• 008 (unregistered)

    Name a file something.mp3.mp3? I didn't know you could do that!

  • freelancer (unregistered) in reply to Rex
    Rex:
    Cmd. Keen:
    Better to just mashing "OK" to something then? In most situations, if you press Cancel, you can get the dialog again by doing what you did before (trying to close the program, format your hard drive, save a file with a name that already exists) - blindly pressing OK would destroy data in 2/3 of those, cancel would be harmless.

    Better to not try to second-guess your users - assume they took an action deliberately and don't need a second "yes, I really did mean that". If they screwed up, provide a good undo method instead.

    I'd like to see you implementing an "Undo format c:" method :P

    Captcha: smile - you're on candid camera. I hate that show :(

  • (cs) in reply to Daza
    Daza:
    Submitter was trying to save some emo music. Sadly, he couldn't save it from itself.
    That's funny!
  • Anonymous (unregistered) in reply to RobertB
    RobertB:
    Shill:
    Daza:
    Cyrus:
    Is that a razor blade next to the audio signal in the first picture...?
    Submitter was trying to save some emo music. Sadly, he couldn't save it from itself.

    Did someone say 'emo'? I heard there were some great cam girls at emocamgirls.com.

    You know you're addicted to TDWTF when you laugh at the above.

  • (cs) in reply to tezoatlipoca
    tezoatlipoca:
    KattMan:
    Shill:
    Daza:
    Cyrus:
    Is that a razor blade next to the audio signal in the first picture...?
    Submitter was trying to save some emo music. Sadly, he couldn't save it from itself.

    Did someone say 'emo'? I heard there were some great cam girls at emocamgirls.com.

    And I still can't get there from work. They denied my access for "research purposes."

    What do they do? Read you depressing poety and threaten to jab themselves with broken pencils?

    well, yes, but they strip at the same time too

  • Farmie (unregistered) in reply to Ackshooerry
    Ackshooerry:
    The mystery file to be replaced is "thermallogic.gif".

    Carry on.

    OMG HAX! wowz! u beat teh 8-bit encryption :|

    i didn't know you could do that...

  • koni (unregistered) in reply to JUST ANOTHER WTF
    JUST ANOTHER WTF:
    Opie:
    Hurry up, while it's hot!

    Available - Buy Now The following Domain Names are available for registration.

    Domain Name Status

    emocamgirls.com Available
    emocamgirls.net Available
    emocamgirls.org Available
    emocamgirls.biz Available
    emocamgirls.info Available
    emocamgirls.us Available

    Does that mean emocamgirls.gov is taken?

    What about emocamgirls.edu?

  • blunden (unregistered) in reply to freelancer
    freelancer:
    I'd like to see you implementing an "Undo format c:" method :P

    Captcha: smile - you're on candid camera. I hate that show :(

    That's not the same thing since that is run in a command prompt and as such, asks you to type y or n.

  • AdT (unregistered) in reply to freelancer
    freelancer:
    I'd like to see you implementing an "Undo format c:" method :P

    Didn't some versions of MS-DOS have an unformat command?

  • freelancer (unregistered) in reply to blunden
    blunden:
    freelancer:
    I'd like to see you implementing an "Undo format c:" method :P

    Captcha: smile - you're on candid camera. I hate that show :(

    That's not the same thing since that is run in a command prompt and as such, asks you to type y or n.
    Fine. I'd like to see you implementing an "Undo right-click harddrive, choose format, press OK" method :P

    And yes, MS-DOS 5-6 (or something like that) did have an unformat command. Not sure how well it worked, though. Besides, it didn't work if you had installed Windows.

  • (cs) in reply to JS
    JS:
    NeoMojo:
    The first one's not a WTF because it's on a MAC and MACs are awesome.

    /sarcasm

    Do I really need to point out an app on Windows that has stupid bugs, so that I can damn the entire platform?

    the real WTF is pompous mac fanbois lack of a sense of humor

  • Anon (unregistered) in reply to WWWWolf
    WWWWolf:
    Anon:
    The dumping of the Cancel button in the middle makes absolutely no sense. Is that a Mac thing, and they added the "Use both" button? If it is, I've got a rant about placing Cancel on the left...

    On Mac (and Linux with GNOME), affirmative choice is on far right and negative its left side, so the OK button is on always on the edge of the dialog. (I think it's a bit more logical because you don't need to hunt the OKs as much that way.) Also on Mac, additional options (like "Don't save" or whatever) are on the very left.

    The point isn't that the cancel is on middle, the point is that the Cancel button isn't right where most people have easiest time mashing their mouse pointer at. =)

    That's retarded. First of all, the concept that ANY point on the dialog is the "easiest" point to hit is retarded. It's simply not true. The easiest point to hit is whichever point happens to be under the mouse pointer at the time. Since things that launch a dialog can take place ALL OVER the screen, there's no definitive "easiest" place to hit, it varies based on whatever the user was doing when the dialog appeared.

    Since no particular place on the dialog is "easiest" to hit, the buttons should be placed in order from most likely to use to least likely to use. Now I don't know about Apple or GNOME users, but I read English from left to right. Therefore I would expect the most used option on the left and the least used on the right.

    Screwing with that order due to some imagined "easiest to press" button is retarded.

    GNOME takes it a step further and explains that most users would expect frequently used options on the right because that's the way real-world appliances are set up. I really don't know where to start with that one, other than to ask if anyone has ever noticed that fact. And if anything they own actually follows that "rule".

  • (cs) in reply to NeoMojo
    NeoMojo:
    The first one's not a WTF because it's on a MAC and MACs are awesome.
    I don't really think Media Access Controls are that great.
  • freelancer (unregistered) in reply to operagost
    operagost:
    NeoMojo:
    The first one's not a WTF because it's on a MAC and MACs are awesome.
    I don't really think Media Access Controls are that great.
    I do. They provide the the most basic addressing of every Ethernet network, and therefore they're pretty damn useful. And I think that anything that's pretty damn useful is awsome.
  • dkf (unregistered) in reply to Anon
    Anon:
    First of all, the concept that ANY point on the dialog is the "easiest" point to hit is retarded. It's simply not true. The easiest point to hit is whichever point happens to be under the mouse pointer at the time. Since things that launch a dialog can take place ALL OVER the screen, there's no definitive "easiest" place to hit, it varies based on whatever the user was doing when the dialog appeared.
    Interestingly, I've seen GUIs that try to deal with that in several WTF?!y ways. Whether it is worse to try to position the dialog so that the mouse is over the spot you are most likely to want to click on (even if the mouse is at the edge of the screen...) or to put the dialog in the middle and warp the mouse to the magic spot, I don't really know. I just know that I (and everyone else I knew) hated both behaviours. Compared to those horrors, buttons in strange orders with odd names... no problem at all.
  • AdT (unregistered) in reply to freelancer
    freelancer:
    I do. They provide the the most basic addressing of every Ethernet network, and therefore they're pretty damn useful. And I think that anything that's pretty damn useful is awsome.

    And let's not forget that Message Authentication Codes are also awesomely useful.

    codemonkey:
    The real WTF is ppl using macs. Eyecandy is all it is

    Oh no, you are right! All this time I thought Mac OS X was an easy to use and feature-rich operating system, but now that I actually tried some more stuff out I noticed that none of the pretty buttons does anything except the iTunes one (this is why I didn't notice before!!!).

    I am so pissed off, I will write to Steve Jobs and demand a full refund + damages immediately as soon as I find a non-fake way of writing an email.

    Anon:
    I'd love to hear some Apple fan explain the choice in button positions.

    There is no explanation. Though shalt not depart from the One Microsoft Way or the Wrath of Steve Ballmer shall rain down on you!

  • kg (unregistered) in reply to Tp
    Tp:
    I am eagerly waiting for the first story about some company requiring all hard copies to use WingDings in order to prevent company secrets leaving the premises.

    I did very briefly work for a small company where the new security scheme, invented by the President and co-owner, was to ask all employees to rename their files with arbitrary numbers - for example, mw_claims_05_2006.doc might become 5647, or 5647.doc - I'm not sure if extensions were allowed. Employees were expected to either remember all of the new names or to keep an index with descriptions in one of the files.

  • Chad (unregistered) in reply to mac-attack
    mac-attack:
    codemonkey:
    The real WTF is ppl using macs. Eyecandy is all it is

    "If you use a mac, you don't have to be a douche bag, but you probably are."

    hows CS3 running on your Linux box.... oh wait...

    captcha: Alarm ... sound them cause here come the flames

  • ChiefCrazyTalk (unregistered) in reply to Tp
    Tp:
    The real wtf is the name "WingDings".
    Slightly off-topic - I often wondered what the difference was between "Wing-Dings" and "Wing-Zings" (Both are boneless chicken wings). Turns out Wing-Zings are spicy Wing-Dings.
  • (cs) in reply to freelancer
    freelancer:
    operagost:
    NeoMojo:
    The first one's not a WTF because it's on a MAC and MACs are awesome.
    I don't really think Media Access Controls are that great.
    I do. They provide the the most basic addressing of every Ethernet network, and therefore they're pretty damn useful. And I think that anything that's pretty damn useful is awsome.
    On the contrary, Multiple Acronym Creation is quite annoying :P What about emocamgirls.csiro.au?
  • (cs) in reply to Rex
    Rex:
    Cmd. Keen:
    Better to just mashing "OK" to something then? In most situations, if you press Cancel, you can get the dialog again by doing what you did before (trying to close the program, format your hard drive, save a file with a name that already exists) - blindly pressing OK would destroy data in 2/3 of those, cancel would be harmless.

    Better to not try to second-guess your users - assume they took an action deliberately and don't need a second "yes, I really did mean that". If they screwed up, provide a good undo method instead.

    How about "You have deleted [filename]. OK/Undo" - if they click OK, actually delete it.

  • freelancer (unregistered) in reply to Random832
    Random832:
    Rex:
    Cmd. Keen:
    Better to just mashing "OK" to something then? In most situations, if you press Cancel, you can get the dialog again by doing what you did before (trying to close the program, format your hard drive, save a file with a name that already exists) - blindly pressing OK would destroy data in 2/3 of those, cancel would be harmless.

    Better to not try to second-guess your users - assume they took an action deliberately and don't need a second "yes, I really did mean that". If they screwed up, provide a good undo method instead.

    How about "You have deleted [filename]. OK/Undo" - if they click OK, actually delete it.

    Probably a bad idea to trick your users. Besides, the end result would still be the same.

    And get off the emo cam girls, guys.

  • (cs) in reply to Shill

    I think it's actually Webdings, not Wingdings in this case?

    Shill:
    Daza:
    Cyrus:
    Is that a razor blade next to the audio signal in the first picture...?
    Submitter was trying to save some emo music. Sadly, he couldn't save it from itself.

    Did someone say 'emo'? I heard there were some great cam girls at emocamgirls.com.

    Bahahahaha... YouTube spam reference? I really hate those YouTube spammers.

  • Darren (unregistered) in reply to Anon
    Anon:
    Screwing with that order due to some imagined "easiest to press" button is retarded.

    Screwing with the order? It's been like that on Macs since before Windows was a platform.

    The OK button is to the right of the Cancel button for the same reason that the 'Next' button is to the right of the 'Back' button in a Wizard. It's a perfectly natural button layout: Right = Forward, Left = Back.

    The button that causes damage or data loss (like "Don't Save") is removed from the standard OK/Cancel button locations, for obvious reasons.

    Not to mention that the buttons are named by verb, rather than those satanic Yes/No/Cancel dialogs you always see in Windows.

    [image]
  • (cs) in reply to Darren
    Darren:
    Anon:
    Screwing with that order due to some imagined "easiest to press" button is retarded.

    Screwing with the order? It's been like that on Macs since before Windows was a platform.

    The OK button is to the right of the Cancel button for the same reason that the 'Next' button is to the right of the 'Back' button in a Wizard. It's a perfectly natural button layout: Right = Forward, Left = Back.

    The button that causes damage or data loss (like "Don't Save") is removed from the standard OK/Cancel button locations, for obvious reasons.

    Not to mention that the buttons are named by verb, rather than those satanic Yes/No/Cancel dialogs you always see in Windows.

    [image]

    Next time somebody decides to fake up a Windows dialog box to prove whatever point they have, they should make sure the spelling is correct.

  • Pfooti (unregistered)

    Blah, blah, blah. There's a long argument going between people about button placement in dialog boxes. I just want to take the time to mention that, despite my not caring who "wins" this argument, Apple and some other folks have actually studied this kind of stuff. With people doing research and stuff. Now, Apple might not have everything (or even anything) right, but they do have a set of published Human Interface Guidelines (google it yourself if you're interested). The apple HIG have been revised for the newfangled OSX stuff, but they've been around for ages.

    For example, it turns out that it is easier to hit the button in the lower-right of the window. You might not notice, especially since you're all computer-savvy, but it's true. Now, you can argue about whether or not you ought to put the "okay" or the "cancel" button in the easiest-to-get-to location, but the people at apple have decided on their own what should go there.

    I'm not trying to sound like a fanboi here. What I'm trying to point out is that good interface design is difficult, but can be informed by real research, rather than anecdotal "it works best for me" style design. It's just as hard as good database design. The dialog in question: now that's just plain weird/funny. There's all sorts of bad software (and even sometimes, bad design) for the Mac. You just don't see it as much around here, for whatever reason.

  • SlyEcho (unregistered) in reply to Quinnum
    Quinnum:
    Darren:
    Anon:
    Screwing with that order due to some imagined "easiest to press" button is retarded.

    Screwing with the order? It's been like that on Macs since before Windows was a platform.

    The OK button is to the right of the Cancel button for the same reason that the 'Next' button is to the right of the 'Back' button in a Wizard. It's a perfectly natural button layout: Right = Forward, Left = Back.

    The button that causes damage or data loss (like "Don't Save") is removed from the standard OK/Cancel button locations, for obvious reasons.

    Not to mention that the buttons are named by verb, rather than those satanic Yes/No/Cancel dialogs you always see in Windows.

    [image]

    Next time somebody decides to fake up a Windows dialog box to prove whatever point they have, they should make sure the spelling is correct.

    ... and the correct version of Windows is used.

  • NeoMojo (unregistered) in reply to operagost
    operagost:
    NeoMojo:
    The first one's not a WTF because it's on a MAC and MACs are awesome.
    I don't really think Media Access Controls are that great.

    I understand your confusion. MAC does indeed look like the acronym MAC, but I was in fact shouting MAC as I have a nervous tick whenever I think of alternatives to the mainstream.

  • Anonymouse (unregistered) in reply to Edward Royce
    Edward Royce:
    Wouldn't WingDings be the greatest name for a snack food?

    "Hello my good man. May I perchance purchase some WingDings please?"

    Those already exist. They're Ring Dings with a speech impediment.

  • Anon (unregistered) in reply to Darren
    Darren:
    Anon:
    Screwing with that order due to some imagined "easiest to press" button is retarded.

    Screwing with the order? It's been like that on Macs since before Windows was a platform.

    The OK button is to the right of the Cancel button for the same reason that the 'Next' button is to the right of the 'Back' button in a Wizard. It's a perfectly natural button layout: Right = Forward, Left = Back.

    That's retarded, because no user will think like that unless they've had that logic explained to them. With Back/Next buttons, the logic is already explained with the button names. Besides, usually it's "Back/Next/Cancel" with Cancel certainly not taking you to the very end.

    People read left-to-right. (Or whatever direction their language reads.) When people see a dialog, they don't think "what do I need to click to move to the next action" they think "oh, it's asking me a question, what answer do I want?" and then they'll read the available answers from left-to-right because that's the way people read.

    Darren:
    Not to mention that the buttons are named by verb, rather than those satanic Yes/No/Cancel dialogs you always see in Windows.
    Those are caused by idiot programmers who are too lazy to create their own dialogs and insist on using Windows's MessageBox function. (Although you could also argue Windows could provide a method for changing the button names.)

    Besides, Vista has a much better interface for choosing multiple actions than either the Apple dialog shown here or the little dialog you created. It provides large button strips with a verb and then a short description of what the action does under them. The best and most common example is probably the "This program has crashed" dialog.

  • (cs) in reply to Anon
    Anon:

    People read left-to-right. (Or whatever direction their language reads.) When people see a dialog, they don't think "what do I need to click to move to the next action" they think "oh, it's asking me a question, what answer do I want?" and then they'll read the available answers from left-to-right because that's the way people read.

    You're looking at this from the wrong point of view.

    Apple's HIG allows people to skim dialogs instead of reading them. This has two important implications for usability. First, note that the Apple HIG always puts the confirmation button in the same place. ALWAYS. The button will ALWAYS be on the lower right corner of a window or dialog in a Apple HIG compliant application. If you're sure your previous action is correct, you can go straight for the button or hit enter. Since there's no need to examine alternatives, there's no need to read anything.

    If you do not want to confirm an action, you will have to read/skim from left to right. In which case, putting the confirmation button on the left marginally wastes your time in the way you described.

  • Anon (unregistered) in reply to poopdeville

    Then Apple is retarded. You know what they say about premature optimization?

    If you need to optimize user speed through dialog boxes, you're using them too much! (Based on iTunes under Windows, there's a good chance that this is in fact true for Apple. Do you want to remove this? Yes/No Do you want to delete it? Delete/Waste Disk Space)

    There's a simple reality that Apple's HIG completely forgets: no one is going to notice that! Users read from left to right, and nearly everyone expects "yes" to appear before "no". Dialogs should appear infrequent enough that the user needs to read through them, they shouldn't be popping up often enough that placing buttons out of normal read order speeds up usage.

    Seriously, no normal user is going to think "oh, the confirmation button is always on the right" they're going to read through the dialog and wonder why the options are out of order.

  • (cs) in reply to Anon
    Anon:
    Then Apple is retarded. You know what they say about premature optimization?

    If you need to optimize user speed through dialog boxes, you're using them too much! (Based on iTunes under Windows, there's a good chance that this is in fact true for Apple. Do you want to remove this? Yes/No Do you want to delete it? Delete/Waste Disk Space)

    I agree that some applications abuse dialogs. But it isn't common. I like being able to skip past "Save or Quit" dialogs, for instance, because I actually do want to quit. There are plenty of boilerplate dialogs I would rather skip, but are necessary. This is true of Windows as well.

    There's a simple reality that Apple's HIG completely forgets: no one is going to notice that! Users read from left to right, and nearly everyone expects "yes" to appear before "no". Dialogs should appear infrequent enough that the user needs to read through them, they shouldn't be popping up often enough that placing buttons out of normal read order speeds up usage.

    There's a simple reality that you completely forget: people learn through Pavlovian mechanisms. The user doesn't have to think about where the confirmation button is. They just know, through conditioning. You can't have that kind of conditioning if the button order changes by context.

    By the way, the confirmation/action/do what i say button is on the bottom right in every window that requires one, including dialog boxes. So this Pavlovian mechanism optimizes speed everywhere.

  • Joe Blaim (unregistered)

    Let me start by saying I have a deep seated hatred for apple technology (surpassed only by my disdain for the glorified weasles from Ann Arbor). I'd like to elaborate but that's not the point. I agree with the apple approach here.

    If apple has stuck to this for so long, most users probably DO have an implicit understanding of this logical justification. Somehow clicking on options on the right side does even seem more natural for some reason. Remember that our indoctrination into the arbitrary standards of our own systems is a very strong impediment to objectivity which many of computing's best minds have commented in far more powerful and eloquent language.

    The Yes/No/Cancel IS just the beginning of the myriad WTFs of windows apps but contrary to the sarcastic reference to "the One Microsoft Way" by AdT, this just underscores the obscene amount of diversity in windows developers that there is no one way in windows which frees the less disciplined developer to keep this site busy with ever increasing WTFs.

    On a separate note, has noone else considered that the files being referenced in the 3rd case are a set of gif files? An overly ambitious icon management program could display the contents of the files in place of the file names to product these results. I've no proof but it is a possible scenerio... or was this too obvious to mention...

  • 008 (unregistered) in reply to SlyEcho
    SlyEcho:
    Quinnum:
    Darren:
    Anon:
    Screwing with that order due to some imagined "easiest to press" button is retarded.

    Screwing with the order? It's been like that on Macs since before Windows was a platform.

    The OK button is to the right of the Cancel button for the same reason that the 'Next' button is to the right of the 'Back' button in a Wizard. It's a perfectly natural button layout: Right = Forward, Left = Back.

    The button that causes damage or data loss (like "Don't Save") is removed from the standard OK/Cancel button locations, for obvious reasons.

    Not to mention that the buttons are named by verb, rather than those satanic Yes/No/Cancel dialogs you always see in Windows.

    [image]

    Next time somebody decides to fake up a Windows dialog box to prove whatever point they have, they should make sure the spelling is correct.

    ... and the correct version of Windows is used.

    ...And remember that Windows doesn't have Kernel Panics. It has Bug Checks or Stop Errors.

  • smash (unregistered) in reply to 008
    008:
    SlyEcho:
    Quinnum:
    Darren:
    Anon:
    Screwing with that order due to some imagined "easiest to press" button is retarded.

    Screwing with the order? It's been like that on Macs since before Windows was a platform.

    The OK button is to the right of the Cancel button for the same reason that the 'Next' button is to the right of the 'Back' button in a Wizard. It's a perfectly natural button layout: Right = Forward, Left = Back.

    The button that causes damage or data loss (like "Don't Save") is removed from the standard OK/Cancel button locations, for obvious reasons.

    Not to mention that the buttons are named by verb, rather than those satanic Yes/No/Cancel dialogs you always see in Windows.

    [image]

    Next time somebody decides to fake up a Windows dialog box to prove whatever point they have, they should make sure the spelling is correct.

    ... and the correct version of Windows is used.

    ...And remember that Windows doesn't have Kernel Panics. It has Bug Checks or Stop Errors.

    ... and their message boxes aren't titled "Placeholder", even if the programmer didn't change the default title.

  • smash (unregistered) in reply to poopdeville
    poopdeville:
    Anon:
    Then Apple is retarded. You know what they say about premature optimization?

    If you need to optimize user speed through dialog boxes, you're using them too much! (Based on iTunes under Windows, there's a good chance that this is in fact true for Apple. Do you want to remove this? Yes/No Do you want to delete it? Delete/Waste Disk Space)

    I agree that some applications abuse dialogs. But it isn't common. I like being able to skip past "Save or Quit" dialogs, for instance, because I actually do want to quit. There are plenty of boilerplate dialogs I would rather skip, but are necessary. This is true of Windows as well.

    Dialog boxes aren't, they've never been about optimizing speed. If you're so sure that the user did what he intended to, then don't pop-up the dialog at all, it will be way faster.

    Dialogs are about double-checking a potentially data-loss user action. And so it's better to place the 'safest' button on the best spot i.e. lower right. If you think cancel should be in the middle, word your question in a way that ok is the harmless answer (though it will seem strange at first).

    I think the stupidiest dialogs out there are those when I copy 1000 mp3 to my player and some of them are identical, but others aren't. The Replace dialog could have a button "Skip identical files" (by name and timestamp) and it would save a hell of a time. Anyway, even if I don't like the way MS uses dialogs they're nicely built, button positions and all.

    There's a simple reality that Apple's HIG completely forgets: no one is going to notice that! Users read from left to right, and nearly everyone expects "yes" to appear before "no". Dialogs should appear infrequent enough that the user needs to read through them, they shouldn't be popping up often enough that placing buttons out of normal read order speeds up usage.

    There's a simple reality that you completely forget: people learn through Pavlovian mechanisms. The user doesn't have to think about where the confirmation button is. They just know, through conditioning. You can't have that kind of conditioning if the button order changes by context.

    By the way, the confirmation/action/do what i say button is on the bottom right in every window that requires one, including dialog boxes. So this Pavlovian mechanism optimizes speed everywhere.

    Yeah, Pavlovian mechanism, speed improments, all this crap huh? Then tell me, have you ever had to search for an file recovery app because you deleted the wrong file? How long would a common user lose on this simple hunt? Not to mention those who don't even know whether it's possible, or what/where to search the web for. How much time did they gain because they pressed a button without reading?

    It can only be worse when it comes to formatting. Well, forget Pavlov, and leave him to his ducks.

    captcha: cognac --> ooh the worlld is spiiinnning...

  • (cs) in reply to smash
    smash:
    Yeah, Pavlovian mechanism, speed improments, all this crap huh? Then tell me, have you ever had to search for an file recovery app because you deleted the wrong file? How long would a common user lose on this simple hunt? Not to mention those who don't even know whether it's possible, or what/where to search the web for. How much time did they gain because they pressed a button without reading?

    It can only be worse when it comes to formatting. Well, forget Pavlov, and leave him to his ducks.

    Not once, no. That's what the Trash is for. In fact, I usually use a keyboard shortcut to empty the trash without a confirmation dialog.

    Formatting is handled by the Disk Utility, and requires running sudo. So don't be dense. Users will do a doubletake and read a dialog box if they don't expect to see it from repeated usage. Or if they don't expect to see it in the context of the application they're running. Or if it's asking for administrative permission.

    I'm done with this. Your kind of troll is boring. /b/ is far more interesting.

  • AdT (unregistered) in reply to Anon
    Anon:
    If you need to optimize user speed through dialog boxes, you're using them too much! (Based on iTunes under Windows, there's a good chance that this is in fact true for Apple. Do you want to remove this? Yes/No Do you want to delete it? Delete/Waste Disk Space)

    I haven't used iTunes on Windows, but on Mac OS, contrary to the UAC and Windows Defender annoyances under Windows Vista, these dialog boxes all have a "don't ask me again" checkbox for your convenience.

    Now try to create a 'C:\Program Files\Whatever' folder on a fresh install of Windows Vista. The last time I tried this, I got no less than four dialog boxes.

    1. UAC: Do you really want to create C:\Program Files\New Folder?
    2. Windows Defender: Someone is trying to create C:\Program Files\New Folder, ok?
    3. UAC: Do you really want to rename C:\Program Files\New Folder to Whatever?
    4. Windows Defender: Ok to rename...?

    That's off the top of my head and the exact wording was certainly different, but you (hopefully) get the point. Why does Windows Explorer have to create a "New Folder" in the first place instead of just creating a folder called "Whatever"?

    Anon:
    Seriously, no normal user is going to think "oh, the confirmation button is always on the right" they're going to read through the dialog and wonder why the options are out of order.

    Where "normal user" means someone who is used to using Windows and unintelligent? Seriously, anyone who has been using either system for some time will figure out where the confirmation button is. Most rhesus monkeys would be smart enough to figure it out.

  • AdT (unregistered) in reply to 008
    008:
    ...And remember that Windows doesn't have Kernel Panics. It has Bug Checks or Stop Errors.

    Absolutely. The cowardly Mac OS and Linux kernels may panic, but the Windows kernel just laughs in the face of death!

  • Synonymous Awkward (unregistered) in reply to Anon
    Anon:
    When people see a dialog, they don't think "what do I need to click to move to the next action" they think "oh, it's asking me a question, what answer do I want?" and then they'll read the available answers from left-to-right because that's the way people read.

    Actually, in my experience, it appears as if they actually think "Oh, it's asking me a question, which button will proceed with my current course of action? I certainly won't read the message to see if it presents any reason why I might want to rethink what I'm doing. Especially if I can cause a virus infestation or major data loss!"

    ;-)

  • Simmo (unregistered) in reply to Sgt. Preston
    Sgt. Preston:
    codemonkey:
    The real WTF is ppl using macs. Eyecandy is all it is
    Wouldn't that be "iCandy"?

    hehe

  • Simmo (unregistered) in reply to AdT
    Anon:
    If you need to optimize user speed through dialog boxes, you're using them too much! (Based on iTunes under Windows, there's a good chance that this is in fact true for Apple. Do you want to remove this? Yes/No Do you want to delete it? Delete/Waste Disk Space)

    iTunes for windows has to be just about the most stupid, prescriptive, unintuitive, inflexible, crassly restrictive program I have ever had the displeasure to use. Interestingly apt that it thus embodies the Worst of Both Worlds.

    Seriously, if you have more than one user, or want to share your files over a network or use a NAS, just don't go there. There are better programs even for maintaining your ipod (should you be mad enough to own one of those things)

  • Hognoxious (unregistered) in reply to FirstPostMan
    FirstPostMan:
    The best part is calling it "WingDing Encryption Method". First laugh I had today. Great!
    That's probably a valid file name in unicode.

    I hate unicode. If plain ol' ascii was good enough for Aristotle, Jesus and Shakespeare it's good enough for anyone.

  • (cs) in reply to codemonkey
    codemonkey:
    The real WTF is ppl using macs. Eyecandy is all it is
    I second this, very expensive eyecandy, plus no right click! I love the MAC one, it isn't a perfect operating system after all.
  • (cs) in reply to Hognoxious
    Hognoxious:
    FirstPostMan:
    The best part is calling it "WingDing Encryption Method". First laugh I had today. Great!
    That's probably a valid file name in unicode.

    I hate unicode. If plain ol' ascii was good enough for Aristotle, Jesus and Shakespeare it's good enough for anyone.

    Nope. ♦♒♏❒❍♋●●☐♑♓♍_♑♓♐ - no mailbox symbol.

    The filename, incidentally, is "thermallogie.gif"

  • Monroe Wallace (unregistered) in reply to Boris the Blade
    Boris the Blade:
    codemonkey:
    The real WTF is ppl using macs. Eyecandy is all it is
    I second this, very expensive eyecandy, plus no right click! I love the MAC one, it isn't a perfect operating system after all.

    You've been able to right click on macs for years. All you do is get something than the shitty mouse that came with all of them before the latest refresh. Mighty mouse has right click, though its a little finicky. And by a little I mean a lot.

    And by "A lot" I mean "I'm a mac user and I just bought a damn logitech because the mighty mouse is useless, despite sharing a name with one of my favourite cartoons."

    Simmo:
    Anon:
    If you need to optimize user speed through dialog boxes, you're using them too much! (Based on iTunes under Windows, there's a good chance that this is in fact true for Apple. Do you want to remove this? Yes/No Do you want to delete it? Delete/Waste Disk Space)

    iTunes for windows has to be just about the most stupid, prescriptive, unintuitive, inflexible, crassly restrictive program I have ever had the displeasure to use. Interestingly apt that it thus embodies the Worst of Both Worlds.

    Seriously, if you have more than one user, or want to share your files over a network or use a NAS, just don't go there. There are better programs even for maintaining your ipod (should you be mad enough to own one of those things)

    I was hoping on some level that iTunes on the mac would be less useless than on the PC.

    I learned my lesson fast there, I did.

  • Farmie (unregistered) in reply to Random832
    Random832:
    Hognoxious:
    FirstPostMan:
    The best part is calling it "WingDing Encryption Method". First laugh I had today. Great!
    That's probably a valid file name in unicode.

    I hate unicode. If plain ol' ascii was good enough for Aristotle, Jesus and Shakespeare it's good enough for anyone.

    Nope. ♦♒♏❒❍♋●●☐♑♓♍_♑♓♐ - no mailbox symbol.

    The filename, incidentally, is "thermallogie.gif"

    It's already been identified as "thermallogic.gif". The 'c' and 'e' just look similar, but it is indeed a 'c'.

  • Po (unregistered) in reply to codemonkey
    codemonkey:
    The real WTF is ppl using macs. Eyecandy is all it is

    VISTA is eye candy... OS X is Unix :)

  • ppu-prof_Hag (unregistered)

    Забота о домашнем пространстве - это забота о спокойствии. Термомодернизация фасадов - это не только изысканный облик, но и обеспечение сохранения тепла в вашем уголке спокойствия. Наша команда, группа специалистов, предлагаем вам переделать ваш дом в идеальное жилище. Выполненные нами проекты - это не просто тепловая обработка, это творчес

Leave a comment on “The Best of Both Worlds”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

« Return to Article