• (nodebb)

    It's off the rails.

  • King (unregistered)

    Frist? Sorry Frist? Sorry? Frist? Go ahead

  • (nodebb)

    Isn't the whole point of codes that they can't be understood?

  • (nodebb)
    reject!(&;:blank?)

    Ruby: Because sometimes Perl is just too readable.

  • Daniel Orner (github) in reply to Dragnslcr

    There's an extra ; in there which is a mistake. The important thing to know here is that the ! and ? are meaningless and part of the actual method names. The only two symbols that do anything in there are : which means that the next word is a symbol, and & which turns the symbol into a proc / method reference.

    ! is idiomatic for a method which is destructive on its receiver, and ? means a boolean method. Neither of them are technically required though.

  • Poetry (unregistered)

    It's like music or poetry, with a nice refrain and there's such a thought-provoking moment when it comes full circle.

  • löchleindeluxe (unregistered)

    "Dear Stackrubyflow reader, here are three ways you can solve your problem: … . Which one do your want to take?" – "Yes."

  • Nick (unregistered)

    Looks like a git merge gone wrong to me. Two developers saw the bug at a similar time - the first thought to use the “merge” function to combine the transfer groups, the other thought to do it manually.

    No doubt the ever-helpful IDE “helped” with the conflict resolution by suggesting “why not keep both?”

Leave a comment on “Again and Again”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

« Return to Article