else.


"penguin" is a profanity?!? wtf? suggested new site name- the daily WTP


Maybe the word penguin was like a control test. That way if the code doing the measurement was skewed, you can see if the control test actually matched up.


Whilst that seems logical- I'm sticking with 'WTP

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 10:08 • by Patrick (unregistered)
clbuttic

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 10:22 • by JoJo (unregistered)

***rly implemented filters are a *****ly subject with me when you end up with messages like:

Please click the help ****on if you require ***istance



Please re-insert the following: ass, butt, poo, prick

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 10:32 • by GooberMcNutly
222550 in reply to 222533
I think there's more profanity in win32 code than anywhere else.


Only in the usage notes.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 10:44 • by JD (unregistered)
I feel the coder's pain but an unwanted customer requirement is absolutely not an excuse to abandon your coding standards and litter the codebase with questionable method signatures. Further more, a simple string replace function such as the RemoveProfanity method could only have taken about five minutes of his "precious development time". A bit of professionalism, please.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 10:48 • by Valerion (unregistered)
"f...ing" was just a short way of writing floccinaucinihilipilificating

What - you're telling me it doesn't? I gotta go call my mother...

Next you'll be telling me Santa doesn't exist!

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 10:56 • by fruey
Profanity filters are a waste of time. It's more fun trying to get around them... and more damage has probably been done with over zealous filters (or blantantly poor use of regexes).

Just stick a parental advisory and let kidz just get an adult to read the messages first.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 10:58 • by Anonymous Coward (unregistered)
I have the word "Belgi*m" in my code SO many focking times!

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 11:22 • by Anon (unregistered)
So let me get this straight, people were receiving gifts, from other people, and complaining to the company that sent out the gift that the sender dropped the f-word in there?

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 11:32 • by jspenguin

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 11:32 • by ih34 (unregistered)
222563 in reply to 222552
I bet it takes more than five minutes to list all the profanity with standard spelling in one language, let alone half-a-dozen others. Then factor in the substitution of 0 (zero) for O (oh) and z for s etc. etc. not forgetting valid messages e.g Present from Scunthorpe etc.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 11:37 • by Loren Pechtel (unregistered)
That programmer should be embar***ed!

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 11:37 • by Steve (unregistered)
222565 in reply to 222533
spxza:
Nice history of profanity in Linux kernel:
http://www.vidarholen.net/contents/wordcount/

I think there's more profanity in win32 code than anywhere else.
A friend of mine once mentioned that his long since gobbled up company actually measured the readiness of a release by the number of f-words appearing in the comments of the code base. As it approached zero, it became closer to being releasable. I forget what the release threshold was but I know it was non-zero.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 11:42 • by pscs
222567 in reply to 222538
dkf:
What, from 100MHz square wave to USS Enterprise?


A square wave isn't a very good carrier (too many harmonics making it hard to filter out), and I didn't think the USS Enterprise was a carrier, as it could only launch shuttles. The Galactica, now THAT's a carrier...

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 11:46 • by RBoy (unregistered)
222569 in reply to 222537
weirded verber:
spxza:
Nice history of profanity in Linux kernel:
http://www.vidarholen.net/contents/wordcount/

I think there's more profanity in win32 code than anywhere else.


"penguin" is a profanity?!? wtf? suggested new site name- the daily WTP


Watch your mouth!

I'm just talkin bout valetudo.

We can dig it.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 11:47 • by RBoy (unregistered)
222570 in reply to 222560
Anon:
So let me get this straight, people were receiving gifts, from other people, and complaining to the company that sent out the gift that the sender dropped the f-word in there?


If I want to wish someone a Happy Fuckin Birthday, I should be allowed to.

Enought of this decet, I want my message to show what I told it to.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 11:47 • by pscs
222571 in reply to 222564
Loren Pechtel:
That programmer should be embar***ed!


I didn't know raß was a swear word :-?

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 11:47 • by dabean
222572 in reply to 222560
Anon:
So let me get this straight, people were receiving gifts, from other people, and complaining to the company that sent out the gift that the sender dropped the f-word in there?

Marking it as "gift" doesn't mean it has to go to another address. Some parent probably phoned them because they received a "motherfocking xbox-360, motherfocker!".

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 11:56 • by phx (unregistered)
222575 in reply to 222572
Marking it as "gift" doesn't mean it has to go to another address. Some parent probably phoned them because they received a "motherfocking xbox-360, motherfocker!".


If someone send me a motherfucking xbox360 out the bloody blue, I'd sure as shit be calling up the cunts that sent it and asking them what the fuck was up. Sure, free fucking 360 you might say? What if some cocksucker with a stolen credit card bought the bastard? Then some assholes would come around to pick the fucking piece of shit up, and I'd be out my goddamn xbox. Then I would've had to read the word "motherfocker" for no fucking gain at all.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 12:09 • by shMerker (unregistered)
I think I learned more double entendres and dirty words from profanity filters than anywhere else. When you can't talk abut Alfred Hitch**** or your garage-***-workspace the filter getting up in arms it gets to be a pain. Meanwhile if someone really wants to swear they can always find some work-around with weird punctuation or l33tisms. A lot of times it's hypocritical, too. There's a log on bash.org where someone has a bible-bot quote a verse like Genesis 22:3 in King James and then the profanity-bot kicks the bible-bot for saying ass.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 12:12 • by akatherder
222578 in reply to 222546
JoJo:
Please re-insert the following: ass, butt, poo, prick


I think this line is funnier out of context.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 12:14 • by NullAndVoid
222579 in reply to 222546
JoJo:

***rly implemented filters are a *****ly subject with me when you end up with messages like:

Please click the help ****on if you require ***istance



Please re-insert the following: ass, butt, poo, prick


Assrly implemented filters are a buttly subject with me when you end up with messages like:

Please click the help pooon if you require prickistance


Umm, I don't get it...?

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 12:14 • by jspenguin
222580 in reply to 222577
shMerker:
There's a log on bash.org where someone has a bible-bot quote a verse like Genesis 22:3 in King James and then the profanity-bot kicks the bible-bot for saying ass.


http://bash.org/?178890

Also:

Malachi 2:3: Behold, I will corrupt your seed, and spread dung upon your faces.

1 Kings 14:10: Therefore, behold, I will bring evil upon the house of Jeroboam, and will cut off from Jeroboam him that pisseth against the wall.

More here.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 12:19 • by d3matt
222581 in reply to 222567
pscs:
dkf:
What, from 100MHz square wave to USS Enterprise?


A square wave isn't a very good carrier (too many harmonics making it hard to filter out), and I didn't think the USS Enterprise was a carrier, as it could only launch shuttles. The Galactica, now THAT's a carrier...


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Enterprise_(CVN-65)

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 12:27 • by TGV
222582 in reply to 222554
Actually, "f...ing" means "fornicating", and "sh*t" means "short-circuit". At least, that's what grep tells me.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 12:51 • by An Old Hacker (unregistered)
222584 in reply to 222562
jspenguin:


78k to change one line of non-visible code.

Ouch.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 12:58 • by 1010011010 (unregistered)
google search the term "conbreastution"

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 13:04 • by Literal (unregistered)
222586 in reply to 222546
JoJo:

***rly implemented filters are a *****ly subject with me when you end up with messages like:

Please click the help ****on if you require ***istance



Please re-insert the following: ass, butt, poo, prick


Assrly implemented filters are a buttly subject with me when you end up with messages like:

Please click the help pooon if you require prickistance

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 13:29 • by Kermos
Content filters, that reminds me of Everquest.

In the Kunark expansion released for the game it actually had a monster name that tripped over the game's own content filter:

Cockatrice

Luckily you could turn the filter off or else you'd be fighting #()$#atrices all day long.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 13:39 • by squeem
222589 in reply to 222557
Anonymous Coward:
I have the word "Belgi*m" in my code SO many focking times!


I have it tattooed on my S**prini.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 13:39 • by pong (unregistered)
Wait, the f-bomb ISN'T a shower of hugs and kisses? I mean, I know there's more to it, but that's what I do when I drop the f-bomb on a girl.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 13:55 • by Dick Hitchcock (unregistered)
I demand you take the reference to female anatomy out of the webpage's <***le>. Someone might look at the page source and be offended.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 14:02 • by Charles400
Pontius Pilate: Well, you sound vewy sure. Have you checked?

Centurion: Well, no, sir. Umm, I think it's a joke, sir... like, uh, 'Sillius Soddus' or... 'Biggus Dickus', sir.

Pontius Pilate: [guard chuckles] What's so funny about "Biggus Dickus? "

Centurion: Well, it's a joke name, sir.

Pontius Pilate: I have a vewy gweat fwiend in Wome called 'Biggus Dickus'.

[guard chuckles]

Pontius Pilate: Silence! What is all this insolence? You will find yourself in gladiator school vewy quickly with wotten behaviour like that.

Brian: Can I go now, sir?

[slap]

Brian: Aaah! Eh.

Pontius Pilate: Wait till Biggus Dickus hears of this!

[guard chuckles]

Pontius Pilate: Wight! Take him away!

Centurion: Oh, sir, he - he only...

Pontius Pilate: No, no. I want him fighting wabid, wild animals within a week.

Centurion: Yes, sir. Come on, you.

[takes the guard away as continues laughing histerically]

Pontius Pilate: I will not have my fwiends widiculed by the common soldiewy. - - Anybody else feel like a little... giggle... when I mention my fwiend... Biggus...

[another guard chuckles]

Pontius Pilate: ... Dickus?

[more chuckling]

Pontius Pilate: What about you? Do you find it... wisible... when I say the name... 'Biggus'...

[chuckle]

Pontius Pilate: ... Dickus?

[both guards chuckle]

Pontius Pilate: He has a wife, you know. You know what she's called? She's called... 'Incontinentia'... Incontinentia Buttocks

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 14:10 • by Mojo Hand (unregistered)
Shattly?

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 14:13 • by Andy (unregistered)
222594 in reply to 222546
JoJo:

***rly implemented filters are a *****ly subject with me when you end up with messages like:

Please click the help ****on if you require ***istance



Please re-insert the following: ass, butt, poo, prick


My favorite is when you're talking about all the great works of Dick Van Dyke, and it comes out **** Van ****.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 14:14 • by Lustig (unregistered)
Won't somebody please think of poor innocent adults, who have to do this chore just because some concerned parents are afraid their kids get exposed to profanity?
Let's just write contents without filtering. Our lives will be much happier, and the world will be a better place to live.
Believe me, all my life I've been exposed to profanity. So fcuking what? Have I became a felon?

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 14:25 • by Franz_Kafka
222596 in reply to 222595
Lustig:
Won't somebody please think of poor innocent adults, who have to do this chore just because some concerned parents are afraid their kids get exposed to profanity?
Let's just write contents without filtering. Our lives will be much happier, and the world will be a better place to live.
Believe me, all my life I've been exposed to profanity. So fcuking what? Have I became a felon?


I know I have - I ripped a cd to mp3 and then converted a dvd to mpg. Hoo boy, but I'm a hardened criminal.

Re: Won't Somebody Please Think of the Children?

2008-10-13 14:36 • by kramthegram (unregistered)
222597 in reply to 222546
It's a clbuttic example of censorship IHMO
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2 | Page 3Next »

Add Comment