- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
- Error'd
- Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Other Series
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
I beg to differ.. you COULD polish this particular turd, but after you were done, the application would no longer exist.
Admin
I'd start off at the Microsoft Access site http://office.microsoft.com/en-ca/access/default.aspx?ofcresset=1 looking at the Help and How-to pages on the left hand side.. There is also the Technical Resources section.
To get one on one help though click on the Discussion Groups link and choose a relevent area within the Access database. That's where Albert, myself, many fellow Access MVPs and other experts hang out. We'd be happy to help you out. I have about 36,000 postings in the newsgroups almost all of which are Acces related.
Admin
There's also a yahoo group called AccessDevelopers http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/AccessDevelopers/
And here's a library full of Access examples: http://www.rogersaccesslibrary.com
Admin
in addition to Tony's suggestions, you can find an excellent list of resources at http://www.accessmvp.com/JConrad/accessjunkie/resources.html
and don't forget to bookmark http://www.mvps.org/access/
Admin
You also appear to be an unthinking moron. I have relatives in Canada, and I don't want you running loose.
Please contact at [email protected].
Thanks ever so much.
Admin
Albert has given reasoned arguments for his stance and your contribution to this thread is...oh wait...you haven't contributed anything, have you?
Admin
I agree, the girl is cute.
Admin
I know Sharon, and she actually moved on to work for Diebold, where these Access macros were modified to handle the 04 election counts and security.
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/04/diebold_vote_da.html
Admin
I think your quote may be wrong. If given the option of two I would go with Fast and Right...
Admin
Sad to say, from some of the code I've seen, this appears to be true. The give-away, of course, is the comments and/or variable names.
Admin
The real problem is that access's JET database will still be in fairly common usage in production, multi-user applications yesterday, today, and [b]two years from now[b].