• Greg (unregistered)

    @Jeff S
    I can totally relate to why Guayo briefly skims your posts and then responds on a whim. AS of late, the posts on the daily WTF have been rather extensive and very wordy IMO. There's not a lot there in terms of content, just a bunch of posturing and pontificating. "Look at me, I'm such a wonderful coder"...that sort of thing. I used to read through most of the posts. Nowadays, if it's over a couple sentences in length I briefly skim and move on. What they're saying really isn't that important after all.

  • Jeff S (unregistered)

    It's great to skim long posts when browsing, but don't try to have an intelligent discussion with someone if you ignore most of what they say! (that applies to real-like conversations as well!)

  • Matthew Wills (unregistered)

    Jeff S,

    I feel for you, but ignore people's comments. A number of people here will shift the argument if they are incorrect or on shaky ground...

  • foxyshadis (unregistered)

    Cakkie, "but since the code only runs one time at a time, and already executes in less than 100ms," means that your code can only handle 10-11 connections a second. In other words, it is built with a growth potential severely limited - especially since it'll get even slower as more records are added. Once another department wants to start using it (or worse, it goes live on a webserver) you're only going to have to create these optimizations all over again. (A join like this can be a few milliseconds, more than an order of magnitude less than 100ms. How is that "negligible"?)

    You are the WTF.

  • Cakkie (unregistered)

    Well, easy :)

    Currently the code is used by only one person, only once a week. They first have to check if the inputted data is correct (which they have to do manual (can take a few minutes per timesheet), and then it needs to be approved (what this code does) by a click on a button.

    Say the number of people using this code at the very same moment doubles, no tripples, no tenfolds, then it would still run within 1 second. If they come bitching over that, I'll start complaining that it takes to coffee machine 15 seconds to prepare my coffee :p

Leave a comment on “The Land Before DateTime Functions”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

« Return to Article