- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
- Error'd
- Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Other Series
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
Wrong language, then. Perl is the home of regexes, and no escaping is required. You can even delimit the regex with whatever characters you like, in case the normal ones ( / ) appear a lot in the regex.
Pete
Admin
There used to be. I believe 3com managed to get it changed.
Pete
Admin
Pete, agreed.
I forgot to mention that you can use the "literal string" construct by prefixing the string with a @, it will treat everything inside of @"<regex here>" as literals, and then they DON'T need to be escaped.
Admin
<FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 10px; COLOR: #000000; LINE-HEIGHT: 12px; FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,sans-serif">Menstrual Cycle Natural Support One Product with Multiple Formulas! </FONT>
<FONT style="FONT-SIZE: 10px; COLOR: #000000; LINE-HEIGHT: 12px; FONT-FAMILY: verdana,arial,sans-serif">Pc problems? If your computer isn't running like it used to, scan now! </FONT>
^ Current google ads. o.O
Admin
"the use of non-capturing groupings ("(?: )") without any actual backreferences"
I'm not sure why that's relevant. I use non-capturing grouping all the time, and I almost never use backrefs. Grouping specifies precedence, too. You know, like (1+2)*3 and all those other places you use parentheses.