• The Lions (unregistered) in reply to Yazeran

    My favorite part is where you claim to have been a PhD student at one time. Every time I read your retarded posts, I smell large cow patties. So, you're trying to get some cred by saying you attended a university longer than any of us? Creative use of imagination where you include some very specific bogus details to try to prove that.

  • Born Texas Proud (unregistered) in reply to The Lions
    The Lions:
    My favorite part is where you claim to have been a PhD student at one time. Every time I read your retarded posts, I smell large cow patties. So, you're trying to get some cred by saying you attended a university longer than any of us? Creative use of imagination where you include some very specific bogus details to try to prove that.
    perv
  • OccupyWallStreet (unregistered)

    So how long until someone sees someone trying to write a non-existent directory that someone decides to well, create said directory and lose the entire ticketing system?

  • Bob (unregistered)

    Too bad he was too lazy to learn COBOL. There's a lot of contract COBOL jobs out there, and they all pay big money.

  • Genius (unregistered) in reply to Bob
    Bob:
    Too bad he was too lazy to learn COBOL. There's a lot of contract COBOL jobs out there, and they all pay big money.
    Don't you have a retarded son to attend to?

    CAPTCHA: appellatio -- I have no idea what a "pellatio" is supposed to be

  • Sgt. Ermy (unregistered) in reply to Born Texas Proud
    Born Texas Proud:
    The Lions:
    My favorite part is where you claim to have been a PhD student at one time. Every time I read your retarded posts, I smell large cow patties. So, you're trying to get some cred by saying you attended a university longer than any of us? Creative use of imagination where you include some very specific bogus details to try to prove that.
    perv
    Only steer and queer come from Texas! Which one are you?
  • saepius (unregistered) in reply to Sgt. Ermy
    Sgt. Ermy:
    Born Texas Proud:
    The Lions:
    My favorite part is where you claim to have been a PhD student at one time. Every time I read your retarded posts, I smell large cow patties. So, you're trying to get some cred by saying you attended a university longer than any of us? Creative use of imagination where you include some very specific bogus details to try to prove that.
    perv
    Only steer and queer come from Texas! Which one are you?

    Prob'ly both.

  • geoffrey (unregistered)

    It seems to me that Jesse created an injection exploit, and executed it on company systems. That is a willful breach of corporate security policy. Not only am I shocked that he received a job offer, I'm also surprised that he was not summarily dismissed, and turned over to law enforcement officials.

  • ME2 (unregistered)

    So... they implemented connection bureaucracy?

  • Ben Jammin (unregistered) in reply to iranonymous
    iranonymous:
    When two words have exactly the same meaning, use the shorter one.

    Unless of course you are an ignorant pompous blowhard.

    That's ironic since "ignorant pompous blowhard" can be drastically shortened using words with the same meanings.

  • Nagesh (unregistered) in reply to Ben Jammin
    Ben Jammin:
    iranonymous:
    When two words have exactly the same meaning, use the shorter one.

    Unless of course you are an ignorant pompous blowhard.

    That's ironic since "ignorant pompous blowhard" can be drastically shortened using words with the same meanings.
    Why, aren't you an observant one. I'm impressed.

  • moz (unregistered) in reply to TGV
    TGV:
    Robert:
    ParkinT:
    "Irregardless" IS NOT A WORD!!!!
    Read the HTML comments
    ORIGIN early 20th cent.: probably a blend of irrespective and regardless. usage: Irregardless is widely heard, perhaps arising under the influence of such perfectly correct forms as irrespective, but should be avoided by careful users of English. Use regardless to mean ‘without regard or consideration for’ or ‘nevertheless’.

    Reading HTML comments is the greater WTF.

    At least the comments give some insight into what passed for a thought process.

    It's supposed to be a quote, but the protagonist is talking with a group of people at the time. Unless they chanted the answer out in unison, it's not a literal description of the event. As such, Remy deserves nothing but contempt for including that sequence of letters in his summary of it.

  • derp (unregistered)

    I don't know about you guys, but if someone referred to me as "The smiling intern" I'd be a little upset.

  • (cs)

    Not Enterprisy enough. He should have used some regex somewhere.

  • Bill C. (unregistered)
    Jesse:
    I built that form, but when I show you how it works, don’t hold it against me.
    Clearly Jesse didn't know what to do with an intern.

    My intern was built with great form, and she did hold it against me.

  • Dirk (unregistered)

    Where's the WTF? The kid's a genious! Made a silk purse out of a sows ear (or however the stupid saying goes).

  • Munareikä (unregistered) in reply to Nagesh
    Nagesh:
    Why, aren't you an observant one. I'm impressed.

    The real WTF is (a) Nagesh forgetting to write in character.

  • just me (unregistered) in reply to qazwsx
    qazwsx:
    qazwsx:
    emaNrouY-Here:
    Oh, yeah. When reading a Remy story (as opposed to a CodeSOD), always read the story in page source (unless you have some other way to read HTML comments from the webpage). I heard that someone had created a Remify add-on for firefox? That would be useful.

    I use Chrome's "Inspect Element" (Firefox has an equivalent feature built-in, and it also has the Firebug plugin which is way better) to read the comments.

    Actually, scratch that. Neither Firebug nor Firefox's built-in tool show comments, at least in any obviously visible way. I guess it's Chrome or nothing.

    Yeah, but thanks to that comment I have discovered Firefox's "3D view" feature and had a good laugh. Thank you!

  • Namely (unregistered)
    Irregardlessly
    FTFY'all
  • Ed (unregistered)

    Greasymonkey ftw

    // ==UserScript== // @name TheDailyWtf - Show Remy's comments // @namespace TheDailyWtf // @include http://thedailywtf.com/Articles/* // @version 1 // ==/UserScript==

    function exec(fn) { var script = document.createElement('script'); script.setAttribute("type", "application/javascript"); script.textContent = '(' + fn + ')();'; document.body.appendChild(script); // run the script document.body.removeChild(script); // clean up }

    exec(function() { var regex = new RegExp(/Authors/Remy_Porter.aspx/);

    var hasRemy = false;

    var links = document.getElementsByTagName('a');

    for (var i = links.length; i--;) { var item = links[i];

    if (regex.test(item.href)){
        hasRemy = true;
        break;
    }
    

    }

    if (!hasRemy) { return; }

    (function(b){b.innerHTML=b.innerHTML.replace(/<!--/g,'<span style="color:red;">(').replace(/-->/g,')')})(document.querySelector('.ArticleBody')) });

  • (cs) in reply to Ed

    My version:

    // ==UserScript== // @name TheDailyWTF // @require http://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.3.2/jquery.min.js // @include thedailywtf.com // @grant // ==/UserScript==

    function showComments(node) { node.each(function(intI, objNode) { var childNode = objNode.firstChild; while (childNode) { if (childNode.nodeType == 8) { $(childNode).replaceWith( $('').text(childNode.nodeValue) ); } else if (childNode.nodeType == 1) { showComments($(childNode)); } childNode = childNode.nextSibling; } }); }

    showComments($('div.ArticleBody'));

  • jay (unregistered) in reply to ParkinT
    ParkinT:
    “...but when I show you how it works, don’t hold it against me.” I have lost count of how many times *I* have said something very similar.

    PERSONAL RANT: "Irregardless" IS NOT A WORD!!!!

    Corollary: I've had many times that I've looked at someone else's code and said, "That was a stupid way to do it. I'm going to fix that." Many hours of work later I discover why they had to do it that way, and I reluctantly revert my changes.

  • jay (unregistered) in reply to Mr Keith
    Mr Keith:
    The Lions:
    Danielle:
    I think this is a beautifull lesson in life and I think many of us recognize a part of our life in this.. Many times, you have to do things in a WTF way, because you just can't do it any other way.. That's sad!

    I think this is known as the Rube Goldberg machine.

    I think this is known as "middleware".

    Or in some cases, "muddleware", when it's only purpose is to muddle through dumb problems.

  • jay (unregistered)

    Tangential comment: The beginning of this story with its reference to dozens of dropdowns reminds me of a far worse possible design that I've seen implemented.

    At the hospital that I used to take my kids to every time they sneezed, they had this brilliant intake system. The clerk would ask you what your insurance company was. You'd tell her, and then she'd pull a binder off the shelf that apparently had a list of all their insurance company codes. She'd page through this until she found the right one and then type the code into the system. Then she'd ask who your regular doctor was. She'd then pull another binder off the shelf and search for the code for that doctor and type it in. Then she'd ask for your address, and she had another binder where she looked up something, I guess a city code or whatever it was. Etc. Some of the codes had few enough possible values that they fit on one page, and so they put the pages for those all in one binder. But every question she asked, she had to look up the code on a piece of paper. Apparently the system had no dropdowns and no look-up functions.

    That hospital closed down a few years ago. I wonder if their user-friendly computer systems had anything to do with it.

  • Marvin the Martian (unregistered)

    The last five words before the

      in the article are very... unfortunately worded.

      If you doubt this, then google "final solution".

  • Robot (unregistered)

    Nobody has pointed the obligitory Tolkien reference yet so I will.

    But the Greybeards were wise, subtle, and quick to anger

    Tolkien

    Do not meddle in the affairs of Wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger.
  • (cs) in reply to Robot
    Robot:
    Tolkien:
    Do not meddle in the affairs of Wizards, for they are subtle and quick to anger.

    Corrolary:

    Do not meddle in the affairs of dragons, for you are crunchy and taste good with ketchup.
  • Neil (unregistered) in reply to minitech
    minitech:
    javascript:(function(b){b.innerHTML=b.innerHTML.replace(/<!--/g,'<span style="color:red;">').replace(/-->/g,'')})(document.querySelector('.ArticleBody'))
    You need to use document.getElementById('Primary') on the home page, otherwise only the first article gets decoded.
  • TSDF (unregistered)

    TRWTF: "Irregardless"

  • Chris (unregistered) in reply to minitech

    Updated version that works:

    javascript:(function(b){b.innerHTML=b.innerHTML.replace(/<!--/g,'<span style="color:red;">').replace(/-->/g,'')})(document.querySelector('.article-body'))

Leave a comment on “Connected to the Connector to the Connection to the System”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

« Return to Article