| « Prev | Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Next » |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:33
•
by
Zunetang
(unregistered)
|
|
tl;dr - dan rather just pist frost.
|
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:33
•
by
DaveK
|
|
Passed as a perimeter? Sounds kinda edgy to me.
|
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:36
•
by
MikeN
(unregistered)
|
|
My favorite part is that it's version 15.1.
|
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:37
•
by
3rd Ferguson
(unregistered)
|
|
I thought we frowned on using student code as WTFs.
//CAPTCHA: "inhibeo" - the spell that causes Hermione to get nervous and put her robe back on |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:38
•
by
M
(unregistered)
|
|
This function just skirts the issue...
Captcha: feugiat - feugiataboutit |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:39
•
by
KattMan
|
|
Honestly it's a language parser, should be easy to do all numbers with little more code.
Go 1-9, then 10-12, then 13-19 becomes easy (nine) + (teen) After that everything else is easy 21, 31 are (twenty) + (one) or (thirty) + (one). Yeah this function is a serious WTF, even in its name, sounds like the forgot to name it and just put the comment as the name. |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:40
•
by
Anon
(unregistered)
|
|
I love how schizophrenic this is. On the one hand you've got a variable named "WORD_CONVERTED_FROM_A_NUMBER_PASSED_THROUGH_A_PERIMETER", but on the other hand you have "HX_373".
It's like a epic battle between overly long descriptive variable names and short, completely cryptic variable names, fighting for the soul of this function. |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:40
•
by
Julia
|
|
I can't wait for the future version that handles up to 10^8...
|
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:40
•
by
DaveK
|
And "enterprise edition", no less! |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:41
•
by
configurator
(unregistered)
|
"Eightteen" for 18 would be better than "four" for 5, I guess... (see "bugs fixed") |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:43
•
by
Anon
(unregistered)
|
I can't even begin to understand the thought process here. 15 lines that do absolutely nothing. It simplifies to p_mode = p_mode which is a NOP. |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:44
•
by
GoodtimesSnuggler
(unregistered)
|
|
I like the bugs fixed
"'Shortened name of the function due to errors on polling the function" THIS IS THE SHORTER NAME?! |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:47
•
by
Coyne
|
|
Enterprisey. Very enterprisey. Also shtupid.
|
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:48
•
by
NickS
(unregistered)
|
|
At one of my previous jobs they hired a new guy not because he was qualified in any way for the job, but solely on the basis that he used to be a Russian rocket scientist during the Cold War.
Instead of doing the things required of his job, he spent 8 hours a day making calendars in MS Paint with various decorations for each month, printing them out, and handing them to everyone in the department. If he made a change to one month, he reprinted everything out again for everyone and went around swapping out the old calendars for the new ones. He was fired in two weeks. For some reason, seeing this code reminded me of him. Good intentions, poor execution, completely irrelevant to the task at hand. |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:50
•
by
ubersoldat
|
Yeah right! |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:53
•
by
Bruce W
(unregistered)
|
|
One of my elementary school teachers told me if I am going to spell a word wrong at least keep the same spelling throughout what I am writing. Glad to see someone else took that lesson to heart. (yes, yes "perimeter" is a real word...)
|
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:55
•
by
Quirkafleeg
(unregistered)
|
|
I like the fact that the first bug fixer could spell "three" but thought "eleevn" was a perfectly acceptable number.
|
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:56
•
by
TGV
|
|
THE BUG FIXES! THE BUG FIXES!! OMG, THEY DO NOTHING!!
|
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:56
•
by
Rafael Giusti
(unregistered)
|
|
> Passed as a perimeter? Sounds kinda edgy to me.
TUDUM TSS!!! |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:58
•
by
Decius
(unregistered)
|
Not quite nothing- if you pass "no perimeter ...", it changes to an empty string. Granted, it doesn't do anything remotely useful, but that's not the same thing as a NOP. |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:59
•
by
Michal
(unregistered)
|
|
He meant definitely "parameter" when writing "perimeter". Then it starts making sense.
|
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 09:59
•
by
C-Octothorpe
|
*golf clap* |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:02
•
by
Bleat
(unregistered)
|
1) How much was this used that this was ever in 'high demand' 2) What kind of API call would this even use? What's more, would it actually have been useful? |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:02
•
by
Weps
|
Hahaha |
|
Time for this programmer to enter the ranks of management and spend the rest of his/her career saying how "we used to do it."
|
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:10
•
by
Steve The Cynic
|
|
If you ask me, whoever wrote it was just taking the piss. It would be worth the submitter's while, I think, to search for calls to this.
In code that's reachable from somewhere reachable, if you get my drift... |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:11
•
by
KattMan
|
|
Ok Code challenge!
Challenge A: write one that can handle conversion of numerics to text without range failures (we can limit at somewhere around the millions? billions?) in the fewest lines possible. Challenge B: write one that still gives the answer but in the most convoluted way. Challenge C: By far the easiest, do one or the other challenges but in a way that we can't tell what you were going for. |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:14
•
by
Jaunticed
(unregistered)
|
|
I'm banking on this being just a joke. Evidence?
'Shortened name of the function due to errors on polling the function Considering that the EXAMPLE USAGE shows what we can guess was the previous function name, and how the new name is needlessly verbose... yeah. |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:15
•
by
PiisAWheeL
|
My thoughts exactly. But it also made my eyes bleed. Shortened it from what?! |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:16
•
by
Prosthetic Lips
|
True, but since this function was for a dictionary and spell checker, that makes it even more ironic! |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:18
•
by
_rnd
(unregistered)
|
|
get_comment_from_a_number_and_post_comment_to_function_and_submit_to_website_tdwtf()
|
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:19
•
by
Spider Flyer
(unregistered)
|
|
Wow...
...How old is this code? Because I saw _working_ code that would do this in a '79 or '80 copy of 'Creative Computing'. Also, you can find working code online if you search for a one of the 'large' number suffixes plus the name of your favorite computer language. For example, while searching for 'septillion c#', I found: http://www.vb-helper.com/howto_net_number_to_words2.html |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:22
•
by
the beholder
(unregistered)
|
I bet that "bug fixes" section is gonna be quite long by the time he puts 10^8 in the range. Whoever wrote this code should be thrown out the window... of a orbital station. |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:25
•
by
KattMan
|
In a degrading orbit or with exiting force? |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:25
•
by
geoffrey, MCP, PMP
(unregistered)
|
One of Visual Basic's many useful features is an Eval function, which executes any text string you hand to it as code. The original author is probably using Eval, and has discovered a limitation on length for the argument. |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:31
•
by
vt_mruhlin
(unregistered)
|
Can we all take a moment to imagine just how bad the original version of this must have been if that particular problem only reproed sometimes? |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:34
•
by
KattMan
|
Was this a problem, perhaps when 5 breeched rthe perimeter one was actually removed by security. This could be expected behaviour. |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:35
•
by
da Doctah
|
Did you learn that when you were threeteen, or wait until you turned fiveteen? |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:38
•
by
PedanticCurmudgeon
|
I was thinking the same thing when I saw the response.write in the middle of the function. |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:41
•
by
KattMan
|
I learned it back when I was eleventeen! |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:45
•
by
ObiWayneKenobi
|
|
Looks like something Nagesh would write; isn't that the type of Hinglish that he writes in?
|
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:47
•
by
Anketam
|
I had the identical reaction. |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:50
•
by
Anonymous
(unregistered)
|
|
Really? I didn't learn it until eleventyone.
|
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 10:53
•
by
toth
|
|
I like that he replaces the empty string with that useless string...but only when the parameter is the empty string.
Because assigning literals to parameters is for suckers. |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 11:02
•
by
Tim
(unregistered)
|
|
obviously a hoax, but a hilarious one :-)
the 'bug fixed' is the best part |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 11:20
•
by
Kasper
(unregistered)
|
Given the look of the code it is not surprising that such a bug could have slipped in. What scares me is that it only happened sometimes. |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 11:28
•
by
big picture thinker
(unregistered)
|
|
p_comment = "Guys take it easy on him. He obviously never dealt with perimeters before and was just experimenting with this advanced technology. I'd like to see any of you implement a function that uses perimeters!"
If p_comment = "" Then p_comment = "" Else p_comment = p_comment End If |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 11:44
•
by
mschaad
(unregistered)
|
|
I just appreciated the fact that the English output is still wrong.
[GrammarNazi] 13,387,281 rendered as words should read "thirteen million three hundred eighty-seven thousand two hundred eighty-one". Note that the word "and" is not in there at all, and tens are properly hyphenated. :-) [/GrammarNazi] Also, to render numbers correctly as words (with the hyphens and everything) is a harder trick than you might think. Thankfully, standard English style dictates that you pretty much never spell out any numbers above nine. So where would you need a library like this, unless your app writes checks? |
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 11:56
•
by
itsmo
(unregistered)
|
|
Seriously, did no one else notice "forteen"
|
Re: get_words_from_a_number_which_is_passed_as_a_perimeter_into_this_function
2012-04-16 12:08
•
by
dogmatic
(unregistered)
|
|
Firing's too good for this clown. I do believe a hanging's in order.
|
| « Prev | Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Page 4 | Page 5 | Next » |