- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
- Error'd
- Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Other Series
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
The second story sounds like my boss describing himself. He thinks he is the greatest strategist and team leader ever to set foot in our company... but he is just crap. Fortunately he is based in Belgium and we only see him a few times per year.
Admin
How could they have thought the "Beacon of Hope" was Swiss when he says right off the bat he doesn't own a wristwatch? Anybody who showed up for the interview without one would be pegged as a ringer from the get-go.
Admin
You want a cover letter, it's hard to beat this one:
Admin
There, twisted that for you.
Admin
--Joe
Admin
If they hate you for your personal opinion then you're right...you're better off not working there anyway. But the more likely scenario is they like someone else's opinion better than yours, and therefore voted higher for that person.
If you think that's dumb, consider the culture where everyone gets along with each other versus one where people have to walk on egg shells all day. I'm not saying it's correct for these things to matter, I'm just saying there's a reason they call it "politically correct" and not "ideally correct."
It's also the reason that HR exists, and plays a major part in the on boarding process in larger companies.
Admin
While working my way through school back in the 1980s, I spent a couple summers working in a hospital human resources office. One government regulation required that we report demographic information, including race. Another regulation prohibited us from asking for such information. I forget exactly how it was resolved, but I think the HR director just made up a bunch of numbers and called it close enough.
Admin
Please don't put all us Americans in with the lot that sue for a living. It's not really the populous, but the lawyers and judges that perpetuate it for their own benefit. The airwaves are full of "if you or somebody you know has been hurt you're entitled to compensation" ads. Since most law-makers are also lawyers, any attempt to put in tort reform is always soundly defeated.
Admin
Admin
"increasing level of seedy intensity"
Awesome.
Admin
Admin
But seriously, I thought he meant they enjoy their time on the land....
Admin
Off the track a little, my favourites are the ones that complain they're discrimnated against because they don't cut (or wash) their hair, or have enough piercings to well <insert something witty>. When you know what the issue is, and it's something you can easily change (wash hair, cut hair, remove piercings) you have noone but yourself to blame when people choose not to hire you - especially for public facing roles where your presentation is important to the companies image (Australia Post, Civic Centre, Canberra - anyone?). There seems an increasing Chico Marx attitude (I don't want to work, I just want a job) coupled with some sort of assumption that people somehow have a right to do whatever work they please, even if they are incapable of it or unwilling to learn fundamental skills required for it.
Admin
EO is not about balancing workplaces into demographics that reflect the real world. EO is about hiring the best person for the job irrespective of their heritage, personal life or colour car they drive. By asking whether someone is a particular gender, ethnicity or sexual orientation we are simply setting up a list we can use to discriminate against some candidates.
For example, "We are an equal opportunity employer, what is your gender?" would imply that they believe they have an imbalance in the workplace toward one gender and are looking to hire the other - this is not EO. Ideally (and of course it's not always possible because of the human factors and occasionally language problems) the 1st page of a resume (assuming it contains onley personal infromation) can be thrown out, and the resume' assessed for it's content with no concern for WHO the applicant is, just HOW WELL they suit the position...
That said, there are probably times when gender is important for a role (not that any such cases immediately spring to mind)
Admin
That's also the case in Australia. It is illegal to ask about marital status, pregnancy status, race, religion, etc. in a job interview.
So I'm surprised if the UK (which obviously has similar laws to Australia) would allow this.
Admin
That's also the case in Australia. It is illegal to ask about marital status, pregnancy status, race, religion, etc. in a job interview.
So I'm surprised if the UK (which obviously has similar laws to Australia) would allow this.
PS: Sorry for dupe; first time poster.
Admin
Admin
The Positive Attitude letter is a bit wordy. Fixed it:
Admin
Hey, Jean-Ralphio is going into the web development business!
Admin
I totally agree, chasing birds or as we sometimes call them -- totty -- is very British we don't really use words like chicks, that's so American ... still I wonder who the bank was, but having worked in a couple of investment banks this doesn't surprise me!
Admin
Another way to say the same thing: Who wants to employ an arrogant loudmouth knowitall who spends all his time at the proverbial water-cooler preaching his own personal psychodrama all day? Fuck off, waster.
Admin
That's a bit sexist. How can the gender of the person make a difference to how efficiently they can prepare a wall for redecoration?
Admin
"he was wearing a wristwatch the size of a dinner plate with more telemetry than a jet cockpit." Congrats, a TDWTF article finally managed to make me laugh out loud.
Admin
I nodded, but you could not see. A written equivalent - fitting to the theme - is of course: seconded.
Admin
A few: Acting (obvious) Any job with heavy lifting (yes, women can do it. But, for the most part, men are bigger and stronger) Doctor's offices (May Need Male and Female staff for the comfort of some patients)
Admin
For example - actors for certain role in film, theatre ... I know, in holywood films it may not make big difference in stupidity level to assign gender and race randomly, but there are also films, where it really matter. Trust me.
Police may want some females to make body searches on suspected females.
In fashion bussines you need some specific gender to present some gender specific clothes (such as underwear, or wedding robes, or swimming suits ...)
In dance schools there is usually pair which teach dance - so if you need (re)fill only one position there, you also need specific gender.
And there is much more such position. Not everybody is just small replaceable wheel in big anonymous machine.
Capcha: eros
Admin
In Germany a company has to meet a quota on woman and disabled people if they have more than 10 employees.
If not the owner has to pay a fine of 1500 Euro a month (worst case).
Admin
This is good advice. I had an interview at which one of the interviewers commented that he hadn't wanted to call me in because my CV was so badly formatted. I produced a copy of the what I had given to the agency, and they showed me what they had got from the agency. In the process of deleting my address and phone number, the agency had wrecked the carefully laid out document.
The interviewer agreed that my version was excellent, and his colleague said something along the lines of "Yes, that's what I thought had happened".
Admin
"If you are an alien, how come you sound like you're from the North?"
Admin
Turned out the agency muffin had been tweaking it to look better, and it didn't match the one I had in my briefcase - (which was different again) which I presented at the interview itself.
Admin
Admin
It's called "positive discrimination" and it sucks.
Admin
But then, who cares? They're minorities. That means we have them outnumbered! Yeah for democracy, where the majority is always right!
Admin
Ok, you may have XXX XXXX'd the name at the bottom of the application letter, but I'd recognize that guy anywhere from his writing style.
How could you pass up the opportunity to meet Mark V. Shaney in the flesh?
Admin
Admin
Swissgerman:
Danke für de gueti bricht, ich han mich köschtlich amüsiert. Chasch den du überhaupt no schwizerdütsch? Gruess us Rapperswil Tobi
Admin
Sounds like a recipe for productivity improvement, then.
Admin
http://alllooksame.com/exam_room.php
Knock yourself out.
Admin
Are you sure the second one wasn't generated from a spam bot utilizing a Markov chain?
Admin
In Germany,
you actually are meant to post this kind of information (marital status, kids, sometimes even siblings and occupation of parents) including a picture of you on your resume.
Contrary to the US Anti-Discrimination Concept, in Germany they want to know as much about you right from the start - and if you don't provide it (by f.e. bringing an american style resume) you usually just get sorted out.
As much as I know this is common in mostly all european countries, I can only speak for Finland and Germany for myself though.
Also, in Germany, it is customary to actually ask the applicant for how much m oney they expect out of a position, something else I think is not that common in the US..
Admin
You need women to model women's clothes - but why should there be "women's clothes" and "men's clothes" anyway?
You need a female officer to perform a search on a female suspect - but why should there be any difference in comfort for either the searcher or the searchee or any greater/lesser expectation for abuse?
You need a man to demonstrate the men's leading role in a dance - but why can't a woman lead a man or a woman lead a woman or a man lead a man? They can all do it. If that makes the students uncomfortable somehow, then that's just the product of their own sexism or heteronormativism.
Which brings to the first one - if men and women are equal, why does a particular role in a story have to be filled by a person with particular plumbing? This apparent belief of ours is just more sexism justified by the sexism of others?
How can you ever have justice when injustice is its own excuse?
Admin
Admin
Because men and women are NOT equal, they are instead complimentary. I don't believe in equality, there are leaders and followers, strong people and smart people, we are not equal, we are instead complimentary, get over this equality fairy tale.
Admin
He must have had a cuckoo clock instead.
Admin
As a disabled woman, I can say that particular thought never crosses my mind. It's always the opposite. Imagine not getting that position you wanted despite being more qualified for it, or being underpaid despite having more experience than your coworkers... and add this question to the list of reasons why: "Is it because my boss thinks I'm an incompetent freak for something I have no control over?" That's the question I suppress in the recesses of my mind because it's a very depressing and futile road to go down.
Admin
Admin
Admin
Admin
I love how you're privy to the qualifications of other applicants! That means that you got into the final cut, where you and the other short-short listers can meet in the lobby and compare notes. Since you obviously weren't the best, or even able to evaluate who was the best for the position, the reason you got onto the short-short list was because of positive discrimination.
Admin
Internal position. I work alongside the person who got it now. And all I'm saying is that the fear of negative discrimination is far greater and it's a nasty little question that's sitting along with 'did I ask for too big a salary?' or 'are my job skills lacking?' I try not to disclose disability status in interviews unless the interviewer notices just because I fear how heavily it'll count against me. And for the most part, it's not been an issue. When it was though, it was really ugly. So disclosing disability ever working in my favor? Maybe when someone offers to carry my groceries out to the car for me... but I find it incredible that it'd happen in a workplace. Maybe someday I'll be proven wrong, but I really like my current coworkers so it may be a while before I try for a better job.