- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
- Error'd
- Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Other Series
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
Those panties are not 80% off. They seem, in fact, to be 100% on.
Admin
I don't get the medicare one, what am I missing.
Are malformed fixed-length flat-file records funny? If so, it makes me sad that my job requires me to remove so much humor from our systems.
Admin
I thought 'LED Tribute 3.avi' was overrated. When they killed off the all the main characters in 'LED Tribute 2.avi' I knew the series was going downhill...
Admin
Admin
TRWTF is premature recyculation.[image] Idiot askimet, how is a link back to the home website spam?
Admin
It looks like you can order those underwear in yellow. Which is nice; that way you can eliminate the middle-man.
Admin
Then that whole prequel 'LED Tribute 0.5.avi' trying to bring the characters back just made it worse.
Admin
This makes me cringe.
Admin
All you'r numbers R wrong! There is only to numberz: yes and no. no is les of [object HTMLInputElement] and yes is biger of true making them only numberz. If thoz don't workz than you can uses 6, but that one'z imaginery.
Sinserly, [CMNTR_FNAME] [CMNTR_LNAME] [CMNTR_SIGNATURE]
Admin
If we assume False is 0 and True is non-zero, then the first one is saying that your password cannot be blank and must be 22 characters or less. Odd limitation, but better than a lot of systems I've seen...
Admin
Why? Because they don't offer brown?
Admin
The real error in #3 is the split infinitive.
Admin
Am I missing something or is the 'funny' part of Remy Porter's submission that Oracle left out the 'if you install the feature at all', thinking that was self-evident?
Admin
The GUI doesn't allow you to not install the Demo code, so it sort of defeats the purpose of allowing the user to perform a "custom" install. There's nothing to customize.
The only way to not install stuff is to invoke the installer via command line. And in some cases even that doesn't work - you sometimes have to resort to editing the installer itself to prevent it from installing crap you don't need/want.
Admin
Oracle left out the "This feature will not be installed" option.
Yeah.... hillarious.
Admin
I was going to say that Nicole sounds hot. Not any more.
Admin
I'm pretty sure that anyone with a girl's name sounds hot to most readers of this site.
Admin
Admin
That image with all the arrows isn't that uncommon.
Creative Centrale is generating thumbnails for your video files, and calls VobSub to generate them for it.
Windows Explorer does the same, but you usually don't notice it because it uses media player instead of
Admin
That Java installation one has been there for as long as I can remember. It has always annoyed me.
Admin
Uh, no. I think it was
Admin
Admin
... Right up to where their lawyers knock on your door.
"Hello: Our records show that you did not pay for a license for the Oracle 'Demos and Samples' feature packaged with our 'Java(TM) SE Development Kit 6 Update 21' package you registered to download. We will need to audit all of your Windows servers and workstations for licensing violations."
"Also we will need to copies of all your internal documents to make sure they correctly attribute the 'Java' trademark to Oracle Corporation."
Admin
The correct answer: Is Octobuary 13nd.
Admin
About the email error for an EDI message.... The real WTF is EDI; it's a communication protocol still used in the healthcare and retail industries 30-40 years after it was created, and quite possibly the worst / most ambiguous standard ever created. It's just God awful... pray that you never have to work with it.
Admin
I have prayed I never have to work with EDI. Pray I don't pray further.
Admin
What made me laugh is the beginning of the standard, useless, unenforceable e-mail confidentiality disclaimer at the end of the EDI mail. A lot of good that waste of space has done them, now hasn't it?
When will people realize that once you stick an e-mail out on the interwebs, you no longer own or control it?
So please, please, please stop adding a 14 line disclaimer to all of your e-mails. It's really annoying to get a one work message like "ok" or "thanks" followed by a 200 word essay on how you're going to sue my ass if I so much as even acknowledge your existence.
Admin
I had to work with EDI by writing an application that performed some pre-processing of purchase orders that went out via EDI and it is most unforgiving. I am still in therapy because of it sucking 2 years of my life away.
If you should see any job posting with those 3 letters, you should do only one thing: (in my best Monty Python voice) "Run away!".
Admin
The best, however, are the combination of the two, when a user adds a disclaimer due to policy, but is unaware that the policy is already enforced automatically by the mail server. Now there are two 14 line disclaimers at the bottom of every email they send.
Who hasn't worked with someone like this?
Admin
Admin
To Whom it May Concern,
I have noticed that over the last couple of months the quality and frequency of the articles on this site have dropped dramatically. One or the other would probably be understood; but the templating and outright copying of past articles his reduced the satisfaction in the content, causing the following side-effects in formerly-satisfied members:
I encourage you at minimum to take these two basic steps:
I remain repectfully yours, Bert Glanstron
Admin
Surely not... Octobuary 43nd is the correct answer.
Admin
Admin
Admin
They don't give options to unicorn lovers, Remy Martin.
Admin
Smart quotes or no, I'm pretty sure I can afford to NOT live in a tiny, depressing box inside a shabby old warehouse.
Admin
Okay, clearly I've missed something. Why are people calling him Remy Martin instead of Remy Porter?
Admin
Admin
Admin
Or my previous employer, who insisted on two disclaimers thus:
{Company redacted} made the following annotations on Tue Jan 04 2011 11:15:41
"This message and any attachments are solely for the intended recipient and may contain confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure, copying, use, or distribution of the information included in this message and any attachments is prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us by reply e-mail and immediately and permanently delete this message and any attachments. Thank you."
{Company redacted} a ajouté le commentaire suivant le Tue Jan 04 2011 11:15:41
Ce courrier et toute pièce jointe qu'il contient sont réservés au seul destinataire indiqué et peuvent renfermer des renseignements confidentiels et privilégiés. Si vous n'êtes pas le destinataire prévu, toute divulgation, duplication, utilisation ou distribution du courrier ou de toute pièce jointe est interdite. Si vous avez reçu cette communication par erreur, veuillez nous en aviser par courrier et détruire immédiatement le courrier et les pièces jointes. Merci.
Admin
I can top that: a year ago, one of our resellers sent the entire company an email. His signature contained his name, title, two phone numbers, email, url, and then two different, lengthy confidentiality agreements in which we were notified that his email might contain privileged or proprietary information, we should delete it if we got it in error, don't distribute it to anyone ever or even so much as mention its existence to anyone, etc.
The contents of the message? "Happy birthday!"
I kept that one in my "amusing emails" file.
Admin
Admin
I once worked for an organization which wanted me to append the "This email should only be read by the intended recipient..."-type of disclaimer to my emails.
So I asked them exactly how a recipient was supposed to know they weren't the intended recipient and not read the message. Further, since the disclaimer comes after the message, even if they knew they weren't the intended recipient, how would they erase that reading, since they've already gotten through the message to see the disclaimer?
After not being able to provide an answer of any kind, they told me to "just add the disclaimer".
I can't remember if "you" or "off" was the second word I used.
Admin
If you stare at those panties without blinking for 30 seconds and then glance over to a completely white surface, you can see the face of Jesus reproaching you for your sins.
Don't ask me how I know.
Admin
I only watch the original LED anime anyway. The whole "Tribute" arc was totally lame, not enough ninjas.
Admin
But that is not TRWTF. The TRWTF was what happened when lots more people replied to say "Don't use 'Reply All'", using Reply All, and others said "Please take me off your mailing list", using Reply All, and yet others said "Stop replying to these messages", using Reply All.
(And yes, I do remember a real situation like this. It was what convinced our directors to let us limit use of EVERYONE and similar over-large maining lists.)
Admin
I've been through the Oracle Java install. IMHO the WTF is not the text, it's that Oracle insists on using check boxes that nobody can recognize as check boxes and nobody can tell checked from unchecked without experience. Cute little pictures of disk drives - who ever sees a disk drive these days? - just make it more confusing. Standard browser check boxes would make it much easier to understand.
Admin
If we assume False is 0 and True is 1, we can do a lot of shit.
Admin
No clue about the [object HTMLInputElement]...
Admin
The fun part was that several people would send their answer using Reply To All which meant that their answer would get sent to everyone. And then other people would submit that as their answer, which was quite hilarious when the answer that got sent out to All was wrong.