Comment On Really Secure WPA

"I appreciate that TeamViewer gives me an option to update," writes Chris, "it's just too bad that option is 'No'." [expand full text]
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2Next »

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 09:00 • by Tester (unregistered)
This comment should always be frist.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 09:06 • by NPSF3000 (unregistered)
^ Fail.

AKISMIT!

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 09:06 • by my name (unregistered)
Are people still saying "first" in this day and age?

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 09:07 • by RuBen (unregistered)
378627 in reply to 378626
my name:
Are people still saying "first" in this day and age?


Yes or No

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 09:11 • by Val (unregistered)
Comment number 5 here.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 09:11 • by Nagesh (unregistered)
You are all being idiots.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 09:15 • by Nagesh (unregistered)
Please do not be disterbing this thread. I am coming here for insite and entertanement, not stupidity.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 09:17 • by Gymbo (unregistered)
378632 in reply to 378629
Nagesh:
You are all being idiots.


type refuting statement 1

type refuting statement 2

type refuting statement 3

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 09:39 • by OJ (unregistered)
12.7 PB, not 14

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 09:39 • by DaveK
So press the top-left button for yes or the top-right button for no. What's the problem?

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 09:55 • by portablejim
378636 in reply to 378633
OJ:
12.7 PB, not 14


It is probably a HFS plus file system (only filesystem that can store such a large file that has Windows support*)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems#Limits

* I may be wrong on this point, so if I am wrong please correct me

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 10:16 • by thatguy (unregistered)
TRWTF is WPA encryption

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 10:29 • by veggen
378639 in reply to 378630
Nagesh:
Please do not be disterbing this thread. I am coming here for insite and entertanement, not stupidity.

I actually agree with (fake) Nagesh. There.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 10:35 • by db2
378640 in reply to 378634
DaveK:
So press the top-left button for yes or the top-right button for no. What's the problem?


Or maybe the Yes and No buttons that are probably on the keypad, which conveniently isn't pictured.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 10:45 • by Steve The Cynic
378641 in reply to 378636
portablejim:
OJ:
12.7 PB, not 14


It is probably a HFS plus file system (only filesystem that can store such a large file that has Windows support*)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems#Limits

* I may be wrong on this point, so if I am wrong please correct me

You are wrong, according to your cited source. NTFS, which we hope is supported by Windows, goes up to 16EB, i.e. three orders of magnitude larger than the teen quantity of PB...

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 11:07 • by airdrik (unregistered)
378642 in reply to 378639
veggen:
Nagesh:
Please do not be disterbing this thread. I am coming here for insite and entertanement, not stupidity.

I actually agree with (fake) Nagesh. There.

Well, then I apologize in advance for disterbing this thread with this useless and uninsiteful comment

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 11:59 • by taixzo
378644 in reply to 378641
Steve The Cynic:
portablejim:
OJ:
12.7 PB, not 14


It is probably a HFS plus file system (only filesystem that can store such a large file that has Windows support*)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems#Limits

* I may be wrong on this point, so if I am wrong please correct me

You are wrong, according to your cited source. NTFS, which we hope is supported by Windows, goes up to 16EB, i.e. three orders of magnitude larger than the teen quantity of PB...


That is the limit of the file system itself; however, quoting Wikipedia:
Wikipedia:
This is the limit of the on-disk structures. The NTFS driver for Windows NT limits the volume size that it can handle to 226 TB and the file size to 16 TB respectively.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 12:08 • by Andrew (unregistered)
TRWTF is HP Quality Center. Steaming pile of shit, that. Breaks every UI accessibility rule in the past 50 years. I'd rather have rusty iron spikes be jammed into my eyeballs.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 12:11 • by Velox (unregistered)
378647 in reply to 378640
db2:
DaveK:
So press the top-left button for yes or the top-right button for no. What's the problem?


Or maybe the Yes and No buttons that are probably on the keypad, which conveniently isn't pictured.


This. This looks a lot like the Safeway gas pumps, which have a keypad on the right with yes/no buttons. The real WTF is the cropping of the picture.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 12:25 • by Someone (unregistered)
378650 in reply to 378626
my name:
Are people still saying "first" in this day and age?


No, they say 'frist'.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 12:29 • by Alex Papadumbass (unregistered)
378651 in reply to 378647
Velox:
db2:
DaveK:
So press the top-left button for yes or the top-right button for no. What's the problem?


Or maybe the Yes and No buttons that are probably on the keypad, which conveniently isn't pictured.


This. This looks a lot like the Safeway gas pumps, which have a keypad on the right with yes/no buttons. The real WTF is the cropping of the picture.


Shut the fuck up, you morons. If I have decided to publish it, then it is a WTF. I own this site and no one here is smarter than me. I get thousands of submissions per day, and I am not stupid to publish something here without reason. So write your "expert opinions" on your toilet paper and shove it up your ass.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 12:39 • by that guy (unregistered)
378652 in reply to 378647
Exactly.

(Hi Akismet)

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 12:39 • by Remy Porter (unregistered)
378653 in reply to 378651
Alex Papadumbass:
Velox:
db2:
DaveK:
So press the top-left button for yes or the top-right button for no. What's the problem?


Or maybe the Yes and No buttons that are probably on the keypad, which conveniently isn't pictured.


This. This looks a lot like the Safeway gas pumps, which have a keypad on the right with yes/no buttons. The real WTF is the cropping of the picture.


Shut the fuck up, you morons. If I have decided to publish it, then it is a WTF. I own this site and no one here is smarter than me. I get thousands of submissions per day, and I am not stupid to publish something here without reason. So write your "expert opinions" on your toilet paper and shove it up your ass.
Guys, I have some terrible news. Alex just passed while I was shoving some toilet paper up his ass.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 12:46 • by Ralph (unregistered)
Whenever you see a product that says "you need to upgrade because so-and-so did" run like hell. This is a sure sign that you are working with something from an antisocial vendor who is doing their best to lock you in to a proprietary product so they can keep sucking money from the same fools year after year.

The correct way is to establish a standard format for the information to be shared, and let multiple programs compete to see who can best work with that format. We had this, for a little while, with the web. It was based on HTML and HTTP standards but then vendors started thinking "how can I muck around with this until everyone has to use my browser only?"

Hint: "Word" is not a standard, it is a vendor's proprietary product. So saying "my document is in Word format" is like saying "I know how to make noise with my mouth without expressing anything meaningful."

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 12:47 • by Nagesh
378655 in reply to 378646
Andrew:
TRWTF is HP Quality Center. Steaming pile of shit, that. Breaks every UI accessibility rule in the past 50 years. I'd rather have rusty iron spikes be jammed into my eyeballs.


Trust me rusty iron spike hurt more. I was once climbing pipe and one rusty iron spike stick out of the wall. It pierce in my thigh and it pain like rusty iron spike in thigh.

Cannot for my life imagine one in eyeball. So to cut long story short, HP Quality center is better than rusty iron spike in any place in your body.

kthxbai.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 12:47 • by Synchronos
Re number two: Just get an image enhancer that can bitmap, to save some precious storage space.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 12:52 • by Katy Gaga (unregistered)
378657 in reply to 378655
Nagesh:
Andrew:
TRWTF is HP Quality Center. Steaming pile of shit, that. Breaks every UI accessibility rule in the past 50 years. I'd rather have rusty iron spikes be jammed into my eyeballs.


Trust me rusty iron spike hurt more. I was once climbing pipe and one rusty iron spike stick out of the wall. It pierce in my thigh and it pain like rusty iron spike in thigh.

Cannot for my life imagine one in eyeball. So to cut long story short, HP Quality center is better than rusty iron spike in any place in your body.

kthxbai.
Sure. But just barely.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 12:52 • by Nagesh (unregistered)
378658 in reply to 378653
Remy Porter:
Alex Papadumbass:
Velox:
db2:
DaveK:
So press the top-left button for yes or the top-right button for no. What's the problem?


Or maybe the Yes and No buttons that are probably on the keypad, which conveniently isn't pictured.


This. This looks a lot like the Safeway gas pumps, which have a keypad on the right with yes/no buttons. The real WTF is the cropping of the picture.


Shut the fuck up, you morons. If I have decided to publish it, then it is a WTF. I own this site and no one here is smarter than me. I get thousands of submissions per day, and I am not stupid to publish something here without reason. So write your "expert opinions" on your toilet paper and shove it up your ass.
Guys, I have some terrible news. Alex just passed awey while I was shoving some toilet paper up his ass.


FTFY
Good ridence, Alex.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 13:01 • by Wiz (unregistered)
TRWTF is HP QC.

CAPTCHA: "dignissim" because QC users have lost all dignissim.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 13:08 • by Nagesh
378661 in reply to 378653
Remy Porter:
Alex Papadumbass:
Velox:
db2:
DaveK:
So press the top-left button for yes or the top-right button for no. What's the problem?


Or maybe the Yes and No buttons that are probably on the keypad, which conveniently isn't pictured.


This. This looks a lot like the Safeway gas pumps, which have a keypad on the right with yes/no buttons. The real WTF is the cropping of the picture.


Shut the fuck up, you morons. If I have decided to publish it, then it is a WTF. I own this site and no one here is smarter than me. I get thousands of submissions per day, and I am not stupid to publish something here without reason. So write your "expert opinions" on your toilet paper and shove it up your ass.
Guys, I have some terrible news. Alex just passed while I was shoving some toilet paper up his ass.


Are you sure of qualified to give enema?

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 13:10 • by Katy Gaga (unregistered)
378662 in reply to 378658
Nagesh:
Remy Porter:
Alex Papadumbass:
Velox:
db2:
DaveK:
So press the top-left button for yes or the top-right button for no. What's the problem?


Or maybe the Yes and No buttons that are probably on the keypad, which conveniently isn't pictured.


This. This looks a lot like the Safeway gas pumps, which have a keypad on the right with yes/no buttons. The real WTF is the cropping of the picture.


Shut the fuck up, you morons. If I have decided to publish it, then it is a WTF. I own this site and no one here is smarter than me. I get thousands of submissions per day, and I am not stupid to publish something here without reason. So write your "expert opinions" on your toilet paper and shove it up your ass.
Guys, I have some terrible news. Alex just passed awey while I was shoving some toilet paper up his ass.


FTFY
Good ridence, Alex.
That, by you, is fixed? Try "away."

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 13:14 • by alegr
Bryan Slatner needs to ditch his NAS box.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 13:16 • by Nagesh (unregistered)
378664 in reply to 378662
Katy Gaga:
Nagesh:
Remy Porter:
Alex Papadumbass:
Velox:
db2:
DaveK:
So press the top-left button for yes or the top-right button for no. What's the problem?


Or maybe the Yes and No buttons that are probably on the keypad, which conveniently isn't pictured.


This. This looks a lot like the Safeway gas pumps, which have a keypad on the right with yes/no buttons. The real WTF is the cropping of the picture.


Shut the fuck up, you morons. If I have decided to publish it, then it is a WTF. I own this site and no one here is smarter than me. I get thousands of submissions per day, and I am not stupid to publish something here without reason. So write your "expert opinions" on your toilet paper and shove it up your ass.
Guys, I have some terrible news. Alex just passed away while I was shoving some toilet paper up his ass.


FTFY
Good ridence, Alex.
That, by you, is fixed? Try "away."


Tried. What now?

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 13:39 • by Jay (unregistered)
378666 in reply to 378655
Nagesh:
Andrew:
TRWTF is HP Quality Center. Steaming pile of shit, that. Breaks every UI accessibility rule in the past 50 years. I'd rather have rusty iron spikes be jammed into my eyeballs.


Trust me rusty iron spike hurt more. I was once climbing pipe and one rusty iron spike stick out of the wall. It pierce in my thigh and it pain like rusty iron spike in thigh.

Cannot for my life imagine one in eyeball. So to cut long story short, HP Quality center is better than rusty iron spike in any place in your body.

kthxbai.


I had a son who had rusty iron spikes jammed in his eyeballs once. I assure you it was no laughing matter.

Sorry, I couldn't help it on that one.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 14:03 • by Nagesh
378668 in reply to 378666
Jay:
Nagesh:
Andrew:
TRWTF is HP Quality Center. Steaming pile of shit, that. Breaks every UI accessibility rule in the past 50 years. I'd rather have rusty iron spikes be jammed into my eyeballs.


Trust me rusty iron spike hurt more. I was once climbing pipe and one rusty iron spike stick out of the wall. It pierce in my thigh and it pain like rusty iron spike in thigh.

Cannot for my life imagine one in eyeball. So to cut long story short, HP Quality center is better than rusty iron spike in any place in your body.

kthxbai.


I had a son who had rusty iron spikes jammed in his eyeballs once. I assure you it was no laughing matter.

Sorry, I couldn't help it on that one.


Rusty spike very serious. You need to take tetnus shot.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 14:29 • by nB (unregistered)
378672 in reply to 378655
Nagesh:
Andrew:
TRWTF is HP Quality Center. Steaming pile of shit, that. Breaks every UI accessibility rule in the past 50 years. I'd rather have rusty iron spikes be jammed into my eyeballs.


Trust me rusty iron spike hurt more. I was once climbing pipe and one rusty iron spike stick out of the wall. It pierce in my thigh and it pain like rusty iron spike in thigh.

Cannot for my life imagine one in eyeball. So to cut long story short, HP Quality center is better than rusty iron spike in any place in your body.

kthxbai.
I am thinking you have not used QC then... It is bad, very very bad.
My techs have to use it to report results, our test efficency dropped like a stone once they moved to QC. They take more time to put their test results into the DB than it takes them to run the damn test in the first place.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 14:41 • by Paul Neumann (unregistered)
Josh must have gotten the last ResourceBundle snapfish had in stock. I wonder if I were to purchase the last cash register at my local cash register dealer if they would sell me the one they were currently using. I would certainly expect a reasonable discount with it being a floor model and all.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 14:43 • by Paul Neumann (unregistered)
Chris has found the newest Team Viewer feature, by only showing options other users have selected it predicts future selections with 100% accuracy. This saves time and reduces confusion for all Team Viewer users.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 15:30 • by Buffalo
378676 in reply to 378646
Andrew:
TRWTF is HP Quality Center. Steaming pile of shit, that. Breaks every UI accessibility rule in the past 50 years. I'd rather have rusty iron spikes be jammed into my eyeballs.

That is precisely the sort of "quality" one would expect from something with HP in its name.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-06 15:51 • by Coyne
Don't know how the rest was determined, but the appearance of 2^16 in the middle of the WPA message ("49655368 to 971687751") suggests really creative programming.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-07 00:23 • by notchulance
378686 in reply to 378677
Just in case that "49655368 to 971687751" is not mutually inclusive, guess I'd start trying with 49655369.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-07 01:23 • by Frank (unregistered)
378688 in reply to 378653
Or do you mean passed GAS?

LOL!

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-07 02:24 • by Nagesh (unregistered)
378689 in reply to 378688
Frank:
Or do you mean passed GAS?

LOL!


You peeple laugh my English, but you also not understands English. Already told you Alex passed away. Read post above.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-07 03:26 • by Matt Westwood
378690 in reply to 378672
nB:
Nagesh:
Andrew:
TRWTF is HP Quality Center. Steaming pile of shit, that. Breaks every UI accessibility rule in the past 50 years. I'd rather have rusty iron spikes be jammed into my eyeballs.


Trust me rusty iron spike hurt more. I was once climbing pipe and one rusty iron spike stick out of the wall. It pierce in my thigh and it pain like rusty iron spike in thigh.

Cannot for my life imagine one in eyeball. So to cut long story short, HP Quality center is better than rusty iron spike in any place in your body.

kthxbai.
I am thinking you have not used QC then... It is bad, very very bad.
My techs have to use it to report results, our test efficency dropped like a stone once they moved to QC. They take more time to put their test results into the DB than it takes them to run the damn test in the first place.


How's it compare with QF-Test?

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-07 08:48 • by ¯\(°_o)/¯ I DUNNO LOL (unregistered)
378691 in reply to 378640
db2:
DaveK:
So press the top-left button for yes or the top-right button for no. What's the problem?
Or maybe the Yes and No buttons that are probably on the keypad, which conveniently isn't pictured.
The font looks exactly like the one used on Dresser-Wayne gas pumps, and "normal" ones only have two lines, so it's probably being used in compatibility mode for that screen.

But out of context it's pretty funny.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-07 10:23 • by PiisAWheeL
378693 in reply to 378655
Nagesh:
kthxbai.
Has nagesh always been coding in lolcode?

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-07 13:39 • by Tud (unregistered)
In 10 years, someone will see the iPod touch picture and think "I don't get it".

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-07 22:08 • by EnlargeThatAgainWouldya (unregistered)
I'm forced to use Quality Center on a daily basis at work.

But compared to our automation test "framework", QC looks like a masterpiece of software engineering.

Our automation test framework is on the order of 50,000 lines of VBScript.

50,000 lines of VBScript.

FIFTY THOUSAND LINES OF VEE BEE SCRIPT.

(Enlarge that again, wouldya?)

-Insert 72 pt font "FIFTY THOUSAND LINES OF VB SCRIPT"-

Written by Indians. From India.

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-08 04:37 • by nevyn (unregistered)
Woot! Software I work on is featured on TDWTF! Is that a milestone or a new low...?

Long story short, statfs and statvfs are not interchangeable...

Re: Really Secure WPA

2012-04-08 08:07 • by Don (unregistered)
378699 in reply to 378654
Ralph:

Hint: "Word" is not a standard, it is a vendor's proprietary product. So saying "my document is in Word format" is like saying "I know how to make noise with my mouth without expressing anything meaningful."

Ah, of course. Yet by saying exactly "my document is in Word format"; most intelligent - crap no, pretty much all users I've ever known in 20 years doing IT - know what product to use when opening the document. At most, you're missing the information of version but since most office platforms have compatibility patches that allow you to read Word 2010 docs natively on Word 2003; even that's not a barrier.

So in conclusion, you're essentially an idiot with too much time on your hands mate.
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2Next »

Add Comment