• (cs) in reply to QJo
    QJo:
    trtrwtf:
    Bob:
    ted:
    QJo:
    another unoriginal hipster doofus:
    ted:
    renewest:
    Reminds me of this XKCD comic:

    http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/random_number.png

    I didn't even click on the link and knew it was some fag linking xkcd.

    Yes, well done. It's not like he explicitly said "Reminds me of this XKCD comic". You must be very proud of that deduction.

    test:
    It's not clever. It's not funny. Just the word "random_number" with a link under it and the short, useless, one sentence post shows the kind of unoriginal, uninspired, idiot is making the post.

    It was funny to read when it came out. It's even funny when clicking on the Random button on the site and seeing it. It's NOT funny when someone links to it from a one-sentence post and thinks they're so fucking clever to have discovered xkcd.

    Did you consider that perhaps it was intended not for you, but for people who have yet to read that particular xkcd comic?

    I'm surprised that such a simple statement ("this reminds me of ...") would provoke such vitriol. Maybe avoiding the comments section altogether would make you happier.

    Cool down, fellows. This is an old "meme" which someone gets out and dusts down whenever xkcd is invoked. It catches loads of people.

    f- you. What makes you think I'm not dead damn serious? It's a retarded practice and it needs to stop!

    Please attempt some sensitivity. I had a son who was retarded, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter.

    Fuck off, Bob.

    Whee! It's like watching a drunkard fall downstairs. You know it's going to happen as soon as the cat winds itself between his legs, and from that very first moment of teeter, you can predict practically the entire process.

    Sounds like an episode of Full House or Step By Step

  • Uncle Al (unregistered)

    Ah yes -- shuffle for randomization since, after all, more shuffles are guaranteed to increase randomization. Just like shuffling a deck of cards with eight perfect riffle shuffles instead of one (for those who happen not to know this result, eight perfect shuffles of a deck of 52 playing cards returns it to the original state).

  • (cs) in reply to QJo
    QJo:
    Whee! It's like watching a drunkard fall downstairs. You know it's going to happen as soon as the cat winds itself between his legs, and from that very first moment of teeter, you can predict practically the entire process.
    I loled...

    I need to get a cat, some stairs, alcohol, and call a couple of my buddies over who don't know their limits!

  • (cs) in reply to Uncle Al
    Uncle Al:
    Ah yes -- shuffle for randomization since, after all, more shuffles are guaranteed to increase randomization. Just like shuffling a deck of cards with eight perfect riffle shuffles instead of one (for those who happen not to know this result, eight perfect shuffles of a deck of 52 playing cards returns it to the original state).
    Like ROT26...

    Side note: someone actually created a site about ROT26.

  • nag-geoff (unregistered)

    In probability theory, a stochastic process, or sometimes random process, is the counterpart to a deterministic process.

    The triple random also aims at being a deterministic process. I would imagine this is an attempt by the developer to game the system for future profits. Such attempts have been made throughout history of civilization.

  • Tud (unregistered) in reply to The poop of DOOM
    The poop of DOOM:
    QJo:
    trtrwtf:
    Bob:
    ted:
    QJo:
    another unoriginal hipster doofus:
    ted:
    renewest:
    Reminds me of this XKCD comic:

    http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/random_number.png

    I didn't even click on the link and knew it was some fag linking xkcd.

    Yes, well done. It's not like he explicitly said "Reminds me of this XKCD comic". You must be very proud of that deduction.

    test:
    It's not clever. It's not funny. Just the word "random_number" with a link under it and the short, useless, one sentence post shows the kind of unoriginal, uninspired, idiot is making the post.

    It was funny to read when it came out. It's even funny when clicking on the Random button on the site and seeing it. It's NOT funny when someone links to it from a one-sentence post and thinks they're so fucking clever to have discovered xkcd.

    Did you consider that perhaps it was intended not for you, but for people who have yet to read that particular xkcd comic?

    I'm surprised that such a simple statement ("this reminds me of ...") would provoke such vitriol. Maybe avoiding the comments section altogether would make you happier.

    Cool down, fellows. This is an old "meme" which someone gets out and dusts down whenever xkcd is invoked. It catches loads of people.

    f- you. What makes you think I'm not dead damn serious? It's a retarded practice and it needs to stop!

    Please attempt some sensitivity. I had a son who was retarded, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter.

    Fuck off, Bob.

    Whee! It's like watching a drunkard fall downstairs. You know it's going to happen as soon as the cat winds itself between his legs, and from that very first moment of teeter, you can predict practically the entire process.

    Sounds like an episode of Full House or Step By Step
    For some reason I read that as Spongebob Squarepants. Also I had a few quote tags to spare so I put them around your post. Hope you don't mind.

  • (cs) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    QJo:
    Whee! It's like watching a drunkard fall downstairs. You know it's going to happen as soon as the cat winds itself between his legs, and from that very first moment of teeter, you can predict practically the entire process.
    I loled...

    I need to get a cat, some stairs, alcohol, and call a couple of my buddies over who don't know their limits!

    That's a lot of work just to watch someone fall down. I admire your dedication.

  • Random idiot (unregistered) in reply to Tud
    Tud:
    The poop of DOOM:
    QJo:
    trtrwtf:
    Bob:
    ted:
    QJo:
    another unoriginal hipster doofus:
    ted:
    renewest:
    Reminds me of this XKCD comic:

    http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/random_number.png

    I didn't even click on the link and knew it was some fag linking xkcd.

    Yes, well done. It's not like he explicitly said "Reminds me of this XKCD comic". You must be very proud of that deduction.

    test:
    It's not clever. It's not funny. Just the word "random_number" with a link under it and the short, useless, one sentence post shows the kind of unoriginal, uninspired, idiot is making the post.

    It was funny to read when it came out. It's even funny when clicking on the Random button on the site and seeing it. It's NOT funny when someone links to it from a one-sentence post and thinks they're so fucking clever to have discovered xkcd.

    Did you consider that perhaps it was intended not for you, but for people who have yet to read that particular xkcd comic?

    I'm surprised that such a simple statement ("this reminds me of ...") would provoke such vitriol. Maybe avoiding the comments section altogether would make you happier.

    Cool down, fellows. This is an old "meme" which someone gets out and dusts down whenever xkcd is invoked. It catches loads of people.

    f- you. What makes you think I'm not dead damn serious? It's a retarded practice and it needs to stop!

    Please attempt some sensitivity. I had a son who was retarded, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter.

    Fuck off, Bob.

    Whee! It's like watching a drunkard fall downstairs. You know it's going to happen as soon as the cat winds itself between his legs, and from that very first moment of teeter, you can predict practically the entire process.

    Sounds like an episode of Full House or Step By Step
    For some reason I read that as Spongebob Squarepants. Also I had a few quote tags to spare so I put them around your post. Hope you don't mind.

    I felt like this needed another quote wrapping.

  • Lets break this (unregistered) in reply to Random idiot
    Random idiot:
    Tud:
    The poop of DOOM:
    QJo:
    trtrwtf:
    Bob:
    ted:
    QJo:
    another unoriginal hipster doofus:
    ted:
    renewest:
    Reminds me of this XKCD comic:

    http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/random_number.png

    I didn't even click on the link and knew it was some fag linking xkcd.

    Yes, well done. It's not like he explicitly said "Reminds me of this XKCD comic". You must be very proud of that deduction.

    test:
    It's not clever. It's not funny. Just the word "random_number" with a link under it and the short, useless, one sentence post shows the kind of unoriginal, uninspired, idiot is making the post.

    It was funny to read when it came out. It's even funny when clicking on the Random button on the site and seeing it. It's NOT funny when someone links to it from a one-sentence post and thinks they're so fucking clever to have discovered xkcd.

    Did you consider that perhaps it was intended not for you, but for people who have yet to read that particular xkcd comic?

    I'm surprised that such a simple statement ("this reminds me of ...") would provoke such vitriol. Maybe avoiding the comments section altogether would make you happier.

    Cool down, fellows. This is an old "meme" which someone gets out and dusts down whenever xkcd is invoked. It catches loads of people.

    f- you. What makes you think I'm not dead damn serious? It's a retarded practice and it needs to stop!

    Please attempt some sensitivity. I had a son who was retarded, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter.

    Fuck off, Bob.

    Whee! It's like watching a drunkard fall downstairs. You know it's going to happen as soon as the cat winds itself between his legs, and from that very first moment of teeter, you can predict practically the entire process.

    Sounds like an episode of Full House or Step By Step
    For some reason I read that as Spongebob Squarepants. Also I had a few quote tags to spare so I put them around your post. Hope you don't mind.

    I felt like this needed another quote wrapping.

    Is there a maximum depth?

  • nag-geoff (unregistered)

    Amidst a serious discussion, these jokers want to play with quote tags.

  • Former VB.NET Programmer (unregistered)

    I like the part where the first and last items of the shuffled array have reduced probability of being chosen, due to the rounding that occurs in the implicit conversion from double to integer in the last line.

  • (cs) in reply to Lets break this
    Lets break this:
    Random idiot:
    Tud:
    The poop of DOOM:
    QJo:
    trtrwtf:
    Bob:
    ted:
    QJo:
    another unoriginal hipster doofus:
    ted:
    renewest:
    Reminds me of this XKCD comic:

    http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/random_number.png

    I didn't even click on the link and knew it was some fag linking xkcd.

    Yes, well done. It's not like he explicitly said "Reminds me of this XKCD comic". You must be very proud of that deduction.

    test:
    It's not clever. It's not funny. Just the word "random_number" with a link under it and the short, useless, one sentence post shows the kind of unoriginal, uninspired, idiot is making the post.

    It was funny to read when it came out. It's even funny when clicking on the Random button on the site and seeing it. It's NOT funny when someone links to it from a one-sentence post and thinks they're so fucking clever to have discovered xkcd.

    Did you consider that perhaps it was intended not for you, but for people who have yet to read that particular xkcd comic?

    I'm surprised that such a simple statement ("this reminds me of ...") would provoke such vitriol. Maybe avoiding the comments section altogether would make you happier.

    Cool down, fellows. This is an old "meme" which someone gets out and dusts down whenever xkcd is invoked. It catches loads of people.

    f- you. What makes you think I'm not dead damn serious? It's a retarded practice and it needs to stop!

    Please attempt some sensitivity. I had a son who was retarded, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter.

    Fuck off, Bob.

    Whee! It's like watching a drunkard fall downstairs. You know it's going to happen as soon as the cat winds itself between his legs, and from that very first moment of teeter, you can predict practically the entire process.

    Sounds like an episode of Full House or Step By Step
    For some reason I read that as Spongebob Squarepants. Also I had a few quote tags to spare so I put them around your post. Hope you don't mind.

    I felt like this needed another quote wrapping.

    Is there a maximum depth?

    That'll be enough of that!

  • shuffled, not stirred (unregistered)

    This may actually be an attempt to decorrelate a (potentially) poor pseudo-random, number generator. The technique is called Bays_Durham shuffle, and of course it is implemented poorly, if not wrongly (don't know enough VB to judge that).

    Captcha duis - practicing your German at home in the Netherlands.

  • Tron 3.0 (unregistered) in reply to trtrwtf
    trtrwtf:
    Lets break this:
    Random idiot:
    Tud:
    The poop of DOOM:
    QJo:
    trtrwtf:
    Bob:
    ted:
    QJo:
    another unoriginal hipster doofus:
    ted:
    renewest:
    Reminds me of this XKCD comic:

    http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/random_number.png

    I didn't even click on the link and knew it was some fag linking xkcd.

    Yes, well done. It's not like he explicitly said "Reminds me of this XKCD comic". You must be very proud of that deduction.

    test:
    It's not clever. It's not funny. Just the word "random_number" with a link under it and the short, useless, one sentence post shows the kind of unoriginal, uninspired, idiot is making the post.

    It was funny to read when it came out. It's even funny when clicking on the Random button on the site and seeing it. It's NOT funny when someone links to it from a one-sentence post and thinks they're so fucking clever to have discovered xkcd.

    Did you consider that perhaps it was intended not for you, but for people who have yet to read that particular xkcd comic?

    I'm surprised that such a simple statement ("this reminds me of ...") would provoke such vitriol. Maybe avoiding the comments section altogether would make you happier.

    Cool down, fellows. This is an old "meme" which someone gets out and dusts down whenever xkcd is invoked. It catches loads of people.

    f- you. What makes you think I'm not dead damn serious? It's a retarded practice and it needs to stop!

    Please attempt some sensitivity. I had a son who was retarded, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter.

    Fuck off, Bob.

    Whee! It's like watching a drunkard fall downstairs. You know it's going to happen as soon as the cat winds itself between his legs, and from that very first moment of teeter, you can predict practically the entire process.

    Sounds like an episode of Full House or Step By Step
    For some reason I read that as Spongebob Squarepants. Also I had a few quote tags to spare so I put them around your post. Hope you don't mind.

    I felt like this needed another quote wrapping.

    Is there a maximum depth?

    That'll be enough of that!

    This is starting to look a little bit like an integrated circuit.

  • The name (unregistered) in reply to Lets break this
    Lets break this:
    Random idiot:
    Tud:
    The poop of DOOM:
    QJo:
    trtrwtf:
    Bob:
    ted:
    QJo:
    another unoriginal hipster doofus:
    ted:
    renewest:
    Reminds me of this XKCD comic:

    http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/random_number.png

    I didn't even click on the link and knew it was some fag linking xkcd.

    Yes, well done. It's not like he explicitly said "Reminds me of this XKCD comic". You must be very proud of that deduction.

    test:
    It's not clever. It's not funny. Just the word "random_number" with a link under it and the short, useless, one sentence post shows the kind of unoriginal, uninspired, idiot is making the post.

    It was funny to read when it came out. It's even funny when clicking on the Random button on the site and seeing it. It's NOT funny when someone links to it from a one-sentence post and thinks they're so fucking clever to have discovered xkcd.

    Did you consider that perhaps it was intended not for you, but for people who have yet to read that particular xkcd comic?

    I'm surprised that such a simple statement ("this reminds me of ...") would provoke such vitriol. Maybe avoiding the comments section altogether would make you happier.

    Cool down, fellows. This is an old "meme" which someone gets out and dusts down whenever xkcd is invoked. It catches loads of people.

    f- you. What makes you think I'm not dead damn serious? It's a retarded practice and it needs to stop!

    Please attempt some sensitivity. I had a son who was retarded, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter.

    Fuck off, Bob.

    Whee! It's like watching a drunkard fall downstairs. You know it's going to happen as soon as the cat winds itself between his legs, and from that very first moment of teeter, you can predict practically the entire process.

    Sounds like an episode of Full House or Step By Step
    For some reason I read that as Spongebob Squarepants. Also I had a few quote tags to spare so I put them around your post. Hope you don't mind.

    I felt like this needed another quote wrapping.

    Is there a maximum depth?

    No, but it bugs out after a while. :D

  • Tud (unregistered) in reply to nag-geoff
    nag-geoff:
    Amidst a serious discussion, these jokers want to play with quote tags.
    [image]
  • Simply Zunesis (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    QJo:
    Whee! It's like watching a drunkard fall downstairs. You know it's going to happen as soon as the cat winds itself between his legs, and from that very first moment of teeter, you can predict practically the entire process.
    I loled...

    I need to get a cat, some lube, alcohol, and call a couple of my buddies over who don't know their limits!

    Sounds like a party!

  • Simply Zunesis (unregistered) in reply to The poop of DOOM
    The poop of DOOM:
    QJo:
    Whee! It's like watching a drunkard fall downstairs. You know it's going to happen as soon as the cat winds itself between his legs, and from that very first moment of teeter, you can predict practically the entire process.
    Sounds like an episode of Full House or Step By Step
    Replace "cat" with "cock", "fall downstairs" with "get fucked", and "teeter" with "twink" and call it "Full Ass" or "Stroke by Stroke".
  • (cs) in reply to trtrwtf
    trtrwtf:
    C-Octothorpe:
    QJo:
    Whee! It's like watching a drunkard fall downstairs. You know it's going to happen as soon as the cat winds itself between his legs, and from that very first moment of teeter, you can predict practically the entire process.
    I loled...

    I need to get a cat, some stairs, alcohol, and call a couple of my buddies over who don't know their limits!

    That's a lot of work just to watch someone fall down. I admire your dedication.

    It's not the destination, but the trip...

  • Arrgggg! The Bells! (unregistered) in reply to Tron 3.0
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    u
    [omitted]
    .
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    u
    [omitted]
    .
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    u
    [omitted]
    .
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    u
    [omitted]
    .
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
  • nag-geoff (unregistered)

    The above comment deserves to be deleted.

  • Bldsquirrel (unregistered) in reply to envelope
    envelope:
    TRWTF is VB

    I've been using Visual Basic 6, and it's awesome! It combines the lack of flexibility of explicit variable declarations with the logic errors that implicit decelerations can lead to!

  • n/a (unregistered) in reply to Simply Zunesis

    In this land of fools talking to copy-pasta, your fans missed you, Zune!

    Simply Zunesis:
    C-Octothorpe:
    QJo:
    Whee! It's like watching a drunkard fall downstairs. You know it's going to happen as soon as the cat winds itself between his legs, and from that very first moment of teeter, you can predict practically the entire process.
    I loled...

    I need to get a cat, some lube, alcohol, and call a couple of my buddies over who don't know their limits!

    Sounds like a party!

  • Arrgggg! The Bells! (unregistered) in reply to nag-geoff
    nag-geoff:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.
    FTFY
  • Bldsquirrel (unregistered) in reply to nag-geoff
    nag-geoff:
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.

    You should quote the post you're talking about so we know which one it is.

  • (cs) in reply to Bob
    Bob:
    Please attempt some sensitivity. I had a son who was retarded, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter.
    Welcome back, Bob. Did you enjoy your vacation? The trolling here has been deficient in your absence.
  • Simply Zunesis (unregistered) in reply to n/a
    n/a:
    In this land of fools talking to copy-pasta, your fans missed you, Zune!
    Simply Zunesis:
    C-Octothorpe:
    QJo:
    Whee! It's like watching a drunkard fall downstairs. You know it's going to happen as soon as the cat winds itself between his legs, and from that very first moment of teeter, you can predict practically the entire process.
    I'm blue-boled...

    I need to get a cat, some lube, alcohol, and call a couple of my buddies over who don't know their limits!

    Sounds like a party!
    Just for you, I kicked it up a notch.

  • Simply Zunesis (unregistered) in reply to Simply Zunesis
    Simply Zunesis:
    n/a:
    In this land of fools talking to copy-pasta, your fans missed you, Zune!
    Simply Zunesis:
    C-Octothorpe:
    QJo:
    Whee! It's like watching a drunkard fall downstairs. You know it's going to happen as soon as the cat winds itself between his legs, and from that very first moment of teeter, you can predict practically the entire process.
    I'm blue-boled...

    I need to get a cat, some lube, alcohol, and call a couple of my buddies over who don't know their limits!

    Tights and Bacardi - Sounds like a party!
    Just for you, I kicked it up a notch.
    ...and another.

  • Simply Zunesis (unregistered) in reply to Simply Zunesis
    Simply Zunesis:
    Simply Zunesis:
    n/a:
    In this land of fools talking to copy-pasta, your fans missed you, Zune!
    Simply Zunesis:
    C-Octothorpe:
    QJo:
    Whee! It's like watching a drunkard fall downstairs. You know it's going to happen as soon as the cat winds itself between his legs, and from that very first moment of teeter, you can predict practically the entire process.
    I'm blue-boled...

    I need to get a cat, some lube, alcohol, and call a couple of my buddies over who don't know their limits!

    Tights and Bacardi - Sounds like a party!
    Just for you, I'll kick him in the crotch. But not too hard, we want to have a baby some day.
    ...and another.
    ...and another.

  • wonk (unregistered) in reply to Tud
    Tud:
    The poop of DOOM:
    QJo:
    trtrwtf:
    Bob:
    ted:
    QJo:
    another unoriginal hipster doofus:
    ted:
    renewest:
    Reminds me of this XKCD comic:

    http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/random_number.png

    I didn't even click on the link and knew it was some fag linking xkcd.

    Yes, well done. It's not like he explicitly said "Reminds me of this XKCD comic". You must be very proud of that deduction.

    test:
    It's not clever. It's not funny. Just the word "random_number" with a link under it and the short, useless, one sentence post shows the kind of unoriginal, uninspired, idiot is making the post.

    It was funny to read when it came out. It's even funny when clicking on the Random button on the site and seeing it. It's NOT funny when someone links to it from a one-sentence post and thinks they're so fucking clever to have discovered xkcd.

    Did you consider that perhaps it was intended not for you, but for people who have yet to read that particular xkcd comic?

    I'm surprised that such a simple statement ("this reminds me of ...") would provoke such vitriol. Maybe avoiding the comments section altogether would make you happier.

    Cool down, fellows. This is an old "meme" which someone gets out and dusts down whenever xkcd is invoked. It catches loads of people.

    f- you. What makes you think I'm not dead damn serious? It's a retarded practice and it needs to stop!

    Please attempt some sensitivity. I had a son who was retarded, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter.

    Fuck off, Bob.

    Whee! It's like watching a drunkard fall downstairs. You know it's going to happen as soon as the cat winds itself between his legs, and from that very first moment of teeter, you can predict practically the entire process.

    Sounds like an episode of Full House or Step By Step
    For some reason I read that as Spongebob Squarepants. Also I had a few quote tags to spare so I put them around your post. Hope you don't mind.

    17 dollars.

    wait. what?

  • Tud (unregistered) in reply to Arrgggg! The Bells!

    You didn't have to do that, you know.

  • _ (unregistered) in reply to Arrgggg! The Bells!

    Wow, that actually crashed my tab in IE8...

  • (cs)

    Oh boy, the DWTF comments are now at sub-YouTube quality. I didn't even think that was possible.

  • nag-geoff (unregistered) in reply to Bldsquirrel
    Bldsquirrel:
    nag-geoff:
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.

    You should quote the post you're talking about so we know which one it is.

    Are we to indulge in silly behavior for the rest of the evening?

  • Nagesh (unregistered) in reply to _
    _:
    Wow, that actually crashed my tab in IE8...
    IE 6 is being much more stabel.
  • (cs) in reply to Arrgggg! The Bells!
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    nag-geoff:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.
    FTFY

    Reminds me a little of this

    Which Akismet is saying is spam - that's kind of funny, actually.

  • Bldsquirrel (unregistered) in reply to nag-geoff
    nag-geoff:
    Bldsquirrel:
    nag-geoff:
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.

    You should quote the post you're talking about so we know which one it is.

    Are we to indulge in silly behavior for the rest of the evening?

    Watch out folks, we've got Graham Chapman here!

  • valetudo (unregistered)

    Can we hurry and get to the next page already? I can't read the comment page in IE7, and I am having to post with my remote-post script.

  • Tud (unregistered) in reply to nag-geoff
    nag-geoff:
    Bldsquirrel:
    nag-geoff:
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.

    You should quote the post you're talking about so we know which one it is.

    Are we to indulge in silly behavior for the rest of the evening?

    Of course! IT'S A PARTY! WOOOO WOOOO!

    Wait, this is not a party? Damn I'm wrong again. (seriously, what other kind of behaviour do you expect here? Go to stackoverflow or something. I don't know many programming discussion websites.)

    CAPTCHA: consequat. It's all a consequat of xkcd.

  • Me (unregistered)

    It's a sad day to see the comments dropping to this level. I LoLed though!!!

  • Simply Zunesis (unregistered) in reply to trtrwtf
    trtrwtf:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    nag-geoff:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.
    FTFY

    Reminds me a little of this

    Which Akismet is saying is spam - that's kind of funny, actually.

    trtrwtf:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    nag-geoff:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.
    FTFY

    Reminds me a little of this

    Which Akismet is saying is spam - that's kind of funny, actually.

    trtrwtf:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    nag-geoff:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.
    FTFY

    Reminds me a little of this

    Which Akismet is saying is spam - that's kind of funny, actually.

    fuuni, i dudnet gat alaksa mets.
  • Arrgggg! The Bells! (unregistered) in reply to trtrwtf
    trtrwtf:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    nag-geoff:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.
    FTFY

    Reminds me a little of this

    Which Akismet is saying is spam - that's kind of funny, actually.

    trtrwtf:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    nag-geoff:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.
    FTFY

    Reminds me a little of this

    Which Akismet is saying is spam - that's kind of funny, actually.

    trtrwtf:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    nag-geoff:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    h
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.
    FTFY

    Reminds me a little of this

    Which Akismet is saying is spam - that's kind of funny, actually.

    fuuni, i dudnet gat alaksa mets.
  • trtrwtf (unregistered) in reply to Arrgggg! The Bells!
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    trtrwtf:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    nag-geoff:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.
    FTFY

    Reminds me a little of this

    Which Akismet is saying is spam - that's kind of funny, actually.

    trtrwtf:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    nag-geoff:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.
    FTFY

    Reminds me a little of this

    Which Akismet is saying is spam - that's kind of funny, actually.

    trtrwtf:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    nag-geoff:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.
    FTFY

    Reminds me a little of this

    Which Akismet is saying is spam - that's kind of funny, actually.

    fuuni, i dudnet gat alaksa mets.
  • Carl (unregistered) in reply to QJo
    QJo:
    That's not God's fault. That's all the work of the devil.
    But... the devil is God's fault! Unless he isn't all-powerful after all, of course.
  • nag-geoff (unregistered) in reply to trtrwtf
    trtrwtf:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    trtrwtf:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    nag-geoff:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.
    FTFY

    Reminds me a little of this

    Which Akismet is saying is spam - that's kind of funny, actually.

    trtrwtf:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    nag-geoff:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.
    FTFY

    Reminds me a little of this

    Which Akismet is saying is spam - that's kind of funny, actually.

    trtrwtf:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    nag-geoff:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.
    FTFY

    Reminds me a little of this

    Which Akismet is saying is spam - that's kind of funny, actually.

    fuuni, i dudnet gat alaksa mets.
    trtrwtf if sd for u? Euyt! WEuyt! d f d f a c b a g
    I the nag-geoff. I wrat thr gui card. cord. coud. gui coud.

    I couder. couder of coputerizes.

    Ha! Ha!

  • Anonimous (unregistered) in reply to Zylon
    Zylon:
    Oh boy, the DWTF comments are now at sub-YouTube quality. I didn't even think that was possible.
    Reveling in your handiwork?
  • Simply Zunesis (unregistered) in reply to Me
    Me:
    It's a sad day to see the comments dropping to this level. I LoLed though!!!
    Simply Zunesis:
    trtrwtf:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    nag-geoff:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.
    FTFY

    Reminds me a little of this

    Which Akismet is saying is spam - that's kind of funny, actually.

    trtrwtf:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    nag-geoff:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.
    FTFY

    Reminds me a little of this

    Which Akismet is saying is spam - that's kind of funny, actually.

    trtrwtf:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    nag-geoff:
    Arrgggg! The Bells!:
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    q
    a
    w
    s
    e
    d
    r
    f
    captcha why?
    t
    g
    y
    [omitted]
    (
    .
    )
    /
    -
    =
    captcha why not?
    The above comment deserves to be deleted.
    FTFY

    Reminds me a little of this

    Which Akismet is saying is spam - that's kind of funny, actually.

    fuuni, i dudnet gat alaksa mets.
    E sample sonezzzzzsys. E art gebediah, Luo$$$$ed!!! e u go 2 teh bar rom whit stiped shrtied gui. u r 2 b whit a negr= oenis! Hw ha! hq!
  • Turd (unregistered)

    We have 2 more comments after this one to get to the next page. I hope things will be better by then.

  • Lets break this (unregistered) in reply to Turd
    Turd:
    We have 2 more comments after this one to get to the next page. I hope things will be better by then.

    Here is one more

  • Gary (unregistered) in reply to QJo
    QJo:
    Cool down, fellows. This is an old "meme" which someone gets out and dusts down whenever xkcd is invoked. It catches loads of people.

    It's like the Old Comedian's Home - they don't bother telling the jokes any more, they just call out the number.

    221!

Leave a comment on “Random Char and Triply-Random Double”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

« Return to Article