- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
- Error'd
- Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Other Series
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
What's with the lack of daily postings lately?
Admin
Admin
Admin
He did not build it either. He signed his name to a bill written by telcos who were donating generously. He got lucky and did something good while collecting his graft... i mean campaign contributions.
CAPTCHA: persto ... tada!
Admin
CAPTCHA: persto ... tada!
Admin
I'd say Boucher deserves at least as much credit as Gore, if not more.
Admin
+1 Seriously, if you give me the power to compel other people's money and give it to still another group of other people to do the inventing, I can tell you, I'd would "create" some pretty sweet stuff too. Most if it would be good at blowing things up.
Admin
It's no fun when the poster admits up front that what he did was really dumb. How can you ridicule someone when he starts out by admitting his own mistakes? There's just no joy in it.
Admin
String sql = "insert into cliente01 (Cod, Produto,Valor)" + "values (?,?,?)";
Godd help us ...
captcha: "vulputate". Lovely.
Admin
So let me get this straight. Millions of American citizens worked to earn money which they gave to the government in taxes. Brilliant engineers developed hardware and software. Hard-working linemen laid cable across the country. Dedicated technicians put it all together and made it work. Al Gore agreed it was a good idea and wrote on a piece of paper that money should be taken from the citizens to pay all the other people. So of all those involved, who deserves the credit for creating the Internet? Why, Al Gore of course ... the person whose only contribution was to take money from one group of people to give to another.
Hey, by that reasoning, I created the airplane. It's true. The Wright brothers may have invented it. Boeing may have built it. Skilled technicians may have maintained it. Highly-trained pilots may have flown it. But hey, I asked my parents to buy me a plane ticket, so I'm the one who made it all happen.
Admin
University Computer Science is about the theoretical basis of computing. Learning programming is merely an implementation detail which can be done on your own time.
A degree in programming and real-world IT is something different: maybe Information Systems or a community college degree.
Consider for instance a university degree in Music. Lots of music theory. It probably helps if you play an instrument and are in a band. There may be courses about the music industry but there is no guarantee that you are a big time artist when you graduate.
Similarily a university degree in English. Lots of theory and history but you don't expect to be publishing books when you graduate.
Admin
Well, this explains why my internet bank doesn't allow using the back button.
Admin
I've got zero degrees. I've had PHd's working in my team under me, getting less money. Most of them knew heaps about lots of esoteric stuff (like how all the differing modem algorithms work since 300bps - sure that is a useful skill, that you couldn't pick up when you actually NEED to) - hardly any of them had any real skills beyond what they have had spoon fed to them.
A four year computer science degree IS good for something. Churning out crap programmers, who THINK they are actually really good.
Admin
When I graduated from university in Software Development, I scored higher than any other student in the history of my school. But when I look back on my career, I realise that practically everything of importance to building good code has been learned on the job: team work, coding standards, an in-depth understanding of the APIs, tool mastery, the importance of documentation, peer-review, the art of automated testing. My degree covered these things, but in a checkbox manner. You never really learn something by being told. I think you have to open Pandora's Box in order to understand why its best to keep it closed.
Now when I recruit graduates I assume they will write terrible code. In the interviews I aim to figure out if the person has passion and intelligence - and how will they react to a constructive code review...
Admin
I really like this new format of WTFs
Admin
Admin
Admin
Admin
Let's face it... at least you admit to your own mistakes.
Which is more than i can say of some peopel i know.
Admin
Dude, mating requires a partner. Even if you need alcohol to talk to her.
Admin
Admin
TRWTF is the trackbacks!
Admin
That's ridiculous, fools NEVER learn. Besides, there would be no first wise man if it was like that. Actually, no creative thought at all.
Yeah, don't hire me. THANKS!
Admin
I'm sure we've heard this same story from the opposite end....
Admin
I don't believe this tale. Even a total n00b wouldn't make that many stupid decisions all in one project. Would he? I've seen plenty of craptastic code in my day (heck, even wrote some of it), but this is incompetence on another level altogether. Too dumb to be true.
Admin
You're pretty much the definition of unemployable.