• RFoxmich (unregistered)

    First -> 最初 (Japanese) -> Primero (Spanish) -> i parë (Albanian) -> முதல் (Tamil) ...

  • faoileag (unregistered) in reply to RFoxmich
    RFoxmich:
    First -> 最初 (Japanese) -> Primero (Spanish) -> i parë (Albanian) -> முதல் (Tamil) ...
    But Sir, you picked the wrong word to start with! Frist -> 期間 (Japanese) -> período (Spanish) -> periudhë (Albanian) -> காலம் (Tamil) ...

    There. FTFY.

  • QJo (unregistered)

    This is the third time this week I've actually laughed out loud at TDWTF. Not as loudly as yesterday, which caused the heads of colleagues to turn towards me in annoyance, but it did invoke an audible chuckle.

    These entries are humour at their very best.

  • RaspenJho (cs)

    Congratulations Randolpho! I always knew you were lipstick on a pig material!

  • atlas (unregistered)

    trwtf is why this is the prize winner. so what, its quirky and humorous, its not a serious site. He probably just wrote it for the sake of writing it, i hardly think it qualifies. If this code was doing something more than driving a "quirky and humorous" site, then yea. But this smacks of lack of content to be honest.

  • Eric (unregistered)

    Atlas, the entire point of the competition was to write something stupid. This is the definition of stupid. It's not a normal entry on TDWTF.

  • cyborg (unregistered) in reply to Eric
    Eric:
    Atlas, the entire point of the competition was to write something stupid. This is the definition of stupid. It's not a normal entry on TDWTF.

    Atlas: TRWTF.

  • Krunt (unregistered)

    I'm lazy - is there a link to where this is being hosted so we can all play with it?

  • Bianca Love (unregistered)

    Finally. My master plan has come to fruition. 15 years ago everyone I knew questioned the wisdom of marrying Randolpho. "Is this a joke!?!" They asked. "Did you lose a bet!?!" They wailed. "Are his parents billionaires......and terminally ill?" They pondered. "Does he really wear a size 13wide shoe?" (Why yes. Yes he does.) They never suspected the truth. Tactical bacon, I did this all for you. Soon we will be together. Forever. Tactical bacon, I love you.

  • Anomaly (unregistered)

    I hope we get the actual contest winner soon instead of more of these honorable mention winners. Don't get me wrong they are creative and evil but at least they tried.

  • Mark Bowytz (cs) in reply to Anomaly
    Anomaly:
    I hope we get the actual contest winner soon instead of more of these honorable mention winners. Don't get me wrong they are creative and evil but at least they tried.

    I didn't want to do this, but here's a link to the big winner

  • ¯\(°_o)/¯ I DUNNO LOL (unregistered) in reply to atlas
    atlas:
    trwtf is why this is the prize winner. so what, its quirky and humorous, its not a serious site. He probably just wrote it for the sake of writing it, i hardly think it qualifies. If this code was doing something more than driving a "quirky and humorous" site, then yea. But this smacks of lack of content to be honest.
    If you know so much about what is good and what isn't, then why didn't you submit your own brillant entry?
  • RichP (cs) in reply to ¯\(°_o)/¯ I DUNNO LOL
    ¯\(°_o)/¯ I DUNNO LOL:
    atlas:
    trwtf is why this is the prize winner. so what, its quirky and humorous, its not a serious site. He probably just wrote it for the sake of writing it, i hardly think it qualifies. If this code was doing something more than driving a "quirky and humorous" site, then yea. But this smacks of lack of content to be honest.
    If you know so much about what is good and what isn't, then why didn't you submit your own brillant entry?
    He did. He lost. He's bitter. Now he's complaining.
  • Randolpho (unregistered) in reply to Krunt
    Comment held for moderation.
  • chubertdev (cs) in reply to atlas
    atlas:
    trwtf is why this is the prize winner. so what, its quirky and humorous, its not a serious site. He probably just wrote it for the sake of writing it, i hardly think it qualifies. If this code was doing something more than driving a "quirky and humorous" site, then yea. But this smacks of lack of content to be honest.

    Right or wrong, that's just how these contests were done a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away.

  • Scribbler (cs) in reply to atlas
    atlas:
    trwtf is why this is the prize winner. so what, its quirky and humorous, its not a serious site. He probably just wrote it for the sake of writing it, i hardly think it qualifies. If this code was doing something more than driving a "quirky and humorous" site, then yea. But this smacks of lack of content to be honest.

    What I'm getting here is that the point is not something you have much experience with.

  • chubertdev (cs) in reply to atlas
    atlas:
    trwtf is why this is the prize winner. so what, its quirky and humorous, its not a serious site. He probably just wrote it for the sake of writing it, i hardly think it qualifies. If this code was doing something more than driving a "quirky and humorous" site, then yea. But this smacks of lack of content to be honest.

    you could have just acted indifferently towards this. you know. more "atlas shrugged."

  • Norman Diamond (unregistered) in reply to Mark Bowytz
    Comment held for moderation.
  • PT (unregistered) in reply to Mark Bowytz
    Comment held for moderation.
  • Anomaly (unregistered) in reply to Mark Bowytz
    Comment held for moderation.
  • Nmare (cs) in reply to Anomaly
    Anomaly:
    Mark Bowytz:
    Anomaly:
    I hope we get the actual contest winner soon instead of more of these honorable mention winners. Don't get me wrong they are creative and evil but at least they tried.

    I didn't want to do this, but here's a link to the big winner

    I'm at work so I can't click that link. Some other unwitting pawn please do the honors. And if you would be ever so kind, write up a status report of where that veiled link goes.

    Captcha: causa - Causa I don't want to.

    I at the job too...but i have a serious doubt about it.

  • DQ (unregistered)

    I asked five questions and each time he answered 'NO' So finally I wondered: "Is this a WTF?" Guess what the answer was :)

    Captcha: ratis as in 'Ratis wat hij antwoordde'

  • Randolpho (unregistered) in reply to Nmare
    Comment held for moderation.
  • Nmare (cs) in reply to Randolpho
    Randolpho:
    Nmare:
    Anomaly:
    Mark Bowytz:
    Anomaly:
    I hope we get the actual contest winner soon instead of more of these honorable mention winners. Don't get me wrong they are creative and evil but at least they tried.

    I didn't want to do this, but here's a link to the big winner

    I'm at work so I can't click that link. Some other unwitting pawn please do the honors. And if you would be ever so kind, write up a status report of where that veiled link goes.

    Captcha: causa - Causa I don't want to.

    I at the job too...but i have a serious doubt about it.

    Don't worry, it's totally work safe. Maybe not sanity safe, and definitely an old joke, but safe for work.

    Back, at home... Confirmed! Safe and i like it! But i have sanity problem for real =)

    by the way, grats for your title!

  • ludus (unregistered)
    Comment held for moderation.
  • srgh (unregistered) in reply to ludus
    Comment held for moderation.
  • sagaciter (unregistered) in reply to srgh
    srgh:
    yeah, I guess you could have donez that....
    I can't even finish my personal things. When I put a simple task on my "TODO (urgent)" list it takes me 6 months to finish it. How do you expect me to have done that?
  • lolwtf (cs)

    TRWTF is that it has a jukebox. Talk about feature creep.

  • srgh (unregistered) in reply to sagaciter
    sagaciter:
    srgh:
    yeah, I guess you could have donez that....
    I can't even finish my personal things. When I put a simple task on my "TODO (urgent)" list it takes me 6 months to finish it. How do you expect me to have done that?
    meh...your workload is neither my problem nor something I give a rat's ass about.

    But it's good to have an "ideas man"....

  • tchize (unregistered) in reply to Randolpho

    "Should we invade Syria" translated as "Professional"

    Wtf ??? (Ho, and that mean yes)

  • pete23 (unregistered)

    Extra points for the inefficient modulus implementation of isEven;-)

  • dkf (cs) in reply to Randolpho
    Randolpho:
    You're doing [insert deity of choice here]Codethulhu's work, folks. :)
    Yep.
  • Hmmmm (cs) in reply to Mark Bowytz
    Mark Bowytz:
    Anomaly:
    I hope we get the actual contest winner soon instead of more of these honorable mention winners. Don't get me wrong they are creative and evil but at least they tried.

    I didn't want to do this, but here's a link to the big winner

    Luckily that clip has been blocked in my country on copyright grounds but I still felt a bit sick just reading the title...
  • Harm (unregistered)

    Kenny is giving me the stare, I can't even tell if he's mumbling. But he's persistant that's for sure, nice entry :)

  • Eternal Density (cs)

    My favourite terrible thing about this is that it's so slow computing an answer that I went to read other articles while I waited. The first answer happened to be given right when I checked back but the second one I missed and there's no way to see the answer if you're not looking at the right moment so...

  • anin (unregistered)

    the biggest WTF is that there is no demo (nor is the demo linked at github)!

  • Randolpho (unregistered) in reply to anin
    anin:
    the biggest WTF is that there is no demo (nor is the demo linked at github)!

    I have remedied that. Thanks for pointing it out!

  • Neil (unregistered) in reply to DQ
    DQ:
    I asked five questions and each time he answered 'NO' So finally I wondered: "Is this a WTF?" Guess what the answer was :)
    I asked, 'Will your answer to this question be "no"?' with predictable results...
  • NameOfTheDragon (unregistered)

    Outstanding! That's a ruthlessly honest copyright message, too!

Leave a comment on “OMGWTF2: Lipstick on a Pig”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

« Return to Article