• Calli Arcale (unregistered) in reply to Lorne Kates
    Lorne Kates:
    Coyne:
    It's like...it's like building Mars-shot navigation around an advanced scientific calculator.

    Even worse than the worst combination you can imagine...

    Close-- it's like running a Mars-shot navigation via the brew-timer on Mission Control's coffee maker-- blocking the brewing of coffee for three and a half years. CAPCOM would be grumpy.

    And then there would be hell to pay, oh yes, and it ain't just CAPCOM who'd be grumpy. If you follow Wayne Hale's blog (he was a Shuttle flight director for a long time, then became Shuttle program manager, then eventually retired from NASA), he talks of how sacred and practically mission-critical that coffee was. Keeping the coffeemakers supplying an endless flow of burnt brew was nearly as important as making sure the facility didn't lose power. They're all massive coffee addicts. Interfere with the coffee machine and you'd be lucky to get out of there alive!

  • Paul (unregistered) in reply to geoffrey
    geoffrey:
    centurijon:
    geoffrey:
    evilspoons:
    geoffrey:
    Surely the real problem here is that this guy just figured he could cancel someone's job without bothering to discover the nature of that job or its priority. That's much like someone coming along and disconnecting your terminal while you work. I believe that kind of behaviour should result in you being marched from the building. There is a reason why everyone else was hesitant around the printer - they knew cancelling the job was wrong.

    If anyone should be marching down to HR it should be the guy whose job was cancelled without warning. Oh you can add ignoring warning signs to the charges too.

    Seriously? The printer isn't FOR running computational jobs, it's for printing. There's a reasonable expectation of availablility for a resource like that. If it's sitting for hours doing nothing, you can safely assume it's broken because no pages are being printed by a device whose sole purpose is to make pages have toner on them.

    You are absolutely correct, I agree with you. We have the benefit of understanding the situation however, the guy who just cancelled the job did not.

    An unnamed person had submitted a job to the internal reader. You don't just cancel it unless you know it's purpose and it's priority. you just don't. In this case the guy who submitted the job was in the wrong it turns out, but the ends do not justify the means. "Bob" was equally in the wrong here for acting like a maverick and just pulling the switch. In certain situations that might result in disciplinary action. Notice that his co-workers understood this which is why they didn't take any action themselves.

    There are times when you need a maverick, or at least someone to take initiative in a poor situation.

    Having a line of people waiting for a print queue (like sheep) is completely unacceptable - especially if the non-print job is expected to take two days to run. The article stated that he tried to find the person responsible for the print job and that person was missing. In that situation I would not have even hesitated to cancel the job either.

    Sharing is caring, and number crunching on a printer is stupid.

    I disagree, it's far better to hold off and wait for management to deal with the situation then cancel a job you know nothing about which could potentially bring down the entire company. Hell is paved with good intentions.

    WTF geoffrey? If the job was so important that its failure would bring down the entire company, the moron should have been given enough compute power to get the job done without stopping everyone else from getting their jobs done.

    Anyone who thinks it's OK to hog a SHARED RESOURCE for several days doing something that resource was never intended to do in the first place and then act like a bullying brat about it would find their employment around here to be a short one. They have no business working in a place with other people.

  • Tom (unregistered)

    Off all the things this comment is, being first is not one of them.

  • (cs) in reply to trtrwtf
    trtrwtf:
    frits:
    QJo:
    If I were the boss I'd haul both of them into the office for a re-evaluation of their positions.
    I'd have them lick kick each other until one of them gave up.
    But if we selected employees this way, everyone would end up uber-gay. Unless you were trying to make the queer equivalent of the playboy mansion, in which case, as you were.
    It seems that one of your alter-egos is leaking a bit.
  • (cs) in reply to Josh
    Josh:
    Am I the only one that thinks geoffrey is the guy from the story who had his "print job" killed?
    No, others have suggested it. Personally, I think it's a bit presumptuous and silly to suggest such a cynical possibility.
    Josh:
    Why else would anyone take his position on this issue?
    Poor reading comprehension, trolling, somebody canceled his print job once so he's here to rant, etc. Or more likely: to play devil's advocate, exercise his debate skills, balance the discussion, point out less-obvious WTFs*, etc. Take your pick; you'll probably guess wrong.
    • Ex: While I gladly support Bob's actions in the story, better communication would have helped the situation.
  • (cs) in reply to redblacktree
    redblacktree:
    geoffrey:
    I am tired so lets agree to disagree for now and leave it at that

    Translation: You totally trolled the entire forum and you're bored with answering outraged posts. You're now going to log in as another sock puppet and get ready to do it all again tomorrow.

    FTFM

  • iToad (unregistered) in reply to ņăĝęŠĥ
    ņăĝęŠĥ:
    How exactly do you program the printer to do computation?

    This story is fishy.

    Normally, the printer driver for a postscript device writes a Postscript program to generate your printout. It then sends it (as a text file), to the printer. The printer runs the Postscript program and generates your printout.

    You can also cheat. You write your Postscript program in a text editor and send it directly to the printer, bypassing the printer driver. The printer can't tell the difference between a Postscript job to crunch numbers, and a Postscript job to print a page. Back in the olden days, I actually did this (on a DEC LaserWriter), and it worked. The only drawback to this was that Postscript was similar to Forth, and Forth skills were not very common.

    A lot of printers contain very capable CPUs to run the graphics engine. They could probably fly through a well-written Postscript program.

  • asdf (unregistered)

    Ctrl^D or Ctrl^M

  • Bub (unregistered) in reply to ThePants999
    ThePants999:
    TRWTF is this sentence:
    Of all the things the problem that wasn't his was, being not his problem wasn't one of them.

    Seriously. WTF. That sentence could be weaponised and deployed in surgical strikes.

    Something just dribbled out my right ear, and I think my right retina has become detached.

  • (cs) in reply to PedanticCurmudgeon
    PedanticCurmudgeon:
    trtrwtf:
    frits:
    QJo:
    If I were the boss I'd haul both of them into the office for a re-evaluation of their positions.
    I'd have them lick kick each other until one of them gave up.
    But if we selected employees this way, everyone would end up uber-gay. Unless you were trying to make the queer equivalent of the playboy mansion, in which case, as you were.
    It seems that one of your alter-egos is leaking a bit.

    Yeah, that's why I'm official now. It's a shame, I kind of liked being (unregistered)

  • (cs) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    redblacktree:
    FTFM
    Isn't it traditional to pretend that your sockpuppets are different people?
  • (cs) in reply to Abso
    Abso:
    C-Octothorpe:
    redblacktree:
    FTFM
    Isn't it traditional to pretend that your sockpuppets are different people?
    Sorry, I don't follow...

    I was simply stating that, in my opinion, geoffrey wasn't admitting defeat and instead executed a successful trolling. If redblacktree thought something else I am not one to tell him what he meant. He meant what he said, which is why I fixed it for myself, not for him...

    Capeesh?! :)

  • fytrpylut (unregistered) in reply to QJo

    You don't "wield responsibility." You are saddled with responsibility and you wield authority.

  • Tzafrir Cohen (unregistered)

    Obligatory link: ps-httpd: http://www.pugo.org:8080/

  • David (unregistered)

    I don't know if anyone mentioned it yet- I stopped reading after the first page of circular arguments- but Geoffery is obviously a troll.

    He was quite successful recently with his massive derailing of another comment section by suggesting "Sometimes rolling your own custom database is more secure than the ones made by people who actually know what they are doing lewl!"

    Normally I don't mind the troll feeding, its basically all that happens in these comment sections. But I found the arguments to be especially boring and tame. If you're going to start arguments and stay stupid things (and by all means, please do) at least have the decency to make it entertaining for the rest of us to read.

  • Ryan (unregistered)

    Yayyyy, another Penguicon story. These were great. Made my day to hear, too bad there weren't too many more.

  • Nagesh (unregistered) in reply to geoffrey
    geoffrey:
    Hell is paved with good intentions.
    I am thinking "road to hell is paved with good intentions." Lukily, we Hindu get multiple incarnashians rether than Pope-folowers.
  • Lucent (unregistered) in reply to David
    David:
    I don't know if anyone mentioned it yet- I stopped reading after the first page of circular arguments- but Geoffery is obviously a troll.

    He was quite successful recently with his massive derailing of another comment section by suggesting "Sometimes rolling your own custom database is more secure than the ones made by people who actually know what they are doing lewl!"

    Normally I don't mind the troll feeding, its basically all that happens in these comment sections. But I found the arguments to be especially boring and tame. If you're going to start arguments and stay stupid things (and by all means, please do) at least have the decency to make it entertaining for the rest of us to read.

    So if you're going to be indecent, at least we should have the decency to... You know what? Fuck you.

    Fuck You. Fuck Your Face. Fuck Your Job. Fuck Your Name. Fuck Your Khakis. Fuck Your Shoes.

    Fuck Your Mom. Fuck Your Dad. Fuck Your Sister. Fuck Your Brother. Fuck Your Kids. (I'll) Fuck Your Wife.

    Fuck Your Cat. Fuck Your Car. Fuck Your House. Fuck Your Goldfish. Fuck The Bushes Along Your Front Walk.

    Fuck Your Mailbox. Fuck Your Mailman. Fuck Your Refrigerator. Fuck Your Television. Fuck Your Star Wars Action Figure Collection.

    Fuck Everything About You.

    Fuck You...

    Fuck You...

    Fuck You.

    Seriously, go Suck A Caribou's Ass.

  • Nagesh (unregistered) in reply to Nagesh
    Nagesh:
    geoffrey:
    Hell is paved with good intentions.
    I am thinking "road to hell is paved with good intentions." Lukily, we Hindu get multiple incarnashians rether than Pope-folowers.

    Pope is incarnation of Vishnu only, asshat. And stop to be using my name.

  • (cs) in reply to David
    David:
    I don't know if anyone mentioned it yet- I stopped reading after the first page of circular arguments- but Geoffery is obviously a troll.

    He was quite successful recently with his massive derailing of another comment section by suggesting "Sometimes rolling your own custom database is more secure than the ones made by people who actually know what they are doing lewl!"

    Normally I don't mind the troll feeding, its basically all that happens in these comment sections. But I found the arguments to be especially boring and tame. If you're going to start arguments and stay stupid things (and by all means, please do) at least have the decency to make it entertaining for the rest of us to read.

    It's a delicate balance of stupidity and sincerity, really. You can't make it too obvious because fellow posters will see it for what it is and ignore it, and this includes follow-up responses. If it's too stupid or outlandish, he wouldn't get any bites.

  • David (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    David:
    I don't know if anyone mentioned it yet- I stopped reading after the first page of circular arguments- but Geoffery is obviously a troll.

    He was quite successful recently with his massive derailing of another comment section by suggesting "Sometimes rolling your own custom database is more secure than the ones made by people who actually know what they are doing lewl!"

    Normally I don't mind the troll feeding, its basically all that happens in these comment sections. But I found the arguments to be especially boring and tame. If you're going to start arguments and stay stupid things (and by all means, please do) at least have the decency to make it entertaining for the rest of us to read.

    It's a delicate balance of stupidity and sincerity, really. You can't make it too obvious because fellow posters will see it for what it is and ignore it, and this includes follow-up responses. If it's too stupid or outlandish, he wouldn't get any bites.
    Do you even read posts do you just spit out whatever comes to mind from my first few words. Go back to the kiddie's table to practice your reading comprehension and we can try again later, alright? :)

  • Hortical (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    It's a delicate balance of stupidity and sincerity, really. You can't make it too obvious because fellow posters will see it for what it is and ignore it, and this includes follow-up responses. If it's too stupid or outlandish, he wouldn't get any bites.
    What is it with you and giving people so much credit? [image]
  • (cs) in reply to David
    David:
    C-Octothorpe:
    David:
    I don't know if anyone mentioned it yet- I stopped reading after the first page of circular arguments- but Geoffery is obviously a troll.

    He was quite successful recently with his massive derailing of another comment section by suggesting "Sometimes rolling your own custom database is more secure than the ones made by people who actually know what they are doing lewl!"

    Normally I don't mind the troll feeding, its basically all that happens in these comment sections. But I found the arguments to be especially boring and tame. If you're going to start arguments and stay stupid things (and by all means, please do) at least have the decency to make it entertaining for the rest of us to read.

    It's a delicate balance of stupidity and sincerity, really. You can't make it too obvious because fellow posters will see it for what it is and ignore it, and this includes follow-up responses. If it's too stupid or outlandish, he wouldn't get any bites.
    Do you even read posts do you just spit out whatever comes to mind from my first few words. Go back to the kiddie's table to practice your reading comprehension and we can try again later, alright? :)
    Well played, good sir...

  • The Mr. T Experience (unregistered)

    All you nerds are a bunch of jerkoffs, and you deserve every punch you've ever received.

  • (cs) in reply to The Mr. T Experience
    The Mr. T Experience:
    All you nerds are a bunch of jerkoffs, and you deserve every punch you've ever received.

    Grammatically, that sentence is a disaster. Please try again.

  • willaien (unregistered) in reply to geoffrey
    geoffrey:
    Let me throw a curve ball at you. What if the job readout was in error and the job was actually 50 megabytes of important company report - a report which management urgently needs to close the quarter?

    Try explaining why there will be mass redundancies to your coworkers standing round the printer next week.

    Then it is a hung job that isn't ever going to print and needs to be resubmitted.

  • Postscripter (unregistered)

    I've actually written postscript code that did nontrivial work in the printer. (It let us print cool graphs from stupid reporting software.) While the processors in early postscrip printers were fast, the actual PS interpreter wasn't a speed demon when it came to nonrendering tasks. The idiot would've been better off doing his number crunching in just about any compiled language.

  • David (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    Well played, good sir...
    I can't tell you how pleasing it is to receive words of affirmation from you. I will never forget them. Or you.
    • An old friend

    Yes, it's real. Real as real can be. I don't want to hurt you C-Octo. I want you to stick around a long, long time.

  • The Mr. T Experience (unregistered) in reply to trtrwtf
    trtrwtf:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    All you nerds are a bunch of jerkoffs, and you deserve every punch you've ever received.

    Grammatically, that sentence is a disaster. Please try again.

    See what I mean? I just can imagine your nerdy expression on your smug nerd face, teetering over your stupid noodle neck.

    Who wouldn't punch this?

  • The Sane One (unregistered) in reply to geoffrey
    geoffrey:
    I disagree, it's far better to hold off and wait for management to deal with the situation then cancel a job you know nothing about which could potentially bring down the entire company. Hell is paved with good intentions.
    No, it's not better. That queue is costing the company a lot of money per minute. But more importantly, if indeed some business-critical calculation is being run on a printer in a hallway, and cancelling it brings down the entire company, then I'd say it's a completely justified mercy kill...
  • (cs) in reply to The Mr. T Experience
    The Mr. T Experience:
    trtrwtf:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    All you nerds are a bunch of jerkoffs, and you deserve every punch you've ever received.

    Grammatically, that sentence is a disaster. Please try again.

    See what I mean? I just can imagine your nerdy expression on your smug nerd face, teetering over your stupid noodle neck.

    Who wouldn't punch this?

    Ahh yes, a grossly off-topic thread wouldn't be complete without an Internet Tough Guy (TM).

    Also, what makes you think he isn't morbidly obese and doesn't have a neck? Ever thought of that, tough guy?

  • The Mr. T Experience (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    trtrwtf:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    All you nerds are a bunch of jerkoffs, and you deserve every punch you've ever received.

    Grammatically, that sentence is a disaster. Please try again.

    See what I mean? I just can imagine your nerdy expression on your smug nerd face, teetering over your stupid noodle neck.

    Who wouldn't punch this?

    Ahh yes, a grossly off-topic thread wouldn't be complete without an Internet Tough Guy (TM).

    Also, what makes you think he isn't morbidly obese and doesn't have a neck? Ever thought of that, tough guy?

    It's my imagination, hero. BTW-I'll punch a fat guy too.

  • (cs) in reply to The Mr. T Experience
    The Mr. T Experience:
    C-Octothorpe:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    trtrwtf:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    All you nerds are a bunch of jerkoffs, and you deserve every punch you've ever received.

    Grammatically, that sentence is a disaster. Please try again.

    See what I mean? I just can imagine your nerdy expression on your smug nerd face, teetering over your stupid noodle neck.

    Who wouldn't punch this?

    Ahh yes, a grossly off-topic thread wouldn't be complete without an Internet Tough Guy (TM).

    Also, what makes you think he isn't morbidly obese and doesn't have a neck? Ever thought of that, tough guy?

    It's my imagination, hero. BTW-I'll punch a fat guy too.
    Sounds like fun. Lets start with your mom.

  • (cs) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    trtrwtf:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    All you nerds are a bunch of jerkoffs, and you deserve every punch you've ever received.

    Grammatically, that sentence is a disaster. Please try again.

    See what I mean? I just can imagine your nerdy expression on your smug nerd face, teetering over your stupid noodle neck.

    Who wouldn't punch this?

    Ahh yes, a grossly off-topic thread wouldn't be complete without an Internet Tough Guy (TM).

    Also, what makes you think he isn't morbidly obese and doesn't have a neck? Ever thought of that, tough guy?

    A good point.

  • The Mr. T Experience (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    C-Octothorpe:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    trtrwtf:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    All you nerds are a bunch of jerkoffs, and you deserve every punch you've ever received.

    Grammatically, that sentence is a disaster. Please try again.

    See what I mean? I just can imagine your nerdy expression on your smug nerd face, teetering over your stupid noodle neck.

    Who wouldn't punch this?

    Ahh yes, a grossly off-topic thread wouldn't be complete without an Internet Tough Guy (TM).

    Also, what makes you think he isn't morbidly obese and doesn't have a neck? Ever thought of that, tough guy?

    It's my imagination, hero. BTW-I'll punch a fat guy too.
    Sounds like fun. Lets start with your mom.
    I thought smart guys like yourself don't go for lame mom jokes.
    Then again, based on the crap you write, I'm going to rescind the whole "smart guys like yourself" bit. Carry on lame-o. :P

  • (cs) in reply to The Mr. T Experience
    The Mr. T Experience:
    C-Octothorpe:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    C-Octothorpe:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    trtrwtf:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    All you nerds are a bunch of jerkoffs, and you deserve every punch you've ever received.

    Grammatically, that sentence is a disaster. Please try again.

    See what I mean? I just can imagine your nerdy expression on your smug nerd face, teetering over your stupid noodle neck.

    Who wouldn't punch this?

    Ahh yes, a grossly off-topic thread wouldn't be complete without an Internet Tough Guy (TM).

    Also, what makes you think he isn't morbidly obese and doesn't have a neck? Ever thought of that, tough guy?

    It's my imagination, hero. BTW-I'll punch a fat guy too.
    Sounds like fun. Lets start with your mom.
    I thought smart guys like yourself don't go for lame mom jokes.
    Then again, based on the crap you write, I'm going to rescind the whole "smart guys like yourself" bit. Carry on lame-o. :P

    Oh, now you're just being mean. That's not nice at all.

  • talentless_newbie (too lazy to log in properly) (unregistered) in reply to geoffrey
    geoffrey:
    boog:
    geoffrey:
    ...it's far better to hold off and wait for management to deal with the situation then cancel a job you know nothing about which could potentially bring down the entire company. Hell is paved with good intentions.
    Bullshit. Say, let's all stop calling it "a job you know nothing about", shall we?
    1. The job was only a few bytes.
    2. It had been running for almost an hour.
    3. It hadn't started printing yet.
    4. It was holding up everyone else.

    On any normal print server, this would be an error state. And if cancelling a tiny blocking long-running non-printing print job could potentially bring down the entire company, you've really got bigger issues.

    Let me throw a curve ball at you. What if the job readout was in error and the job was actually 50 megabytes of important company report - a report which management urgently needs to close the quarter?

    Try explaining why there will be mass redundancies to your coworkers standing round the printer next week.

    Curve ball swung at and hit for a double:

    If you're a manager and you know you have an critically-important-but-large print job that will stop the rank and file from getting their work done, wouldn't you either print it off-hours (or, as the case may be, delegate it to someone else to print off-hours)? After all, if you're preventing your reports from getting their work done, chances are you also won't hit your quarterly numbers, rendering your 50 MB report useless.

    (4/10 - 3 for concept and incendiary first post, 1 for getting me to respond)

  • D Martensson (unregistered) in reply to geoffrey
    geoffrey:
    An unnamed person had submitted a job to the internal reader. You don't just cancel it unless you know it's purpose and it's priority. you just don't. In this case the guy who submitted the job was in the wrong it turns out, but the ends do not justify the means. "Bob" was equally in the wrong here for acting like a maverick and just pulling the switch. In certain situations that might result in disciplinary action. Notice that his co-workers understood this which is why they didn't take any action themselves.

    No normal print job of a few KB should take hours to complete. So if that situation occurs the normal solution is to kill the job.

    If, for some strange reason, you decide to use the printer in a fashion it is not supposed to be used you SHOULD put a note up describing what and WHY you are doing it.

    Not doing that is compounding the already big error.

    If a car has broken breaks you do not glue the door lock, you put a note up warning about the broken breaks ;)

    Most normal printer problem solution charts recommends killing any job that looks hung in the queue.

  • (cs) in reply to The Mr. T Experience
    The Mr. T Experience:
    I thought smart guys like yourself don't go for lame mom jokes.
    I never claimed to be smart, so your initial assertion was your own fault.
    The Mr. T Experience:
    Carry on lame-o. :P
    Glad I have your blessings!
  • the beholder (unregistered) in reply to Lorne Kates
    Lorne Kates:
    blah:
    DO NO KILL JOB UNTIL FRIDAY (or try to use the printer as your personal mainframe)
    Nice typo Lorne. :D

    I find it extremely ironic that the sign's author was indeed using the printer as a personal mainframe. He would be a woman in real life, if not for the fact that he can write a number-crunching PostScript job.

    Dang, almost made it through without one. You can't blame me, what with the text being so small... :|

    Then check again, because you've been fooled. There's no such typo.

  • (cs) in reply to iToad
    iToad:
    A lot of printers contain very capable CPUs to run the graphics engine. They could probably fly through a well-written Postscript program.
    One would hope, since that's what they were designed for.
  • The Mr. T Experience (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    I thought smart guys like yourself don't go for lame mom jokes.
    I never claimed to be smart, so your initial assertion was your own fault.
    The Mr. T Experience:
    Carry on lame-o. :P
    Glad I have your blessings!
    Am I write in assuming that as long as I keep typing stuff, your going to respond?
  • (cs) in reply to The Mr. T Experience
    The Mr. T Experience:
    C-Octothorpe:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    I thought smart guys like yourself don't go for lame mom jokes.
    I never claimed to be smart, so your initial assertion was your own fault.
    The Mr. T Experience:
    Carry on lame-o. :P
    Glad I have your blessings!
    Am I write in assuming that as long as I keep typing stuff, your going to respond?
    Does your mom have a beard?
  • (cs) in reply to The Mr. T Experience
    The Mr. T Experience:
    trtrwtf:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    All you nerds are a bunch of jerkoffs, and you deserve every punch you've ever received.

    Grammatically, that sentence is a disaster. Please try again.

    See what I mean? I just can imagine your nerdy expression on your smug nerd face, teetering over your stupid noodle neck.

    Who wouldn't punch this?

    Come on then fuckface, want to have a go? Think you're hard enough? You silly little wanker, just fuck off.

  • schmitter (unregistered)

    Wasn't "The printer sat in the hallway, hooked up to an old PC that was the de facto print server."? Probably just Win98SE printer sharing. Since the tool wasn't printing anything, his print job should have been killed and his connection to the printer should have also been terminated.

  • The Mr. T Experience (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    C-Octothorpe:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    I thought smart guys like yourself don't go for lame mom jokes.
    I never claimed to be smart, so your initial assertion was your own fault.
    The Mr. T Experience:
    Carry on lame-o. :P
    Glad I have your blessings!
    Am I write in assuming that as long as I keep typing stuff, your going to respond?
    Does your mom have a beard?
    So that's a yes.
  • Nagesh (unregistered) in reply to Nagesh
    Nagesh:
    Nagesh:
    geoffrey:
    Hell is paved with good intentions.
    I am thinking "road to hell is paved with good intentions." Lukily, we Hindu get multiple incarnashians rether than Pope-folowers.

    Pope is incarnation of Vishnu only, asshat. And stop to be using my name.

    That what was previas Pope?

    Incarnation of vishnu is not to be taking form for anuther 2,000 years.

  • The Mr. T Experience (unregistered) in reply to Matt Westwood
    Matt Westwood:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    trtrwtf:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    All you nerds are a bunch of jerkoffs, and you deserve every punch you've ever received.

    Grammatically, that sentence is a disaster. Please try again.

    See what I mean? I just can imagine your nerdy expression on your smug nerd face, teetering over your stupid noodle neck.

    Who wouldn't punch this?

    Come on then fuckface, want to have a go? Think you're hard enough? You silly little wanker, just fuck off.

    So some pommie bastid thinks he's tough, does he? Typical. Every Brit is a brawler as long as he's in Britain.

  • (cs) in reply to Lucent
    Lucent:
    Fuck You. Fuck Your Face. Fuck Your Job. Fuck Your Name. Fuck Your Khakis. Fuck Your Shoes.

    Fuck Your Mom. Fuck Your Dad. Fuck Your Sister. Fuck Your Brother. Fuck Your Kids. (I'll) Fuck Your Wife.

    Fuck Your Cat. Fuck Your Car. Fuck Your House. Fuck Your Goldfish. Fuck The Bushes Along Your Front Walk.

    Fuck Your Mailbox. Fuck Your Mailman. Fuck Your Refrigerator. Fuck Your Television. Fuck Your Star Wars Action Figure Collection.

    Fuck Everything About You.

    Fuck You...

    Fuck You...

    Fuck You.

    Uh-oh. Flaming is one thing, but now you've gone and committed a federal offense!

  • (cs) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    The Mr. T Experience:
    BTW-I'll punch a fat guy too.
    Sounds like fun. Lets start with your mom.
    Hahaha!

    Normally I don't care much about the "your mom" jokes, but calling his mom a fat guy: +1

Leave a comment on “The Killing Job”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

« Return to Article