| « Prev | Page 1 | Next » |
|
Bahahaha. I wonder if he ever realised how pointless it was. He
could've maybe given it a bit more of a descriptive name, like HOW_MANY_PEOPLE_WILL_EVER_BE_INVOLVED_IN_MY_SEX_LIFE. He truly has yet to figure out the purpose of naming constants. |
|
rofl at the code, not the previous joke. Good one.
|
|
Reminded me of this snippet from Code Complete: "When naming constants, name the abstract entity the constant represents rather than the number the constant refers to. FIVE is a bad name for a constant (regardless of whether the value it represents is 5.0). CYCLES_NEEDED is a good name. CYCLES_NEEDED can equal 5.0 or 6.0. FIVE = 6.0 would be ridiculous. By the same token, BAKERS_DOZEN is a poor constant name; DONUTS_MAX is a good constant name." |
|
I agree with seizethedave- ONE is
a bad choice of names. I would have gone with VALID_DB_STATE or something. It's not bad to use constants for return values ect. |
|
Exactly the kind of insight I would expect from a Wahoo.
On a lighter note, I'd just like to point out that maybe we're wrong to criticise this code without more context. Perhaps ONE is an acronym for a state that just happens to be encoded as the number 1. It could stand for "Object Normally Entered", or any number of perfectly acceptable phrases. |
|
I think the author of the code was doing a good job at being a defensive programmer. If the value of 1 ever changed, he would only need to fix the code in one place. Excellent foresight!
|
|
That’s no excuse, is ONE actually meant something, it should
|
|
Sorry for the oh-so-lame joke. Acronym or not, it really shouldn't be
named that. Like stated, should be like VALID_DB_STATE or DB_OPEN. Something worth looking at. |
|
Yep, my first boss was a fan of defining constants like ONE and ZERO. I
believe her reasoning was along the lines of: "Well, if people see a '1' or a '0' in code, they might think it's a magic number; but if they see 'ONE' or 'ZERO' they know that's what the coder really meant." Riiiight. I could publish my own WTF based on some of the other programming pearls this person tried to teach me... |
|
MIT Kerberos Version 4 (from the early 90's) had a global constant "ONE" with a value of 1, which eventually became:
to fix the namespace pollution (and from there, went away altogether as HOST_BYTE_ORDER became a configuration test - the last two releases of Kerberos v4 had a *lot* of code-level improvements...) The trick was that you could tell the byte order, if the 1 ended up in the first byte it was one way, if it didn't, it was the other way, and if you had a PDP 11/23 with "middle endian" support in your C (longs composed the "other" way from the bytes in the short halves) we laughed at you.
|
|
Well, this Perl module says ONE => 'one' so I'm not sure who to believe. If two programs say they're Jesus, one of them must be wrong. http://search.cpan.org/src/ABW/XML-Schema-0.07/lib/XML/Schema/Constants.pm
|
|
This is awesome! When we finally ditch that arabic system and revert to Roman Numerals, this guy will be ready !
|
|
Of course, there are situations where ONE as a constant might make sense:
Enum PersonalPronouns ONE = 1 I WE I_AND_I End Enum |
That won't work unless you add: Const ROYAL_WE = PersonalPronouns.I |
|
Despite himself, this guy managed to do some good - when somebody competant comes along to actually replace the magic numbers, grepping for "ONE" will be a lot more informative than grepping for "1". (It's JoeNotCharles, but I can't be arsed to find the login button right now - why isn't there one right on the reply form?) |
|
I think there is a logon button on the Reply page. Should be the one in the top-right. Do you like VB a lot, btw? [6]
Actually, if someone is going to replace the magic numbers, he could get confused when he finds ONEHUNDRED or ONETHOUSAND too. [:P] |
Yes! I simply love inputing "FiftySixMillionThreeHundredAndSeventyEightThousandFourHundredAndTwentySixDollars". Sure beats typing out the digits. Intellisense for that would be nice..... |
|
Well, this isn't really a magic number, but a clever co-worker of mine
once thought he could fake a stylesheet in a cold fusion application using the following: application.font.black = "black"; application.font.white = "white"; and then littering the html pages with: <font color="<cfoutput>application.font.black</cfoutput>"> WTF. I think he sells insurance these days... |
|
That's a bit like naming yourself anonymous so that no-one can identify you.
A Poster. |
|
|
| « Prev | Page 1 | Next » |