• (cs) in reply to csrster
    csrster:
    I work for a national internet archiving consortium. We are legally obliged to ignore robots.txt.
    Well, nobody else is going to ask this question at this point, because here on TDWTF we value immediacy and sad self-gratification above knowledge.

    But why? And by what law?

    I mean, I understand ignoring robots and crawlers and stuff; that's just common sense.

    But exactly what law mandates you to invade personal privacy when there's a Big Ole Warning Sign outside saying "Chien Mechant! Chatte Lunatique!"

    May your idiot bosses be infested with bot flies. (Yes, I'm aware that the suggestion is slightly Alanis Morrisette^W^W ironic.)

  • Willllllllllllllllll (unregistered)

    DON'T use headers to secure your web application.

    Just don't.

  • David Guaraglia (unregistered)

    Well, actually the correct answer is "never delete stuff from your server on a GET request, only on a POST request, and even then only after checking the user has the permission to delete stuff". Everything else is just fixing potholes.

  • twobee (unregistered)

    usually you also put a die() below your header() call, to be sure the script is really stopped.

  • Anon (unregistered)

    Yeah, server stored session variables that delete after authentication of action authorization are just too hard as well.

  • passing_coder (unregistered)

    Wouldn't you usually tell robots/crawlers NOT to index a CMS page anyway? AND throw them into a honeypot if they try? On top of that wouldn't you design a CMS not to be accessible by ips other than those previously input into a db anyhow?

  • hydrahit (unregistered)
    Comment held for moderation.
  • hydrahit (unregistered)
    Comment held for moderation.
  • omgomghit (unregistered)
    Comment held for moderation.
  • MichaelUndof (unregistered)
    Comment held for moderation.
  • omgomghit (unregistered)
    Comment held for moderation.
  • RamonGerse (unregistered)

    [image]

    Over the years of independence, the institute has trained more than 13000 physicians (including 800 clinical interns, 1116 masters, 200 postgraduates and 20 doctoral students) in various directions.

    870 staff work at the institute at present,[when?] including 525 professorial-teaching staff in 55 departments, 34 of them are Doctors of science and 132 candidates of science. 4 staff members of the professorial-teaching staff of the institute are Honoured Workers of Science of the Republic of Uzbekistan, 3 – are members of New-York and 2 – members of Russian Academy of Pedagogical Science.

    The institute has been training medical staff on the following faculties and directions: Therapeutic, Pediatric, Dentistry, Professional Education, Preventive Medicine, Pharmacy, High Nursing Affair and Physicians’ Advanced Training. At present[when?] 3110 students have been studying at the institute (1331 at the Therapeutic faculty, 1009 at the Pediatric, 358 at the Dentistry, 175 students at the Professional Education Direction, 49 at the faculty of Pharmacy, 71 at the Direction of Preventive Medicine, 117 ones study at the Direction of High Nursing Affair).

    Today graduates of the institute are trained in the following directions of master's degree: obstetrics and gynecology, therapy (with its directions), otorhinolaryngology, cardiology, ophthalmology, infectious diseases (with its directions), dermatovenereology, neurology, general oncology, morphology, surgery (with its directions), instrumental and functional diagnostic methods (with its directions), neurosurgery, public health and public health services (with its directions), urology, narcology, traumatology and orthopedics, forensic medical examination, pediatrics (with its directions), pediatric surgery, pediatric anesthesiology and intensive care, children's cardiology and rheumatology, pediatric neurology, neonatology, sports medicine.

    The clinic of the institute numbers 700

  • Thomasjeams (unregistered)
    Comment held for moderation.
  • StevenGeomy (unregistered)
    Comment held for moderation.
  • Williamsit (unregistered)

    DWI charges require most of the highly trained secrets employed in criminal defense court rooms. protecting a OVI is initiated with making sure none of one's constitutional rights were violated. Because a cop is in front of you, and they are essentially the only witness all of the time, the commands and MO is of the nature. some of us all create accidents, and police are no no exception to the rule. The Occasion starts with obvious suspicion that can progress to probable cause. For example, someone gets pulled over for driving too slow at 1 a.m.. A police officer has regular suspicion that aperson has created a traffic offense, racing. Now, when the law enforcment begins to make eye connection or steps in towards your auto, law enforcement will exclaim you are showing watery eyes, or there is an smell of alcohol. This raises the reasonable intuition of abnormal driving to giving a police officer a good chance that someone may be driving while intoxicated. 80% of police will say odor of whiskey, blood shot eyes, or mumbiling speech. The cop may usually elaborate you were fumbling around trying to get your license and insurance card out. At this point the person driving will be likely told to get out of a car and do universal driving sobriety checks. Those are SFST’s are taught under NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) standardizations and need to be followed per instruction. If you do go through the tests, the cop may make mistakes which will make the check, or tests excluded from evidence. Things such as physical impairments and the best street conditions can be factored amoung the results of your field sobriety test. (example: someone can’t perform a jump and pivot check on ramped sidwalk). A person may usually take a digital breath test. There are irregularities in these gadgets also, after all they are technolgo that need maintenance and specialized training on every day. The incarceration is taped at the time the officer turns on their red and blues. Through this ca

  • RandyEleks (unregistered)
    Comment held for moderation.
  • Thomasjeams (unregistered)
    Comment held for moderation.
  • Kathrynnuh (unregistered)
    Comment held for moderation.
  • JaimeSap (unregistered)
    Comment held for moderation.
  • Iskusstven_mxMr (unregistered)

    Открывая новые горизонты с помощью ИИ

  • Derekwaisy (unregistered)
    Comment held for moderation.
  • Filip (github)

    Beautiful

  • ppu-prof_Si (unregistered)
    Comment held for moderation.
  • ppu-prof_Si (unregistered)
    Comment held for moderation.

Leave a comment on “Well-Intentioned Destruction”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #260211:

« Return to Article