• snubbe (unregistered) in reply to PS

    Awesome! I'll put my whole application within that block!

  • Learn to Read! (unregistered) in reply to Jabmist

    They're discussing .Net, not Java.

  • Serge (unregistered) in reply to Jabmist

    He was talking about the .NET environment where running a thread within "try, catch, finally" doesn't bubble up any exceptions which occur within that thread. The exception has to be caught within the actual thread, not the parent thread which spawned it.

  • Dave Black (unregistered) in reply to Jabmist

    Uh...maybe I missed something, but aren't we talking about .NET - I'm sure that other languages have different implementations (i.e. your example is in Java)

  • Kendall F. (unregistered)

    I have been burned by that one. I discovered the hard way that pressing the 'X' close button on a console window is equivalent to killing the process. I thought surely it would die gracefully, but, no.

  • David (unregistered) in reply to Jabmist

    If you read the original post, the author mentioned .Net 1.0 - not Java. So while Java will fire off the finally event, that does not mean .Net will.

  • John tan (unregistered)

    Alex Papadimoulis, you sucks

  • Alex Papadimoulis (unregistered) in reply to John tan
    John tan:
    Alex Papadimoulis, you sucks
    John tan, you blows goats
  • ewolfman (unregistered)

    Loved the Min story. Really funny.

Leave a comment on “My Tales”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

Log Out

« Return to Article