• RLB (unregistered)

    Google ha a reputation to damage? That's a frist one to me!

  • (nodebb)

    The editor of that manual made a clbuttic mistake

  • Conradus (unregistered) in reply to Dragnslcr

    In gaming circles, it's known as "dawizard".

  • (nodebb)

    What's wrong with the Google screenshot? I don't see any typos there.

  • Cole (unregistered) in reply to Maia-Everett

    "Sign in with you [sic] Google account..."

  • (nodebb)

    Isn't "sign in with you" the sequel to that big hit "melt with you"?

  • (nodebb)

    Shallow being italicized for shall is fine, but "don't" being automatically redacted inthe Epstein files was just funny.

  • (nodebb)

    TIL: Kentucky is the Aloha State!

  • (nodebb)

    I wanted to say something funny about Herren Admins' Handle but reminded myself of John Scalzi's quote about the failure case of smartass

    Fulfilling the self-fulfilling prophecy, shouldn't "Herren" be either "Herr" or "Herrn"? Accusative so presumably Herrn.

  • MangusPI (unregistered)

    I haven't see that one, but I feel the need to ask: If it's redacted, how do you know what was there, that it was "don't" and not something else?

  • (nodebb) in reply to MangusPI

    If it's redacted, how do you know what was there, that it was "don't" and not something else?

    ***' you know how to infer a redacted word from context?

    Addendum 2026-04-05 14:02: Lost an asterisk off the end of the redacted word somehow.

  • MangusPI (unregistered) in reply to jeremypnet

    Yes, context can give a very big clue, I grant that, but even when we feel we can say for 100% what the missing word is, it can still turn out to be something very unexpected. Wheel of Fortune has proven, that time and again, for over 40 years.

Leave a comment on “Clever domain name here”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

Log Out

« Return to Article