• (disco) in reply to HardwareGeek
    HardwareGeek:
    Actually, my intended implication was that the problem is using Firefox; the version number wasn't really relevant other than, perhaps, ridiculing the superultrahyperinflation.
    My misunderstanding. I thought you were pointing out that 42 is going to be the number for the next release and that I may be seeing things differently as a result of running a development build instead of a production build.

    As for Firefox itself being a problem? I hope nobody believes that their rendering engine is perfect, because there's no such thing. But in this specific case, I would say it's doing the right thing. Even though you could argue that it's wrong to change fonts to one not requested by the page and not configured in the browser's settings, I think most people would prefer to see the intended glyph instead of a rectangle. But "most people" is certainly not "everybody".

    The only potential bug I can think of would be that FF appears to be rendering the glyph with Segoe, when it could have used Arial Unicode - which would be more logical, given the fact that the CSS lists Arial as the second-choice font for the page and the page's encoding is UTF-8.

  • (disco) in reply to David_C
    David_C:
    As for Firefox itself being a problem?

    Yes. Yes, it is. (You may have noticed that poking fun at browsers other than one's personal preference is a common source of amusement around here, albeit one that generally involves less vitriol than, say, OS preferences. Especially since Discourse seems to do everything it possibly can to break differently on every platform.)

  • (disco) in reply to HardwareGeek
    HardwareGeek:
    Especially since Discourse seems to do everything it possibly can to break differently on every platform.

    You just have to remember that certain developers regard not being them as Doing It Wrong.

    I'm waiting for someone to ask for a usable version on the iWatch. The sheer coolness is bound to overcome the desire to banhammer anyone reporting issues…

  • (disco) in reply to dkf
    dkf:
    usable version

    Did you just ask....

    [image]
    dkf:
    on the iWatch.
    [image]

    #NO

  • (disco) in reply to accalia

    Precisely. Can you imagine @end wanting to not have a business reason for owning an iWatch? :smile:

  • (disco) in reply to accalia

    Anyone here used Android Wear? Didn't it come out months before iWatch?

  • (disco) in reply to LB_

    I have an Android Wear watch. The LG Watch Urbane. I'm pretty happy with it. I would not recommend DiscHorse usage on it, but it does smartwatch things well.

  • (disco) in reply to Fox

    I've got one of these. It tells me the time. It needs no batteries. It needs no winding. http://image.rakuten.co.jp/watch-salva/cabinet/fasion02/aaa56316121.jpg?_ex=128x128

  • (disco) in reply to tufty

    It doesn't feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop, ever, until you are dead.

  • (disco) in reply to hungrier

    … or take it off for 48 hours.

  • (disco) in reply to tufty

    All I see is a broken image link. So I guess that's cool?

  • (disco) in reply to tufty
    tufty:
    It needs no batteries. It needs no winding.

    Self winding watches.... how do they fxxing work?

  • (disco) in reply to tufty

    No batteries? Really? I thought that most watches had at least a single button cell. Mine even has a backlight button for when it's dark and I can't see it. Then again, I've never had to replace the battery...

  • (disco) in reply to LB_

    There exist watches that are so well made that the movement of your arms in normal situations are enough to "charge" it to keep ticking all day.

    Disclaimer: I have not worn a watch since getting a mobile phone around the turn of the century.

  • (disco) in reply to accalia
    accalia:
    Self winding watches.... how do they fxxing work?
    There's a weighted part in there (sort of like a pendulum, but it rotates around the central axis of the watch) that moves in response to your wrist-motion. It winds the spring whenever your wrist moves while wearing it. See also How Stuff Works and Wikipedia.

    My watch (a Citizen EcoDrive) is battery powered, but it has a solar cell under the face, so it will keep running as long as it is exposed to light. It takes several months of complete darkness to make it stop. A few hours in bright sun can fully charge it from a completely-drained state. Ambient indoor light is sufficient to charge it and keep it charged under normal circumstances.

  • (disco) in reply to David_C
    David_C:
    moves in response to your wrist-motion. It winds the spring whenever your wrist moves while wearing it.

    I take it these self-winding watches are all men's then?

  • (disco) in reply to obeselymorbid

    Oh! Oh! :giggity: Engine responded!


    Filed under: Next level of detection has been reached!

  • (disco) in reply to accalia

    They work really well, actually, although like all mechanicals they aren't as accurate as a quartz motion. Mine loses maybe 3 minutes a month, which I consider alright. The mechanism has been pretty much explained below.

    TRWTF, though is this.

    My watch has a glass back, so you can see the mechanism working. Or you would be able to, if you had eyes in your wrist.

    [spoiler][image][/spoiler]

    Works pretty well for me, as some metal-backed watches bring me out in a rash, but seriously. What were they smoking when they came up with that idea?

  • (disco) in reply to Tsaukpaetra
    Tsaukpaetra:
    :giggity: Engine

    Did I acquire such reputation already?

  • (disco) in reply to tufty
    tufty:
    you can see the mechanism working

    It's clearly a cool feature to have that no one ever uses seriously but still might be influenced by when choosing a product to buy.

  • (disco) in reply to obeselymorbid

    The :giggity: Engine is my own device, helping me recognize such language that could be considered (at least in part) sexual in some way.

    Not sure if you want it, most people apparentapparentlyapparent apparently don't,

  • (disco) in reply to Tsaukpaetra
    Tsaukpaetra:
    (at least in part) sexual in some way.

    Everything can be sexual in some way if you try hard enough to see it that way.

    Tsaukpaetra:
    apparentapparentlyapparent apparently

    Pause for a moment and type with both hands on the keyboard, damn it.

  • (disco) in reply to obeselymorbid
    obeselymorbid:
    Everything can be sexual in some way if you try hard enough to see it that way.
    Exactly! So on goes the training. I'm getting better!
    obeselymorbid:
    Pause for a moment and type with both hands on the keyboard, damn it.
    I'm on Chrome Beta, which the most recent build buildz the keyboards autocorrect (again), typing this on my back in bed, i van't be arsed to be accurate right now...

    (autocorrect disabled for reasonreasonreasonreasons)

  • (disco) in reply to Tsaukpaetra
    Tsaukpaetra:
    Chrome Beta

    :giggity:

  • (disco) in reply to tufty
    tufty:
    My watch has a glass back, so you can see the mechanism working. Or you would be able to, if you had eyes in your wrist.

    The other good thing about a glass back is that it shouldn't irritate your skin. Most people (:wave:) are fine with stainless steel, but some people aren't.

  • (disco) in reply to tufty
    tufty:
    What were they smoking when they came up with that idea

    It's smoked glass, duh!


    Edit: When I first saw that pic, it wasn't fully loaded and actually looked like viewed through smoked glass. Now I see it clearly and would like to delete this post if it wasn't for the likes.

  • (disco) in reply to obeselymorbid
    obeselymorbid:
    Everything can be sexual in some way if you try hard enough to see it that way.
    ♫ When correctly viewed, Everything is lewd. I can tell you things about Peter Pan And the Wizard of Oz - there's a dirty old man! ♫

    -- Smut, by Tom Lehrer

  • (disco) in reply to obeselymorbid
    obeselymorbid:
    I take it these self-winding watches are all men's then?
    Nope
  • (disco) in reply to David_C

    They don't need to be.

    https://youtu.be/D9qOUDHgzpM?t=17s

  • (disco) in reply to tufty

    Needs no winding

    Stops working if not used in 48 hours

    One of these statements is wrong. Methinks it's the first one.

  • (disco) in reply to dkf

    Who wears a fucking watch?

    The key to life is:

    1. You don't need to know what time it is TO THE SECOND at a moment's notice, it's ok if you're a minute or two off in either direction, CALM THE FUCK DOWN CLOCKWATCHER

    2. Your cellphone keeps track of the time

    If you wear a watch, you have not perfected slack.

  • (disco) in reply to blakeyrat
    blakeyrat:
    CLOCKWATCHER

    :giggity: Engine indicates that this should be "COCKWATCHER".

  • (disco) in reply to blakeyrat

    :wave:

    Do I actually look at it often? Nah. Also, I'm pretty sure it's more slack to look at your wrist than to pull your phone out of your pocket and wait for the screen to come on.

  • (disco) in reply to blakeyrat

    Smartwatches can be useful, though.

    1. They show notifications from your phone, so you don't have to take your phone out of your pocket to see that it's just an email confirming that you just used a card to buy a sandwich for lunch, and you can look at your watch during a meeting much more discreetly than your phone
    2. They let you respond in some fashion to many notifications, further saving you time and effort
    3. They have some decent apps
    4. ebook speed reader
    5. foreign language flash cards
    6. Google Maps, at least for Android Wear, which lets you keep track of directions without having to deal with your phone
    7. remote phone camera control
    8. biometrics tracking
  • (disco) in reply to JazzyJosh
    JazzyJosh:
    Do I actually look at it often? Nah.

    Doesn't matter. If you wear one, you're suit and tie lawyer man. It's actually illegal to wear a watch without at least TWO pairs of wrinkle-free Dockers on.

    JazzyJosh:
    Also, I'm pretty sure it's more slack to look at your wrist than to pull your phone out of your pocket and wait for the screen to come on.

    The point is: stop checking the time. THAT IS THE TRUE SLACK.

    Also buy a better phone with a tilt sensor where the screen lights up as soon as you move it. Your phone purchasing is TOO slack. There is a perfect level of slack.

  • (disco) in reply to blakeyrat

    Waiting for the Droid Turbo 2 to come out so the Droid Turbo prices on swappa drop I think.

  • (disco) in reply to Fox
    Fox:
    Smartwatches can be useful, though.

    For assholes.

    Fox:
    biometrics tracking

    Do they have any apps that cater specifically to gay foxes who wear bras?

  • (disco) in reply to David_C
    David_C:
    Nope

    whoosh?

    How will women accumulate enough wrist action to wind the clock?

  • (disco) in reply to obeselymorbid
    obeselymorbid:
    How will women accumulate enough wrist action to wind the clock?
    Women wank as well.
  • (disco) in reply to blakeyrat
    blakeyrat:
    Who wears a fucking watch?

    It has become more of a status symbol. Though occasionally I use it for its intended purpose - for example, during a boring meeting it's less apparent to slightly bend your hand instead of reaching for the phone in your pocket while yawning.

  • (disco) in reply to tufty
    tufty:

    Women wank as well.

    I was under impression it involves way less wrist action, though upon further consideration, it might be enough hand movement for the watch.

  • (disco) in reply to blakeyrat
    blakeyrat:
    2) Your cellphone keeps track of the time

    Unless you use Discourse on your cellphone, in which case the battery is dead by like noon and you don't know when you can fuck off work without raising suspicion.

  • (disco) in reply to blakeyrat

    If you have a cellphone, you have not perfected slack.

  • (disco) in reply to obeselymorbid

    I just bring a gavel and call recess.

  • (disco) in reply to tufty
    tufty:
    If you have a cellphone, you have not perfected slack.

    This is true.

  • (disco) in reply to Fox
    Fox:
    Smartwatches can be useful, though.

    You have failed to identify the main reason for having a smartwatch.

    1. Receiving a video call on a smartwatch will let you pretend to be Dick Tracy.

    There really isn't any other argument there that makes as much sense.

  • (disco) in reply to dkf

    I don't know of any smartwatches with a camera, actually

Leave a comment on “For Quality Assurance Purposes”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

« Return to Article