• Franz Kafka (unregistered) in reply to mh
    mh:
    Sad reality is that for a lot of organisations business needs have grown exponentially in recent years, but they're still stuck with the same server rooms as they always had.

    So what? My savings account grows exponentially, but 5%/year isn't that much. You should be able to cope with 10% exponential growth indefinitely. If you can't, then the company should stop growing.

  • Mario (unregistered) in reply to merreborn
    merreborn:
    That's two more people than some shops have. Here, we've got about 30+ servers, and zero people dedicated to supporting them. Small company, no budget for a full-time admin.
    Except, a full-time equivalent is being done by the people that are there. It'ld actually be better to have a real admin who also does something else.
  • (cs) in reply to Jasmine
    Jasmine:
    If they are Athena, Zeus, and Apollo then you are at my old company, and there was a reason for that naming, but as the company got bigger, the reasons made less sense over time...

    Overall it's kind of stupid and hearkens back to the days when geeky code names almost always came from some other geeky interest, like mythology or comic books. There's a whole lot of servers out there with copyrighted names.

    You name machines (locally) by some schema. It's cute and it means something to the local administrators who have to distinguish them from each other. When you buy batches of machines each fiscal, you give them new schemas. This way when someone utters the name, you have a rough idea of how old the machine is and what it might be used for.

    Then, you use the MAGIC of DNS to give meaningful/purposeful names to the servers as aliases.

    mail.example.com -> apollo.example.com webserver1.example.com -> matrix.example.com dbserver.example.com -> matrix.example.com

    And when you get the new honking DB server, after testing, you just update the alias and everyone is magically using the new machine: dbserver.example.com -> behemoth.example.com

    Or is this idea too "novel"? Am I FREAKING ANYBODY OUT? Learn to manage your shit people. Use the tools effectively.

  • (cs) in reply to Pap

    I don't know. It sounds like they could have invested some money into some organization. Maybe it's because I'm a neat-freak, but I wouldn't mind investing a pretty penny into organizing the jungle of wires and boxes.

  • (cs) in reply to kirchhoff
    kirchhoff:
    .... And when you get the new honking DB server, after testing, you just update the alias and everyone is magically using the new machine: dbserver.example.com -> behemoth.example.com

    Or is this idea too "novel"? Am I FREAKING ANYBODY OUT? Learn to manage your shit people. Use the tools effectively.

    Hallelujah brother. The choir is with you....

    -Me

  • N.E. Yasniy (unregistered)

    The REAL W.T.F. is that John goes on vacation and is surprised when someone doesn't clean up his mess for him while he's gone.

  • WTFNamingException (unregistered) in reply to AbbydonKrafts
    AbbydonKrafts:
    WTFNamingException:
    Amen. Thank god I no longer have to work with servers called "MyCompany-Sharepoint" that do email and "MyCompany-SQL-01" that run sharepoint and "MyCompany-EXCH-01" that do VMWare.

    WTF? Do none of you completely format a computer and make a clean install before assigning it to another job? Even if you don't, renaming a computer is such a minor task. Geez. I'd much rather be able to find a computer by browsing than have to break out my Super Hi-tech Information Technology decoder ring.

    Hey it wasn't up to me! but I'm not a network admin so even if by some strange twist of fate they were to give me access to DNS admin on the LAN I'd probably screw it up. I just program computers man, sod domain administration, that's for grumpy star trek geeks.

  • Rich (unregistered) in reply to Sharkie
    Sharkie:
    The easiest and most effective way to address this issue is two-fold: 1) Fire the lazy slobs that feel comfortable adding to the mess and don't take enough pride in their jobs to run wiring cleanly. There IS no valid excuse for messy wiring. 2) Take your marketing rep for a two-martini lunch to instigate a rumor that future prospects would like to tour the server room.

    #1 takes care of the human resource problem. #2 takes care of the budget problem.

    Here's how it seems to work though: IT dept is understaffed, there's ten things to be done at once and a fire every other day. You know that doing the job properly will save time in the long run but you also know that you'll be seen doing froo-froo stuff with the cabling while Jenny from accounting can't post the financials. So you jam it in, wire it up and worry about it later. Your #1 doesn't even enter the equation because of understaffing and would just make things worse.

    Pilots would call this flying behind the power curve where it takes more power to fly more slowly.

    We had this (though not to the degree of the story) before there were appropriate staffing levels. Once you have appropriate staffing levels, Joe can go take care of Jenny while you do the froo-froo stuff with the cables and then instead of having to deal with crappy cables later, you can do something else that makes your job run even smoother. All of a sudden, the bean counters and suits find things are running smoother and everyone's happy. Unfortunately, they won't believe you if you just explain this to them.

    Rich

  • pointer (unregistered) in reply to Scott
    Scott:
    This will really suck in a week or so when two new employees start and need to be on the network full-time. I hope that order comes in soon because the nearest BestBuy is a half-hour drive...
    You're complaining about a half-hour drive? Geesh, I know gas prices are high, but still.
  • muhahaha (unregistered) in reply to IQpierce
    IQpierce:
    Get over your mistaken belief that the writing on this site is inherently humorous. It's bad enough when you write a long-ass article where the actual funny thing is drowned in your lame attempts at humor in the form of flowery, over-dramatic prose... But today we get nothing BUT the crappy, overreaching writing. The "story" boils down to:

    "There's this guy, and at his job, they have a really bad server room. I mean REALLY bad! Things are, liked, stacked on each other! And look at some of the names of the servers! They're really ridiculous!"

    Your lame-ass attempts at humor through hyperbole add zero entertainment value to the crappy story that some retard puked out of his ass. F minus.

    Get over yourself. I for one enjoy the added prose. I grant it's not million-dollar book deal sort of stuff, but it's still fun for me. And if you want to "boil down" the story, every story in existence boils down to "There's this person. Oh no, something happens." I take it you don't care much for literature, tv, movies, plays, and entertainment in general.

  • iToad (unregistered) in reply to akatherder
    akatherder:
    We embedded all kinds of useful information in our system names:

    geographical region (e.g. continent), city, server architecture, our "group", OS (windows or solaris mostly), server usage (e.g. server, domain controller, virtual host, virtual server, network device)

    So you would end up with something like afsoxclwv001

    It looks cryptic but most of the systems we worked on were in the same location, architecture, os, and group. So you memorized the theme after a few days.

    AKA Hungarian notation for servers.

  • (cs) in reply to Rich
    Rich:
    You know that doing the job properly will save time in the long run but you also know that you'll be seen doing froo-froo stuff with the cabling while Jenny from accounting can't post the financials. So you jam it in, wire it up and worry about it later.

    That's assuming the "froo-froo" stuff is seen in a negative light, and it discounts the possibility that Jenny would not be having problems posting the financials if the servers were properly organized and maintained.....

    I've worked in places where if you didn't run the wiring properly you didn't have a job for long. It was simply unacceptable to work any other way. Server organization and running wires correctly was seen as essential, not "froo-froo"....

    -Me

  • n0ia (unregistered)

    The real WTF is that they spelled MacGyver wrong.

    I'd probably use the word "MacGyver-ized" instead too, but I think that just comes down to personal preference.

  • SamuraiPenguin (unregistered)

    How funny. My company recently gained back a rackmount server that had been sitting unused in our datacenter for years. It was a shelf, for a server that decided to give up the ghost. Glass half full!

    Captcha: Howdy, svr07 aka shelf03!

    (server names changed to protect the not-so-innocent...)

  • (cs) in reply to Critter
    Critter:
    ParkinT:
    Sadly, ALL server rooms resemble a jungle of wires. I have been in many Server Rooms and Telephone Wire Centers and there really is no such thing as ORGANIZATION! It is simply not possible in the daily operation.

    I do know what you are talking about, and I hate to burst your bubble, but there are some. My current employer has a very neat, clean server room. Also, back when I was a contractor, I did see a neat, clean server room every now and then. They do exist.

    Of course they exist, at least before any servers are installed...

    Man, if I were in charge of one of my company's server rooms, it would look much worse than this. Hell if my apartment is anything by which to go by, half the servers wouldn't even be reachable.

    And as a result, I will never have to put up with a job as boring as maintaining a server room...

  • Feek (unregistered) in reply to Secret Agent Man
    Secret Agent Man:
    I don't know. It sounds like they could have invested some money into some organization. Maybe it's because I'm a neat-freak, but I wouldn't mind investing a pretty penny into organizing the jungle of wires and boxes.

    Hell, you don't even need a pretty penny. Spend 20 bucks on 500 tie-wraps, and you've cut through at least 75% of the problem.

  • Feek (unregistered) in reply to AbbydonKrafts
    AbbydonKrafts:
    I've started naming new computers with mythological names - but that relate to what they are. The people "in charge" of setting up computers around here are unimaginative and, surprise, use the user's name. My first one was ENG-PANDORA for our source repository. I've actually had to explain to many how the name relates. My current computer is going into dry heaves and having seizures, so I commandeered a new computer as a replacement. I named it ENG-PROMETHEUS. I'm waiting for the Engineering VP to get what I'm saying.

    So what you're saying is that because you know Greek mythology, everyone else should, too? To be honest, I'm not completely sure how the Pandora thing relates, and I don't get the Prometheus at all. You're a real life BOFH, aren't you?

  • Joe Blaim (unregistered) in reply to ParkinT
    ParkinT:
    Sadly, ALL server rooms resemble a jungle of wires. I have been in many Server Rooms and Telephone Wire Centers and there really is no such thing as ORGANIZATION! It is simply not possible in the daily operation.
    Ignorance is bliss right? To be so sure and be wrong... I was allowed on a tour of my company's server room once. Once past the air-tight security doors into the holy sanctum (where the slightest hint of smoke meant you have 60 sec to escape before the doors lock and the room is flushed w/ inert gas) I hardly saw a single cable.

    The floor was actually just a platform of removable panels sitting 1 foot above the real floor. The myriad cords had plenty of room to be sorted and channelled free from layout issues like aisles and equipment.

  • Feek (unregistered) in reply to Rich
    Rich:
    Here's how it seems to work though: IT dept is understaffed, there's ten things to be done at once and a fire every other day. You know that doing the job properly will save time in the long run but you also know that you'll be seen doing froo-froo stuff with the cabling while Jenny from accounting can't post the financials. So you jam it in, wire it up and worry about it later. Your #1 doesn't even enter the equation because of understaffing and would just make things worse.

    Pilots would call this flying behind the power curve where it takes more power to fly more slowly.

    We had this (though not to the degree of the story) before there were appropriate staffing levels. Once you have appropriate staffing levels, Joe can go take care of Jenny while you do the froo-froo stuff with the cables and then instead of having to deal with crappy cables later, you can do something else that makes your job run even smoother. All of a sudden, the bean counters and suits find things are running smoother and everyone's happy. Unfortunately, they won't believe you if you just explain this to them.

    How difficult is it to point out how much money is lost from the current configuration and how much would be saved if it was set up correctly? It's as simple as telling whatever PHB needs to be told "It's taking me 30 minutes to do a 10 minute job because of that mess. I need time to clean it". See how quickly telling your boss that you're wasting time gets it cleaned up. In fact, being understaffed, to me, seems like more of a reason to have everything neat. With the server room all hairy willy-nilly, how much longer does it take you to do things in there than if it were neat? On top of that, just like that previous comment, who's to say the problem Jenny's having doesn't stem from the fact the server room looks like it does?

    In no organization in which I've been in charge of the servers, from 2 servers to 200, have I abided by a messy server room. I have too damn much to do in a day to worry about whether I'm 100% sure this cable I'm about to unplug is the right one, or to go searching like Indiana Jones to find a server.

    If I'm coming into a mess that's not my own, and there's ten things to do at once, I make cleaning the server room one of those things. I don't even spend a ton of time doing it. 5 or 10 minutes here and there for a month will work. Baby steps. It can even be done at the end of the day. You have to go home some time, so before you do spend some time cleaning.

    There's no valid reason for a server room that's so messy that you have to worry about corpses hiding in wire spaghetti. Saying you don't want to seem froo-froo for cleaning cables is like saying that you don't want to seem weak for going to the doctor about that sucking chest wound.

  • Bradlegar the Hobbit (unregistered)

    On server names: Once I was talking to a friend of mine who has a loose association with the I/T department at the university where he works. He was talking about three of the servers on their network and some of the things they did, and mentioned Io, Europa, and Titan. So I asked him about Ganymede. There was a distinct pause, then he asked, "How did you know about that one? It's not even connected to the network!"

    So I explained to him about Jupiter and the Galilean moons.

  • Mr Steve (unregistered) in reply to IQpierce
    IQpierce:
    This is precisely the type of DailyWTF article I hate.

    Get over your mistaken belief that the writing on this site is inherently humorous. It's bad enough when you write a long-ass article where the actual funny thing is drowned in your lame attempts at humor in the form of flowery, over-dramatic prose... But today we get nothing BUT the crappy, overreaching writing. The "story" boils down to:

    "There's this guy, and at his job, they have a really bad server room. I mean REALLY bad! Things are, liked, stacked on each other! And look at some of the names of the servers! They're really ridiculous!"

    Your lame-ass attempts at humor through hyperbole add zero entertainment value to the crappy story that some retard puked out of his ass. F minus.

    Man there's always 1 whinger, like every single wtf post

    IF YOU DON'T LIKE IT THEN DON'T F@#kIN READ THE SITE !!!! NO ONE IS FORCING YOU TO DO ANYTHING!!!

    Personally I loved the bit about rack servers with no mounts :D

  • Mark G (unregistered)
    [image]

    :P

  • (cs) in reply to Scott
    Scott:
    I hope that order comes in soon because the nearest BestBuy is a half-hour drive...

    A half-hour drive is a major problem? Where do you live, Leichtenstein?

  • Skipper (unregistered)

    Lucky him he didn't find an FCCTHULHUSRV01 or something.

  • (cs) in reply to Feek
    Feek:
    How difficult is it to point out how much money is lost from the current configuration and how much would be saved if it was set up correctly? It's as simple as telling whatever PHB needs to be told "It's taking me 30 minutes to do a 10 minute job because of that mess. I need time to clean it". See how quickly telling your boss that you're wasting time gets it cleaned up.

    You live in a land of rainbows and fairytales.

    We've had our service department halved in a year, despite the pre-halving department working overtime every day and asking for more staff. Service, Sales, R&D, external distributors are all begging for more Service staff. Sales and distributors lose face because we can't fix things fast. R&D can't get products out on time because they've had to shoulder support load. Service need staff because they're all going insane trying to do the work in addition to having to do reports demanded by management so management can figure out why the fault is happening (despite clear and vocal demand from multiple directions for more service staff).

    "Explain it to your boss" is a far cry from "acceptance from your boss.

  • Anonymous (unregistered) in reply to its me
    its me:
    IQpierce:
    This is precisely the type of DailyWTF article I hate.

    (...)

    You think you can do better? So are you volunteering your time to help out and write some articles? Are you starting your own WTF-like site? No?

    Then you have two options:

    1. Stop reading WTF.
    2. Quit your bitchin'.

    Indeed, how dare people give feedback to let the crew know which types of stories are more or less popular. Clearly the only option people should have is to love it or leave. In fact, comments should be disabled entirely.

    I'll grant it wasn't the most nicely-phrased criticism ever, but it was more constructive than your reply.

  • (cs) in reply to ParkinT
    ParkinT:
    Sadly, ALL server rooms resemble a jungle of wires. I have been in many Server Rooms and Telephone Wire Centers and there really is no such thing as ORGANIZATION! It is simply not possible in the daily operation.

    Of course it is possible, damn it.

    For the wires: route them using cable trays from dedicated patch cabinets either over the ceiling or through the raised floor if you have one. Put patch trays into (high density) server cabinets. Label every wire. If a wire gets faulty, label it so and leave it in place. Then put a new one. Use cable ties as if your depended on it.

    For the servers:

    • for cheapskates: if you buy cabinets without shelves then don't buy cabinets. Go to IKEA and buy open-frame standalone metal shelves with additional X-frame struts for strenghening and wall struts for keeping things upright. This is way better than cabinets without sufficient shelves (especially if you have a lot of desktop servers). Rackmountable servers you just put on their "short side". Never, never, ever stack servers on top of each other.
    • for sane people: Buy your cabinets with sufficient shelves if you are bent on using desktop-type machines as servers. Put remote accessible KVM-switches into the cabinets. Wire them up using patch panels (or for systems with low bandwidth requirements or clusters put switches into the cabinets itself). Dedicate one or more cabinets as patch panel cabinets only. Dedicate one ore more cabinets for core network switches.

    Labeling servers: do it. If you are in the business of virtual servers do not bother to label as to which virtual servers run on top of which physical servers. That's crap since you will never be able to have up-to-date labels once daily operations kick in fully. Just label the physical server name and an inventory number (inventory number because in the course of daily operations server hard disks might get swapped and so even "physical servers" migrate from one physical machine to another - a physical server name is not an inventory number).

    Servers: buy servers with rack mounting kits, not desktops.

    UPS: don't get me started on that issue ..........

  • (cs) in reply to jimlangrunner
    jimlangrunner:
    Sadly, they don't happen often enough. Say you want to clean it up. Say you put in your own time. Say you spend a Saturday cleaning, moving cables, and documenting everything. Say you do all that.

    Then say you cry because some S.O.B. decides it's too much effort to check the docs before putting a new server in place, routing the wires, and plugging it in.

    I did say it, because I've been there. I'm a programmer. I've seen the spaghetti code, and I've seen the spaghetti wiring. It ain't pretty. And there's not a danged thing you can do to change it.

    That is why you do not want to be the fool who does that kind of work voluntarily because:

    (a) if you move servers and cables on your own in such spaghetti setup you will get something wrong because you will mis-re-route (does this word exist ? I do not know - but I hope you get my point here.) a cable or you shut down some POS server and it does start properly because it's install is a POS or some SOB has no documented the proper startup procedure or you can not shut it down because the console is logged with some user account you don't know the password .... Anyway, something goes wrong. You get blamed (actually, you get fucked if you are doing anything without telling anybody.

    (b) why do it in the first place. Even if you are doing a perfect job on (no (a) happens) then on Monday some arsehole comes and starts the old shit again and you do not have any management support to have his arse kicked so hard that the boot is tickling his throat. And consider this: this kind of work will not get you a higher annual raise or bonus if you do everything right bit it will cost you your annual bonus or raise if shit happens (which it will - don't dream otherwise).

    (c) if you have systems you are responsible for in that kind of POS room just take care of your own systems. Lock your cabinets and keep the keys with you. Do your own wiring in a professional way. If you have network equipment on top of servers to handle put it into your own (dedicated) cabinet(s). Put UPS units and fast power transfer switches (if you can get the budget) into each of your own cabinets. Label everything. Check your systems physically on-site every day. Report every dork who is touching your cabinets in writing to your management and try to blame them for some fault. Don't give a shit about other people's systems - they are not your responsibility.

    (d) you are not the the CEO or the CIO or the IT Operations Manager - don't try to save the world on your own. If the shit blows up eventually, just make sure your own ass is covered.

    Now if you are tasked with this work by management then make sure that you have proper management support. That starts with a (hopefully) blanket authorization signed by the CIO and/or IT department head. If you can't get this, stall: don't do anything and report lack of progress because of the lack of written authorizations from senior IT management. Once you have a written authorization, make a project schedule and get it approved in writing by senior IT management. Identify each tom, dick and harry who might have equipment in the server room (don't forget your cable guys). Send them a written request with the authorization from senior management attached request complete documentation for all their systems in said server room to be given to you in writing officially signed and approved by their management by a tight deadline. Do physical survey of the server room in the mean time and lock down the server room from now on and get an server room access policy approved. The day after the deadline expires report a non-responding groups, units etc. in writing to your management sponsor. Once you have received replies from all units, correlate their information with the physical server room survey you have done earlier. Do not let anybody weasel out of resolving any discrepancies found(like: "Oh we do not need to bother about the old systems because the new systems are coming netx year."). Then start the work: purchase new equipment as needed, install it and start doing the work by stages: step by step for each unit who has any systems in the server room (network group last).

  • (cs) in reply to Sharkie
    Sharkie:
    The easiest and most effective way to address this issue is two-fold: 1) Fire the lazy slobs that feel comfortable adding to the mess and don't take enough pride in their jobs to run wiring cleanly. There IS no valid excuse for messy wiring. 2) Take your marketing rep for a two-martini lunch to instigate a rumor that future prospects would like to tour the server room.

    #1 takes care of the human resource problem. #2 takes care of the budget problem.

    Clever & Smart.

  • (cs) in reply to IQpierce
    IQpierce:
    This is precisely the type of DailyWTF article I hate.

    Get over your mistaken belief that the writing on this site is inherently humorous. It's bad enough when you write a long-ass article where the actual funny thing is drowned in your lame attempts at humor in the form of flowery, over-dramatic prose... But today we get nothing BUT the crappy, overreaching writing. The "story" boils down to:

    "There's this guy, and at his job, they have a really bad server room. I mean REALLY bad! Things are, liked, stacked on each other! And look at some of the names of the servers! They're really ridiculous!"

    Your lame-ass attempts at humor through hyperbole add zero entertainment value to the crappy story that some retard puked out of his ass. F minus.

    Hey guys, here is one of the sad little muppets who fuck their server room - isn't he cute .... so angry.

  • (cs) in reply to Mark G
    Mark G:

    UN-BE-FUCKING-LIEVE-ABLE.

    They could have at least mounted the stuff onto large picture frames ....

  • Da' Man (unregistered)

    Some more naming conventions:

    • in one company we (that is, my boss, who had a good sense of humor) named the servers after spaceships from Sci-Fi movies.

    "Hey, I think Nostromo crashed again. We really should move the mail server over to Enterprise!" :-)

    • In another company I worked, they named all the servers by car brands. Well, the reason was that the very first server had a shiny red case, so it became 'ferrari'. Later followed 'audi', 'bmw' and - my favourite: 'lada' :-)

    • When I had to reorganize the IT for a company, I decided to give the servers all names of butterflies. Latin names, that is. So we had one 'Apollo' (yepp, that's a butterfly, too!) and another one 'Amaryllis', and so on.

    The workstations all had names of trees, and I let the users choose which tree they want. They even got a desktop background image of that particular tree. I was hoping to make them identify more with their computer, and I think it helped quite a bit.

    And if I have to look up, which user has 'ELWS017' or which user has "maple", that really adds up to the same effort.

    Other options would include names of birds ("I think, 'eagle' has crashed!" :-) or famous actors ("it seems, 'eastwood' is down!")

    Any other ideas?

    Da' Man

  • (cs)

    Hmm, that server room looked like one that I worked in at Microsoft. In fact, we had a workgroup file server that was accidentally reformatted once because it was sitting on the floor unlabeled and instructions were given to reformat and reinstall all of the old spare machines on the floor.

    After that, we did more frequent backups and labeled the server.

  • s (unregistered) in reply to codemoose
    codemoose:
    Wow.

    You mean some companies have separate rooms for their servers?

    Yep... Server room (+office +customer desk +basic employee daytime area), service room (+boss' office, +spare parts storage) and a bathroom (+cartridge refill room). Office support and ISP in one. The network is all Ethernet (over 3 kilometers radius around the company), and in many places the cable is ran over the roadside trees.

  • s (unregistered)

    A recent mail on the corporate mailing list:

    Subject: computer "FUSION" (nicely obscured by Outlook, as usually)

    There's a PC in the server room. Whoever knows its use, please contact the admin.

    From: someuser What PC? If you mean one between the wardrobe and the window, it's "RETARD", and it acts as a console for router 2651.

  • Frzr (unregistered)

    "switches dangling from thick systems of entangled wires".

    Horrific... They were probably thinking, if its weight can be supported by four CAT-5 cables, why bother allocating rack space for it? Think of one rack-mounted RJ45 patch panel you hang devices from. It allows more efficient use of rack volume.

  • michael (unregistered)

    I used to work for a bank as a developer where some of the other developers compiled a big music collection by sharing their folders on their own machines. I thought this was impressive (and of course stupid by audit and compliance reasons). But then I went to the server room with one of the infrastructure guys to get introduced to a machine labeled BIG01 (no idea what that stood for) which contained all the infrastructure guys' mp3s and movies. Very likely even backed up just in case.

  • (cs)

    At my last employer, a place of many WTFs, they have some machines in the server room which cannot be switched off for fear of what will happen. They are a pair of Apple Quadras, which weren't exactly server class machines when new. Someone vaguely remembers them being part of a data feed, but despite monitoring the network traffic to and from the machines nothing definite has been worked out as to their purpose. Management changes so frequently, and documentation is so scant, that each new head of IT decides it's better for the machines to be left alone rather than switch them off and wait to see who screams.

  • (cs) in reply to its me

    I feel I have to point out that this is yet another "going-nowhere" DailyWTF article about hardware.

    Hardware articles are either "Oh no the wires!" or "somethings dripping in the server room again!". Hardware is an inherrently dull topic. Unless you are actively trying to attract the wrong sort of people to this blog at the expense of more enlightened readers, I recommend avoiding hardware articles altogether in the future.

  • John Smith (unregistered) in reply to WTFNamingException
    WTFNamingException:
    IQpierce:
    This is precisely the type of DailyWTF article I hate.

    Your lame-ass attempts at humor through hyperbole add zero entertainment value to the crappy story that some retard puked out of his ass. F minus.

    Unfortunately, this is precisely what I thought when I realised the end of the article was actually the end. There was me, waiting for the "Government Inspector" to turn up and unplug all the wires on account of planing permission or some such... but no.

    You apparantly missed the RWTF in the hyperbole (some of which I admit was mine, but some of which seems to have been blown up to another level in the anonymization process, which was unnecessary, because I had already anonymized it - just to be safe!)

    TRWF is that someone puts in a new, relatively expensive 1U xSeries x336 machine, for some noble purpose, without giving it an appropriate label, and probably injecting it in a random rack at a random level. Then later someone ("Gary") who is probably a sysadmin of some sort, enters the room, sees the unlabeled server, and decides "hey, that machine must be labeled", upon which he continues to type FCSRVUNKNOWN001 into the labeling machine, prints the label and affixes it to the server. The mere thought of the insanity required to NOT find out what the server was doing, still makes me dizzy to the point that I almost faint. I mean - put a console on the damn thing. Or just turn it off, then see who complains. For sake of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, do something. Don't just accept the lousy status quo. Either that, or DON'T do something. If you need to flag the machine for later identification, put a bright red post-it note on it, saying "WTF is this? Let me know before next week, or it will be turned off and removed from the room."

    The day I saw that - at first - seemingly innocent label, I swear the blood left my brain and for all intents and purposes I passed out. And I distinctly remember that the last thought before that was: WTF?! which I why I felt it was worthy to share here, sorry if it wasn't to your taste.

    As for server rooms, I believe any server room should have a "king" who gets the last word on all placement of machines, and who is actually authorised to ensure that the room is orderly at all times, with sufficient power, cooling and accessibility. For my next job, I will insist on seeing the server room before I sign a contract.

    -John

  • (cs) in reply to pointer

    If you're calling it "gas" the prices aren't high - you don't know what high fuel (petrol/diesel) prices are.

  • (cs) in reply to Joe Blaim

    The floor was actually just a platform of removable panels sitting 1 foot above the real floor.

    Wow, what a great innovation they have! They ought to rush right out and patent that.

    Oh. Wait. I think I may have seen something kinda sorta like that before.

    Sorry, my memory of it is a bit fuzzy... after all... it was... over twenty years ago!

    That sort of setup is standard in server rooms.

  • (cs) in reply to Mark G

    {picture omitted, but there's only been one so far so you know which I mean}

    Ah, that must be what they mean by "whackmount".....

  • (cs) in reply to Da' Man

    Other options would include names of ... famous actors ("it seems, 'eastwood' is down!")

    Did Lovelace go down often?

  • Rodolpho Zatanas (unregistered) in reply to its me

    There's no reason to excuse ass-bad writing.

  • Rodolpho Zatanas (unregistered) in reply to Rodolpho Zatanas

    Oops, should have quoted instead of replying.

  • jmo21 (unregistered) in reply to Rodolpho Zatanas

    naming conventions eh?

    one company i worked at had game names/characters eg. Mario, Doom, Halo

    Another bizarelly used local hotel names in Amsterdam which was really weird - the only one i remember off the top of my head was Krasnapolsky, which doesnt exactly role off the tongue!

    (i usually hate people mentioning their captchs, but mine is "onomatopoeia" - jeez!!)

  • Brian (unregistered)

    I worked at a place who's server room was such chaos that to find a specific server I would remote in, right click the CD drive and hit eject. Now just find the one with the drive tray open. This worked because our admin never put the front covers back on the rack mount boxes.

  • Chris Harmon (unregistered)

    A few years back I was a contractor at a power plant in Michigan. The server room was quite a amalgamation of servers almost to this article's description. As my contracting time continued (on/off for ~3 years or so), I was given more duties and before I quit that job, I was the Lead (even as a contractor!) over the team, and had as one of my tasks to clean up the servers and cables (which I did - and documented it pretty extensively).

    The worst part however wasn't really that (obviously - since I was able to clean it up) - it was the one old guy on the team that likely caused it to end up that way. He would sneak in and add cables and workstations and miscellaneous hardware anywhere he could. The real issue they had that caused the cleanup was power consumption (ironic isn't it to be an issue at a power plant) - and even adding workstations would occasionally become an issue.

    It was kind-of fun to clean and organize all the servers and know how it was all put together... too bad nowhere else (that I have been working at since then) seems to ever do that, but I guess I'm just a neat freak :)

  • Someone (unregistered) in reply to Bradlegar the Hobbit
    Bradlegar the Hobbit:
    On server names: Once I was talking to a friend of mine who has a loose association with the I/T department at the university where he works. He was talking about three of the servers on their network and some of the things they did, and mentioned Io, Europa, and Titan. So I asked him about Ganymede. There was a distinct pause, then he asked, "How did you know about that one? It's not even connected to the network!"

    So I explained to him about Jupiter and the Galilean moons.

    Titan is a moon of Saturn. The Galilean moons of Jupiter are Callisto, Europa, Ganymede, and Io.

Leave a comment on “Lost in the Jungle”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

« Return to Article