Comment On No Peas for Me, Thanks

Matt K., I really hope you didn't eat these. [expand full text]
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2 | Page 3Next »

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 08:02 • by ParkinT
Add post comment failed - Sorry we're hosed now.

Why wouldn't the peas last for a hundred years? Looking at the ingredients (if you read upside-down) they contain NOTHING but salt)


I am surprised B.L. did not "Add" what looks like a pair of sunglasses "to Dictionary" !

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 08:05 • by Peas (unregistered)
I guess those peas aren't young and tender anymore... they must be old and wrinkly by now.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 08:09 • by Fiona (unregistered)
The true casualty of the millennium bug.....

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 08:14 • by Clippy (unregistered)
It looks like you're about to experience an error left over from Windows 3.1. Would you like to:

* Upgrade to the next version of Windows, which really truly swears to be a total rewrite this time?
* Ignore this message and proceed to lose all your files?
* Install Linux

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 08:29 • by Troy (unregistered)
"So, what about this y2k problem"

"They fixed that 900 years ago!"

</1000 years in the future>

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 08:32 • by Addison (unregistered)
We had a Cobol parser once that when you printed code it showed as 1908.

As a side note the Linux kernel will roll over its date in a few hundred years. I CAN'T WAIT

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 08:35 • by Dave (unregistered)
The real wtf is the lack of 'W'

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 08:38 • by John (unregistered)
TRWTF is that the date on the peas actually reads September 19, 2009 ('09).

I mean, if it was 1901, or 1969, or something like that, then it might be a valid date parse error, but come on. It's a valid date, even if it's in an ambiguous format.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 08:44 • by amischiefr
Ok, what letter exactly is this guy trying to use? Goggles? It gives you the option to add "goggles" to the dictionary! I suggest you do this.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 08:45 • by Eric L (unregistered)
I had bought my first daughter a couple of the Microsoft Actimates dolls back in the late 90s, a barney and a DW (Arnold's sister, some little rat looking thing). my younger daughter is 4 now and she was playing with DW but the batteries were dead so we replaced them. Setting the date on it gives you a range of 1998-2007. its not even a full 4 bits those bastards.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 08:51 • by Smash King
225139 in reply to 225137
amischiefr:
Ok, what letter exactly is this guy trying to use? Goggles? It gives you the option to add "goggles" to the dictionary! I suggest you do this.
Why would he? They do nothing

Isn't this meme getting a little old?

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 08:55 • by John (unregistered)
225140 in reply to 225138
Eric L:
I had bought my first daughter a couple of the Microsoft Actimates dolls back in the late 90s, a barney and a DW (Arnold's sister, some little rat looking thing). my younger daughter is 4 now and she was playing with DW but the batteries were dead so we replaced them. Setting the date on it gives you a range of 1998-2007. its not even a full 4 bits those bastards.

TRWTF is that you were willing to have a Barney in your house. That thing would have driven me demented.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:00 • by Code Dependent
Photoshop photoshop photoshop photoshop photoshop photoshop photoshop photoshop
Mushroom mushroom

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:01 • by Walleye
225143 in reply to 225140
John:
Eric L:
I had bought my first daughter a couple of the Microsoft Actimates dolls back in the late 90s, a barney and a DW (Arnold's sister, some little rat looking thing). my younger daughter is 4 now and she was playing with DW but the batteries were dead so we replaced them. Setting the date on it gives you a range of 1998-2007. its not even a full 4 bits those bastards.

TRWTF is that you were willing to have a Barney in your house. That thing would have driven me demented.


Fortunately, it's just a short drive. Ba Da Bing. Thank you, I'll be here all week. Try the veal.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:02 • by Ryuzaki (unregistered)
OH NO, it's Y2K....time to hit the shelter again.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:04 • by Smash King
225145 in reply to 225140
John:
TRWTF is that you were willing to have a Barney in your house. That thing would have driven me demented.
Sometimes I wish I had one... I make it up with a punching bag, but punching Barney would be a lot more satisfying.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:07 • by Anders Hesselbom (unregistered)
It is good to see the old millennium bug. I have missed you. Thanks for all the work you have generated!

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:07 • by sibtrag
225148 in reply to 225132
Dave:
The real wtf is the lack of 'W'


People of a different political persuasion may argue that 'W' is the real WTF.

Also 'Y' is missing. (and 'w' and 'y')

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:08 • by DoctorFriday
225149 in reply to 225140
John:

TRWTF is that you were willing to have a Barney in your house. That thing would have driven me demented.


Actually, it could be interesting to hack: http://www.ics.uci.edu/~jpd/barney/

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:10 • by Hiding (unregistered)
225150 in reply to 225144
Ryuzaki:
OH NO, it's Y2K....time to hit the shelter again.


You hit the shelter and find all your tinned goods are a century out of date. Now what do you do?

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:21 • by Jones (unregistered)
It's not Y2K, it's September 19, '09 (as in 09-19-2009)

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:24 • by Bob (unregistered)
225154 in reply to 225131
Addison:
As a side note the Linux kernel will roll over its date in a few hundred years.


Do you mean 29 years?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_Problem

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:31 • by bobzilla
No one has commented yet on the fact that the peas say "Publix Young & Tender". And now they have. Try and bring the comments out of the gutters now. MWHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:32 • by Lyle (unregistered)
225156 in reply to 225150
Hiding:
You hit the shelter and find all your tinned goods are a century out of date. Now what do you do?

Who cares, the shelter is now full of brain starved zombies. Now what do you do?

validus

2008-10-28 09:33 • by Anonymous (unregistered)
> err 0xc0000013
# for hex 0xc0000013 / decimal -1073741805
STATUS_NO_MEDIA_IN_DEVICE ntstatus.h
# {No Disk}
# There is no disk in the drive.
# Please insert a disk into drive %hs.
USBD_STATUS_DATA_BUFFER_ERROR usb.h
# as an HRESULT: Severity: FAILURE (1), FACILITY_NULL (0x0), Code 0x13
# for hex 0x13 / decimal 19
ERROR_WRITE_PROTECT winerror.h
# The media is write protected.
# 3 matches found for "0xc0000013"

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:33 • by bobzilla
Also, there must be a lot of Cholesterol because it says "OMG". :-)

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:34 • by Karl von L. (unregistered)
225159 in reply to 225152
Jones:
It's not Y2K, it's September 19, '09 (as in 09-19-2009)


TRWTF is that in this day and age they can't print nicely formatted, unambiguous dates on food packages. Is "Sept. 19, 2009" really rocket science?

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:38 • by Mhendren
225161 in reply to 225132
Dave:
The real wtf is the lack of 'W'


Obviously goggles sperm to the Cth power couldn't be "W" or "Y", that would have been a huge typo.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:40 • by dkf
225162 in reply to 225156
Lyle:
Who cares, the shelter is now full of brain starved zombies. Now what do you do?
Watch Big Brother.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:44 • by Anonymous Shopper (unregistered)
225163 in reply to 225159
Karl von L.:
TRWTF is that in this day and age they can't print nicely formatted, unambiguous dates on food packages. Is "Sept. 19, 2009" really rocket science?
TRWTF is the fact that they run a Unix program, ported to Windows NT, hacked together by a bunch of Perl scripts, written by people who only know VB6. Come to think of it, there were a lot of WTFs there.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:49 • by MMSS (unregistered)
looks like he was using Inuktitut
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inuktitut_syllabics

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 09:53 • by Anonymous Coward (unregistered)
225165 in reply to 225154
If you run 64bit linux you are all right AFAIK

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:04 • by Fred (unregistered)
More likely is that they missed the space between 19 and 09.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:07 • by Johnny Awkward (unregistered)
225169 in reply to 225121
ParkinT:
Looking at the ingredients (if you read upside-down) they contain NOTHING but salt)


Are you looking upside-down a something else? I don't see any ingredients list.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:09 • by PBSkid (unregistered)
225170 in reply to 225138
Arthur, not Arnold.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:09 • by EFH (unregistered)
225171 in reply to 225147
In case you'e not jokingL I'm purty sure that's just September 19th, 2009, without enough whitespace.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:09 • by Anonymous (unregistered)
It would probably be obvious to anybody using any normal common sense that the date on the peas is September 19, 2009. Sure, it's a somewhat ambiguous and not well formatted date but leave it to us IT folks to interpret it as a Y2K issue.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:11 • by BobB
Sell by 1909... Let me see what the Bachelor's Extended Food Stuffs Usability Date Extender chart says...
...
...
Okay, they should STILL be edible today and until 2012... We can begin to consider throwing them out around 2030...

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:11 • by snoofle
225174 in reply to 225132
Dave:
The real wtf is the lack of 'W'

Haven't we all had enough "W" to last us a lifetime?

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:15 • by shinobu
225175 in reply to 225138
Eric L:
I had bought my first daughter a couple of the Microsoft Actimates dolls back in the late 90s, a barney and a DW (Arnold's sister, some little rat looking thing). my younger daughter is 4 now and she was playing with DW but the batteries were dead so we replaced them. Setting the date on it gives you a range of 1998-2007. its not even a full 4 bits those bastards.


Did you really think you could use them forever without purchasing an update? Did you read the EULA?

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:20 • by GettinSadda
We already had the Apple one on the sidebar - 6 months ago!

http://forums.thedailywtf.com/forums/t/8439.aspx

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:30 • by SuperousOxide
225179 in reply to 225159
Karl von L.:

TRWTF is that in this day and age they can't print nicely formatted, unambiguous dates on food packages. Is "Sept. 19, 2009" really rocket science?


But their way saves 4 characters worth of ink. Multiply that by the number of bags of frozen peas...

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:35 • by buddha (unregistered)
225181 in reply to 225147
how about not the y2k bug but a spacing issue. Sept 19 09
As in next year, peas fine, k thanks.

Common sense people.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:38 • by pbean
225182 in reply to 225159
Karl von L.:
Jones:
It's not Y2K, it's September 19, '09 (as in 09-19-2009)


TRWTF is that in this day and age they can't print nicely formatted, unambiguous dates on food packages. Is "Sept. 19, 2009" really rocket science?


No rocket scientists would use SEP 1909 as well.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:41 • by pbean
225183 in reply to 225179
SuperousOxide:
Karl von L.:

TRWTF is that in this day and age they can't print nicely formatted, unambiguous dates on food packages. Is "Sept. 19, 2009" really rocket science?


But their way saves 4 characters worth of ink. Multiply that by the number of bags of frozen peas...


Yep and printing "SEP 1909" instead of "SEP 19 09" saves a whole space worth of ink. Omg, the profits!

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:43 • by JeffS
HAS ANYBODY MENTIONED THAT ITS SUPPOSED TO BE SEPT 19 2009

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:44 • by t (unregistered)
...of course, had they just written the date properly "19 Sep 09", even a lack of spaces would still give a clear, unambiguous BBdate.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:46 • by JeffS
225186 in reply to 225169
It's got 20 OMG's worth of sodium. Sounds like a lot to me.

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:49 • by Prosthetic Lips (unregistered)
225187 in reply to 225182
pbean:
No rocket scientists would use SEP 1909 as well.


I thought they would first convert to metric ... or was that imperial? Oh, just pick one and get onto the next defect.

CAPTCHA: damnum (hey, can you say that here?)

Re: No Peas for Me, Thanks

2008-10-28 10:49 • by Mii (unregistered)
The "Windows - No Disk" error is actually a virus/trojan.. you might want to run a virus scan...
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2 | Page 3Next »

Add Comment