• (disco)

    Did you mean: formed

  • (disco) in reply to balazs

    Fromidable! :1234:

  • (disco)

    Nice. Pity there was no villain in this episode.

  • (disco)

    It could have been worse: Excel instead of Access.

  • (disco)

    I love it when project sprint plan comes together.

  • (disco)

    I pity the fool that post frist.

  • (disco) in reply to balazs

    The tyop conut is friarly high in this stroy.

  • (disco) in reply to dkf
    dkf:
    The tyop conut is friarly high in this stroy.
    Yeah, I hayt itt wen trypogaphical errers slipp inn too mye messijjes. Oops.
  • (disco) in reply to Foosah
    Foosah:
    Nice. Pity there was no villain in this episode.

    Access is the villain in this episode.

  • (disco) in reply to Zacrath

    Serious question: with SQL Azure so cheap, and the limited version of SQL Server free, why is anybody in their right senses using Access? Surely this is the ultimate WTF. It's like turning up at the racetrack with a knackered Ford Escort and refusing to drive the free Red Bull F1 car.

  • (disco) in reply to kupfernigk
  • (disco) in reply to kupfernigk
    kupfernigk:
    why is anybody in their right senses using Access?

    Because you need an amount > 1 brain cells to start an SQL instance and only 1 to start up access.

  • (disco)

    What's with the crazy long img-link in that first picture? Is there a hidden message we should decrypt or something? Maybe it's an address to a cash-machine in downtown Detroit, that can send secret messages to the Alpha-Team!

  • (disco) in reply to allwise

    That's how you inline embed an image in HTML.

  • (disco)

    So, the real WTF is NOT Access, but failing to have a competent Access developer on a project that uses Access as a major component! And secondarily, being sh!!ty at solving obvious design problems.

    The problem here is not Access, but a bad implementation of the intended design: enabling BA-editable Display Names. If we wanted the BA's to be able to edit field display names, and given the restriction (for whatever bizarre reason) that it must be an Access front end (and maybe back-end, but that's not the problem here), then it would be easy to split the display names into a separate table, linked to the main field meta data table by the field ID. You could even put this table in a separate file, with appropriate permissions. BA's would have their own copy of an Access file that was a front end for that field name file. They could never even see the other tables, could never edit any other data.

    But, that's probably overkill.

    Also: you can absolutely implement version control, or at least, data-history in Access and version snap-shots in the file system, if you want to. A well designed form and a bit of code will do it, if you want to get fancy. At the very least, you have 3 copies of the database folder, one for DEV, one for QA, and one for Production. Changes to the Production display names can be rolled into the DEV version as needed. The current DEV version rolls up to QA and Production. Dev also maintains history of prior versions of the DB, that go with prior releases. Just like any other version control.

    Really, all you need is to present the BA's with a simple front-end form, contained in a separate Access file, that links to the dev version and shows the module name, screen name, and field name, that allows them to edit the display names. They can use built-in Access search features to find the fields they want to edit. The other tables are linked read-only tables. This is the bronze-plate solution.

    The silver-plate solution improves the form to include customized search features and implements undo or roll-back of naming mistakes.

    The gold-plate solution includes a mock-up of the selected screen, that enables changing field names.

    And so on...

    The BA's would never access the tables directly!

    Even if you eventually moved the solution to SQL server, you still retain the ability to use Access (or whatever) as an easily customizable front-end for the BA's

  • (disco) in reply to rad131304

    Exactly! And where better to inject a hidden message, than as a Stenography in an inline image!

  • (disco) in reply to aliceif
  • (disco) in reply to hungrier
    Comment held for moderation.
  • (disco) in reply to accalia

    nothing?

    okay we do have an odd failure mode here....

    -sigh- and i thought i had all the bugs ironed out.

  • (disco) in reply to accalia

    After 9 translations TransPerfect says: Unsuported queue type

    Filed under: English -> Ukranian -> Turkish -> Spanish -> Polish -> Portuguese -> Italian -> German -> French -> Dutch -> English

    <!-- Posted by SockBot 0.13.0 "Devious Daine" on Wed Oct 29 2014 08:58:10 GMT-0400 (EDT)-->
  • (disco) in reply to SockAdept

    oh. nevermind. you're just really slow....

  • (disco) in reply to accalia

    After 10 translations Bing says: Slow Nevermind and!

    Filed under: English -> Vietnamese -> Catalan -> Danish -> Indonesian -> Swedish -> Romanian -> Finnish -> Thai -> Chinese Simplified -> Spanish -> English

    <!-- Posted by SockBot 0.13.0 "Devious Daine" on Wed Oct 29 2014 09:01:22 GMT-0400 (EDT)-->
  • (disco) in reply to SockAdept

    The daily WTF needs more bots!

  • (disco) in reply to aliceif

    After 10 translations Bing says: WTF every day need more programs!

    Filed under: English -> Vietnamese -> Catalan -> Latvian -> Estonian -> Greek -> Spanish -> Slovenian -> Danish -> Haitian Creole -> Czech -> English

    <!-- Posted by SockBot 0.13.0 "Devious Daine" on Wed Oct 29 2014 09:02:33 GMT-0400 (EDT)-->
  • (disco) in reply to SockAdept
    Comment held for moderation.
  • (disco) in reply to SockAdept
    Comment held for moderation.
  • (disco) in reply to aliceif
    Comment held for moderation.
  • (disco)

    This is spookily like a project I ran from a couple of years ago, it may even be the same one with some anonymizification. Mine was a different industry, and the tools mostly FLOSS, but in the damn centre of it was this festering Access abomination called DataDictionary, it had evolved from Excel, but not fully.

    And the fact it was Access/Excel was not really the problem, although why we'd made this huge hoo-haa of being all open-saucy with the other bits and then decided to use excel and access to drive the damn thing was beyond me. Once there was a perceived need to constantly change the schema and have a softly-defined interface you might as well just use the same toolset you already have to facilitate all that.

    It all came about because the project manager initially insisted there was no way to change a deployed schema and he had a better idea. Once we'd established (the hard way, of course) self-updating frameworks did not do what he thought they did, the project trundled off adding sides to this reinvented wheel.

    WTF1: Going all inner platform because of a fundamental ignorance about change management WTF2: Doing it this way WTF3: Not realising quite quickly it's a real waste of time and ripping out the unnecessary layers

  • (disco) in reply to accalia

    You should not have said that :imp:

  • (disco) in reply to aliceif

    it was bound to happen.....

  • (disco)

    Cleverbot is down, I haven't really been home this week and haven't had the chance to restart my bots.

    Also not sure if the idea belongs in the Bad Ideas Thread or the Evil Ideas Thread. But we should probably try it anyway!

  • (disco) in reply to James_Steiner

    This is pretty good, if a little long. I don't understand why you're not getting any bites.

  • (disco) in reply to mott555
    Comment held for moderation.
  • (disco) in reply to antiquarian
    antiquarian:
    I don't understand why you're not getting any bites.

    You answered your question:

    antiquarian:
    a little long.

    A long troll needs more invective and CAPS to keep the reader engaged.

  • (disco) in reply to hungrier
    hungrier:

    I'm betting that's intentional, seeing as the french word for cheese is fromage.

  • (disco) in reply to aliceif
    aliceif:
    The daily WTF needs more bots!

    I have a poll which disagrees with you.

  • (disco) in reply to abarker

    It's Canadian, where products are labelled in English and French.

  • (disco) in reply to hungrier

    Well, that explains it.

  • (disco)

    Newbie: "Okay, so there's the development team. Then there's the crack development Alpha team that supports the development team."

    Insider: "Right."

    Newbie: "Then there's the crack development Beta team, that supports the Alpha team."

    Insider: "Right."

    Newbie: "So that's it, then?"

    Insider: "No, then there's the crack development team Gamma that supports the Beta team."

    Newbie. "Oh. Then that's it?"

    Insider: "No, sonny! No, it's crack development teams all the way down..."

  • Axel (unregistered)

    ...so is the van-sized office DOWN BY THE RIVER?

Leave a comment on “The Alpha-Team”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

« Return to Article