| « Prev | Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Next » |
But I thought "black" and "white" were just social constructs, convenient abstractions invented by simple-minded people to try to explain a complex set of interrelated systems: how the sun produces light which travels through millions of miles of space, how light strikes an object and may be absorbed, reflected, or refracted off; how that reflected light impinges on the human eye, where it is converted to electrochemical impulses which are transmitted along the optic nerve to the brain; and how the brain that processes those messages to produce the sensations that we call "black" and "white". So your statement is meaningless gibberish. Curiously, though, any 5-year-old can instantly tell whether a particular piece of paper is black or white, and can usually quickly tell whether a given person is a boy or a girl. Even when they can't tell in a particular case, e.g. because it's too dark to see the colors or the person is deliberately disguising themself, the child still understands the difference. It's amazing how little education it sometimes takes to make a person unable to recognize the obvious. "SOME IDEAS ARE SO STUPID, ONLY INTELLECTUALS BELIEVE THEM." -- George Orwell |
|
Well if they got 2 + 3 right, at least they've learned *something*.
|
What is this? Some kind of transgender propaganda? |
Re: Out of Service
2012-04-27 13:53
•
by
Jellineck
(unregistered)
|
Nice try, Mr. Fluffypaws. There is no way I'm convincing your veterinarian to give you a sex change. |
A useful distinction is commonly made between "sex" and "gender". "Sex" describes a person biologically--what's the hardware? "Gender" describes them socially--how do they present themselves to the world? For most of us these do coincide but tranvestites are a good example of people for whom they don't. It's not clear why a law school admission form should be asking about either of those attributes though. |
|
Did you ever notice how certain topics bring out the weirdos? e.g. Gender, autism, Ron Paul
|
|
Heaven forbid Congress' IT dept actually write their tour-request sight to protect against SQL injection. Just tell users not to use any SQL keywords.
|
That sign was out of service. |
Re: Out of Service
2012-04-27 15:58
•
by
iWantToKeepAnon
(unregistered)
|
So they should have used a slider bar control instead of a radio button? captcha: abigo ... where did Abi go ... and is Abi really a girl? |
Strange, then, that we still only have two sets of reproductive organs. |
|
Nice, a transexuality flamewar!
Wait, it's still not complete. We have a "THEY'RE JUST DISGUISED MEN", but we still need a good "THERE'S NO SUCH THING AS GENDER ITS ALL A SOCIAL CONSTRUCT" if we want this thread to reach 6 pages. |
Re: Out of Service
2012-04-27 16:54
•
by
Zapp Brannigan
(unregistered)
|
Does xxx come with extra lady parts? |
Re: Out of Service
2012-04-27 16:56
•
by
Zapp Brannigan
(unregistered)
|
Do you 2 of the same or one of each? |
Re: Out of Service
2012-04-27 17:32
•
by
Calli Arcale
(unregistered)
|
Chromosomes *are* genes (or rather, they're made of genes). ;-) And there are more of them than just the ones that determine our sex. XY females are interesting. Chromosome-wise, they are male, but most of the time, this is caused by a genetic defect that makes their cells unresponsive to the hormone testosterone. (Incidentally, with respect to XY female athletes, this doesn't mean they have an unfair advantage; it actually means they have a disadvantage, because it means anabolic steroids, natural or injected, have no affect on them.) Most of them don't learn this until adulthood. Some don't find out until they try to have children and, upon seeking medical advice, discover that they lack a uterus. A genetic test will reveal why. XX males result from a mishap in the process of producing the haploid DNA of a sperm cell, where an X gets the SRY gene. SRY normally lives only on the Y chromosome, and it's the gene responsible for maleness. It is extremely rare. As with XY females, they are sterile. Surplus Xes also result from mishaps in production of gametes, where an extra chromosome goes along for the ride. Another interesting gender issue isn't genetic at all -- it's called chimerism. Named for the mythical chimera, a human chimera is actually their own fraternal twin. It's unknown how often it happens, since logically most would never find out as it usually doesn't cause problems. Two fertilized eggs happen to implant very near one another, or bump into each other on the way. If this happens before either one has started to differentiate, they may develop as a single individual, with the various stem cells sorting themselves out into skin, blood, organs, etc. and not minding that different ones have different DNA. Sometimes, you get situations where a person has bicolored skin, if the two original embryos were destined to have different skin color and both ended up contributing stem cells to the skin. Some are discovered via failed paternity tests, which are always especially shocking when it's the *mother* who fails the test. If her ovaries came from one embryo and her blood from another embryo, a traditional paternity test will suggest that she is the *aunt* of her own child. And in a way, she is. She's also the mother. And sometimes chimerism can produce intersex conditions. One case was a man who saw a doctor to find the cause of his infertility. They found a very low sperm count, and upon further investigation, found his estrogen levels were very high for a man. He had what he'd always believed was an undescended testicle with what pediatricians had said was a twisted vas deferens. It wasn't that at all -- ultrasound revealed that it was an ovary, and the twisted vas deferens was actually a fallopian tube with sort of a bit of something that might have grown into a uterus, if it had had a chance. Genetic tests revealed the ovary to be the sister of his one teste, and various other tissues were biopsied; it seemed the two sets of DNA were pretty well scattered through his body. He was his own twin. That's probably rare. But it does happen -- probably more than we realize, since it is usually only discovered by accident. |
Hey! Please try to show some sensitivity. My son is an autistic Ron Paul supporter with a gender, and let me tell you it is no laughing matter! |
Re: Out of Service
2012-04-27 20:10
•
by
Paul Neumann
(unregistered)
|
You think you've got it bad? My son is an autistic transgendered Ron Paul [Neumann], and it's a riot! Seriously though, Paul 2012 FTW! |
<3 |
Some people have sex. (Did you forget where you're posting?) |
TRWTF is a web page that requires me to allow Javascript from two separate domains just to display the text of the article. |
It says "Select one", so obviously the right answer is 1. |
Re: Out of Service
2012-04-28 02:26
•
by
Jeremy Friesner
(unregistered)
|
|
I think the two-booleans form made some sense. The form's answers would be interpreted as follows:
True / False = Female False / True = Male False / False = Asexual True / True = Hermaphrodite Of course, if they *really* wanted capture all of the nuances completely, they'd use a pair of sliders (0-100%) instead of a pair of boolean options. Or have you do an interpretive dance, or something. |
Re: Out of Service
2012-04-28 02:42
•
by
Jeremy Friesner
(unregistered)
|
You have a point there, but the lawmakers have come up with a way to handle that problem: they simply have their lobbyists write the laws for them. |
|
That gender selection form is closer to being correct than most. Though the real correct answer is "who cares?"
And what about those of us with half a y chromosome, hmmmm? |
Re: Out of Service
2012-04-28 05:51
•
by
Poncy Leon
(unregistered)
|
You could have put that more simply: "My child is a Ron Paul supporter." |
|
Peter should have anonymised his address better. The fraction of Peters is just under 1% and there are about 200 households on the Baliëndijk. That leaves only a handful of Peters and only one of them has a last name short enough to fit in the black box.
|
|
"alter declare delete drop insert select update"
I TRUNCATE thee. |
What about nullable types? Look like you have ignored nullbale type. The form itself is completely incomplete. |
You've nailed it!! So that's where the real problem is: people with a mental capacity of 5 year olds are making instant decisions that affect those unfortunate "obviously boys" and "obviously girls". And you seem to advocate that, even. I'm kind of glad you seem to be a lucky heterosexual who doesn't have to deal with 5 year olds in adult bodies all the time. Lucky you, indeed. |
|
The MSDNAA one occurs due to poor management, or the lack of it. Contracts are department, not school based, and departments get to choose the name they'll be under in the listings. And when contracts are renewed, department might be added under a different name. I could venture a guess that "Is dept" is Information Systems department.
|
Re: Out of Service
2012-04-30 01:24
•
by
DodgyBob
(unregistered)
|
The girl in the skimpy bikini? Oops, sorry, that's in my *other* browser window. |
|
Imagine a communication and the presence of forbidden words...
"OK, whom did you select for the Bin Laden job?" "I'm sorry, Sir, I can't tell you." "WTF?! I'm your commander!" "You used a forbidden word, Sir." "Can you at least give me an update?" "No Sir, sorry Sir, you used a forbidden word again." "Groan... have you at least found him?" "Yes Sir, we're entering the compound now." "OK, drop him." "I'm sorry Sir, I can't comply. You used another forbidden word." "Son, listen to me. We are about to alter history. Just do it." "Really sorry Sir, but I'm under strict orders not to accept any forbidden words." "For goodness' sake! I'm about to declare victory in the War on Terror, and you're giving me this crap?" "It's the forbidden words, Sir." "You know what you can do? You can insert your forbidden words up your..." "I'm afraid we have to abandon the operation now, Sir. You used too many forbidden words." This happened in 2005. |
|
The first one means that you are supposed to use sign language to say 'Out of Service'
|
Re: Out of Service
2012-04-30 06:13
•
by
Lockwood
(unregistered)
|
Of course, we want to avoid adult bodies in 5 year olds. The MSDNAA is not a WTF - IS Dept is Information Services, and the names are *shock horror* entered by the school/college/university staff, so they can misspell when they register. There is no survey running. Disagree. You've asked my this question, so you have just surveyed me. 8rooklyn. |
Don't forget 5outh Carolina, 5outh Dakota, 7ennessee and 7exas. If you're feeling creative, 4labama, 4rizona and 4rkansas. (I've deliberately left out 4laska because the chances of them actually getting that far into a website are slim...) |
|
Those can be pretty easily collapsed into 2 phenotypes, depending on the pressence of the y chromosone. After all, multiple x's will be disabled by the cell (women are not different enough from men that a duplicate active chromosone wouldn't completely screw things up).
|
Males and females generally are not considered separate subspecies either... |
|
The real WTF is the lack of proper punctuation in your SQL injection attacks. You are supposed to do it like this.
Ahem... ');DROP TABLE ALL_COMMENTS;-- |
Re: Out of Service
2012-04-30 12:09
•
by
Lockwood
(unregistered)
|
You never met my missus. (I'll go get my coat) |
|
This is not the SQL Injection vulnerability you're looking for...
|
|
Dont bother ringing it up, it's for a duck
|
Oh, of course. I live in 1000ichigan. |
Re: Out of Service
2012-05-01 12:35
•
by
Paul Neumann
(unregistered)
|
I would have thought that a lack of poor management would be a good thing. |
|
"MSDN Academic Alliance"
It's like a drug pusher. The first one's free! |
Unfortunately, this is all too true |
|
So the sametime developers decided to reduce the number of messages by combining two of them into one.
That's probably one of the least WTF things about Lotus Notes. It's barely worth a mention. |
FTFY |
|
Lol, these are funny. Sounds like they got deployed before they were tested fully.
|
|
TRUNCATE TABLE peters_email;
|
|
there's no WTF, have you never heard of androgyny?
|
Chromosome 21 actually |
| « Prev | Page 1 | Page 2 | Page 3 | Next » |