Comment On The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

It was only 9:15 in the morning and Neal was ready to write the day off as a complete loss. Neal's day started off with him accidentally pressing the "Alarm Off" button instead of "Snooze," missing his morning workout, driving downtown through the tail-end of a traffic jam, and arriving forty-five minutes late to work. But when he stepped in the office, it was oddly vacant: Was it a company holiday? Did he miss the field trip memo? Was today actually a Saturday? "Neal," the president shouted from his corner office, interrupting Neal's workless fantasy, "get in here; come see this!" [expand full text]
« PrevPage 1 | Page 2 | Page 3Next »

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:06 • by Slepnir

You gotta give the president credit at least for (improperly) using Opera.

 

Catchpa  - "whiskey" - sounds good to me right about now

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:06 • by ParkinT

Irony, at its finest.

 

Revenge to the banner advertisers, too.

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:08 • by Rich

Heh.  Doesn't look good when the president of a company is so annoyed by his own product that he heavy-handedly blocks it.

 

captcha: zork.

ahh, Apple ][ days... 

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:13 • by Rafael Larios
107908 in reply to 107903
Oh my God!...  Talking about eating your own dog food!

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:14 • by OperaUser
107909 in reply to 107903
Where can you define blocked words in opera ? i know about blocked content (URLs, images) but not words...

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:15 • by Ben

As a network admin, I am constantly amazed at people who experience some kind of problem and it never crosses their mind they may have caused the problem.  This story sums it up perfectly.  I'm surprised he didn't find some way to blame M$.  Probably just didn't have enough time to think about it.

 Captcha:  Random...as in random acts of stupidity

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:18 • by Jeff S
107915 in reply to 107912
Anonymous:

As a network admin, I am constantly amazed at people who experience some kind of problem and it never crosses their mind they may have caused the problem.  This story sums it up perfectly.  I'm surprised he didn't find some way to blame M$.  Probably just didn't have enough time to think about it.

Well, he did blame Google, which has become the latest "evil" corporation for people to complain about ....

As I usually say regarding code snippets, it's not the tools, it's the people using them. 

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:19 • by Franz Kafka

hoist on his own petard, I guess

 

/genius 

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:19 • by Been there, done that
107917 in reply to 107912

So, a pop-up banner-ad president hates things done by his own product so much he blocks it?

 Now if we can only get the Gods of the Internet to return all spam to the spammer's, maybe they would block themselves....

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:23 • by Rich
107919 in reply to 107909

Where can you define blocked words in opera ? i know about blocked content (URLs, images) but not words...

 

He really didn't block the word.  If you read again, you'll see it blocked the Google search, which uses a GET url, which means the search term was in the URL... 

captcha: captcha

self referential, Brillant!!

no quack 

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:23 • by boflexson

That is just precious.

 

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:23 • by kuroshin
And folks, this is how Scrum works in real life:

The pig go. Go is to the office. Late. The pig look. Look at
what? Empty office. The chicken shout. Shout something.
The something at the pig. The pig confusing. But the pig follow. Follow
with chicken. The chicken very angry. The pig browse. With Google. Chicken blame. Blame is to the White House. Shift blame. Blame is now to Google. The chicken now squawk. Squawk is "B-A-N-N-E-R'. Opera flash. Pig sigh. Sigh is to the chicken. Chicken is fool. Giggle. The DailyWTF giggle.

 

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:25 • by Freaky
107922 in reply to 107909
Anonymous:
Where can you define blocked words in opera ? i know about blocked content (URLs, images) but not words...

Er, they are blocked URLs; his search terms were in the query string, and since he had URLs matching *banner* etc blocked, it wasn't loading them.

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:26 • by GettinSadda
107923 in reply to 107921
kuroshin:
And folks, this is how Scrum works in real life:

The pig go. Go is to the office. Late. The pig look. Look at
what? Empty office. The chicken shout. Shout something.
The something at the pig. The pig confusing. But the pig follow. Follow
with chicken. The chicken very angry. The pig browse. With Google. Chicken blame. Blame is to the White House. Shift blame. Blame is now to Google. The chicken now squawk. Squawk is "B-A-N-N-E-R'. Opera flash. Pig sigh. Sigh is to the chicken. Chicken is fool. Giggle. The DailyWTF giggle.

 

11/10 Awsome 

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:31 • by ssprencel

This is the same kind of moron who thinks that popping up an advertisement across the middle of a web page is a good idea.  I bet this guy would figure that if I force the user to look at my advertisement, then they will buy my product.  They will never get irritated or annoyed with my company name and/or its services that are covering up what the user is really interested in.  Give this man a compiler, and he would swear that it was broken or not installed right before he looked into his code for the source of a bug.

 

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:41 • by allo
tjo, he should have used the right regexps ...

*/banner/*
http://banner.*
[...]

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:41 • by PSWorx
107927 in reply to 107921
no quack

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:41 • by Thomas Cobb
107928 in reply to 107924
ssprencel:

Give this man a compiler, and he would swear that it was broken or not installed right before he looked into his code for the source of a bug.



Dude!  That's harsh!  I resemble that remark.



Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:42 • by King Crab
107929 in reply to 107915
Jeff S:
Anonymous:

As a network admin, I am constantly amazed at people who experience some kind of problem and it never crosses their mind they may have caused the problem.  This story sums it up perfectly.  I'm surprised he didn't find some way to blame M$.  Probably just didn't have enough time to think about it.

Well, he did blame Google, which has become the latest "evil" corporation for people to complain about ....

As I usually say regarding code snippets, it's not the tools, it's the people using them. 

 Although in the case, the person using them is the tool. :D
 

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:46 • by Whiskey Tango Foxtrot? Over.
Given the subject matter, Alex, I think you should have included some sort of homage to David (or Bruce) Banner in your story. Perhaps when the president looks like he's going on a rampage.... you could have suggested that he looked about to turn big and green and split his (suddenly purple) pants. That woulda been cool!

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:46 • by Jeff S
107931 in reply to 107920
boflexson:

That is just precious.

 

When your signature contains more content than your post, and that signature simply links to a website, and that website has nothing to do with the topics here on this forum, that's pretty much considered spam.... please consider changing your signature or you'll probably end up with your posts moderated.

 thanks!
 

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:49 • by Nice!
107932 in reply to 107921
kuroshin:
And folks, this is how Scrum works in real life:

The pig go. Go is to the office. Late. The pig look. Look at what? Empty office. The chicken shout. Shout something. The something at the pig. The pig confusing. But the pig follow. Follow with chicken. The chicken very angry. The pig browse. With Google. Chicken blame. Blame is to the White House. Shift blame. Blame is now to Google. The chicken now squawk. Squawk is "B-A-N-N-E-R'. Opera flash. Pig sigh. Sigh is to the chicken. Chicken is fool. Giggle. The DailyWTF giggle.

Best post of the day!

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:53 • by Fanguad
107935 in reply to 107924
ssprencel:
Give this man a compiler, and he would swear that it was broken or not installed right before he looked into his code for the source of a bug.


No, please don't...

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:56 • by Diamonds

This is why I don't like working 8 hour days. Neal shouldn't feel at all bad for arriving to work late. People like him in 7 hours acomplish as much as someone who works 8 hours. The proof is even in this post. While the whole office was working on this during the 45 minutes that he was late, Neal figured it out in 3 minutes.

 Neal should have gone home right after that meeting and told his boss that he's put in the equivilent of 8 hours of work, because if he wasn't around surely the boss would have spent the whole day to realize that he had blocked the search terms with Opera.

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 15:59 • by seventoes
107937 in reply to 107928
Anonymous:
ssprencel:

Give this man a compiler, and he would swear that it was broken or not installed right before he looked into his code for the source of a bug.



Dude!  That's harsh!  I resemble that remark.

 .... You resemble that remark? I think you mean "Resent"
 

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:00 • by Chris heinz
As embarrassing as it is to admit, I've done this.  I sat down and entered a long list of block terms in Opera right after I installed it and I made a few mistakes causing some to be overly broad.  It was weeks later, when I started using Opera as my primary browser, that I started experiencing this exact same thing. Random web sites just wouldn't work.  I'd click a hyperlink and get nothing.  I spent hours over days frustrated by the experience and was just about to uninstall Opera when I moused over a link and glimpsed one of my block words flash in the status bar.  At that moment everything "clicked" for me.  I'm just glad I didn't drag half the development team into my office complaining about it first.

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:02 • by Kodi
107939 in reply to 107921
kuroshin:
And folks, this is how Scrum works in real life:

The pig go. Go is to the office. Late. The pig look. Look at what? Empty office. The chicken shout. Shout something. The something at the pig. The pig confusing. But the pig follow. Follow with chicken. The chicken very angry. The pig browse. With Google. Chicken blame. Blame is to the White House. Shift blame. Blame is now to Google. The chicken now squawk. Squawk is "B-A-N-N-E-R'. Opera flash. Pig sigh. Sigh is to the chicken. Chicken is fool. Giggle. The DailyWTF giggle.

 

Brilliant !  No one else need reply ! 

 

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:04 • by Thomas Cobb
107940 in reply to 107937
seventoes:
Anonymous:


Dude!  That's harsh!  I resemble that remark.

 .... You resemble that remark? I think you mean "Resent"



Ummm, yeah dude, that's what I meant.  I resent that I resemble that remark.  I really do...

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:04 • by koolkeith13
107941 in reply to 107931
Jeff S:
boflexson:

That is just precious.

 

When your signature contains more content than your post, and that signature simply links to a website, and that website has nothing to do with the topics here on this forum, that's pretty much considered spam.... please consider changing your signature or you'll probably end up with your posts moderated.

 thanks!
 

At least the link is to something that is awesome (homebrew wine).  The bonus is that the site can also be considered community service...  They (Boflexson) are trying to a) make sure people don't go blind while making their homebrew and b) inspire people to try something creative and fun.

 At least that's my take on it.

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:05 • by Anonymous Coward
Wow. Not only is he hypocritical (a banner-company president intentionally trying to block banner ads), he's a moron lashing out at the first (and second) scapegoat he can find:

1) He blamed Google, and only Google... thus implying he never even tried another search engine.

2) He only tried it in a single browser... despite the fact that Opera is NOT the default browser on ANY mainstream platform, and thus we can virtually guarantee something else was available (IE on Windows, Konqueror/Firefox/Mozilla on Linux, Safari on OSX). I mean, he's got 9 employees, in an internet-based company... surely ONE of them has a clue in this area.

3) He didn't even try it on a different computer. WTF?!? At all the businesses I've worked with/at, that's the FIRST thing they do when something goes wrong... yell over to someone else and ask if XYZ is working right.

4) He immediately assumed a conspiracy against ad companies, instead of choosing the simplest, most obvious explanation... somebody screwed up. In this case, himself.

5) He first blamed the government for censoring the entire internet in regards to ADVERTISING. Apparently it didn't occur to him that this would be a rather large news story. As in, ABSOLUTELY FUCKING HUGE.

6) Neal asks what's wrong, and the he gives him a totally useless answer. Furthermore, that answer is condescending (apparently Neal was supposed to know how exactly Google was putting them out of business already) and egotistical (Google is trying to put HIM out of business. If he gave a damn about the business and/or his employees, wouldn't he have said 'they're trying to put US out of business'? But no... 'they're screwing me, you're screwing me, everyone's screwing me'). Additionally, he's so out of control he even blames his own employees ('you're screwing me').

The guy is a freaking lunatic and a raging hothead. Given just this incident, I think he DESERVES to go out of business. The fact that he's still IN business is nothing short of a miracle. I feel sorry for everyone who works under him... it seems inevitable that he will eventually (and incorrectly) target his own employees.

I hope the banner ads make him miserable. His own ads, especially.

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:06 • by Anonymous Coward
107943 in reply to 107942

Sorry for the formatting... here it is again...
 

Wow. Not only is he hypocritical (a banner-company president intentionally trying to block banner ads), he's a moron lashing out at the first (and second) scapegoat he can find:

1) He blamed Google, and only Google... thus implying he never even tried another search engine.

2) He only tried it in a single browser... despite the fact that Opera is NOT the default browser on ANY mainstream platform, and thus we can virtually guarantee something else was available (IE on Windows, Konqueror/Firefox/Mozilla on Linux, Safari on OSX). I mean, he's got 9 employees, in an internet-based company... surely ONE of them has a clue in this area.

3) He didn't even try it on a different computer. WTF?!? At all the businesses I've worked with/at, that's the FIRST thing they do when something goes wrong... yell over to someone else and ask if XYZ is working right.

4) He immediately assumed a conspiracy against ad companies, instead of choosing the simplest, most obvious explanation... somebody screwed up. In this case, himself.

5) He first blamed the government for censoring the entire internet in regards to ADVERTISING. Apparently it didn't occur to him that this would be a rather large news story. As in, ABSOLUTELY FUCKING HUGE.

6) Neal asks what's wrong, and the he gives him a totally useless answer. Furthermore, that answer is condescending (apparently Neal was supposed to know how exactly Google was putting them out of business already) and egotistical (Google is trying to put HIM out of business. If he gave a damn about the business and/or his employees, wouldn't he have said 'they're trying to put US out of business'? But no... 'they're screwing me, you're screwing me, everyone's screwing me'). Additionally, he's so out of control he even blames his own employees ('you're screwing me').

The guy is a freaking lunatic and a raging hothead. Given just this incident, I think he DESERVES to go out of business. The fact that he's still IN business is nothing short of a miracle. I feel sorry for everyone who works under him... it seems inevitable that he will eventually (and incorrectly) target his own employees.

I hope the banner ads make him miserable. His own ads, especially.

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:20 • by SpComb
107945 in reply to 107938
I had the same problem too, all the images in my /admin/ interface were replaced with the alt text. Thankfully, I decided to check the source with the "View Generated Source" and noticed all the style='display: none;' attributes that adBlock had stuck in, and figured it out from there.

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:22 • by akatherder
107946 in reply to 107936
Diamonds:

This is why I don't like working 8 hour days. Neal shouldn't feel at all bad for arriving to work late. People like him in 7 hours acomplish as much as someone who works 8 hours. The proof is even in this post. While the whole office was working on this during the 45 minutes that he was late, Neal figured it out in 3 minutes.

If Neal got to work on time, he would have fixed the problem sooner and the whole office wouldn't have wasted their time watching the boss man yell.  Kudos for fixing the problem, but he wasted a lot of their time (and patience) by being tardy.

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:25 • by Anon
107948 in reply to 107943

Anonymous:
Sorry for the formatting... here it is again...

The formatting wasn't the main problem with that post.

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:28 • by Matt
Speaking of banners... The banner at the bottom of the post caused the
page to take 10 seconds to load for me as my browser waited for
something from feeds.feedburner.com.  10 seconds isn't that much... but
a signficant delay caused by a banner ad on a post making fun of the
president of a banner advertising firm who was caught banning banner
ads... Well let's just say that the bounds of irony are being tested.

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:33 • by anony-mouse
107951 in reply to 107937
seventoes:
Anonymous:
ssprencel:

Give this man a compiler, and he would swear that it was broken or not installed right before he looked into his code for the source of a bug.



Dude!  That's harsh!  I resemble that remark.

 .... You resemble that remark? I think you mean "Resent"
 

*whoosh*


want to know what that noise was?  the sound of it going right over your head...

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:37 • by Kodi
107952 in reply to 107937
seventoes:
Anonymous:
ssprencel:

Give this man a compiler, and he would swear that it was broken or not installed right before he looked into his code for the source of a bug.



Dude!  That's harsh!  I resemble that remark.

 .... You resemble that remark? I think you mean "Resent"
 

Might wanna think about keeping compilers away from this one too ! :)

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:38 • by swordfishBob
107953 in reply to 107917
Anonymous:

So, a pop-up banner-ad president hates things done by his own product so much he blocks it?


Well, maybe his banners are photographed on a wooden table..

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:38 • by dande
107954 in reply to 107946
akatherder:
Diamonds:

This is why I don't like working 8 hour days. Neal shouldn't feel at all bad for arriving to work late. People like him in 7 hours acomplish as much as someone who works 8 hours. The proof is even in this post. While the whole office was working on this during the 45 minutes that he was late, Neal figured it out in 3 minutes.

If Neal got to work on time, he would have fixed the problem sooner and the whole office wouldn't have wasted their time watching the boss man yell.  Kudos for fixing the problem, but he wasted a lot of their time (and patience) by being tardy.

Great, so you are blaming Neal for his boss' and colleagues' moronic behaviour?

Who said life is fair... 

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:41 • by Anon E Mouse

That boss needs to lay off the coke.  Seriously, it sounds like he has a substance abuse problem. 

 captcha = wtf

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:41 • by Jon
107956 in reply to 107937
seventoes:
 .... You resemble that remark? I think you mean "Resent" 
Like 'ain't', I think that one has grown to the point where it's used entirely for humour.

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:42 • by cabhan
He wasn't blocking banner ads, he was just trying to learn the customs of his targeted customers.  "Banner ads?  No, no.  Rectangular ads!"

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:43 • by facetious
107958 in reply to 107946
Anonymous:

If Neal got to work on time, he would have fixed the problem sooner and the whole office wouldn't have wasted their time watching the boss man yell.  Kudos for fixing the problem, but he wasted a lot of their time (and patience) by being tardy.

... way to place blame incorrectly. It wasn't Neal's job to fix this problem, he just happened to be able to. Since it wasn't his job to do so, it isn't his fault that the entire department had an unproductive morning.

In fact, it's pretty stupid of everyone to just stand around for 45 minutes while the boss is yelling at them. If they really had a lot of work to do and were planning on blaming Neal for consuming their morning by being late to work, the other employees most likely would have given the "We're sorry, we don't know the answer and we feel terrible. Perhaps Neal will know when he gets here, but until then, we're heading back to our own tasks so that we don't waste any more of your precious money that is already being squandered by Google." response.

It's not Neal's fault the department is filled with people who have no time-management skills.


Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:48 • by ResidentialEvil
107959 in reply to 107946
Anonymous:
Diamonds:

This is why I don't like working 8 hour days. Neal shouldn't feel at all bad for arriving to work late. People like him in 7 hours acomplish as much as someone who works 8 hours. The proof is even in this post. While the whole office was working on this during the 45 minutes that he was late, Neal figured it out in 3 minutes.

If Neal got to work on time, he would have fixed the problem sooner and the whole office wouldn't have wasted their time watching the boss man yell.  Kudos for fixing the problem, but he wasted a lot of their time (and patience) by being tardy.

 So now it's his fault that the rest of the office are a bunch of morons? Let's hope he never calls in sick or takes a vacation day, as apparently nothing will get done, and it will be Neal's fault.

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:50 • by Broken Hack
107960 in reply to 107921
kuroshin:
And folks, this is how Scrum works in real life:

The pig go. Go is to the office. Late. The pig look. Look at
what? Empty office. The chicken shout. Shout something.
The something at the pig. The pig confusing. But the pig follow. Follow
with chicken. The chicken very angry. The pig browse. With Google. Chicken blame. Blame is to the White House. Shift blame. Blame is now to Google. The chicken now squawk. Squawk is "B-A-N-N-E-R'. Opera flash. Pig sigh. Sigh is to the chicken. Chicken is fool. Giggle. The DailyWTF giggle.

 

 I think I'm going to start writing all my emails in this form from now on.
 

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:55 • by Jeff L.
107963 in reply to 107921
kuroshin:
And folks, this is how Scrum works in real life:

The pig go. Go is to the office. Late. The pig look. Look at
what? Empty office. The chicken shout. Shout something.
The something at the pig. The pig confusing. But the pig follow. Follow
with chicken. The chicken very angry. The pig browse. With Google. Chicken blame. Blame is to the White House. Shift blame. Blame is now to Google. The chicken now squawk. Squawk is "B-A-N-N-E-R'. Opera flash. Pig sigh. Sigh is to the chicken. Chicken is fool. Giggle. The DailyWTF giggle.



Best laugh I've had all week. Someone needs to build a Scrum dialectizer (http://www.rinkworks.com/dialect/).




-J- 


Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 16:55 • by ssprencel
107965 in reply to 107946
Anonymous:
Diamonds:

This is why I don't like working 8 hour days. Neal shouldn't feel at all bad for arriving to work late. People like him in 7 hours acomplish as much as someone who works 8 hours. The proof is even in this post. While the whole office was working on this during the 45 minutes that he was late, Neal figured it out in 3 minutes.

If Neal got to work on time, he would have fixed the problem sooner and the whole office wouldn't have wasted their time watching the boss man yell.  Kudos for fixing the problem, but he wasted a lot of their time (and patience) by being tardy.

The way I see it is that Neal showed up 45 minutes late and so he has a 45 minute deficit.  Neal then fixes the problem in three minutes what nine people could not do in 45 minutes.  9x45 = 405 or 6 hours and 45 minutes.  Take away the 45 minutes of work that he was late for and the 3 minutes of work that he completed and Neal should be able to go home in 1 hour and 57 minutes.

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 17:02 • by dustin

omg

paula bean

brillant

wooden table

no quack

f---ing Google

bean bag girl

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 17:15 • by marvin_rabbit

Well, in Soviet Russia, the banner ads....

Whoops, wrong site.  Sorry. 

Re: The Great Google Banner Ad Conspiracy

2006-12-19 17:24 • by emurphy

Shark Tank had a story a few weeks back about a company whose new-fangled spam-blocker was generating false positives left and right.  See, the company is a mortgage broker, and... well, I'm sure y'all can figure it out from there.

 

« PrevPage 1 | Page 2 | Page 3Next »

Add Comment