• spellingnazi (unregistered) in reply to rumpelstiltskin
    rumpelstiltskin:
    I would help the receptionist out of hornyness if she were hot, but if I had any reason what-so-ever to believe it was part of the interview, and that was actually work I'd be expected to do, I'd tell them to get corned.

    It says at the beginning of the story that this is sort of thing is part of the job. You would have gone out of your way to apply and interview for a job that you knew you didn't want.

    I don't think it's any secret why we see lots of stories like this: there's a lot of grunt work in IT, and someone has to do it. Keeping inventory of software licenses, making sure you have enough patch cables on hand...just stupid work. People go to school, get their certs, and what ideally would be concrete for them is really a jumble of facts that they memorized long enough to pass a test.

    They apply for IT jobs because someone lied to them and said there was money in it. Then, not only are they frustrated to be doing what they consider to be menial work, their employer gets frustrated because they can't troubleshoot basic things.

  • Craig Matthews (unregistered)

    The real WTF is allowing people who don't work for your company to touch a computer which has access to corporate information.

    Everyone involved in administering the "receptionist test" should be fired.

  • Some Wonk (unregistered) in reply to Ren
    Ren:
    iToad:
    Some of the smarter companies take management candidates out to dinner, and then arrange for the restaurant to make a small error in the candidate's order. If he flies into a screaming rage, he doesn't get the job.

    What happens when they "accidentally" bring something he's deathly allergic to?

    They save a bundle on life insurance.

  • (cs) in reply to bucket
    bucket:
    I'm pretty sure the forum software inserts typo's into my posts... I always check them before I press Submit and two of my posts suddenly had a typo in them when I read them back. :( And no edit button that I can find as well.
    Hint: try pressing "Preview" instead of "Submit". And if you use a registered username, you get the "Edit" button.
  • Engywuck (unregistered)

    If you are able to do anything "evil" to the network or computer config with a receptionist login on a computer that can be accessed by anyone coming in the building if the receptionist is (mentally) away then your companys security policy is sh*t (or your security officer).

    Not counting being able to f*ck with the Semi-Sensitive Data the receptionist needs to access/change, of course (really sensitive data shouldn't be accessable on a reception anyways...)

    Yes, I know... "should" and "is"...

    but hey, just saying "try another disk this one's write protected" or "your printer is offline, is there a reason for that?" can't possibly be security-relevant or dangerous. Powering the printer on when it's offline for a reason (say, emitting smoke when on) is another case, but even then the tech guy should have put it away or at least stick a HUGE warnig sticker to it.

  • Tapcon (unregistered) in reply to Bappi
    Bappi:
    Tapcon:
    Ren:
    iToad:
    Some of the smarter companies take management candidates out to dinner, and then arrange for the restaurant to make a small error in the candidate's order. If he flies into a screaming rage, he doesn't get the job.

    What happens when they "accidentally" bring something he's deathly allergic to?

    ... then he doesn't eat it and politely informs the waitstaff? I'm not deathly allergic to anything but I can only assume that's how that situation should be handled.

    Doesn't work. I had a project at the Seattle school district, and someone in the office was mortally allergic to seafood. You couldn't even bring seafood in the building or his allergies would be triggered.

    You can imagine what would've happened if you'd put a plate of fish in front of him.

    That's a rather extreme case, and the interviewer would obviously have to be made aware so they themselves didn't order seafood.

    Also, I think it's safe to assume that any "small" change to a dish isn't going to include adding items that people are commonly severely allergic too.

  • Steve (unregistered)

    When they told me to fix the computer, I would have grabbed my crotch and said 'fix this'.

    When calling for the interview, I would have said 'Should I bring my F^&#in' tools?'

  • Alan (unregistered)

    If I were hiring and someone refused to help the receptionist I would probably not hire them either. I need people who can get stuff done. Not people who make excuses about how that function isn't in their contract, or they are so afraid of breaking something or doing something "wrong" that they are doomed to inaction. If they are smart enough to cover their own asses by saying "I will try, but I do not know your system and can't do much without risking damage" then so much the better.

  • jtl (unregistered) in reply to zip
    zip:
    I can't wait for someone to explain how real developers don't need to have the common sense to check that a printer is on, and how they'd walk out of the interview if you tried this on them.

    Where have you gone TopCod3r? The Daily WTF turns it's lonely eyes to you. Woo woo woo.

  • TimmyEvil (unregistered) in reply to xtremezone
    xtremezone:
    No, the French Canadians are proud they speak French. The rest of us hate it. >:(

    Some of us are proud that Francophones speak French and disappointed that everyone west of Cornwall is so lazy (and yes, that includes me.)

    On Topic: Now that we have an HR department that insists on weeding through the resumes before anyone useful gets to them I can see this as being a pretty good way to weed out the functionally lazy: those people who have enough gumption to understand that they may need a TLA or two, but not motivated enough to actually know the stuff the TLA covers.

  • Craig Matthews (unregistered) in reply to Engywuck
    Engywuck:
    If you are *able* to do anything "evil" to the network or computer config with a *receptionist* login on a computer that can be accessed by anyone coming in the building if the receptionist is (mentally) away then your companys security policy is sh*t (or your security officer).

    Not counting being able to f*ck with the Semi-Sensitive Data the receptionist needs to access/change, of course (really sensitive data shouldn't be accessable on a reception anyways...)

    Yes, I know... "should" and "is"...

    but hey, just saying "try another disk this one's write protected" or "your printer is offline, is there a reason for that?" can't possibly be security-relevant or dangerous. Powering the printer on when it's offline for a reason (say, emitting smoke when on) is another case, but even then the tech guy should have put it away or at least stick a HUGE warnig sticker to it.

    The same receptionist apparently has the ability to go to arbitrary websites and download software if the Ubuntu story is to be believed. Sounds like there's hardly any security on these guys' network at all, and yet they let potential employees who don't work there yet get in front of a computer. Hell, they even had them handling removable media.

  • Cybercat (unregistered)

    Saying "I will try, but I do not know your system and can't do much without risking damage" covers your ass about as much as a piece of toilet paper will protect you from a flame thrower in the legal world my friend. People are scared because someone MADE them scared, not just because they're pansies (although that's a possibility). Someone asked for something, and then fucked them later on when they messed up a portion and then that boss or whoever blames it on them. Refusing to do a SECRET task like this (unless done rudely) that is not implicitly part of the interview process by no means shows a lack of social graces OR ability. You'd be a moron to base your hiring procedure on that.

    Now if they refused to do it after the interviewer came out and said "hey, do you know how to fix this problem" it's COMPLETELY different. (obvious tag here)

  • (cs) in reply to Engywuck
    Engywuck:
    If you are *able* to do anything "evil" to the network or computer config with a *receptionist* login on a computer that can be accessed by anyone coming in the building if the receptionist is (mentally) away then your companys security policy is sh*t (or your security officer). [...]
    Just because an I.T. security policy is in place does not mean that it was well conceived or even makes sense... At some places, developers have to fight with I.T. just to get enough privs to debug a process, and at others a PC acting as a print server had an automatic login and access to just about all file servers on the network.
  • (cs) in reply to DaveyDaveDave
    DaveyDaveDave:
    Personally - I'd think, 'what an unfriendly, unhelpful person, I wouldn't want to work with him/her'.

    It's very true that you can tell an awful lot about a person from how he/she talks to the receptionist (or waiter, porter, other service staff).

    Honestly, I was expecting the content to follow that track - have the receptionist take candidates to lunch and report back on their behavior.

  • (cs) in reply to Anon
    Anon:
    To be fair, the keyboard language thing is a bit tricky. It's not something you expect to see suddenly change by itself. If the receptionist's keyboard was happily typing in English the day before, why would it suddenly be set to French?
    Any Spanish-speaking person (especially in Latin America) would be aware of b0rked keyboard layouts. For some weird reasons, there are two Spanish layouts: 'es' and 'la', respectively. One of these layouts swaps around most punctuation marks, and most people are too lazy/stupid to change the keyboard layout. So I sometimes get people writing stuff with the french "backwards" accent (à) instead of using the acute accent (á), which incidentally, is the only one used in Spanish.

    So yes, maybe because of this, seeing weird punctuation/symbols when pressing punctuation keys will immediately tell me "damn, they keyboard layout's wrong!". But that may be because of the aforementioned layout duplicity.

  • xous (unregistered)

    In an interview I did for a "Information Technologist 3" position at a local university a they had a practical issue for me to solve.

    They had laptop setup and plugged in but didn't have any network connectivity. They said it had be brought from one building down to do a presentation in this building.

    First thing I did was took a look at the ipconfig /all and noticed that the network settings were statically configured. I did some quick mental subnetting and confirmed that the IP address and gateway were in the same subnet and the broadcast was correct. I said "If I recall correctly your currently migrating some of the buildings to static dhcp, is this building using DHCP?"

    The tech on the interview panel said Yes and I was done. I did "excellent".

    The real WTF is that I probably would not have got that question had I not learned a bit on how their network was setup prior to the interview.

    In the end I didn't get the job because an "internal candidate" applied. -_- Unions.

  • pweegar (unregistered) in reply to Neil

    Why is that in any way a WTF? I have a friend who works at a university here in az. He asked me not long ago why he was having problems saving his Excel files to a floppy. And yes, he has internet access.

    Then again, at the company I work at, we got in several new Dell's. Guess what they had in them. That's right. FLOPPY DRIVES. So, it really isn't all that weird.

    What I found strange was there was only 1 person there to interview at a time??? I don't remember ever being the sole person wating for an interview. And, not being an employee, I wouldn't have touched the receptionist's pc. Wouldn't want to take the chance of really messing up spmething. As already posted, I would have politely told her to call the IT department.

  • Sigivald (unregistered) in reply to incognito

    Incognito said: Honestly - do you think an 18 year old kid has grown up with a floppy drive at all?

    Yes.

    Many K-12 schools still use floppies for student work, though USB keys are the way of the future.

    Someone who is 18 now was 8 when the iMac came out as the first commodity PC with no floppy drive.

    They've had plenty of time to see a floppy disk in their lives.

  • anonymous (unregistered) in reply to Satanicpuppy
    Satanicpuppy:

    I can understand screwing up the dead tech: a write protect tab? How quaint.

    Yeah, because my new tech SD card doesn't have a write protect switch.

  • RetroPR.com (unregistered)

    I had an interview at a university back in 2001, and while I was waiting to be interviewed for a Sysadmin/ Helpdesk/ Computers Handyman, they were struggling with the Nimda virus (or one of those that wouldn't let you work because of reboots), so after seeing the "expert" fighting with it for about five minutes, I stepped in, aborted the shutdown, and used that "magic" removal tool that Symantec, McAfee, and everyone else were providing, and voila....

    Of course after talking for 5 minutes about my previous networking experience, and migrations from NT to Win2K I got the job!

  • Dirk Diggler (unregistered) in reply to xous
    xous:
    static dhcp
    What is that?
  • Gleb (unregistered)

    Actually, the last candidate was right: in Konqueror file type is determined by headers if the extension isn't associated with anyting.

  • Engywuck (unregistered) in reply to Dirk Diggler

    the same thing that Microsofts DHCP server calls "reserved addresses"? Gives the same computer always the same address despite using DHCP (and as such being able to give DNS, Gateway etc. information to the client computer)

  • Bobble (unregistered) in reply to Dirk Diggler
    Dirk Diggler:
    xous:
    static dhcp
    What is that?

    I would guess it's a fancy way of saying hcp :P

  • Dan (unregistered) in reply to Satanicpuppy
    Satanicpuppy:
    incognito:
    Wait...I'm having trouble placing the time period - what with the talk of Ubuntu and Wikipedia. The PC still had a floppy drive???? Honestly - do you think an 18 year old kid has grown up with a floppy drive at all?

    But step one (assuming you didn't immediately think write protect tab) should have been to try another disk

    Actually, I'm pretty sure step 1 would be to pay attention to the error. I assume it's a Windows PC, and (I realize it has been a while, but) its error message should be something like "Write protect error writing the file". That should be an immediate clue to check the write protect tab.

    Of course I quit using floppies long before they fell out of use, simply because they became completely unreliable. Take a brand new floppy out of the box and half the time the drive would tell you it's unreadable. The other half, the file would likely not last long enough to be transferred to another drive. I typically resorted to writing multiple copies of a file to multiple floppies, hoping one would work.

    I'm just happy for flash drives.

  • Waiter of Death (unregistered) in reply to Ren

    They hire someone else. Duh.

  • Anon (unregistered) in reply to DaveyDaveDave
    DaveyDaveDave:
    Personally - I'd think, 'what an unfriendly, unhelpful person, I wouldn't want to work with him/her'.

    It's very true that you can tell an awful lot about a person from how he/she talks to the receptionist (or waiter, porter, other service staff).

    Yes you can tell that they value company IT security, do not wish to put themselves into legal risk, do not wish to cause potential headaches for the actual IT staff, etc. For all I know this is a desired behavior of the system (by the powers that be) that the receptionist is trying to bypass for their own benefit (ie: it’s easier for them, who cares how it impacts others).

    I’d personally be a lot more worried about the ones who did offer to help since they quite visibly have no idea about what can go wrong. What other systems will they unthinkably touch on the job to “help someone” without knowing the whole picture or going through official channels?

    Tapcon:
    ... then he doesn't eat it and politely informs the waitstaff? I'm not deathly allergic to anything but I can only assume that's how that situation should be handled.

    That’s assuming he realizes (before taking a bite) what has been served to him and that whatever he asked to have removed hasn’t been removed. See the odd thing about having an allergy is that you don’t usually get close to food that contain that product so it’s damn difficult sometimes to realize it can take on certain appearances once processed.

    Bappi:
    Doesn't work. I had a project at the Seattle school district, and someone in the office was mortally allergic to seafood. You couldn't even bring seafood in the building or his allergies would be triggered.

    You can imagine what would've happened if you'd put a plate of fish in front of him.

    Yeah such people would (or rather should) generally avoid going out to eat period since too much could go wrong in such a setting. If they have to go out then they’d first need to be very explicit in what they can’t be near so other people in their group don’t order it.

  • moz (unregistered) in reply to SomeCoder
    Strum Rincewind:
    Doesn't anyone think it strange that the receptionist lets someone unknown to them have access to a company computer?
    Not really. The receptionist can watch the interviewee throughout, and has to be fairly computer literate to assess the less dreadful candidates.
    SomeCoder:
    This is an interesting idea to screen candidates and it seems to have worked but they need a back up plan just in case someone politely tells the secretary "Maybe you should call your IT department?"
    If you said that in this context, the receptionist would almost certainly ask you again. If you decline to try completely, but also avoid sounding too rude or weird, it shouldn't count against you.
  • MoreExperienceThanYou (unregistered) in reply to Anon
    Anon:
    To be fair, the keyboard language thing is a bit tricky. It's not something you expect to see suddenly change by itself. If the receptionist's keyboard was happily typing in English the day before, why would it suddenly be set to French?
    About 99.9% of the time people call IT and just say "It stopped working, I swear I didn't do anything." This situation is no different...they tell you the problem and it's your job to fix it. If they knew what may have caused they would probably figure it out for themselves and they wouldn't be calling you in the first place.

    So...no, the keyboard thing isn't tricky, it's perfectly legit for anybody that is WORTH hiring for their knowledge....which you obviously aren't.

  • The crowd (unregistered) in reply to bd
    bd:
    DaveAronson:
    Hello, tech support? I'm having trouble writing a comment, could you come take a look at it?
    Have you tried turning it off and on again?
    Ha ha, awesome!
  • (cs) in reply to Craig Matthews
    Craig Matthews:
    Engywuck:
    If you are *able* to do anything "evil" to the network or computer config with a *receptionist* login on a computer that can be accessed by anyone coming in the building if the receptionist is (mentally) away then your companys security policy is sh*t (or your security officer).

    Not counting being able to f*ck with the Semi-Sensitive Data the receptionist needs to access/change, of course (really sensitive data shouldn't be accessable on a reception anyways...)

    Yes, I know... "should" and "is"...

    but hey, just saying "try another disk this one's write protected" or "your printer is offline, is there a reason for that?" can't possibly be security-relevant or dangerous. Powering the printer on when it's offline for a reason (say, emitting smoke when on) is another case, but even then the tech guy should have put it away or at least stick a HUGE warnig sticker to it.

    The same receptionist apparently has the ability to go to arbitrary websites and download software if the Ubuntu story is to be believed. Sounds like there's hardly any security on these guys' network at all, and yet they let potential employees who don't work there yet get in front of a computer. Hell, they even had them handling removable media.

    Downloading a file is one thing. The ability to run it is a completely different story.

  • (cs) in reply to webhamster
    webhamster:
    Code Dependent:
    Zero:
    The difference is that the Canadians are proud they speak French whereas the Parisians are proud they speak French.
    Since that makes no sense whatsoever, I'm going to guess you meant to say this:

    The difference is that the Canadians are proud they speak French whereas the Parisians are proud they are French.

    The problem is that Canadians don't speak French. We speak 'Quebecois'. They're almost two totally different languages. And don't even get started on 'Acadian'...

    ... and then there's 'Joual'.

  • foo (unregistered) in reply to Anon
    Anon:
    To be fair, the keyboard language thing is a bit tricky. It's not something you expect to see suddenly change by itself. If the receptionist's keyboard was happily typing in English the day before, why would it suddenly be set to French?

    Simplest explanation is that the second shift receptionist is French.

  • MM (unregistered) in reply to Engywuck
    Engywuck:
    If you are *able* to do anything "evil" to the network or computer config with a *receptionist* login on a computer that can be accessed by anyone coming in the building if the receptionist is (mentally) away then your companys security policy is sh*t (or your security officer).

    Not counting being able to f*ck with the Semi-Sensitive Data the receptionist needs to access/change, of course (really sensitive data shouldn't be accessable on a reception anyways...)

    If she were only a receptionist, then she probably wouldn't have even needed to have a computer in the first place. Very few places, however, can afford to hire someone to just babysit the reception area. Nearly all receptionists have to do at least some secretarial work as well. There are a lot of companies where the "receptionist" is really a secretary or assistant who got stuck with handling reception in addition to her main job, and secretaries need access to a lot of sensitive data.

    As to it being accessable to anyone coming in the building when the receptionist is away, presumably she'd have the sense (and a directive from the company) to at least turn on the screensaver whenever she stepped away from her desk, so someone would need her password to easily get in. A combination of that and having the computer itself in a locked cabinet would provide reasonable enough security for most places.

  • MM (unregistered) in reply to SomeCoder
    SomeCoder:
    Every company I've worked for has some really insanely paranoid people running IT. For someone to come in and jump on a receptionists computer to fix something... they would probably call the FBI immediately ;)

    Seriously though, I would be afraid of breaking some policy, unknowingly, and then being automatically disqualified from working there.

    I wouldn't touch a computer at a company I didn't work for yet without a clear indication that I was permitted to do so (something much clearer than the receptionist asking for help). I would, however, try to help her by suggesting things that she could try checking.

  • (cs) in reply to Dan
    Dan:
    Of course I quit using floppies long before they fell out of use, simply because they became completely unreliable. Take a brand new floppy out of the box and half the time the drive would tell you it's unreadable. The other half, the file would likely not last long enough to be transferred to another drive. I typically resorted to writing multiple copies of a file to multiple floppies, hoping one would work.

    I'm just happy for flash drives.

    I used floppies for years. 5.25" and 3.5" at various densities from 320Kb to 1.44Mb per floppy. Never had issues like that. But then, floppy drives used to be well built too. Newish drives exist to read the occasional floppy, and the quality probably isn't there any more. But floppies were reliable indeed, I had hundreds of them with games, programs, software packages and documents on them, and they all still worked a few years ago when I last got nostalgic.

    It's like cassette tapes. They will fade given enough time and poor storage conditions, but they can still play great. But you can't buy a decent tape deck these days unless you go for a specialist deck or second hand for a well looked after piece of equipment...

  • (cs) in reply to campkev
    shepd:
    Why is it these applicants even make it there?

    Oh, I forgot. Like most places, I'm guessing the hiring (okay, resume review) process is based on how many degrees the person has, how many languages/operating systems/insert-unrelated-thing-here they've worked on, and how long they were in their last job, rather than the basic items the job actually requires;

    How did they get there? It's a university. They're trying to find one of the few undergrads who possesses the trifecta of willing to help, able to help, and willing to put up with common, menial tasks that an undergrad in university IT will be doing all the time.

    I got an interview for a lab-repair-guy/network admin/teaching assistant position because I asked about it (yes, this was all one job). That's often all it takes in college. I got the job because I demonstrated my ability to actually use the skills in test situations.

    Oh, and my "previous network experience" that got me the job? Setting up and debugging networks at LAN parties. (That was actually something to be proud of before Windows XP came along and made it comparatively easy.) But it worked!

  • (cs) in reply to Gorfblot
    Gorfblot:
    snoofle:
    justin:
    I think it would have been great had you assembled it, put a bios password on it, and walked out with a note saying, break this, ill be back in 20 minutes
    I'd hire you in a second!

    Don't you mean in 20 minutes?

    No, I meant in a second - the really good folks get snapped up quickly!

  • MM (unregistered) in reply to Ren
    Ren:
    iToad:
    Some of the smarter companies take management candidates out to dinner, and then arrange for the restaurant to make a small error in the candidate's order. If he flies into a screaming rage, he doesn't get the job.
    What happens when they "accidentally" bring something he's deathly allergic to?
    It's probably best for that "error" to be ommitting something from the order rather than adding something to it.
  • (cs) in reply to Dave
    Dave:
    Paris is hardly representative, FWIW my gf spent a year in france (Rennes) and I found the french obnoxious no matter what language you spoke to them in.
    You may just have been unlucky. But in my experience most of the french are like other people, friendly to the friendly and obnoxious to the really obnoxious, so it may have been you.
  • Dan (unregistered) in reply to fruey
    fruey:
    I used floppies for years. 5.25" and 3.5" at various densities from 320Kb to 1.44Mb per floppy. Never had issues like that. But then, floppy drives used to be well built too. Newish drives exist to read the occasional floppy, and the quality probably isn't there any more. But floppies were reliable indeed, I had hundreds of them with games, programs, software packages and documents on them, and they all still worked a few years ago when I last got nostalgic.

    Yep, that was my experience. In the days of 5.25 and the early days of 3.5", all was well. But somewhere in there, disks and drives were made cheaply and from then on, only disks supplied by software companies had any reliability. Then Zip disks took over, but eventually they too lost the reliability battle.

  • Neef (unregistered)

    I'd be loathe to actually touch a machine that wasn't under my purview (ie : If Im not employed by a company, Im not going to start fucking with their machines), and I'd be surprised to find a company willing to do that.

    Mind you, after having worked for a university for the last year and a bit, I can easily see someone at this place thinking this is a fantastic idea...

  • (cs)

    UP UP DOWN DOWN LEFT RIGHT LEFT RIGHT B A SELECT START

  • (cs) in reply to SomeCoder
    SomeCoder:
    That's a pretty terrible assumption to make. You would assume that the guy, nervous as hell, coming in for an interview would immediately jump to his feet to fix a receptionists computer while not being paid for it and having no prior knowledge to how their network, IT, etc. works.
    You touched The System?! You don't have authorization to touch The System!!!

    Seriously, I do a hell of a lot of tech support, but the primary thing to do is make the proper person is doing the job. IT hates the guy who home-brews his laptop.

  • Lincoln (unregistered)

    While not pre-arranged tests (one of them I wasn't really looking for a job, nor did an opening exist at the time), I got both of my two "real" jobs, in part, by jumping in and helping solve a problem.

    I've also scored an upgrade to First Class for fixing the printer at the gate (no one at the airline's help desk was answering, and in the conversation I overheard, the issue was threatening to delay my flight). Offered to take a look at it. Beast of a tractor-fed Dot Matrix printer with one heck of a jam...cleared the paper jam, still refused to print. Offline/online-- unhappy beeping, no printy. Power cycle the printer and out comes the flight manifest, weather, etc. and I walk away.

    Agent walks up to me before I board and tells me I "forgot" my "correct" boarding pass.

  • Bob (unregistered)

    Linux will not stop you from accidentally renaming a file whatever from whatever.doc. Windows displays a warning message saying that renaming a file extension might make it unusable.

    Some file managers may associate .doc files with openoffice/abiword/ms office in wine/whatever word processor you're using even if it does not have the extension.

    Nautilius appears to be able to do use both file-extensions AND magic numbers , because it tried to open a .docx in the archive manager (by using magic numbers to see that it is zip-compressed), but I was able to change .docx to open in my word processor.

  • (cs) in reply to fruey
    fruey:
    I used floppies for years. 5.25" and 3.5" at various densities from 320Kb to 1.44Mb per floppy. Never had issues like that. But then, floppy drives used to be well built too. Newish drives exist to read the occasional floppy, and the quality probably isn't there any more.
    I used flopped for at least 10 years. They were pretty good, but by the end it was damn painful.

    One thing I've heard (maybe apochraphyl) is that the floppy drives that aren't used accumulate dust, which affects all the floppies that are put into it.

    I bet most of my 5.25" are still good, but my pile of 3.5" are mostly crap.

  • rec (unregistered) in reply to Anon
    Anon:
    To be fair, the keyboard language thing is a bit tricky. It's not something you expect to see suddenly change by itself. If the receptionist's keyboard was happily typing in English the day before, why would it suddenly be set to French?

    If you have two languages installed, pressing "shift+ctrl" will toggle (or rotate, if you have more than two languages) the language for the current application.

  • (cs) in reply to Tapcon
    Tapcon:
    Also, I think it's safe to assume that any "small" change to a dish isn't going to include adding items that people are commonly severely allergic too.
    No, it is not safe to assume that.
  • BOB (unregistered) in reply to incognito
    incognito:
    Wait...I'm having trouble placing the time period - what with the talk of Ubuntu and Wikipedia. The PC still had a floppy drive???? Honestly - do you think an 18 year old kid has grown up with a floppy drive at all?
    Obviously it is in the future: they mentioned Ubuntu Obnoxious Orangutan. Ubuntu releases come out every six months and are in alphabetical order. Ubuntu Intrepid Ibex will be released in 8 days. So it is 36 months from now.

Leave a comment on “The Receptionist Test”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

« Return to Article