• Gunny Hartman (unregistered) in reply to Design Pattern
    Design Pattern:
    anon:
    Even metric hours consist of only 60 minutes, It may however be imperial time?

    Nah, that would mean it is not showing the nunes, and even then there are only 15 moments in imperial time... http://blog.forret.com/2004/08/imperial-time-units-here-come-the-nunes/

    It must be US military time, as you say ninehundred when it's 09:00 AM: http://usmilitary.about.com/od/theorderlyroom/a/militarytime.htm

    That's zero nine-hundred, maggot.

  • JB (unregistered) in reply to Anon

    That's what I think, but the guy says 'thankfully it's 6am...' 19:09 would be 7:09 PM, how the hell does he get 6am from 19:09?

  • Andy (unregistered)

    I think Boston reads The Daily WTF... they fixed it.

    http://www.cityofboston.gov/Moep/ReadyBoston/cyber_security.asp

  • (cs) in reply to Red October
    Red October:
    I used to work at RadioShack.

    TRWTF is that you used to work at Radio Shack.

  • Zarggg (unregistered) in reply to Anon

    Actually, the clock was programmed to detect slips in the space-time continuum. It was trying to let him know that it was now the year 1989.

  • Xythar (unregistered)

    In the interests of cyber safety I'm making this post while lying in a low, flat location.

  • illtiz (unregistered)

    I suggest turning the clock upside down - is that a chess move?

  • Madrigorne (unregistered) in reply to Anon

    looks like the flux capacitor may have taken a power hit...

  • Michael Molkenthin (unregistered)

    Buy NOW - #DIV/0 percent on all prices!!

  • Phillip (unregistered) in reply to Michael P.

    I'm not shure if the battery can bring the power of 1.21 gigawatts

  • Mathew (unregistered)

    That clock I'd say is reading 14:04 and that the 9 8 and 9 appear only because the camera is seeing the light bleed into unlit areas. To the human eye i'd put money on it showing 14:04 clearly.

  • Bruce (unregistered) in reply to Anon

    Hurry up! The party starts in 10 minutes!

  • Dals (unregistered) in reply to Anon

    Thanks, Cap! Be sure, that 'metric time' doesn't have a 89 minutes.

  • WilliamF (unregistered)

    those types of clocks dont have enough segments to show the "20- 23" times hence the hour is actually invalid for that particular clock. on a more light-hearted note it could be showing the number of minutes past an epoch. (midnight 1.38 days ago) which would make it 9:15 am

  • SkyWulf (unregistered) in reply to Anon
    Anon:
    Obviously the clock is showing metric time.
    19:89
    Obviously.
  • Anon (unregistered)

    It's not a clock, it's a TIME MACHINE, clearly! It's taken you back to 1989!

  • Anonymous (unregistered) in reply to Anon

    Even if it's metric time, 19:89 does not make sense..

  • smarterAnon (unregistered) in reply to Anon

    Assuming you mean a 24-hour clock, that would mean that the clock thinks it is 7 pm and not 6 am....also. It says 89 minutes. Explain to me how that is possible..

  • they call me lightning (unregistered)

    Clearly you've traveled back to 1989.

  • Anonymous (unregistered) in reply to Anon

    If you mean 24-hour time, that doesn't have >= 84-minute hours.

  • JakoLV (unregistered) in reply to Anon

    Obviously you need education...

Leave a comment on “Need Have Have”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

Log Out

« Return to Article