• trtrwtf (unregistered) in reply to trtrwtf
    trtrwtf:
    boog:
    (and any regulars, like trtrwtf, could easily be added to a white-list).

    Oooooh.... you're swelling.

    ZTFY

  • (cs) in reply to 0dwx2uAn2f2ns8
    0dwx2uAn2f2ns8:
    boog:
    You should really increase the vowel to consonant ratio in your name generator. Or shorten the name. Currently, a search for a string of 5 or more adjacent consonants in the name would match on about 98% of your random names, with few false positives (and any regulars, like trtrwtf, could easily be added to a white-list).
    Yeah, I know. I thought of a few other ways of improving it, but it appears to be having the desired effect already...
    So it would seem. You sure have invented quite the bullet-proof name generator; no one can beat it, for sure.

    But then people will just filter your comments based on content instead of name (it should be easy for even a poorly-trained Bayesian filter to pick out your unique brand of comments). Darn it all!

  • (cs) in reply to boog
    boog:
    0dwx2uAn2f2ns8:
    boog:
    You should really increase the vowel to consonant ratio in your name generator. Or shorten the name. Currently, a search for a string of 5 or more adjacent consonants in the name would match on about 98% of your random names, with few false positives (and any regulars, like trtrwtf, could easily be added to a white-list).
    Yeah, I know. I thought of a few other ways of improving it, but it appears to be having the desired effect already...
    So it would seem. You sure have invented quite the bullet-proof name generator; no one can beat it, for sure.

    But then people will just filter your comments based on content instead of name (it should be easy for even a poorly-trained Bayesian filter to pick out your unique brand of comments). Darn it all!

    You forgot to mention his liberal (and clever) use of "invisible" comments. Evil genius, he is...By clever, I mean retarded. And by evil genius, I mean depraved, overweight and sexless teenager which his own parents are ashamed of.

  • (cs) in reply to Anno
    Anno:
    So... this site really doesn't have any moderators, does it? What's the point of a comments thread when almost no one has anything to say on the subject of the post and spammers/trolls are allowed to run free?
    What makes you think any thread on TDWTF has a point?
  • Your Best Friend (unregistered) in reply to boog
    boog:
    0dwx2uAn2f2ns8:
    Yeah, I know. I thought of a few other ways of improving it, but it appears to be having the desired effect already...
    So it would seem. You sure have invented quite the bullet-proof name generator; no one can beat it, for sure.

    But then people will just filter your comments based on content instead of name (it should be easy for even a poorly-trained Bayesian filter to pick out your unique brand of comments). Darn it all!

    If I thought it was bulletproof, why would I have agreed that it was easily circumvented? The condescending attitude doesn't really work there.

  • Your Best Friend (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    boog:
    But then people will just filter your comments based on content instead of name (it should be easy for even a poorly-trained Bayesian filter to pick out your unique brand of comments). Darn it all!
    You forgot to mention his liberal (and clever) use of "invisible" comments. Evil genius, he is...
    Despite my inane comments, I only ever claimed to be clever in jest (if I did at all, I don't remember saying that). Nor did I ever believe that my ability to overcome filtering methods was bulletproof and the fact that you two are so eager to point out the obvious means of defeating it just makes you look like try-hards.

    Filtering based on content? Duh! Filtering the word "cocks" would catch 90% of my posts. Show me the javascript AI that simulates human revulsion to comments and I'll just play with that all day. It would be like what porn is to sex, which is, as I'm sure you know, good enough for me...

    C-Octothorpe:
    By clever, I mean retarded. And by evil genius, I mean depraved, overweight and sexless teenager which his own parents are ashamed of.
    And I'll have you know I am not a teenager!
  • (cs) in reply to Your Best Friend
    Your Best Friend:
    If I thought it was bulletproof, why would I have agreed that it was easily circumvented?
    I was saying that I thought it was bullet-proof. I wouldn't think of falsely attributing to you my own thoughts and beliefs.
    Your Best Friend:
    The condescending attitude doesn't really work there.
    Sorry, I was going for sarcasm, not condescension.
  • (cs) in reply to boog
    boog:
    Your Best Friend:
    If I thought it was bulletproof, why would I have agreed that it was easily circumvented?
    I was saying that I thought it was bullet-proof. I wouldn't think of falsely attributing to you my own thoughts and beliefs.
    Your Best Friend:
    The condescending attitude doesn't really work there.
    Sorry, I was going for sarcasm, not condescension.
    In his defence and his own words, he never did claim to be clever...
  • Your Best Friend (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    boog:
    Your Best Friend:
    If I thought it was bulletproof, why would I have agreed that it was easily circumvented?
    I was saying that I thought it was bullet-proof. I wouldn't think of falsely attributing to you my own thoughts and beliefs.
    Your Best Friend:
    The condescending attitude doesn't really work there.
    Sorry, I was going for sarcasm, not condescension.
    In his defense and his own words, he never did claim to be clever...
    I really just prefer your method of heaping self-validating scorn on poor passers-by on the internet to his pretense of Enlightening Beam of Wisdom from Odin.

    Sure, I'm a retard. I'm a retard that consistently outsmarts you. (And corrects your spelling!)

    How long have we been doing this? I hope it never ends.

  • Ganesha (unregistered) in reply to Your Best Friend
    Your Best Friend:
    C-Octothorpe:
    boog:
    Your Best Friend:
    If I thought it was bulletproof, why would I have agreed that it was easily circumvented?
    I was saying that I thought it was bullet-proof. I wouldn't think of falsely attributing to you my own thoughts and beliefs.
    Your Best Friend:
    The condescending attitude doesn't really work there.
    Sorry, I was going for sarcasm, not condescension.
    In his defense and his own words, he never did claim to be clever...
    I really just prefer your method of heaping self-validating scorn on poor passers-by on the internet to his pretense of Enlightening Beam of Wisdom from Odin.

    Sure, I'm a retard. I'm a retard that consistently outsmarts you. (And corrects your spelling!)

    How long have we been doing this? I hope it never ends.

    What a loser sociopath you are! How's hoodarino by the way?

  • Your Best Friend (unregistered) in reply to Ganesha
    Ganesha:
    Your Best Friend:
    How long have we been doing this? I hope it never ends.
    What a loser sociopath you are! How's hoodarino by the way?
    hoodaticus? I don't know. Where has he been?

    I'm sad, 'cause one of the only ones who admitted to liking my sense of humor. I wish he'd come back. Hung like a mule, too. Maybe that's what I really miss.

  • (cs) in reply to Your Best Friend
    Your Best Friend:
    C-Octothorpe:
    boog:
    Your Best Friend:
    If I thought it was bulletproof, why would I have agreed that it was easily circumvented?
    I was saying that I thought it was bullet-proof. I wouldn't think of falsely attributing to you my own thoughts and beliefs.
    Your Best Friend:
    The condescending attitude doesn't really work there.
    Sorry, I was going for sarcasm, not condescension.
    In his defense and his own words, he never did claim to be clever...
    I really just prefer your method of heaping self-validating scorn on poor passers-by on the internet to his pretense of Enlightening Beam of Wisdom from Odin.

    Sure, I'm a retard. I'm a retard that consistently outsmarts you. (And corrects your spelling!)

    How long have we been doing this? I hope it never ends.

    It sounds like you're getting mad... Are you getting mad?Dance puppet, dance!

  • Your Best Friend (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    Your Best Friend:
    Sure, I'm a retard. I'm a retard that consistently outsmarts you. (And corrects your spelling!)

    How long have we been doing this? I hope it never ends.

    It sounds like you're getting mad... Are you getting mad?Dance puppet, dance!
    Right on cue.

    What's this? A puppet calling someone a puppet! Now that's comedy! Who was the first to sling insults again?

    I have all day to chat. I guess you do, too. Your time must be just as worthless as mine.

    Having a hard day at work? They have me chasing this stupid roundabout way of discovering an poorly-documented standard so we can implement it on the old version of our platform, which we're about to upgrade from. Fun.

    But on the other hand, I can act like it's taking lonher than it really is.

  • (cs) in reply to JamieC
    JamieC:
    I guess we'll all have to make "due" with shitty editors too :sigh: <quote> "With prices like this, I think that we'll just make due with black and white printouts." </quote>

    I think he meant "...make doo...", referring to the shitty quality of his output.

  • (cs) in reply to Steve The Cynic
    Steve The Cynic:
    And TRWTF today?

    In the first 12 posts, 7 were from authors claiming to be "Nagesh".

    The problem with the Nagesh posts is not that they aren't funny (although they aren't), but that they are tedious and repetitive.

    But then again, tedious repetition of tired memes seems to be the norm here. Ho hum.

    Which raises the question "Is tedious repetition of tired memes" itself a meme? And if so, once that meme becomes tired and tediously repeated, will we tear a new asshole in spacetime?

  • (cs) in reply to SQLDave
    SQLDave:
    Steve The Cynic:
    And TRWTF today?

    In the first 12 posts, 7 were from authors claiming to be "Nagesh".

    The problem with the Nagesh posts is not that they aren't funny (although they aren't), but that they are tedious and repetitive.

    But then again, tedious repetition of tired memes seems to be the norm here. Ho hum.

    Which raises the question "Is tedious repetition of tired memes" itself a meme? And if so, once that meme becomes tired and tediously repeated, will we tear a new asshole in spacetime?

    No, that's zunesis's job.

  • (cs) in reply to SQLDave
    SQLDave:
    Which raises the question "Is tedious repetition of tired memes" itself a meme?
    I already answered that! In fact i answered it before you even asked the question!
    SQLDave:
    And if so, once that meme becomes tired and tediously repeated, will we tear a new asshole in spacetime?
    I agree with C-Octothorpe on this!
  • Shea (unregistered)

    Hmmm... $2.1 billion dollars each?

    I'll take three.

  • panvicka (unregistered)

    hehe i love the amazon page, i would be so confused lol

  • Zunesis (reverting to original form) (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    SQLDave:
    Which raises the question "Is tedious repetition of tired memes" itself a meme? And if so, once that meme becomes tired and tediously repeated, will we tear a new asshole in spacetime?
    No, that's zunesis's job.
    Thank you for thinking of me. I'm pleased to see I've been assimilated into you and you will be able to carry on my legacy.

    Now that I've gotten to you, we can be together forever.

  • Anon (unregistered)

    There are 26k google results for that number, 1,57...=22/14-142857/999999*10^15 What's going on?

  • Axel (unregistered)
    1. Do
    2. Doo
    3. Due
    4. Dew

    Which best describes the writing on this site? If you said "number 2," you are right. On multiple levels.

Leave a comment on “Rock &amp;#8216;n' Bowl Champion”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

Log Out

« Return to Article