Frank inherited some code that reads URLs from a file, and puts them into a collection. This is a delightfully simple task. What could go wrong?
static String[] readFile(String filename) {
String record = null;
Vector vURLs = new Vector();
int recCnt = 0;
try {
FileReader fr = new FileReader(filename);
BufferedReader br = new BufferedReader(fr);
record = new String();
while ((record = br.readLine()) != null) {
vURLs.add(new String(record));
//System.out.println(recCnt + ": " + vURLs.get(recCnt));
recCnt++;
}
} catch (IOException e) {
// catch possible io errors from readLine()
System.out.println("IOException error reading " + filename + " in readURLs()!\n");
e.printStackTrace();
}
System.out.println("Reading URLs ...\n");
int arrCnt = 0;
String[] sURLs = new String[vURLs.size()];
Enumeration eURLs = vURLs.elements();
for (Enumeration e = vURLs.elements() ; e.hasMoreElements() ;) {
sURLs[arrCnt] = (String)e.nextElement();
System.out.println(arrCnt + ": " + sURLs[arrCnt]);
arrCnt++;
}
if (recCnt != arrCnt++) {
System.out.println("WARNING: The number of URLs in the input file does not match the number of URLs in the array!\n\n");
}
return sURLs;
} // end of readFile()
So, we start by using a FileReader
and a BufferedReader
, which is the basic pattern any Java tutorial on file handling will tell you to do.
What I see here is that the developer responsible didn't fully understand how strings work in Java. They initialize record
to a new String()
only to immediately discard that reference in their while loop. They also copy the record
by doing a new String
which is utterly unnecessary.
As they load the Vector
of strings, they also increment a recCount
variable, which is superfluous since the collection can tell you how many elements are in it.
Once the Vector
is populated, they need to copy all this data into a String[]
. Instead of using the toArray
function, which is built in and does that, they iterate across the Vector
and put each element into the array.
As they build the array, they increment an arrCnt
variable. Then, they do a check: if (recCnt != arrCnt++)
. Look at that line. Look at the post-increment on arrCnt
, despite never using arrCnt
again. Why is that there? Just for fun, apparently. Why is this check even there?
The only way it's possible for the counts to not match is if somehow an exception was thrown after vURLs.add(new String(record));
but before recCount++
, which doesn't seem likely. Certainly, if it happens, there's something worse going on.
Now, I'm going to be generous and assume that this code predates Java 8- it just looks old. But it's worth noting that in Java 8, the BufferedReader
class got a lines()
function which returns a Stream<String>
that can be converted directly toArray
, making all of this code superfluous, but also, so much of this code is just superfluous anyway.
Anyway, for a fun game, start making the last use of every variable be a post-increment before it goes out of scope. See how many code reviews you can sneak it through!
