- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
- Error'd
- Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Other Series
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
I could use that 1Gb microdrive. We can't get them anymore but still need to support a data collection product which uses them.
Admin
To the tune of "Let it be":
When I find my code in tons of trouble Friends and colleagues counsel me Speaking words of wisdom: "Write in c."
To the tune of "I want to hold your hand":
Hey I've got a program That I don't understand And that's 'cos my program Is written in FORTRAN ...
And there's always:
"Java java java java java chameleon ..."
Admin
Frittata == Glorified scrambled eggs
Methinks the 3oz of Bacon is going to trump the use of Eggbeaters instead of whole eggs...
Admin
It's like they say:
Some people, when confronted with a problem, think "I know, I'll use sauerkraut." Now they have two problems.
Catpcha: acsi a question, getty an answer.
Admin
Admin
All of the Lisp parts of that are pretty suspect. For one thing, as I understand the situation Common Lisp was a combination of features from the various Lispen floating around at the period, including MACLisp, Scheme, and a bunch of others. I think a notable exception is Emacs Lisp - not a forebear of Common Lisp as I recall. I don't know what parts of scheme are claimed to derive from Smalltalk, either. MACLisp->Scheme is plausible, I suppose, since both are MIT offerings and presumably Abelson and Steele would have been famliar with MACLisp. Could be, but I don't know that it's the case.
Perl, as well as Python and I think Ruby as well, should all have Lisp among their ancestors. At least, all of the authors claim inspiration from Lisp, and I know that the first two languages, when done right, feel a lot like Lisp, even though the syntax is completely unrelated. I don't know Ruby, but I'm told that the situation is about the same there...
Admin
Hmm, they missed the Obj-C -> Java link. http://cs.gmu.edu/~sean/stuff/java-objc.html
Admin
It's probably closer to 3 or 4 inches. However, that having been said, one of those adapters is for a mouse - and they only use three pins on the PS/2 side. As such, that adapter will not work for many purposes. (Or, at least, my own instance of that same 3.5" extension cable will not work for anything besides my old PS/2 mouse. (Yes, that does require another USB/PS/2 converter. I only ran that test to see if it'd work for anything. I still don't know if it'll work for PS/2 mouse movement, because only the buttons on that mouse were working when I did that test.))