|
|
|
| Hurry! Enter The Daily WTF's OMGWTF2 Contest by June 28th! - Prizes! Fame! Trophies! Do your worst: http://omg2.thedailywtf.com/ |
| « Prev | Page 1 | Page 2 | Next » |
|
This comment should always be frist.
|
|
^ Fail.
AKISMIT! |
|
Are people still saying "first" in this day and age?
|
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-06 09:07
•
by
RuBen
(unregistered)
|
Yes or No |
|
Comment number 5 here.
|
|
You are all being idiots.
|
|
Please do not be disterbing this thread. I am coming here for insite and entertanement, not stupidity.
|
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-06 09:17
•
by
Gymbo
(unregistered)
|
type refuting statement 1 type refuting statement 2 type refuting statement 3 |
|
So press the top-left button for yes or the top-right button for no. What's the problem?
|
It is probably a HFS plus file system (only filesystem that can store such a large file that has Windows support*) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_file_systems#Limits * I may be wrong on this point, so if I am wrong please correct me |
|
TRWTF is WPA encryption
|
I actually agree with (fake) Nagesh. There. |
Or maybe the Yes and No buttons that are probably on the keypad, which conveniently isn't pictured. |
You are wrong, according to your cited source. NTFS, which we hope is supported by Windows, goes up to 16EB, i.e. three orders of magnitude larger than the teen quantity of PB... |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-06 11:07
•
by
airdrik
(unregistered)
|
Well, then I apologize in advance for disterbing this thread with this useless and uninsiteful comment |
That is the limit of the file system itself; however, quoting Wikipedia:
|
|
TRWTF is HP Quality Center. Steaming pile of shit, that. Breaks every UI accessibility rule in the past 50 years. I'd rather have rusty iron spikes be jammed into my eyeballs.
|
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-06 12:11
•
by
Velox
(unregistered)
|
This. This looks a lot like the Safeway gas pumps, which have a keypad on the right with yes/no buttons. The real WTF is the cropping of the picture. |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-06 12:25
•
by
Someone
(unregistered)
|
No, they say 'frist'. |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-06 12:29
•
by
Alex Papadumbass
(unregistered)
|
Shut the fuck up, you morons. If I have decided to publish it, then it is a WTF. I own this site and no one here is smarter than me. I get thousands of submissions per day, and I am not stupid to publish something here without reason. So write your "expert opinions" on your toilet paper and shove it up your ass. |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-06 12:39
•
by
that guy
(unregistered)
|
|
Exactly.
(Hi Akismet) |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-06 12:39
•
by
Remy Porter
(unregistered)
|
Guys, I have some terrible news. Alex just passed while I was shoving some toilet paper up his ass. |
|
Whenever you see a product that says "you need to upgrade because so-and-so did" run like hell. This is a sure sign that you are working with something from an antisocial vendor who is doing their best to lock you in to a proprietary product so they can keep sucking money from the same fools year after year.
The correct way is to establish a standard format for the information to be shared, and let multiple programs compete to see who can best work with that format. We had this, for a little while, with the web. It was based on HTML and HTTP standards but then vendors started thinking "how can I muck around with this until everyone has to use my browser only?" Hint: "Word" is not a standard, it is a vendor's proprietary product. So saying "my document is in Word format" is like saying "I know how to make noise with my mouth without expressing anything meaningful." |
Trust me rusty iron spike hurt more. I was once climbing pipe and one rusty iron spike stick out of the wall. It pierce in my thigh and it pain like rusty iron spike in thigh. Cannot for my life imagine one in eyeball. So to cut long story short, HP Quality center is better than rusty iron spike in any place in your body. kthxbai. |
|
Re number two: Just get an image enhancer that can bitmap, to save some precious storage space.
|
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-06 12:52
•
by
Katy Gaga
(unregistered)
|
Sure. But just barely. |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-06 12:52
•
by
Nagesh
(unregistered)
|
FTFY Good ridence, Alex. |
|
TRWTF is HP QC.
CAPTCHA: "dignissim" because QC users have lost all dignissim. |
Are you sure of qualified to give enema? |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-06 13:10
•
by
Katy Gaga
(unregistered)
|
That, by you, is fixed? Try "away." |
|
Bryan Slatner needs to ditch his NAS box.
|
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-06 13:16
•
by
Nagesh
(unregistered)
|
Tried. What now? |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-06 13:39
•
by
Jay
(unregistered)
|
I had a son who had rusty iron spikes jammed in his eyeballs once. I assure you it was no laughing matter. Sorry, I couldn't help it on that one. |
Rusty spike very serious. You need to take tetnus shot. |
I am thinking you have not used QC then... It is bad, very very bad. My techs have to use it to report results, our test efficency dropped like a stone once they moved to QC. They take more time to put their test results into the DB than it takes them to run the damn test in the first place. |
|
Josh must have gotten the last ResourceBundle snapfish had in stock. I wonder if I were to purchase the last cash register at my local cash register dealer if they would sell me the one they were currently using. I would certainly expect a reasonable discount with it being a floor model and all.
|
|
Chris has found the newest Team Viewer feature, by only showing options other users have selected it predicts future selections with 100% accuracy. This saves time and reduces confusion for all Team Viewer users.
|
That is precisely the sort of "quality" one would expect from something with HP in its name. |
|
Don't know how the rest was determined, but the appearance of 2^16 in the middle of the WPA message ("49655368 to 971687751") suggests really creative programming.
|
|
Just in case that "49655368 to 971687751" is not mutually inclusive, guess I'd start trying with 49655369.
|
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-07 01:23
•
by
Frank
(unregistered)
|
|
Or do you mean passed GAS?
LOL! |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-07 02:24
•
by
Nagesh
(unregistered)
|
You peeple laugh my English, but you also not understands English. Already told you Alex passed away. Read post above. |
How's it compare with QF-Test? |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-07 08:48
•
by
¯\(°_o)/¯ I DUNNO LOL
(unregistered)
|
The font looks exactly like the one used on Dresser-Wayne gas pumps, and "normal" ones only have two lines, so it's probably being used in compatibility mode for that screen. But out of context it's pretty funny. |
Has nagesh always been coding in lolcode? |
|
In 10 years, someone will see the iPod touch picture and think "I don't get it".
|
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-07 22:08
•
by
EnlargeThatAgainWouldya
(unregistered)
|
|
I'm forced to use Quality Center on a daily basis at work.
But compared to our automation test "framework", QC looks like a masterpiece of software engineering. Our automation test framework is on the order of 50,000 lines of VBScript. 50,000 lines of VBScript. FIFTY THOUSAND LINES OF VEE BEE SCRIPT. (Enlarge that again, wouldya?) -Insert 72 pt font "FIFTY THOUSAND LINES OF VB SCRIPT"- Written by Indians. From India. |
|
Woot! Software I work on is featured on TDWTF! Is that a milestone or a new low...?
Long story short, statfs and statvfs are not interchangeable... |
Re: Really Secure WPA
2012-04-08 08:07
•
by
Don
(unregistered)
|
Ah, of course. Yet by saying exactly "my document is in Word format"; most intelligent - crap no, pretty much all users I've ever known in 20 years doing IT - know what product to use when opening the document. At most, you're missing the information of version but since most office platforms have compatibility patches that allow you to read Word 2010 docs natively on Word 2003; even that's not a barrier. So in conclusion, you're essentially an idiot with too much time on your hands mate. |
| « Prev | Page 1 | Page 2 | Next » |