- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
- Error'd
- Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Other Series
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
Nothing like idiots to tell you that you are documenting things wrong. Then they provide a fix. And don't use the standard JavaDoc TODO tag in the fix.
Admin
No, in some times and places people THINK that there can be multiple instances of supreme beings, while in others people think that there can be only one, and others think there is none at all. But clearly one group is right and the others are wrong. Just because there is confusion over the specifications doesn't mean that there is no right answer! Is this how you write your code? "The marketing department says that 'price' is an attribute of the Product entity, which would make the price the same for all sales at all stores, but the store managers say that it is an attribute of Sale because salesman can negotiate on-the-spot discounts. So I guess that means there is no right answer and we can throw it where ever we like!"
Admin
Admin
/**
Admin
Late comment: I'd much rather autogenerated comments that just say "please put real comments here", than autogenerated comments that look like real comments until you actually read them, at which point you realize they're useless, and in some cases hilarious gibberish. Some real examples from our project, for the benefit of anyone else random wandering through old comments: