- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
- Error'd
- Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Other Series
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
1=1.38KB 0=2.86KB
QED
Admin
Admin
But the PhDs know they can't resort to the life-or-death argument, which just frustrates them all the more, making them yell louder and stomp their feet harder.
There's almost an inverse ratio. The true geniuses have a calm quiet air about them, because everybody knows they've earned respect. The wannabe hangers-on struggle mightily over who gets the bottom rung on the ladder.
Admin
The people who can't produce anything anybody is willing to buy are left with only one alternative: beg for money. Or I guess they could just steal it. No wait, why take the risk of your victims shooting back when the government goons will steal it for you and hand it over if you ask nicely?
Which is why you get guys who graduate from begging daddy for money for ho's to begging the government for money so they can invent hoes.
Admin
"Hello, IT..."
"Have you tried turning it off and on again?"
"right. Thank you!" <click>
Admin
TRWTF is that nobody called out the author on "Jim from IT" yet
[image] [image]Seriously, did nobody else even chuckle at that?
Captcha: decet
Admin
The "R"s of tech support:
Retry Reboot Reinstall Refund!
Admin
There is another reason that you need to beg for money: You gave all your hoes aways for free!
Publishing a exact description on how to make hoes, so every one can have a hoe, not just some privileged people who can afford to buy one.
Admin
This troll shows some promise. How many people will bite?
Admin
"Aha, this needs a specialist maintenance hack. I doubt you have the necessary equipment at your home base - we'll have to improvise. Tell me, do you have some ice cubes - colder the better? You'll need as many as you can find. And also I'm going to need you to find a wooden spoon, or spatula or something, it's got to be wooden ... "
etc. etc. etc. and on until:
"Right, now take that wooden spoon, which by now should be at the correct temperature ... and shove it up your arse as far it it will fucking go."
Admin
I think that's how we got the housing bubble that destroyed the world's economy, as leftist schemes always will. Banks forced to loan to people who had no down payment. But hey at least some politicians got to brag about how they were helping the homeless, so there's that.
Admin
How does it benefit anyone, if someone does not have a hoe , has to do it manually and cannot do anything more productively in that time?
And soon 3d printer can create an arbitrary number of those hoes...
Absolutely not!
If people were allowed to just camp on an empty field, instead of proving that they have earned the right to be somewhere with that loan, there would not be any problem.
The left position always was that loans are going to destroy the economy and must be abolished.
Admin
It is so concerning when people do not equate education and research with value. I'm guessing your problems at whatever university you worked at had more to do with your bad attitude than anyone else's.
Admin
Some doctors (such as radiologists) have the social skills of rocks, too.
Admin
With all these silly jokes you missed the real problem here: why is there a /dev/zero but not a /dev/one? Does Linus hate ones or are they just too big to generate in real time?
Admin
[quote][quote user="someone"][quote user="Karl"]You sound like one of those who think everybody should get everything, whether or not they earn it. [/quote] Exactly!
How does it benefit anyone, if someone does not have a hoe , has to do it manually and cannot do anything more productively in that time?[/quote]It benefits me and my friends. How else could we look down on those peasants who can't even afford a hoe (whatever that is)! [quote]And soon 3d printer can create an arbitrary number of those hoes...[/quote]Fortunately, we still have copyright, patents and intellectual property to stop that. [quote][quote user="Karl"] I think that's how we got the housing bubble that destroyed the world's economy, as leftist schemes always will. [/quote]
Absolutely not!
If people were allowed to just camp on an empty field, instead of proving that they have earned the right to be somewhere with that loan, there would not be any problem.
The left position always was that loans are going to destroy the economy and must be abolished.[/quote]Rubbish! The housing bubble was created by this left socialist government. Or maybe the previous government which was also socialist.
Admin
What a stupid comment software! Can't even get the quotes right. Listen you smart programmers: If the quoting don't match, either fix it or give me some red error message. Don't post the article which renders wrong!
So again:
Rubbish! The housing bubble was created by this left socialist government. Or maybe the previous government which was also socialist.Admin
Admin
Admin
Admin
I sense much butt hurt in this thread from probable university staff/professors/grad students. Haha... higher education can be a great tool to improve your intelligence, but lots of idiots don't know how to use the tool and just assume that it worked when it didn't...
Much like MaryB and her dial-up internet
Admin
Admin
Not socialist -- corporatist. Which is why, when all of those loans failed, they just paid back the banks' losses and continued the same disasterous policies. Leftist/socialists would have let the banks fail...and would not have let them take advantage of people with these predatory lending practices in the first place. The deregulation that allowed them to do that was capitalist; the government assurance that they wouldn't lose was corporatist.
Admin
Also worth noting that hardcore leftists generally oppose government as a whole, preferring instead a society based on consent and mutual aid. The difference between an anarcho-syndicalist (which are generally the people calling themselves "leftist", to differentiate themselves from the nanny-state liberals) and an anarcho-capitalist (the people who generally use the term "libertarian") is not about government, which both want to abolish, but about the best way to organize a society and culture without government. The anarcho-capitalists think it should be an every man for himself free-for-all, while the syndicalists would prefer a cooperative society of strong, democratic communities.
Admin
Well, that sounds reasonable...
Here in Europe I have often heard the US did not have a left government, since they killed all the Indians/Native Americans off...
Admin
Now if you talk about giving people more stuff than we can actually afford to, that's not even leftist, that's retarded populism.
Admin
So is it like a TDWTF thing where literally everyone posting in the comments is trolling? Because if not then there are a hell of a lot of populist IT guys out there who can't wait to tell everyone how them thar doctors with all them fancy book learnin's ain't so smart after all.
Admin
Not at all. Con is short for confidence, a con-job depends on convincing the mark that the con-artist is genuine.
Appealing to your ego and pride is a typical way to accomplish that. Lots of people will act clueless or helpless to get what they want, this woman probably does it without thinking.
The professionals work the same way; look at the Nigerian scammers: they're perfectly happy for you to believe that they're ignorant foreign (black) idiots who couldn't possibly outwit a savvy Westerner.
Admin
That really is fucking annoying.
Admin
It's also still the same in less developed countries. Cable companies have brought wired internet to some of the bigger villages and one village even has wired phone lines now, but otherwise cellular is the only way.
Admin
Yeah, Paul, because bosses are never assholes with unrealistic expectations. We don't have those posts here on a regular basis.
If universities weren't required to produce something of value, then why do businesses require a college degree for so many jobs? If businesses value productivity, then obviously colleges are productive, because otherwise businesses wouldn't value them.
Admin
Except you're typically using the 3G or whatever the cell data plan uses, not using dialup via a conventional cell call like WhiskeyJack described.
Admin
Admin
There is an old saying I will hereby mangle:
The reason that the politics in academia are so intense is because the stakes are so small.
I worked in education and there is nothing more self-important than an unimportant faculty member.
Admin
Now to complete the task, all we need to do is advise MARYB to turn on the WiFi in her computer and look for a hotspot.
Simple solution if you ask me! Dial-up is for wimps!
Admin
True... but to have VoIP, you need high-speed hard line internet access... Kind of a chicken and egg problem.
Even today, some people have a choice between dial-up and (expensive) satellite. Within an hour drive of a major university. (Don't ask how I know)
Admin
Actually some cellular phone companies blocked Skype because customers figured out that VoIP over cellular data was cheaper than cellular voice. I think phone companies finally figured out they can't win that one.
Admin
http://dilbert.com/strips/comic/2004-12-09/
Admin
You americans never had a socialist government! The only types of government you know is right and far right.
Admin
So it is leftist schemes who destroyed global economies and not the neoliberal capitalist monster, which has achieved global poverty while a handful of people own billions. The housing bubble was caused from the greed of banks, who wish for the global population to owe them and be their slaves and thus gave out loans like crazy.
Admin
Admin
Americans bickering about their "left" and "right" governments show a striking similarity to people comparing McDonald's to Burger King and claiming one is healthier than the other.
</troll>Admin
Alternatively, the housing bubble was caused from the greed of people, who wanted things they couldn't afford and were too stupid to realise that it was a bad idea to take out a loan that would take 3,000 years to pay back at 5 times your current salary.
Yes, blame the banks who lend money, rather than those who borrow it. Blame the big corporates rather than the people who make them into big corporates by continuing to buy stuff from them while complaining about it. Blame companies who outsource abroad, while lapping up all the products that you can buy more cheaply now BECAUSE they have outsourced abroad. Etc
The real answer is that pretty much everyone was culpable, but people like to blame OTHER people rather than accept blame themselves.
Admin
But the whole point was that you wouldn't ever need to pay it back. House prices were going to rise at ten percent a year forever, so after twenty years or so you could sell, pay off the loan, and still be a millionaire on the profits. That's what the banks told you, and the government was there to back them up, so they must be right.
Indeed
Admin
democratic communities != society based on consent If a 'democratiuc community' decides something, they would actually need a form of state power to make it happen. so syndicalists are actually PRO government, but they may not all be sophisticated enough to realize that.
Admin
you claim it were greedy bankers in a free, capitalist market that caused it.
Why would a banker give a loan that is unprofitable to anyone?
As you see, this does not make sense.
Admin
in other words, typical customers...
Admin
+1
Admin
Because the bankers thought, if the loaner cannot pay it back, they get the house and partial back payment, and make a profit in the end.
Admin
Because the individual banker is giving a loan out with the bank's money, not his own. The bank gives the banker his commission based on the initial loan. As long as the banker jumps ship before the loan fails, he personally is making a profit even if the organization has a long-term loss.
You're doing that thing where you assume that an organization acts in its own rational best interest all the time, even though organizations are just groups of fallible human beings.