• (cs) in reply to Steve-o
    Anonymous:
    Btw, do you have a complete acronym database?


    Yes: VERA, the Virtual Entity of Relevant Acronyms.
  • Kevin (unregistered) in reply to Steve-o

    <font color="#000080"><i>Jesper</font>: Solaris Team?
    <br<font color="#a52a2a">Consultant</font>: Ehrm... you know, the expensive Linux and hardware from Sun?</i>
    <br><br>
    Umm, did you just imply that Solaris is an expensive version of Linux?  It's a completely different environment.


  • (cs)
    Alex Papadimoulis:

    <font color="#000080">Jesper</font>: Okay, we run everything here on LAMP.

    <font color="#a52a2a">Consultant</font>: LAMP?



    I'm noticing an irritating tendency for people in the corporate world to conflate LAMP to mean, basically, any application stack that involves Linux.

    Guy 1: "It runs on a LAMP stack." 

    Me: "Wait - I've seen that project. It's running JBoss, right?"

    Guy 1: "Yeah."

    Me: "Well... I mean, that's Java, right?"

    Guy 1: "Well... yeah, but it's on Linux. And I think MySQL is in there too. Right?"

    Guy 2: "Yeah, although we've also been looking at Oracle."

    Guy 1: "Yeah."

    I think the problem is that since there's some ambiguity as to what the P stands for (PHP? Perl? Python?), people figure it just doesn't matter one way or the other.

    Java, however, starts with a J. I'm quite sure of this.
  • kwerle (unregistered) in reply to Captcha: Zork.
    Anonymous:
    At least he was honest. I've seen people waste weeks before it was like 'Well I don't really know anything about what you hired me for.'

    Yeah, someone got this WTF backwards. The consultant sounded solid. The hiring person sounded like they screwwed up.

  • (cs) in reply to shadowman
    shadowman:
    GoatCheez:
    I'm trying to figure out what the Consultant means... If Debian's mostly Red Hat.... Erm... uh.... lol... I'll give him the benefit of the doubt though and assume he meant that he knows mostly about Red Hat linux.


    Hmmm.. Red Hat has its own core, correct?  Not even Debian-based.


    Frankly I haven't used any redhat since 7.1, and definitely not RHEL, but I'm not sure what you mean by core. I'm sure they (RH) provide their own kernel patch set. They probably have some proprietary configuration utils too now (probably all spiffy and graphical to win over windows users). They've always had rpm, but so do other distros (even though it stands for redhat package manager). Maybe a timeline would help. Comparing RedHat and Debian is like comparing MySQL and PostgreSQL (IN CONCEPT, NOT IN FEATURES OR "BETTERNESS" OR ANYTHING!). One doesn't spawn from the other. Frankly, once you install any linux distro it's all pretty much the same. Biggest differences I've found are the package management untils, default packages, and default window manager look... Graphical configuration utils also differ somewhat. Under the hood they're all just about the same though.
  • (cs) in reply to Steve-o
    Anonymous:

    <font color="#000080">Jesper</font>: Solaris Team?
    <font color="#a52a2a">Consultant</font>: Ehrm... you know, the expensive Linux and hardware from Sun? Critical business systems infrastructure? The backbone of the web? Those big metal boxes in IT datacenters? Life before Linux? SCO-bait?
    <font color="#000080"></font>


    Spontaneously unmounting drives? 8-letter passwords? Ed as default editor? Rlogin/telnet by default? Compiler, you have to buy? Ridiculous upgrades?

    Sorry - each day with solaris in my life brought up a new wtf to this world :) (yup - I know it's trolling and much changed after 5.8, but still...)
  • (cs) in reply to sammybaby

    Hmmmm... how about a client-server platform for LAN-based Macintosh programs? The server is Mac OS X with Apache, MySQL, and AppleScript, the clients are written in Java, with AppleScript, manual, and Automator interfaces... I give you, the MAMA-JAMA system. </joke>

  • (cs) in reply to GoatCheez
    GoatCheez:

    Frankly I haven't used any redhat since 7.1, and definitely not RHEL, but I'm not sure what you mean by core. I'm sure they (RH) provide their own kernel patch set. They probably have some proprietary configuration utils too now (probably all spiffy and graphical to win over windows users). They've always had rpm, but so do other distros (even though it stands for redhat package manager). Maybe a timeline would help. Comparing RedHat and Debian is like comparing MySQL and PostgreSQL (IN CONCEPT, NOT IN FEATURES OR "BETTERNESS" OR ANYTHING!). One doesn't spawn from the other. Frankly, once you install any linux distro it's all pretty much the same. Biggest differences I've found are the package management untils, default packages, and default window manager look... Graphical configuration utils also differ somewhat. Under the hood they're all just about the same though.


    What GoatCheez said.

    Basically, a Linux distribution starts with some version of the kernel, adds in patches and software, and some kind of managment system for dealing with the software.  The "big three" in terms of package management are Red Hat (which originated the RPM format), Debian (which originated .deb and the Advanced Package Tool / APT), and Gentoo, which uses a "I'll just automated the process of downloading and compiling source code my damn self" system which will be familiar to folks who have used  BSD or Darwin Ports on OS X.

    Um... anyway. If you're interested in getting started in Linux, I recommend trying Ubuntu, which is based on Debian. It uses a package management tool called Synaptic, which is easily my favorite.  I also recommend picking up a <a href="http://www.vmware.com/products/free_virtualization.html">free copy of  VMWare Server</a>, since it  will enable you to do so without so much as having to mess with your boot loader.

    And incidentally, it's shocking to me that after so many years, Red Hat's officially supported package managmeent toolset is so primitive.

    Disclaimer: I use Ubuntu and OS X at home; Windows, RHEL, and Novell/SuSE at work; I'm also a Red Hat Certified Engineer, for whatever that's worth.
  • Fregas (unregistered)

    Well geez.  What do you expect from a bunch of nerds?  Social tact?

  • Sweet rasberry danish (unregistered) in reply to ole gustie
    ole gustie:
    Anonymous:

    ole gustie:
    Anonymous:
    I love lamp


    I love... carpet

     

    Do you like Tai?

    Tie good, you like shirt?



    **sigh** OK, these are quotes from the character "Brick" in the movie Anchorman.  I am gonna go ahead and guess that you didn't get the references.  However, for the benefit of those of us who did, can you please drop the condescending smartass comments?  
       
    Finally.. how do we spell "Tie" again?

     

    I actually did get your reference, and I was taking it another step as someone pointed out and quoted Homer.  You did a nice job of blowing up at me and making your own condescending smartass comment, I'll give you that, too bad it was misdirected.

    ...I think I ate your chocolate covered squirrel.

  • (cs) in reply to Sweet rasberry danish
    Anonymous:
    ole gustie:
    Anonymous:

    ole gustie:
    Anonymous:
    I love lamp


    I love... carpet

     

    Do you like Tai?

    Tie good, you like shirt?



    **sigh** OK, these are quotes from the character "Brick" in the movie Anchorman.  I am gonna go ahead and guess that you didn't get the references.  However, for the benefit of those of us who did, can you please drop the condescending smartass comments?  
       
    Finally.. how do we spell "Tie" again?

     

    I actually did get your reference, and I was taking it another step as someone pointed out and quoted Homer.  You did a nice job of blowing up at me and making your own condescending smartass comment, I'll give you that, too bad it was misdirected.

    ...I think I ate your chocolate covered squirrel.



    yeah... I did notice what the other guy posted and would have replied earlier with an apology but was too busy trying to dislodge my foot from my mouth.
  • (cs) in reply to ole gustie
    ole gustie:
    Anonymous:
    ole gustie:
    Anonymous:

    ole gustie:
    Anonymous:
    I love lamp


    I love... carpet

     

    Do you like Tai?

    Tie good, you like shirt?



    **sigh** OK, these are quotes from the character "Brick" in the movie Anchorman.  I am gonna go ahead and guess that you didn't get the references.  However, for the benefit of those of us who did, can you please drop the condescending smartass comments?  
       
    Finally.. how do we spell "Tie" again?

     

    I actually did get your reference, and I was taking it another step as someone pointed out and quoted Homer.  You did a nice job of blowing up at me and making your own condescending smartass comment, I'll give you that, too bad it was misdirected.

    ...I think I ate your chocolate covered squirrel.



    yeah... I did notice what the other guy posted and would have replied earlier with an apology but was too busy trying to dislodge my foot from my mouth.

    Where'd you get those clothes from, the toilet store?

  • Genxstar (unregistered)

    <FONT face=Verdana>No where near as exciting as the SOFA technology.</FONT>

     

     

    Or SOFA King Retarted Technology

  • (cs) in reply to GoatCheez
    GoatCheez:
    shadowman:
    GoatCheez:
    I'm trying to figure out what the Consultant means... If Debian's mostly Red Hat.... Erm... uh.... lol... I'll give him the benefit of the doubt though and assume he meant that he knows mostly about Red Hat linux.


    Hmmm.. Red Hat has its own core, correct?  Not even Debian-based.


    Frankly I haven't used any redhat since 7.1, and definitely not RHEL, but I'm not sure what you mean by core. I'm sure they (RH) provide their own kernel patch set. They probably have some proprietary configuration utils too now (probably all spiffy and graphical to win over windows users). They've always had rpm, but so do other distros (even though it stands for redhat package manager). Maybe a timeline would help. Comparing RedHat and Debian is like comparing MySQL and PostgreSQL (IN CONCEPT, NOT IN FEATURES OR "BETTERNESS" OR ANYTHING!). One doesn't spawn from the other. Frankly, once you install any linux distro it's all pretty much the same. Biggest differences I've found are the package management untils, default packages, and default window manager look... Graphical configuration utils also differ somewhat. Under the hood they're all just about the same though.


    But they call it Fedora Core; that must mean there's a special chocolate core in there, right? Right?

    Yeah....

    sincerely,
    Richard Nixon
  • Homer's right-hand man (unregistered) in reply to ole gustie
    ole gustie:
    Anonymous:

    ole gustie:
    Anonymous:
    I love lamp


    I love... carpet

     

    Do you like Tai?

    Tie good, you like shirt?



    **sigh** OK, these are quotes from the character "Brick" in the movie Anchorman.  I am gonna go ahead and guess that you didn't get the references.  However, for the benefit of those of us who did, can you please drop the condescending smartass comments?  
       
    Finally.. how do we spell "Tie" again?



    They are actually Simpsons quotes when Homer changed his name to Max Power. And we spell Tai Thai.
  • Steve-o (unregistered) in reply to Kevin
    Anonymous:
    <font color="#000080"><i>Jesper</font>: Solaris Team?
    <br<font color="#a52a2a">Consultant</font>: Ehrm... you know, the expensive Linux and hardware from Sun?</i>
    <br><br>
    Umm, did you just imply that Solaris is an expensive version of Linux?  It's a completely different environment.




    Come on now, don't take that too seriously. Dip into your toolbelt and pull out your wit hammer, funny screwdriver and humor exacto blade and reread the whole thing. I know I am not that funny but this isn't WTF material.
  • Dude (unregistered) in reply to Free beer
    Anonymous:

    No, I'm here because no one else wanted to come

    I think that says quite a bit about Angelo's company.



    Exactly. What sane company trusts <acronym title="Paying Homage to Perl">PHP</acronym>?
  • rmg66 (unregistered) in reply to RyuO

    RyuO:

    Anyone here ever worked at FisherPriceCoopers?

    I haven't worked for them, but they were hired to "work" for me.

    They were my introduction to "corporate consulting". Our organization (a very promenent non-profit by the way) paid a shit-load if money for a couple of  bozos to come in, lead a few meetings, and ultimately produce several simplistic flow charts of our processes.

    It was a joke. As the newly hired (6 months) person in charge of all data and computer systems I attended all the meetings. I sat there while they told us things I had figured out months ago but did not yet have implemented. It was nothing but simple common sense. But my god! the exectives just ate it up! I learned three things from that experience:

    1.   Consultants (unless technically skilled in an area you are not) are not going to provide your company with anything that a dedicated and intellegent employee can't.

    2.   Executives are not all that bright.

    3.   Executives never trust information or expertise unless it's costing them and arm and a leg.

     

  • StratoS (unregistered) in reply to Blah
    <font size="1">Blah wrote the following post at 09-06-2006 2:26 PM:
    </font>[ SNIP ]
    The number one security threat in IT today is stupid freakin acronyms which most people have never heard of. Upon hearing these acronyms a significant proportion of "experts" lie so they don't appear to be uneducated, ill-informed morons. Those ones get to keep their contracts and go on to create outstanding web systems secured by the magic of cookies. The ones who don't lie usually have the acronym-relevant skills but get canned because they didn't know the latest marketing buzzword, thus apparently proving to The Powers That Be that they don't have the relevent skills or personal desire to drive up their vision.


    That's why www.thedailywtf.com isn't entertainment, it's critical self-education of current and up-to-date  enterprise techniques, with like minded young and snappy IT experts. Here we learn about AJAX, and ASP.NET, and LAMP and WTF
    And how to not utilise them in mission critical systems.

    Your boss shouldn't frown when he watches you surf this site, but smile and be happy to have a employ whom stays current with the IT buzz.


    (i really like the sound of that 'the IT buzz'  it sounds important. like a NBC 15 minutes news special, with 12 minutes of commercial break in between)



  • tsmith (unregistered)

    I write LAMPs using C-Pound!

  • (cs) in reply to SomebodyElse

    SomebodyElse:
    TNSTAAFL

     

    Speaking of Acronyms, that should be TANSTAAFL

  • (cs) in reply to Kevin
    Anonymous:
    <font color="#000080">Jesper</font>: Solaris Team?
    <br<font color="#a52a2a">Consultant</font>: Ehrm... you know, the expensive Linux and hardware from Sun?




    Umm, did you just imply that Solaris is an expensive version of Linux?  It's a completely different environment.


    It's also free these days (though the support ain't cheap).

  • (cs) in reply to rmg66
    Anonymous:

    RyuO:

    Anyone here ever worked at FisherPriceCoopers?

    I haven't worked for them, but they were hired to "work" for me.

    They were my introduction to "corporate consulting". Our organization (a very promenent non-profit by the way) paid a shit-load if money for a couple of  bozos to come in, lead a few meetings, and ultimately produce several simplistic flow charts of our processes.

    It was a joke. As the newly hired (6 months) person in charge of all data and computer systems I attended all the meetings. I sat there while they told us things I had figured out months ago but did not yet have implemented. It was nothing but simple common sense. But my god! the exectives just ate it up! I learned three things from that experience:

    1.   Consultants (unless technically skilled in an area you are not) are not going to provide your company with anything that a dedicated and intellegent employee can't.

    2.   Executives are not all that bright.

    3.   Executives never trust information or expertise unless it's costing them and arm and a leg.

     

    Time for me to plug my favorite consulting book. The gist of it is that executives hire consultants to validate them.

    The trick is to make the customers feel good about themselves AND do a good enough job to keep your self-respect. It is next to impossible in many business environments, and that's why you see so many big consulting firm types (who probably had no self-respect to begin with) take the money and run. The type of company that hires those jokers cannot admit a mistake, even to themselves, so they blame that particular consulting firm and cycle on to another big consulting firm.

    It is a good idea to interview with big consulting firms once in a while to get a sense of their weltanschauung. They'll always tell you the first priority is to make the customer happy, and they're right in a twisted sort of way. The stuff techies care about, like systems that work, or that money people care about, like ROI, are dim concepts to them. It is not that they are against quality per se, they just never had to learn what it was and it would never be a priority.

    There are good consultants out there, mostly independents and "boutique" shops, but you have to look for them. The good ones are always looking for customers they can make happy with quality - that niche makes money on return business. If you're ever shopping for one, find out what their track record was on return business.




  • (cs) in reply to Steve-o
    Anonymous:
    Anonymous:
    <font color="#000080"><i>Jesper</font>: Solaris Team?
    <br<font color="#a52a2a">Consultant</font>: Ehrm... you know, the expensive Linux and hardware from Sun?</i>
    <br><br>
    Umm, did you just imply that Solaris is an expensive version of Linux?  It's a completely different environment.


    Come on now, don't take that too seriously. Dip into your toolbelt and pull out your wit hammer, funny screwdriver and humor exacto blade and reread the whole thing. I know I am not that funny but this isn't WTF material.

    Me, I'll get in my hyperbolic chamber and point out that Linux and Solaris are expensive versions of BSD. The most unlikely vendor of all seems to have come up with the least expensive version, OS/X.
  • trav (unregistered) in reply to tsmith
    Anonymous:
    I write LAMPs using C-Pound!


    Heh, I love C-Pound, it sounds like fighten' words... "PROGRAMMER SMASH!!!"
  • Name me my (unregistered) in reply to shadowman
    shadowman:
    GoatCheez:
    I'm trying to figure out what the Consultant means... If Debian's mostly Red Hat.... Erm... uh.... lol... I'll give him the benefit of the doubt though and assume he meant that he knows mostly about Red Hat linux.


    Red Hat has its own core, correct?  Not even Debian-based.


    I wouldn't mention that around the office...at least my office.
  • Name me my (unregistered) in reply to RyuO
    RyuO:

    Me, I'll get in my hyperbolic chamber and point out that Linux and Solaris are expensive versions of BSD. The most unlikely vendor of all seems to have come up with the least expensive version, OS/X.


    I can't afford that damn Linux either.  Luckily I still have XP and (as you mention) OSX to fill the inexpensive software gap.

    Is it just me or are there more wtf's in the replies here than on the front page?
  • (cs)

    $150/hour for web dev consultants ???

    That is totally unfair. At college I write software for a hardware eye movement tracker (realtime code in C....precisely timed and drawn graphics...). I get a lousy 130 bucks per month ........... sigh........

  • (cs) in reply to Name me my
    Anonymous:
    RyuO:

    Me, I'll get in my hyperbolic chamber and point out that Linux and Solaris are expensive versions of BSD. The most unlikely vendor of all seems to have come up with the least expensive version, OS/X.


    I can't afford that damn Linux either.  Luckily I still have XP and (as you mention) OSX to fill the inexpensive software gap.

    Is it just me or are there more wtf's in the replies here than on the front page?

    It's not unusual. No understanding of TCO is a persistent WTF in this forum.
  • (cs) in reply to RyuO
    RyuO:
    Anonymous:
    Anonymous:
    <font color="#000080"><i>Jesper</font>: Solaris Team?
    <br<font color="#a52a2a">Consultant</font>: Ehrm... you know, the expensive Linux and hardware from Sun?</i>
    <br><br>
    Umm, did you just imply that Solaris is an expensive version of Linux?  It's a completely different environment.


    Come on now, don't take that too seriously. Dip into your toolbelt and pull out your wit hammer, funny screwdriver and humor exacto blade and reread the whole thing. I know I am not that funny but this isn't WTF material.

    Me, I'll get in my hyperbolic chamber and point out that Linux and Solaris are expensive versions of BSD. The most unlikely vendor of all seems to have come up with the least expensive version, OS/X.


    No wonder people aren't using Linux more widely!  They all think that it cost money!
    Now excuse me while I download the latest versions of Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Fedora Core, etc....
  • (cs) in reply to Blah
    Anonymous:


    The number one security threat in IT today is stupid freakin acronyms which most people have never heard of.



    Tell that to O'Reilly. They have a whole darn website called OnLAMP.
  • (cs) in reply to WeatherGod
    WeatherGod:
    RyuO:
    Anonymous:
    Anonymous:
    <font color="#000080"><i>Jesper</font>: Solaris Team?
    <br<font color="#a52a2a">Consultant</font>: Ehrm... you know, the expensive Linux and hardware from Sun?</i>
    <br><br>
    Umm, did you just imply that Solaris is an expensive version of Linux?  It's a completely different environment.


    Come on now, don't take that too seriously. Dip into your toolbelt and pull out your wit hammer, funny screwdriver and humor exacto blade and reread the whole thing. I know I am not that funny but this isn't WTF material.

    Me, I'll get in my hyperbolic chamber and point out that Linux and Solaris are expensive versions of BSD. The most unlikely vendor of all seems to have come up with the least expensive version, OS/X.


    No wonder people aren't using Linux more widely!  They all think that it cost money!
    Now excuse me while I download the latest versions of Ubuntu, FreeBSD, Fedora Core, etc....

    See what I mean? Perfect example for comment 90251...
  • (cs) in reply to felix
    felix:
    Anonymous:


    The number one security threat in IT today is stupid freakin acronyms which most people have never heard of.



    Tell that to O'Reilly. They have a whole darn website called OnLAMP.

    Thanks! I had no idea what OnLAMP referred to until you mentioned it. Come to think of it, I didn't know what LAMP meant until today, even though I'd used each letter. Hold on, does the P mean PHP or Perl or Python or Postgres? No problem, I still know LAMP if I stutter.

    Last year someone referred to me as "just a POJO guy". I didn't know if I was or not, but it turns out he meant "not a Java framework guy", not anything bad like a fetishist or a manager. Someone else smacked him for me.
  • Bozo the Clown (unregistered) in reply to RyuO

    Can't say I'm sold on the TCO argument myself. As a home user I find Windows to require a lot more time and effort than Linux, and it's about the same at my (small) business where I'm the unfortunate Maintainer of the Windows Small Business Server 2000 based network.

  • (cs) in reply to Bozo the Clown
    Anonymous:
    Can't say I'm sold on the TCO argument myself. As a home user I find Windows to require a lot more time and effort than Linux, and it's about the same at my (small) business where I'm the unfortunate Maintainer of the Windows Small Business Server 2000 based network.

    That deserves a serious reply. Yes, I think Linux became the desktop TCO winner somewhere in the last 5 years. That's from the point of view of a techie, though - corporate IT is nowhere close to being convinced. They have a point, too - their TCO includes the social costs of cutting over some very conservative people. Hopefully at some point they can't afford not to cut over...

    On the server side the writing is on the wall - sooner or later everything is going to be on Redhat (RHEL or Fedora or Centos, etc). I have hopes for one of the BSDs, since BSD is faster and more secure, but the odds are against each of them except maybe OS/X. Linux even has an easy answer for what to do with big iron - you can turn a mainframe into a Linux cluster.
  • (cs) in reply to dnm
    Anonymous:
    MySQL & Apache is Access & VB of the open-source world. -- an ex-coworker.

    The real wtf is comparing Apache to VB. After all Apache servers more than 60% percent of all domains: http://news.netcraft.com/archives/2006/02/02/february_2006_web_server_survey.html

    btw anyone noticed that fussball girl is back?
  • (cs) in reply to anonymous
    Anonymous:

    Carnildo:
    richleick:
    Can someone tell me where these $150/hour jobs are?  Do I have to go East/West because I'm not finding it here in the Midwest.  Now that's the real W.T.F.
    You bill $150 an hour because first, you pay *all* the income taxes -- for employees, the employer pays half the Social Security tax. That takes off about $60. Then, there are no benefits: you pay for your own medical insurance, and your own retirement savings. Figure another $30 an hour off there. Finally, as an independent contractor, you'll spend at least one unpaid hour looking for work for every paid hour. That reduces the effective pay to $30 an hour.

     

    OK, now from someone who knows what he's talking about:

    Half the Social Security tax (otherwise known as the "self employment tax" is about 7.5% on the first 90K- that's less than 7K a year, or about $3.50/ hour - not "$60".  And, it's deductible, so it's effectively less than that.  You probably already pay for your own retirement savings, since there are very few defined benefit plans left, but if you're self employed, you can open an SEP IRA, and stash up to $41,000 (or 25% of your income) before taxes- compare that with a 401K, even with the itty bitty company match you might be passing up.  Unless you're in rotten health, medical insurance will quite likely be about the same as what your payroll deduction for medical is (if you work for a Fortune 500 company), so it doesn't make sense to even count that.  And I never spent one unpaid hour looking for every paid hour, and never knew anyone who did.

    You do have to pay your own travel expenses, though, which are going up, but still, should be less than $30/hr even if expensive cities- and that's tax deductible, so, you should really call it $20/hr (that's assuming you don't cheat, and it's really easy...)   

    So, you're still left with well over $100/hr of "regular" income.  It's not a bad deal

    The REAL wtf is that you pay travel expenses.  Even class c can write it off, and too many IT contractors are too damned stupid to file class c.  Travel is a write off, even for an interview.
  • (cs)

    When I was unemployed and looking for PHP development work, I had this one interview. Everything went really well. The guy was asking me questions and I was answering. I didn't know much about ActionScript but because I knew it was essentially Javascript and I knew the APIs were available (and I told him this) he was really impressed.
    He asked me what my Linux skills were like, I said they were fine: that I used Linux at home on my own PC and I was familiar enough with using it to develop in it. He asked me how I was with the MySQL PHP breed. I told him it was my strongest development point. He asked me how I was with Apache. I told him it was the Server I used and that I was familiar with configuring it and using htAccess files (which is all the job spec wanted). He then asked me if I was familiar with lamp. I told him I'd never heard of it.

    I got an email back from him saying somethign to the tune of "We found all of your skils up to scratch but we're not willing to hire someone with out lamp experience". So I stuck "LAMP development" into google and guess what I found?

  • Dazed (unregistered) in reply to pjsson

    pjsson:
    I was consulting for a big bank ...  so they paid me my regular hourly fee to surf and read in their offices until the project started ...  Or if it was like Excel or Access programming I just lied and said I had no clue so I wouldn't have to do it.

    And I suppose you were pleased with yourself. I've been in that situation a couple of times, and went actively looking for something useful to do. One of the little jobs I found led to several months work for a very pleasant group of people (at a time when work was in very short supply) and two new skills on my CV.

    Oh, and I now work for a consultancy that gets around 90% of its work as repeat business from satisfied customers.

    By and large you get out of life what you put into it.

     

  • (cs) in reply to RyuO
    RyuO:

    Last year someone referred to me as "just a POJO guy". I didn't know if I was or not, but it turns out he meant "not a Java framework guy", not anything bad like a fetishist or a manager. Someone else smacked him for me.


    Actually, POJO means Plain Old Java Objects and refers to using J2SE and shying away from EJB objects and the like.
  • Michael (unregistered) in reply to The Vicar

    Could Be Could Be.

    But because Macs are made to play nice with Windows and other nx's (Can't use *nix because that leaves out *nux) We should believe that well get WAMP-Vs And UAMP-Js, along with our handy desk LAMP.

    If that was a little too enterprisey *s is a script.

    CAPTCHA: stfu - Hmm could be telling me something...

  • 4tehwin!!! (unregistered) in reply to sammybaby

    sammybaby:

    ...and Gentoo, which uses a "I'll just automated the process of downloading and compiling source code my damn self" system which will be familiar to folks who have used  BSD or Darwin Ports on OS X...

    we likes to call it portage...and its pretty darn cute. downloads dependancies like synaptic (err whatever-its-called) for ubuntu does too

    /me says crying from my winder's box at work

  • (cs) in reply to campkev
    campkev:

    SomebodyElse:
    TNSTAAFL

     

    Speaking of Acronyms, that should be TANSTAAFL



    Well, the site is called TDWTF, so it's only fitting I included one in my sig.

    Good Catch!
  • (cs) in reply to RyuO
    RyuO:

    That deserves a serious reply. Yes, I think Linux became the desktop TCO winner somewhere in the last 5 years. That's from the point of view of a techie, though - corporate IT is nowhere close to being convinced. They have a point, too - their TCO includes the social costs of cutting over some very conservative people. Hopefully at some point they can't afford not to cut over...


    I'm in the fortunate position to only have to worry about my own TCO, and any emplyer silly enough to force a OS/X box in front of me has effectively cut my hours in half. It may be great to make sure Grandma doesn't lose her e-mail window, but it's like running through pudding for me.
    Windows - well I'd just quit.  Also the TCO for a pair of 23" 1920x1200 lcds is about -$10,000 a year, quite a deal actually!
  • Paul (unregistered) in reply to obediah

    That dude wants lamping! ;)

  • anonymous (unregistered) in reply to Corwinoid
    Corwinoid:
    Anonymous:

    Carnildo:
    richleick:
    Can someone tell me where these $150/hour jobs are?  Do I have to go East/West because I'm not finding it here in the Midwest.  Now that's the real W.T.F.
    You bill $150 an hour because first, you pay *all* the income taxes -- for employees, the employer pays half the Social Security tax. That takes off about $60. Then, there are no benefits: you pay for your own medical insurance, and your own retirement savings. Figure another $30 an hour off there. Finally, as an independent contractor, you'll spend at least one unpaid hour looking for work for every paid hour. That reduces the effective pay to $30 an hour.

     

    OK, now from someone who knows what he's talking about:

    Half the Social Security tax (otherwise known as the "self employment tax" is about 7.5% on the first 90K- that's less than 7K a year, or about $3.50/ hour - not "$60".  And, it's deductible, so it's effectively less than that.  You probably already pay for your own retirement savings, since there are very few defined benefit plans left, but if you're self employed, you can open an SEP IRA, and stash up to $41,000 (or 25% of your income) before taxes- compare that with a 401K, even with the itty bitty company match you might be passing up.  Unless you're in rotten health, medical insurance will quite likely be about the same as what your payroll deduction for medical is (if you work for a Fortune 500 company), so it doesn't make sense to even count that.  And I never spent one unpaid hour looking for every paid hour, and never knew anyone who did.

    You do have to pay your own travel expenses, though, which are going up, but still, should be less than $30/hr even if expensive cities- and that's tax deductible, so, you should really call it $20/hr (that's assuming you don't cheat, and it's really easy...)   

    So, you're still left with well over $100/hr of "regular" income.  It's not a bad deal

    The REAL wtf is that you pay travel expenses.  Even class c can write it off, and too many IT contractors are too damned stupid to file class c.  Travel is a write off, even for an interview.

     

    A write off is a deduction, dumbass.  You still spend the money; you just don't pay taxes on that much income, get it?  And it works that way whether you file as an individual, a corp, an s-corp, a partnership, or whatever else you want.

     

  • Nelus (unregistered) in reply to ole gustie

    ole gustie:
    Anonymous:
    I love lamp


    I love... carpet

     

    I love... desk

  • piersy (unregistered) in reply to ole gustie

    Mate, you want to come to London (yeah the UK one). I've worked with plenty who actually receive £150 an hour (that's 150 sharp), about 220 of your dollars.

  • (cs) in reply to obediah
    obediah:
    RyuO:

    That deserves a serious reply. Yes, I think Linux became the desktop TCO winner somewhere in the last 5 years. That's from the point of view of a techie, though - corporate IT is nowhere close to being convinced. They have a point, too - their TCO includes the social costs of cutting over some very conservative people. Hopefully at some point they can't afford not to cut over...


    I'm in the fortunate position to only have to worry about my own TCO, and any emplyer silly enough to force a OS/X box in front of me has effectively cut my hours in half. It may be great to make sure Grandma doesn't lose her e-mail window, but it's like running through pudding for me.
    Windows - well I'd just quit.  Also the TCO for a pair of 23" 1920x1200 lcds is about -$10,000 a year, quite a deal actually!

    Don't despair, I thought the same thing when I looked at my kids' Mac. It took me a while to get under the damn UI, but when it turned out to have a shell that understood "ps -aux" I was in heaven. The OS really is nice - if they could turn off the UI and fix the crappy hardware they'd really have something. I suppose it is too much to ask to only make the UI proprietary.

    The bad hardware might be limited to the Mac consumer machines, mind you. I looked at an OS/X server at the store and it showed signs of being really good. Now if they could just get rid of the annoying Mac people.
  • Soulbender (unregistered) in reply to Steve-o
    Anonymous:
    The backbone of the web?

    What's the weather like in bizarro world?

Leave a comment on “How Many Consultants Does It Take To Turn On A LAMP? ”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

« Return to Article