- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
- Error'd
- Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Other Series
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
Why not just dynamically create the static site? Yes, it's a stupid request, but that doesn't mean it has to be done stupidly on top of that.
The end result can be .html files without you actually opening up 10000 files to make a menu change.
Admin
He read an article once about how dynamically generating pages was slower than static pages. Mind made up forever.
Have you really never come across that type of person? We once had a consultant try to convince my boss that we should replace all if statements with switches, because they're "faster"...and he almost listened.
Admin
Admin
The efforts to push Perl from a great scripting language to a horrible general purpose OOP language are just ensuring another generation of crap.
Admin
That was my initial thought. But developing the solution outside Japan? Not really the Japanese way.
Admin
Wait a minute... they were embedding XML inside HTML?
...and then I googled this, and discovered that yes, some people apparently do think that this is sometimes a good idea.
Mind. Blown.
Admin
Admin
A database that only allows one connection at a time? That's TRWTF. Is it some kind of corporate edition of a big enterprise DBMS for which they were too cheap to buy additional client licenses? Never mind that the task in question doesn't look particularly complex and could probably be done by something like MySQL.
Admin
I like how your writing style prevents any sane person from wanting to read what you wrote.
Admin
I think that it allowed multiple connections, it just caused a lot of concurrency issues.
Admin
Admin
Admin
Admin
My first thought when I read of "Vernon's" behavior was Ballmer.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d_AP3SGMxxM
Admin
th reel wtf is that nebuddy wold BOTTER havin sumtin 2do witth ituens. verin shod hav ben a kiler app deseyener nsted lol xD !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Admin
Yes, iTunes and Amazon do make a profit. It is just the creators (actual talent) that get left in the dust. They are the ones that get only pennies per song-download (if that!).
Admin
Admin
It's not throwing out the baby with the bathwater if you carefully save the bathwater.
Admin
And I suppose that you know of some tool that is better than Access?
We just need to make sure that someone is always sitting at Lester's desk to re-open the file every time it crashes, but I'm sure that's normal with all enterprise level database engines.
Admin
Admin
Not the worst thing to do when data doesn't change often. I manage a site for my running group, and the people who enter the run information are the only ones who update the site. The runs aren't changed that often, so one of the projects that I have slated for the site is to make that process create a static HTML file that would be referenced by the main page that shows the next 10 run starts, instead of generating that list dynamically.
Admin
Well, iTunes and Amazon each give 70% of the sale of the song back to the label. Roughly 70 cents, while they skim 30% for themselves. And if you buy one song, that's no profit for either as that's eaten up in credit card fees.
Hell, iTunes (and software and other associated services) made Apple $1B in revenue, the worst performing division, and not counting expenses, either.
The labels get 70 cents per 99 cent song. If the artist is only getting a penny, well, the RIAA is chewing up the rest of the money. Not Apple, nor Amazon.
There are indie labels on iTunes that give their artists way more - 30 cents or more per song.
Admin
Admin
When Apples collide:
[image]Admin
I am your manager. Tell me what you need, and I'll tell you how to work without it.
Admin
But I agree, this article was a significant immprovement on most of the crap we 've been seeing here of late.
Admin
For certain tasks, Perl is excellent -- but I wouldn't want to use it for everything. A person without Perl on his CV would need an extra special something else to impress me enough to invite him for an interview -- OTOH someone who stressed his/her Perl expertise at the expense of all else would be demonstrating a severe imbalance and, if facing him/her over an interview table my first question would be to ask him/her what Perl would be used for. "Everything" would of course be the wrong answer.
Admin
JSP is actually okay, and in the correct context the technology can still be useful for certain applications -- but I'm completely in agreement with you on JSF and EJB. JSP shines through its ease of use.
Admin
You can't say that Perl is TRWTF in an article that even mentions Java.
Admin
Getting programmers isn't the issue, getting good programmers is hard, and both languages attract morons.
The operative difference is if you do it in PHP you won't waste ages picking a web templating language.
Admin
Admin
Admin
Oddly, Vernon wasn't the one calling for Perl/Pearl. Nonetheless...
Me too. I even kept my mouth shut when one manager told another manager about Perl and the second one wrote it down as Pearl. Though the second one wasn't Sony, it was a competitor who fits this scenario equally well as Sony. Yup, me too. But my remaining months weren't as long as Eric's.Admin
Admin
Admin
You've never seen enterprisy HTML, have you?
Admin
Given that the files themselves have been generated (most likely by hand) using FrontPage, it is less than likely they will be in a sufficiently uniform format as to allow a straightforward algorithmic treatment in order to provide those required upgrades. Seriously: such is the stuff of nightmares.
Admin
It was dynamically generated, a process which took several days to do, and had to be done anytime links were updated.
The TRWTF was that it had been running months without a problem (that's how well marketed it was). Turned out it was configured by someone who didn't know connection pooling.
-eric
Admin
It was dynamically generated, a process which took several days to do, and had to be done anytime links were updated.
The TRWTF was that it had been running months without a problem (that's how well marketed it was). Turned out it was configured by someone who didn't know connection pooling.
-eric
Admin
clifhanger?
waiting for a sequel...
Admin
Don't worry, we'll get to it first thing tuesday.
Admin
Admin
I'm an embedded software engineer and I've never had a need to use perl for anything except university classes, and even that was minimal.
Admin
Captcha: facilisis - easysys?
Admin
Perl was actually my first "love" way back in the late 1990s. When I found a free web host that supported user CGI files, so Perl was the de-facto language to use. I had only used QBASIC before Perl so it was quite a change, not only syntax but also how CGI and web programming worked. When I did "Web Programming" at uni, I had a crazy lecturer who wanted us to use pure C for CGI scripts. Perl was much easier!
Then I found PHP and used it professionally for a while but now I have been a Perl programmer for over a year.
I used to use software that had its web interface written in PHP and its commandline/cron parts written in Perl, both accessing a common database. That was quite weird but it seemed to work.
Admin
So Mr. Vernon
Maybe he was more competent than it seems?
Admin
+1 in my organisation
(actually make that + quite a few)
Admin
This one is hardcore. I almost feel sorry for Eric. Almost. Because nobody was forcing him to stay there. I would probably walk away after the first Mr.Vernon's exhibition. The next possibility for exit was after being told how retarded the whole system is. And the final "Just be better" speech would be the final straw. There's no possibility I would stay there. Even if I had to go flipping burgers.
In my career I've met my share of "Mr.Vernons" and it's just not worth it.
Admin
This is fat more common than you imagine. I recently left a large company where almost every senior manager was an imbecile. Worseha they covered folongevity is not a requirement of promotion.r each other. The root of the problem was that most if these people had worked for the company for 15-20 years. It should be law that
Admin
bollocks. never try to write comments with an Android phone.