| « Prev | Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Next » |
|
the best part of this story is missing - its how they treat ken after all this crap happens. More than likely they'll shrug it off and everything will go back to normal, with Ken still barking at everybody, which seems to be the WTF, but it always happens.
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 09:08
•
by
Ceiswyn
(unregistered)
|
|
Yes, but WHAT HAPPENED NEXT?!
|
|
And then Ken found 5 dollars? Where's the rest of the?
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 09:11
•
by
Blablablaadje
(unregistered)
|
|
Missing the fun part :(
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 09:13
•
by
Dlareg
(unregistered)
|
|
Garret got a nice bonus. Plus he can now install whatever he wants.
I always make these kinds of deals, there is never any budget for bonuses and stuff. But if you do this overtime, you get a new development laptop to use at home :wink wink: or I get to order from our electronics supplier etc... (different budgets) |
|
Ken, meet Garrote.
|
|
These stories work best when you anonymise them consistently. I presume that the sentence
requires s/Ken/Garrett/ ? |
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 09:31
•
by
Uhhh
(unregistered)
|
|
The real WTF is that I read this one. It really did just seem to
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 09:32
•
by
Anonymous
(unregistered)
|
Proofreading is hard. |
|
You accidentally the whole
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 09:39
•
by
Troy
(unregistered)
|
|
THEN WHO WAS
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 09:40
•
by
amischiefr
|
Like any good book, it keeps you wanting more. You'll be stuck to this site waiting for the next release. |
|
Warning bells started ringing as soon as I saw ex-military in a software development company.
It's like hiring an ex-janitor as a surgeon. |
|
So wait, Ken was speaking in the third person?
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 09:56
•
by
Populus
(unregistered)
|
|
These ex-Navy guys are the worst. They have to have procedures and manuals for everything else they wouldn't know how to turn on a light or go to the bathroom.
|
|
There was an IT manager who wrote procedures to be followed. One day it was discovered that he didn't follow one procedure. The result was
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 10:08
•
by
someguy
(unregistered)
|
|
Or an ex-surgeon as a janitor.
They're entirely different fields, and while I'm of the general opinion that programmers are awesome enough to bring a unique and useful perspective to any situation, most job skills do not translate well. Surgeons may be really smart and really highly trained- but not at being janitors. And they'd probably be horrible at it. |
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 10:14
•
by
gpb
(unregistered)
|
|
And he would have gotten away with it if it weren't for those meddling kids?
Story FAIL |
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 10:15
•
by
meeee
(unregistered)
|
|
i guess that's standard military service behavior: before you go home, make sure to fill up with free diesel (greetings to all swiss army members hehe)
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 10:15
•
by
Luthe
(unregistered)
|
|
bah, how many programmers truly know garbage collection.
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 10:18
•
by
Anonymous
(unregistered)
|
|
Well, that sucks, but TRWTF is that people are so willing to work under shitty managers. That and the fact that the story never really
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 10:21
•
by
Garrett
(unregistered)
|
|
hey tdwtf I need your help
I accidentally the end of the story what should I do... |
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 10:23
•
by
You didn't see me right
(unregistered)
|
|
I was going to write a witty comment but
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 10:33
•
by
blah
(unregistered)
|
|
/*
|
|
Watch out for anyone named Ken.
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 10:33
•
by
Anonymous Coward
(unregistered)
|
|
To everyone complaining that the WTF is missing the end, presumably the implication is that Ken has been siphoning the diesel in the generator after every "test" and getting maintenance to top it up, essentially embezzling his car fuel costs from the business. Do you need everything spelt out for
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 10:38
•
by
Steve
(unregistered)
|
|
Well, it took me a while but I finally figured it out. What you're basically saying is that
|
|
<lemming>All you guys leaving off the ends of your sentences are really starting to </lemming>
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 10:53
•
by
Rob
(unregistered)
|
|
But that's how real life works. You don't always get the ending, so you're free to write your own.
It might be the one where Ken gets fired the next day. It might be the one where Garrett gets fired the next day. Or it might be the one where someone installs cameras without Ken's knowledge and posts the video of Ken siphoning the generator fuel on YouTube. Whichever one fits your worldview (or come up with your own)... :) |
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 10:55
•
by
Leo
(unregistered)
|
|
Garrett accidentally the whole WTF.
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 11:08
•
by
Some Guy
(unregistered)
|
|
Are we sure this guy's name wasn't Jack? As in Candleja
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 11:10
•
by
GCU Arbitrary
|
Whilst it is implied that Ken's embezzlement is discovered by the CEO and he (Ken) then spends the next five years in PMITA prison, it is by no means certain since the end of the story is |
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 11:11
•
by
Bim Job
(unregistered)
|
Well, lemmings jump off the end of a cliff, so why shouldn't they leave off the end of their? Also, fruit flies like a. What's the deal with Photo Guy's hair, anyway? I mean, I'm bald, but even I'm not desperate enough to wear an Ena Sharples hairnet circa 1963, plant my head with rag-weed, and then try to out-Chia Chia... |
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 11:11
•
by
Steve H
(unregistered)
|
|
In b4 Belair
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 11:14
•
by
Inno
(unregistered)
|
|
I'm sure Ken owns a Hummer so
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 11:14
•
by
Airhead
|
Yes, I've heard about this same thing. It was actually quite funny when |
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 11:17
•
by
Durr
(unregistered)
|
Nominating for best post all week |
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 11:17
•
by
Inno
(unregistered)
|
... he was always short on diesel. [There! Completed that for you!] |
|
> it's supposed to be topped off after every test
There's the end of the story, right there... brilliant (with two "i"s.) Like the Sixth Sense, you now have to go back and read the story from the beginning again to fully appreciate it. |
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 11:19
•
by
Joey Stink Eye Smiles
(unregistered)
|
|
I'd bet money that the janit-, uh field tech, simply didn't turn off the generator after the last test and then didn't refuel it.
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 11:26
•
by
@Deprecated
(unregistered)
|
|
It's a "Pick your own ending" book!
If you want Ken to be fired, turn to page 39. If you picked up the magic shoes in the crystal cave, turn to page 17. If you think Garrett now has a new best friend, turn to page 128. |
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 11:33
•
by
Herohtar
(unregistered)
|
*turns to page 17* |
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 11:38
•
by
anonymous coward
(unregistered)
|
|
The real WTF is that the developer even tried to use VBA while he should have warned his manager(s) that he couldn't develop if he couldnt get freaking dev tools.
This is ridiculous. |
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 11:45
•
by
Satanicpuppy
|
Yep. I just had one like that earlier this week. Stupid manager demanding high priority code changes to accommodate an upcoming product change, and they ditched the product change at the absolute last possible second, which caused untold havok with all the code which was suddenly wrong (well, not wrong, but the supply chain is set more than a week in advance, and so the stuff that's been being scheduled for the next 7 days is all wrong, and needs to be rescheduled and rushed with literally hours until production). If the course of events had been reversed, if they had gone live and my code was wrong, I would have had a bad time of it (well, I would have had lots of meetings and talks from my superiours, who, none-the-less, wouldn't have fired or reprimanded me in any meaningful way, for fear I'd snap and kill someone, or, worse, quit), but since it's someone else's fault, even though its cost thousands of dollars and hundreds of hours, it'll just get swept under the rug. Way of the world. Management is seldom held responsible for their own bad decisions. |
|
wow that is like 3 WTFs in one article
|
|
The WTF reminds me of certain episodes of "The Brady Bunch" or "Gilligan's Island" or "Three's Company" where the show ended with no story completion and then showed "to be continued...".
Except there's no "to be continued..." here. |
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 12:00
•
by
Code Dependent
|
Three words: source control rollback |
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 12:09
•
by
Code Dependent
|
Court-martialed would be more appropriate. |
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 12:22
•
by
Peter
(unregistered)
|
|
what's the procedure for installing a camera?
|
Re: Double-Standard Operating Procedures
2009-08-26 12:24
•
by
jmucchiello
|
Or in this case hiring the janitor as a field tech. |
| « Prev | Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Next » |