Comment On Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

The Fully Automated Manual System was originally published on September 22, 2006 [expand full text]
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2Next »

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 09:14 • by Mike (unregistered)
My manual automatic system has posted this comment FRIST!

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 09:15 • by Peter E. d'Anne-trey (unregistered)
Please write FRIST on your screens manually. Thankyou

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 09:20 • by javabeats (unregistered)
So typical and so true.

CAPTCHA: appellatio - quite appropriate!

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 09:22 • by Incredulous (unregistered)
I'm glad that this message board has a fully automated manual system to resolve errors. I find it ironic that my first attempt to post today came back with:

"An Error Occured

Not sure what it was, but it was logged. A human will eventually look at it. If the problem persists, please Contact Us. If the problem is on the contact form, then ... well ... that pretty much sucks. You can email instead: alexp-at-WorseThanFailure.com.
"

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 09:24 • by highphilosopher (unregistered)
Why does no one trust developers? Seriously we could have taken over long ago, but we're all nicer than that.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 09:26 • by The_Assimilator (unregistered)
288734 in reply to 288733
More to the point, why do the incompetents end up in management positions instead of being fired like they deserve?

In this case, the CTO deserved to be fired out of a cannon.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 09:30 • by md5sum
Sounds like a membership web site I was required to build once... People filled out their membership information, which got emailed to a sales agent. The sales agents then manually entered the information into the CRM system and ran the credit cards from the CRM using a plugin developed by our department. They didn't want the website authorizing or charging the member's cards. Then I got a continuous stream of "error reports" from the sales agents when people entered their credit card numbers, expiration dates, and CVV numbers incorrectly.

Just makes no good sense why people would want or accept a half of a solution.

~md5sum~

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 09:36 • by dpm
I am still waiting for the CTO to explain why the newly-hired data entry clerks are more trustworthy than the established development employees.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 09:40 • by Frank (unregistered)
288737 in reply to 288733
highphilosopher:
Why does no one trust developers? Seriously we could have taken over long ago, but we're all nicer than that.


SOMEONE created, or "developed", the viruses and malware out there... So none of us are to be trusted.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 09:48 • by Anonymous (unregistered)
Ah yes, I remember this one well. I don't really have anything new to say about it, I just want to feel involved.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 09:53 • by Beaker (unregistered)
288739 in reply to 288737
Frank:
highphilosopher:
Why does no one trust developers? Seriously we could have taken over long ago, but we're all nicer than that.


SOMEONE created, or "developed", the viruses and malware out there... So none of us are to be trusted.


Nonsense. That's like saying that SOMEONE created all the biological viruses and microbial nasties out there ; ).

Captcha: damnum. My damnum hand don't have no feeling in it.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 09:54 • by Kiss me I'm Polish
How do you fire your manager? I'd use some of that knowledge right now.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 09:56 • by !? (unregistered)
288741 in reply to 288733
highphilosopher:
Why does no one trust developers? Seriously we could have taken over long ago, but we're all nicer than that.

Well, the CTO, which was formerly a developer, did take over.
And then he became a manager.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 10:10 • by Filo Pastry (unregistered)
Hey, this is a case where automation actually creates jobs.

It gives me a warm feeling inside.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 10:12 • by eViLegion (unregistered)
288745 in reply to 288738
Yeah... I'd sooner just not have any WTF for the day than getting an old one. It gets my hopes up that some new juicy article has been posted, and then dashes them when I realise.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 10:14 • by Manuel Labór (unregistered)
"the (mostly implemented) technical details of the new payroll system managed to reach the CTO"

TRWTF is the project plan. Either the CTO needs to sign it off or he doesn't. If he does, get his sign-off before starting implementation.



---
2nd post attempt

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 10:18 • by pitchingchris
288747 in reply to 288740
Kiss me I'm Polish:
How do you fire your manager? I'd use some of that knowledge right now.


I'd venture to say that if you manage to get this done, you'll be on the way out the door with him in more than half the cases.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 10:41 • by Ker-Duh! (unregistered)
288748 in reply to 288734
The_Assimilator:
More to the point, why do the incompetents end up in management positions instead of being fired like they deserve?

In this case, the CTO deserved to be fired out of a cannon.


I truely believe that it is because of the peter principal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Principle

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 10:44 • by rt (unregistered)
Maybe he feared the developers would forget some mundane detail... like a decimal point.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 10:56 • by ih8u (unregistered)
288751 in reply to 288745
eViLegion:
Yeah... I'd sooner just not have any WTF for the day than getting an old one. It gets my hopes up that some new juicy article has been posted, and then dashes them when I realise.


What the dailywtf needs is a simple CGI param "&user=wuss".

You could have it in there automatically when you log in or, just add it to your bookmark (if you're an anonymous dork like me).

Then Classics would not show up. Posts containing "First", "FRIST", or anything similar could be hidden (unless they were whining about a "FRIST" post). Articles which have minor typos would not show up. Articles and posts with questionable or imperfect grammar would be hidden.

Then this free website could pander to your special needs.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 11:05 • by Zapp Brannigan (unregistered)
288753 in reply to 288736
dpm:
I am still waiting for the CTO to explain why the newly-hired data entry clerks are more trustworthy than the established development employees.
They probably didn't even high data entry clerks. At a company I used to work for we used prison labor or out sourced to Eastern Europe data entry.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 11:06 • by SarahE
288754 in reply to 288748
Ker-Duh!:
The_Assimilator:
More to the point, why do the incompetents end up in management positions instead of being fired like they deserve?

In this case, the CTO deserved to be fired out of a cannon.


I truely believe that it is because of the peter principal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Principle

In this case, I don't think it's the Peter Principle, as that would imply that he was competent as a developer... obviously not true here.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 11:12 • by codeReign
288755 in reply to 288737
Frank:
highphilosopher:
Why does no one trust developers? Seriously we could have taken over long ago, but we're all nicer than that.


SOMEONE created, or "developed", the viruses and malware out there... So none of us are to be trusted.

Hey! Don't try blaming this on me. I was just bored...
LOL, sadly I've only made one useful program and it is consider malicious despite legitimately trying to make something useful.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 11:15 • by Peter Principle (unregistered)
288756 in reply to 288754
SarahE:
Ker-Duh!:
The_Assimilator:
More to the point, why do the incompetents end up in management positions instead of being fired like they deserve?

In this case, the CTO deserved to be fired out of a cannon.


I truely believe that it is because of the peter principal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Principle

In this case, I don't think it's the Peter Principle, as that would imply that he was competent as a developer... obviously not true here.
What, no wooden table?

I smell shenanigans...

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 11:19 • by Ozz (unregistered)
288757 in reply to 288735
md5sum:
...People filled out their membership information, which got emailed to a sales agent. The sales agents then manually entered the information into the CRM system and ran the credit cards from the CRM using a plugin developed by our department. They didn't want the website authorizing or charging the member's cards. Then I got a continuous stream of "error reports" from the sales agents when people entered their credit card numbers, expiration dates, and CVV numbers incorrectly.
Man I hope this is not still in use, seeing as it is one big PCI-DSS violation...

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 11:20 • by Ozz (unregistered)
288758 in reply to 288755
codeReign:
LOL, sadly I've only made one useful program and it is consider malicious despite legitimately trying to make something useful.
Don't tell me - you made Windows?

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 11:21 • by configurator (unregistered)
... a digit or two transposed ...


How can a single digit be transposed?

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 11:26 • by Anon (unregistered)
I want to kill that CTO - right after I've killed those "FRIST!" people.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 11:28 • by Ken B (unregistered)
Reminds me somewhat of when our small company was bought by a mid-sized department of a big subsidiary of a huge Fortune 500 company.

For whatever reason, the payroll information was transferred manually to the new company's system. Somehow, numerous people's SSNs had the last four digits replaced with the last four digits of their phone number. (Everyone was picturing punch cards with things on the wrong columns. We probably weren't far off, given the large Fortune 500 IT department mindset.)

This was first noticed when people started going to the doctor, and having their insurance rejected as "not covered". Now, the person in charge of payroll/insurance/etc. was the boss' daughter. (Her information was, of course, correct.) Her position was "well, just pay the [several hundred dollar] doctor bills, and get reimbursed once we straighten things out". This went on for many weeks. (She had no desire or motivation to actually fix it. After all, she didn't have a problem.)

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 11:32 • by Ken B (unregistered)
288762 in reply to 288756
Peter Principle:
What, no wooden table?

I smell shenanigans...
That's what happened at the other side...

They received the fax. Then, because of the "all curled up thermal paper" used, they laid them on a [wooden] table, took pictures of them, scanned in the photos, and printed them out on their color laser printer, which used nice sturdy 60-pound paper, which laid nice and flat for the data entry operators.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 12:10 • by WiseSage (unregistered)
288764 in reply to 288759
If you had your Microsoft-Certified Visual Basic 4.0 Expert certificate from the mid '90s you would know how to do that.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 12:19 • by md5sum
288765 in reply to 288757
Ozz:
md5sum:
...People filled out their membership information, which got emailed to a sales agent. The sales agents then manually entered the information into the CRM system and ran the credit cards from the CRM using a plugin developed by our department. They didn't want the website authorizing or charging the member's cards. Then I got a continuous stream of "error reports" from the sales agents when people entered their credit card numbers, expiration dates, and CVV numbers incorrectly.
Man I hope this is not still in use, seeing as it is one big PCI-DSS violation...


Last night I talked to one of the developers that still works there, and they're re-vamping the system, but as far as I know, they're still using the same method of getting the information from the customer to the final destination. Funny thing is, the "Solutions Architect" (for that company this means "the entry level developer who makes you do stupid stuff because he thinks it's the right way to go about it") there didn't have any complaints about it. According to him, he used to work as a developer for some big bank somewhere on a service that ran over a million transactions per day... Makes one wonder if people check references at all.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 12:21 • by Mason Wheeler (unregistered)
288766 in reply to 288733
I'm sorry, but the existence of DRM disproves your thesis.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 12:22 • by Mason Wheeler (unregistered)
288767 in reply to 288733
highphilosopher:
Why does no one trust developers? Seriously we could have taken over long ago, but we're all nicer than that.


I'm sorry, but the existence of DRM disproves your thesis.

(Second post attempt. Let's see if the "quote" feature actually works this time.)

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 12:29 • by Hans (unregistered)
288768 in reply to 288733
highphilosopher:
Why does no one trust developers? Seriously we could have taken over long ago, but we're all nicer than that.


Dear sir,

Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 12:33 • by Shuryno (unregistered)
288769 in reply to 288744
Filo Pastry:
Hey, this is a case where automation actually creates jobs.

It gives me a warm feeling inside.


I agree, we should all be thankful for this great visionary. We need more of them...

Instead of having a couple of dev , build a system in a year or so, he allows 6 data entry clerk to have a job indefinitely. PURE GENIUS!

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 12:44 • by Marc B (unregistered)
288771 in reply to 288767
Mason Wheeler:
highphilosopher:
Why does no one trust developers? Seriously we could have taken over long ago, but we're all nicer than that.


I'm sorry, but the existence of DRM disproves your thesis.

(Second post attempt. Let's see if the "quote" feature actually works this time.)


I think I've figured out what's wrong with the posting system. Every time someone submits a comment, poor Alex has to print out the comment, put the printout on a wooden table, photograph it and then re-enter the comment into the database (it's the best way to prevent SQL injections).

Obviously, Alex has been busy with other things (that's why where getting reruns), some of the submits are getting lost.

I can only hope this one gets through!

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 12:58 • by Matt (unregistered)
288773 in reply to 288744
Filo Pastry:
Hey, this is a case where automation actually creates jobs.

It gives me a warm feeling inside.


The same way if we all transported cargo by human instead of trains, planes, and automobiles, we'd have TONS more people working.

It was sometime during the steam engine days that someone did an analysis of the work saved by industrialization versus the total labor capacity of the humans on the planet. As far back as that time, machines were already doing more than people could do if all machines were removed and work returned to human hands.

The CTO's solution creates jobs the same way ARRA is creating jobs. Make-work programs are a mis-allocation of resources. But hey, maybe being paid to dig holes in the street, then fill them in again might be better than life in a cubicle. Hmmm.....

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 13:01 • by Outtascope (unregistered)
288774 in reply to 288759
configurator:
... a digit or two transposed ...


How can a single digit be transposed?


Perhaps:

$2372.89 -> $92372.8

I could do with that kind of transposition (though with my luck it would be the week that they decide to start rounding paychecks to the nearest 10 dollars).

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 13:12 • by BSDman (unregistered)
288776 in reply to 288749
Damn! I always do that!

Nice OS reference

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 13:13 • by ContraCorners
288777 in reply to 288751
ih8u:
eViLegion:
Yeah... I'd sooner just not have any WTF for the day than getting an old one. It gets my hopes up that some new juicy article has been posted, and then dashes them when I realise.


What the dailywtf needs is a simple CGI param "&user=wuss".

You could have it in there automatically when you log in or, just add it to your bookmark (if you're an anonymous dork like me).

Then Classics would not show up. Posts containing "First", "FRIST", or anything similar could be hidden (unless they were whining about a "FRIST" post). Articles which have minor typos would not show up. Articles and posts with questionable or imperfect grammar would be hidden.

Then this free website could pander to your special needs.

Of course, it would also be a blank page, but that's another matter.

3nd try...

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 14:01 • by Dan (unregistered)
288782 in reply to 288773
Matt:
Filo Pastry:
Hey, this is a case where automation actually creates jobs.

It gives me a warm feeling inside.


The same way if we all transported cargo by human instead of trains, planes, and automobiles, we'd have TONS more people working.

It was sometime during the steam engine days that someone did an analysis of the work saved by industrialization versus the total labor capacity of the humans on the planet. As far back as that time, machines were already doing more than people could do if all machines were removed and work returned to human hands.

The CTO's solution creates jobs the same way ARRA is creating jobs. Make-work programs are a mis-allocation of resources. But hey, maybe being paid to dig holes in the street, then fill them in again might be better than life in a cubicle. Hmmm.....


Certainly more exercise. Maybe it would help me lose that spare tire...

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 15:12 • by Junkie

Re: The Fully Automated Manual System
2006-09-25 18:44 • by mratzloff 93088 in reply to 92956
Reply Quote

Anonymous:
Anonymous:
Is there a site for code wtfs? This is boring.



you're boring!

Yeah, and you're a towel!



This Fully Automated Manual System comment was originally published on September 25, 2006 :P

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 15:54 • by jmucchiello
288787 in reply to 288782
Dan:
Certainly more exercise. Maybe it would help me lose that spare tire...


No, you'll need the spare tire when you get a flat driving over a ditch that wasn't properly filled back in.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 16:33 • by John C. Random (unregistered)
288790 in reply to 288740
Kiss me I'm Polish:
How do you fire your manager? I'd use some of that knowledge right now.


By quitting

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 17:19 • by SK (unregistered)
288794 in reply to 288787
jmucchiello:
Dan:
Certainly more exercise. Maybe it would help me lose that spare tire...


No, you'll need the spare tire when you get a flat driving over a ditch that wasn't properly filled back in.


We obviously need to automate that. I know a CTO who can do that but it's gonna require hiring a lot of people.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 18:30 • by Dan (unregistered)
288798 in reply to 288736
dpm:
I am still waiting for the CTO to explain why the newly-hired data entry clerks are more trustworthy than the established development employees.


Legally, the CTO might be completely right and the WTF might not be on his part.

I visited a recycling plant. They process a ton of paper they get from local businesses. However, they aren't allowed to directly process most of the paper those companies print because it's too legally sensitive and has to be shredded. So a third party company comes, takes the paper from the businesses, give to minimum wage people to feed to shredders and then give to the recycling plant. It's not one bit more secure that way since the paper leaves the businesses intact but the legal shredding requirement is met.

I wouldn't be really surprised if the CTO is complying with a similar brain damaged regulation.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 21:21 • by Muffassa (unregistered)
288803 in reply to 288754
Obviously. Then it's just another proof of the Dilbert's Principle.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dilbert_Principle

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 23:06 • by ysth (unregistered)
I figured out the WTF. The faxers should be adding (and the data entry clerks validating) checkdigits. It will just require buying a number of four-banger calculators and deploying them by the fax machines.

Re: Classic WTF: The Fully Automated Manual System

2009-10-22 23:55 • by MichaelWH
288806 in reply to 288740
Kiss me I'm Polish:
How do you fire your manager? I'd use some of that knowledge right now.


The best way to screw over a superior is to follow their orders to the letter.
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2Next »

Add Comment