- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
- Error'd
- Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Other Series
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
Admin
Admin
This comment went wide of the uprights, landing in foul territory and losing game, set and match for a TKO in double overtime.
Admin
Admin
I was watching a fight once, and a hockey match suddenly broke out over nothing.
Admin
Admin
It's a tough balance though, because those guys with the 100 years of experience are also the "functions and classes are stupid", "I've been doing it ___ way for 20 years!" guys as well.
Where I used to work they brought in consultants and one of them tried talking the bosses into not letting us use ifs because switches were "faster".
Admin
So was mystery finally revealed or is there part 2 to this story?
Admin
That is only hockey I know of. Also Shahrukh Khan movie called Chak De India must watch for vision of jingoism and love of Hockey.
Admin
Admin
I'm confused. What insane VCS were they using? Can't be decentralized, or he'd always have a local copy. Subversion? I think you'd have to restore from a backup, or dump and load every revision but the ones you don't want, or something similarly drastic and time-consuming. Clearcase, or some other abomination?
Admin
I can envision that conversation. Did you fix that bug? Yes. Revision blah. But that revision broke our test case because the test case was set up to work around the bug, so we reverted it.
Not to mention, WTF, was this compiler thingy that "nobody understood" even though the author, Jason, (if you could call him that) still worked there? What was Adam building and testing with? I didn't know whether to laugh or cry when I read this: "so I know that if it compiles here, it will work perfectly when released."
Admin
On being the "new guy":
It happens all the time. You try to introduce new ideas in the workflow, and nobody listens. Everyone else has years of experience and "know better". This happens even after still being the "new guy" for one year, and having more years of programming experience (I started in the 60's) than the others.
Oh, well. Never mind.
Admin
If Americans see hockey as fighting on ice, it's no wonder the sport isn't popular compared to Canada. Tell me, how many fights broke out in the current NHL playoffs ?
Admin
He should have reverted ALL of his changes back quipping something close to "Well if I'm not good enough for this company, neither is anything I did." Let them start exactly where they were only with far less time on the clock.
Admin
Anyone else wondering why the QA department just sat around while the "compiler" was eating up QA time?
I mean, if this is a code quality tool, then the dev's should have been running the code through the tool all along.
If instead this is a QA tool, then QA should have scheduled some actual testing time after dev is done.
If there was no time for testing (because the dev was occupied with the tool for a few days) then the QA manager should have put the kabosh on deployment until QA is done. That is his responsiblity -- to ensure the quality of the product.
Admin
Looks like you've scored an own goal. I can see we're back to square one, and I'm stumped.
Admin
You're a man's man. No wait. You're a man's man's man.
Admin
The puck has to completely cross the goal line before time elapses in the period.
Admin
Hockey season is over now that the Bs are out. :(
Admin
I like the way you think.
Admin
I'm confused. I thoguht Hockey was played on grass, on a field similar to Soccer.
Admin
Yep, because the simple minded QA shouldn't be able to look at source diffs to get a better understanding of changes. Or even worse, provide feedback on unit test coverage up front to help prevent issues before they occur.
Yea, definitely should segregate the departments even further instead of hiring competent QA professionals.
Admin
What a peculiar game. I bet the physicists love it.
Admin
I think I saw it in Six Sigma or CMM(I?), but it could also just have been some organisations arbitrary implementation of something.
I could imagine someone having worked there and knowing that "case" statments were good but "if"s were bad and then not being able to explain why (I read: "It's faster" as code for "I don't know what I'm saying but it's meant to be better and I know people like speed"
Admin
I'm not sure I understand how something that didn't even load was deployed. Surely the developer themselves does at least enough testing to convince themselves "it appears to work".
Or perhaps this is the "it compiles" story rehashed from a slightly different perspective
Admin
Yes, that's why it's such a tough game.
Admin
Admin
Admin
In order to be a valid goal, the puck must completely cross the goal line before time expires at the end of a period.
Admin
Admin
*has elapsed
[image]Admin
I would just like to say that the offside rule in soccer is the worst rule in all of sports.
Admin
Americans fight by invading countries. Canadians fight by donning gloves, wielding a big stick, and getting pucked.
Admin
If The Compiler operated like make instead of like cc, I'm amazed it compiled anything.
Admin
How so? Yeah, usually it's at a really bad time (ie. chance at goal), but not having it would mean you could leave a player or two deep in the opposition's half with only the goalie between them and the goal. Rugby League and Union both have similar rules, although requiring players to be behind the kicker rather than the last line of defence.
If you want to talk bad rules in [s]soccer[/s] football, how about yellow card accumulation between games (not a rule in every tournament), or not being able to challenge a card after the game (when video replays obviously show the ref is a fucking idiot [image]
Admin
This is what I was thinking. Isn't it QAs job to make sure a crashing app isn't released? Like...shouldn't the firing be because they blame him for not meeting the deadline, not because a crashing app was released?
Also, why didn't he test it on his own device?
We need the OP here
Admin
"We went to the big fight, and a hockey game broke out."
() Well, OK, I just did, but nobody quoted it beforeme.
Admin
Admin
Admin
Did anyone else read, "The plan was to support any mobile operating system and any device," and wonder why that never came up in the story? Obviously you can't do that. The closest thing you can do is have a simple web site with almost no functionality beyond hyperlinks and very little data for a given page, but I'm pretty sure there's devices out there that can't handle that either. But the story seems to imply he did somehow do just that. He got into all the stores - even for those devices/OSs that don't have stores or whose stores stopped being maintained a long time ago.
Admin
Admin
Leaving them at a 1 man disadvantage on the half of the field where they're trying to defend? Or I suppose the other team could just assign 1 man to guard him so it would all even out. Still not seeing the point of that rule.
Admin
I agree here. When I worked in QA, I saved a lot of people's time by just doing a quick look at the diffs between when something passed and failed. Usually it was really easy. Change: ABC to ABD. Product failure: ABC not found. And I'm not talking about test failing because the test was hard coded to expect something, but rather that the product doesn't even start up (I don't know what the developer tested before checking in).
Then I switched to development and I still wish more people in QA would do what I did. Instead it feels like I'm doing both QA and Dev. And yes, I still wonder what developers are doing to test their change before checking in.
But I still agree to this. When I'm in QA or Dev, I don't revert people's changes without reaching out to them first. If they are unavailable, I still make sure they know their change got reverted because it was blocking thousands of QA and Dev from doing their work (yes, I only revert if it is that catastrophic).
Admin
Well, diving is a whole other issue (Reggie Miller is the reason that I don't watch basketball) that makes soccer unwatchable. And the rest of those things are bad, but when you have goals in separate postal codes, and you have a rule that limits how quickly a team can make progress, it brings the action to a snail's pace. There's more action in a single power play in hockey than an entire soccer match.
That being said, how has no one used the term "handegg" yet?
Admin
That would make the author correct.
Admin
How To Be A Hockey Player
Admin
Then you know nothing of the infield fly rule in baseball.
Admin
It doesn't ruin the game. That rule is silly, but it's nowhere near as bad.
Admin
Without the infield fly rule, an infield fly with a runner on first would be an automatic double play. An infield fly with runners on first and second would be an automatic triple play.