- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
- Error'd
- Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Other Series
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
Still, as far as the errors go, they could probably be fixed if only someone could remember when it was last updated (so much for "in the last week").
Admin
Admin
I'll settle for it how it's done in the UK. You don't choose. Modern cards have a microchip, and you almost always enter a PIN, whether it's a debit or a credit card. This is because it's believed to be more secure (possibly wrongly IMHO). To encourage retailers to adopt 'chip-and-pin', the retailer is liable for losses if they accept a fraudulent signature-based transaction (the old style).
To be honest I think the next logical step for security is for credit cards to have a photo. Uncomplicated and makes it harder for a thief to use your card - though not if they withdraw cash from an ATM.
My initial thought was that is retarded. Then I realised - you're wrong to say they struggle to sell the six-packs (they wouldn't if a six-pack was a sensible price). It's the shops that DON'T want to sell six-packs at all. Provided that sufficiently few people will either divert to another shop or go away with no beer, and if people who buy more beer will drink more beer (all reasonable in at least some situations), selling only 24-packs results in more sales. It relies on insufficient competition though, or a rival store could sell six-packs at a sensible price and thus take business.That said, surely no-one would ever pay more for the six-pack unless they didn't know the price, since one could just buy the 24 and dump 18 cans.
Admin
Just think of how disastrous it could be in an industrial situation if instead the gauge read zero or stayed at what it was before. In general, it's not the norm to switch to a blue screen of death type display.
Is it overkill for this application? Yes. But it shows that something is wrong, instead of "all fine here, nothing to see". And again, putting up a message box is stupid, because of whiners "wanting the message box to go away so they can see what's behind it" completely ignoring the actual message.
Admin
Around #9 I'm usually screaming "No, I want gas!"
Admin
I'm not sure I understand your point.
The digit after the decimal point is still there, yes, but it does not have a single spine or thorn.
Admin
I think you should read it like, you get the same information, but either montly or yearly. And then: a year-old analysis proves to be worth ten times less than a month-old analysis.
Admin
Admin
Admin
Admin
I submitted the financial picture - to wit: the subscription for either simply let you into the membership side of their site.
So for $9.99 you had access to the same information for one year, versus $99.99 you'd have access to the site for 1 month. The data was the same either way, and the subscription was simply membership site access.
Actually I cancelled the subscription based on this, then paged back to get a screenshot, so it showed I was cancelled.
Suffice it to say (as noted above) any financial site that does not know it is charging the wrong amount for their web site acccess is probably not a good site to get detailed and complex investment advice from. Further, I found an error that was just as bad in the internal information about stocks. Finance.google/yahoo.com was more accurate.
Shea
Admin
That last one is the WTF-est of them all!
Admin
You mean the website is delivered to the subscriber once a month or once a year, depending on the subscription type? And, if it's all so obvious, would you care to explain the payment intervals rsp. length of the subscription? Without this little piece of information, it is impossible to work out the price per unit of time (or per "delivery"), so what you're claiming is based on assumptions that do not follow from the screenshot anyway.
I guess English majors can't also be logicians. Programmers are trained to avoid making spurious assumptions... the same probably cannot be said about English majors.
Admin
As the author of the code that generated the horrible workflow diagram, I'm in position to explain the story behind it. The defect tracking tool that this comes from has a pretty complicated inheritance model for concepts it calls workflows & projects. A project can inherit settings from its parent project -OR- it can inherit from a completely unrelated workflow -AND- it can override some or all of the project-specific settings.
My original code had a bug when a project changed parents. As a result, I retrieved the wrong project settings from the database and caused the horrid layout you saw in the screenshot. This was fixed in a later version.
Man... talk about a rude shock to be browsing thedailywtf and see your own bug in living color!