• (cs) in reply to Hortical
    Hortical:
    C-Octothorpe:
    PedanticCurmudgeon:
    TRWTF is programming languages that don't allow multiple return values.
    Oh man, don't spark that one up again...
    No, let him speak. I want to hear how Haskell does it. I'm sure it's very impressive.
    Actually, I was referring to Common Lisp.
  • (cs) in reply to PedanticCurmudgeon
    PedanticCurmudgeon:
    Hortical:
    C-Octothorpe:
    PedanticCurmudgeon:
    TRWTF is programming languages that don't allow multiple return values.
    Oh man, don't spark that one up again...
    No, let him speak. I want to hear how Haskell does it. I'm sure it's very impressive.
    Actually, I was referring to Common Lisp.

    But common lisp DOES allow multiple ret... oh, I get it. You were saying that languages that aren't common lisp are the...

    Ohhh!

    You wuz trollin'!

    Okay, I'm with you now. Troll on, bad boy, make it go.

  • Hater (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    I was going to insult you, but it seems being you is enough of an insult.

    Sucks to be you. You can't even stand up and answer manly, puss

  • Bob (unregistered) in reply to trtrwtf
    trtrwtf:
    Bob:
    Screw you. I don't see this forum overflowing with references to the N-word. Why? Because simple usage shows you to be nothing more than an ignorant, insensitive, idiotic bigot.

    And simple repetitive recycling of a tired and boring memelet shows you to be a retard. Hence, I use the word "retard". Or, if you prefer, I'll call you a moron. Or would "tedious dipshit" suit you better? Take your pick. I know I'll see you posting "I had a son who was a tedious dipshit, and I can assure you..." soon enough, in any case, because you're a tedious dipshit. And a moron. And, oh, right, a retard.

    In sum, (let's say it all together, now) fuck off, Bob.

    Yes, I would much rather you use profanity rather than making light of a serious and saddening medical condition although I'm beginning to understand that you're too immature for empathy.

  • (cs) in reply to Hater
    Hater:
    C-Octothorpe:
    I was going to insult you, but it seems being you is enough of an insult.

    Sucks to be you. You can't even stand up and answer manly, puss

    Don't you have some video games to be playing or something?

  • Hater (unregistered) in reply to trtrwtf
    trtrwtf:
    Don't you have some video games to be playing or something?

    I won all of them already. You suck at this too, loser

  • (cs) in reply to trtrwtf
    trtrwtf:
    Hater:
    C-Octothorpe:
    I was going to insult you, but it seems being you is enough of an insult.

    Sucks to be you. You can't even stand up and answer manly, puss

    Don't you have some video games to be playing or something?

    No, his mom took them away because he didn't clean his room.

  • (cs) in reply to Hater
    Hater:
    trtrwtf:
    Don't you have some video games to be playing or something?

    I won all of them already. You suck at this too, loser

    So clearly you're a winner then, right?

  • (cs) in reply to Hater
    Hater:
    trtrwtf:
    Don't you have some video games to be playing or something?

    I won all of them already. You suck at this too, loser

    Just curious.... what is it that I suck at again?

  • Jay (unregistered) in reply to Gordon Freeman
    Gordon Freeman:
    Someone is going to say there probably was some code inside that was removed (probably when all of the email list's mail providers moved the company's domain to their antispam filter).

    That someone is then going to say this is not a WTF, because whatever has an explanation cannot be a WTF, for some reason.

    Ditto. I never have understood those comments. If something started out right and then someone changed it to be stupid, that may explain how it got to be stupid, but it doesn't make it not-stupid.

    Like, driving drunk is stupid. If you explain to me that you only drove drunk because you were too intoxicated at the time to realize that this could lead to an accident, that doesn't make it any less stupid.

  • Born Texas Proud (unregistered) in reply to Jay
    Jay:
    Gordon Freeman:
    Someone is going to say there probably was some code inside that was removed (probably when all of the email list's mail providers moved the company's domain to their antispam filter).

    That someone is then going to say this is not a WTF, because whatever has an explanation cannot be a WTF, for some reason.

    Ditto. I never have understood those comments. If something started out right and then someone changed it to be stupid, that may explain how it got to be stupid, but it doesn't make it not-stupid.

    Like, driving drunk is stupid. If you explain to me that you only drove drunk because you were too intoxicated at the time to realize that this could lead to an accident, that doesn't make it any less stupid.

    I can't believe all of you self-righteous jerks who try to tell me what is and what is not ok to do inside of my own vehicle. You don't see me swerving all over the road while I attempt to send text-messages traveling at highway speed, but it's perfectly acceptable for me to enjoy a cocktail within the confines of my automobile.

  • (cs) in reply to Born Texas Proud
    Born Texas Proud:
    Jay:
    Gordon Freeman:
    Someone is going to say there probably was some code inside that was removed (probably when all of the email list's mail providers moved the company's domain to their antispam filter).

    That someone is then going to say this is not a WTF, because whatever has an explanation cannot be a WTF, for some reason.

    Ditto. I never have understood those comments. If something started out right and then someone changed it to be stupid, that may explain how it got to be stupid, but it doesn't make it not-stupid.

    Like, driving drunk is stupid. If you explain to me that you only drove drunk because you were too intoxicated at the time to realize that this could lead to an accident, that doesn't make it any less stupid.

    I can't believe all of you self-righteous jerks who try to tell me what is and what is not ok to do inside of my own vehicle. You don't see me swerving all over the road while I attempt to send text-messages traveling at highway speed, but it's perfectly acceptable for me to enjoy a cocktail within the confines of my automobile.
    Hell yeah! If I want to take everyone else's life into my own two drunk hands, that is my God given right!

  • Danny Moules (unregistered)
    Ken C.:
    No 'try'? What do you mean? Of course there is a 'try'. Watch any fail compilation video and you'll see that I'm right.

    Fail or fail not... there is no try. Now that you have failed please throw an exception rather than returning false, or we may have to code review you out of existence.

    CAPTCHA: tation. Ut wisi enim ad minim veniam, quis nostrud exerci tation ullamcorper suscipit lobortis nisl ut aliquip ex ea commodo consequat?

  • Jay (unregistered)

    Perhaps, as some insist, there really is no such thing as truth, and so any attempt to find it will inevitably result in failure.

  • (cs) in reply to Born Texas Proud
    Born Texas Proud:
    Jay:
    Gordon Freeman:
    Someone is going to say there probably was some code inside that was removed (probably when all of the email list's mail providers moved the company's domain to their antispam filter).

    That someone is then going to say this is not a WTF, because whatever has an explanation cannot be a WTF, for some reason.

    Ditto. I never have understood those comments. If something started out right and then someone changed it to be stupid, that may explain how it got to be stupid, but it doesn't make it not-stupid.

    Like, driving drunk is stupid. If you explain to me that you only drove drunk because you were too intoxicated at the time to realize that this could lead to an accident, that doesn't make it any less stupid.

    I can't believe all of you self-righteous jerks who try to tell me what is and what is not ok to do inside of my own vehicle. You don't see me swerving all over the road while I attempt to send text-messages traveling at highway speed, but it's perfectly acceptable for me to enjoy a cocktail within the confines of my automobile.

    The great thing about drink-driving is that you can tell if you're taking a corner too fast by how much the level of whiskey in your glass tilts. If it slops over the side, you're probably up on two wheels....
  • (cs) in reply to Mr. T Experience
    Mr. T Experience:
    O Hai guys! is there anything I can do to stir the pot a little more?
    Please show some sensitivity. I had a son who was a fool, and let me assure you: it is no pitying matter.
  • (cs) in reply to Hater
    Hater:
    trtrwtf:
    Don't you have some video games to be playing or something?
    I won all of them already.
    It's not winning if you have to have your older brother kill the end boss for you. You fucking cheater.
  • (cs) in reply to Bob
    Bob:
    The Othe Bob:
    QJo:
    Ken B.:
    So, what happens if the answer is FILE_NOT_FOUND, and the "Return False" fails, too?

    Put it in a "while true" loop of course, and keep going round and round until it works. Don't forget to write the stack dump of why it didn't work to a log file, preferably on another machine, the one hosting the production database would be best. Then every evening at about 6:30 you get the line printers to print the file out.

    I had a retarded co-worker who would have an issue with that plan.

    Please show some sensitivity. I had a son who was retarded, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter.

    Bobby, This line geting too old now.

  • (cs) in reply to dohpaz42
    dohpaz42:
    At first glimpes, it's a small WTF - if at all. On further reflection, this function seems to have been deprecated and its functionality removed. And, instead of spending the time going through the entire code base and refactoring every spot that touched this function, they simply made it a stub that always returns true; probably with the idea of coming back at a later date to remove the function and its references completely. Should they have removed the Try/Catch? Maybe, but it's a no-op, so it does no harm except to waste a few bytes on the disk (and somehow qualify as a front-page WTF on this site).

    Good observation.

  • (cs) in reply to Hater
    Hater:
    C-Octothorpe:
    I was going to insult you, but it seems being you is enough of an insult.

    Sucks to be you. You can't even stand up and answer manly, puss

    Hater, Please stop posting now. kthxbai

  • Born Texas Proud (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    Born Texas Proud:
    Jay:
    Gordon Freeman:
    Someone is going to say there probably was some code inside that was removed (probably when all of the email list's mail providers moved the company's domain to their antispam filter).

    That someone is then going to say this is not a WTF, because whatever has an explanation cannot be a WTF, for some reason.

    Ditto. I never have understood those comments. If something started out right and then someone changed it to be stupid, that may explain how it got to be stupid, but it doesn't make it not-stupid.

    Like, driving drunk is stupid. If you explain to me that you only drove drunk because you were too intoxicated at the time to realize that this could lead to an accident, that doesn't make it any less stupid.

    I can't believe all of you self-righteous jerks who try to tell me what is and what is not ok to do inside of my own vehicle. You don't see me swerving all over the road while I attempt to send text-messages traveling at highway speed, but it's perfectly acceptable for me to enjoy a cocktail within the confines of my automobile.
    Hell yeah! If I want to take everyone else's life into my own two drunk hands, that is my God given right!
    Who said anything about drunk? I don't even have a buzz by the time I reach the laughable "legal limit."

  • (cs) in reply to Born Texas Proud
    Born Texas Proud:
    C-Octothorpe:
    Born Texas Proud:
    Jay:
    Gordon Freeman:
    Someone is going to say there probably was some code inside that was removed (probably when all of the email list's mail providers moved the company's domain to their antispam filter).

    That someone is then going to say this is not a WTF, because whatever has an explanation cannot be a WTF, for some reason.

    Ditto. I never have understood those comments. If something started out right and then someone changed it to be stupid, that may explain how it got to be stupid, but it doesn't make it not-stupid.

    Like, driving drunk is stupid. If you explain to me that you only drove drunk because you were too intoxicated at the time to realize that this could lead to an accident, that doesn't make it any less stupid.

    I can't believe all of you self-righteous jerks who try to tell me what is and what is not ok to do inside of my own vehicle. You don't see me swerving all over the road while I attempt to send text-messages traveling at highway speed, but it's perfectly acceptable for me to enjoy a cocktail within the confines of my automobile.
    Hell yeah! If I want to take everyone else's life into my own two drunk hands, that is my God given right!
    Who said anything about drunk? I don't even have a buzz by the time I reach the laughable "legal limit."
    You know, I'm starting to miss Hater...

  • airdrik (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    Born Texas Proud:
    C-Octothorpe:
    Born Texas Proud:
    Jay:
    Gordon Freeman:
    Someone is going to say there probably was some code inside that was removed (probably when all of the email list's mail providers moved the company's domain to their antispam filter).

    That someone is then going to say this is not a WTF, because whatever has an explanation cannot be a WTF, for some reason.

    Ditto. I never have understood those comments. If something started out right and then someone changed it to be stupid, that may explain how it got to be stupid, but it doesn't make it not-stupid.

    Like, driving drunk is stupid. If you explain to me that you only drove drunk because you were too intoxicated at the time to realize that this could lead to an accident, that doesn't make it any less stupid.

    I can't believe all of you self-righteous jerks who try to tell me what is and what is not ok to do inside of my own vehicle. You don't see me swerving all over the road while I attempt to send text-messages traveling at highway speed, but it's perfectly acceptable for me to enjoy a cocktail within the confines of my automobile.
    Hell yeah! If I want to take everyone else's life into my own two drunk hands, that is my God given right!
    Who said anything about drunk? I don't even have a buzz by the time I reach the laughable "legal limit."
    You know, I'm starting to miss Hater...

    Well, that's too bad. We were all hoping you wouldn't. Better luck next time.

  • (cs)

    The correct way to write a stub would have been the function to throw a not implemented expectation.

    public void foo() {
   try {
     // do something that throws an Exception
   } catch (Exception ex) {
     // don't know what to do here yet
     throw new NotImplementedException("TODO", ex);
   }
 }
  • Bronie (unregistered)

    I love horsemeat ;)

  • Hater (unregistered) in reply to Bronie
    Bronie:
    I love horsemeat ;)
    I love yoursmeat.
  • Feargal O'Reilly (unregistered) in reply to trtrwtf
    trtrwtf:
    Bob:
    The Othe Bob:
    QJo:
    Ken B.:
    So, what happens if the answer is FILE_NOT_FOUND, and the "Return False" fails, too?

    Put it in a "while true" loop of course, and keep going round and round until it works. Don't forget to write the stack dump of why it didn't work to a log file, preferably on another machine, the one hosting the production database would be best. Then every evening at about 6:30 you get the line printers to print the file out.

    I had a retarded co-worker who would have an issue with that plan.

    Please show some sensitivity. I had a son who was retarded, and let me assure you: it is no laughing matter.

    Fuck off, Bob.

    Please show some sensitivity. I had a son who fucked off, and believe me, it was a particularly disturbing sight.

  • Trollestia (unregistered)
  • (cs) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    Born Texas Proud:
    Jay:
    Gordon Freeman:
    Someone is going to say there probably was some code inside that was removed (probably when all of the email list's mail providers moved the company's domain to their antispam filter).

    That someone is then going to say this is not a WTF, because whatever has an explanation cannot be a WTF, for some reason.

    Ditto. I never have understood those comments. If something started out right and then someone changed it to be stupid, that may explain how it got to be stupid, but it doesn't make it not-stupid.

    Like, driving drunk is stupid. If you explain to me that you only drove drunk because you were too intoxicated at the time to realize that this could lead to an accident, that doesn't make it any less stupid.

    I can't believe all of you self-righteous jerks who try to tell me what is and what is not ok to do inside of my own vehicle. You don't see me swerving all over the road while I attempt to send text-messages traveling at highway speed, but it's perfectly acceptable for me to enjoy a cocktail within the confines of my automobile.
    Hell yeah! If I want to take everyone else's life into my own two drunk hands, that is my God given right!

    Sounds good to me. Less Americans in the world.

  • DirkAndTheMac (unregistered) in reply to frits

    If you really can't handle the truth then why are you bothering to try!!!!

  • Andrei Rinea (unregistered)

    During the try block there is a number of asynchronous exceptions that can occur and be "caught" by the catch block.

    These are:

    OutOfMemoryException StackOverflowException ThreadAbortException

    .. and others

  • (cs) in reply to Matt Westwood
    Matt Westwood:
    Sounds good to me. Less Americans in the world.
    Please show some sensitivity. I had a son who was American, and I can assure you it was no laughing matter.

    (Sorry, but I'm testing a theory that the best way to kill a bad meme is to use it in the most ridiculous way possible.)

  • (cs) in reply to PedanticCurmudgeon
    PedanticCurmudgeon:
    Matt Westwood:
    Sounds good to me. Less Americans in the world.
    Please show some sensitivity. I had a son who was American, and I can assure you it was no laughing matter.

    (Sorry, but I'm testing a theory that the best way to kill a bad meme is to use it in the most ridiculous way possible.)

    Please show some sensitivity. I had a son who was a meme, not a good meme, but still a meme.

  • Nagesh (unregistered) in reply to PedanticCurmudgeon
    PedanticCurmudgeon:
    Matt Westwood:
    Sounds good to me. Less Americans in the world.
    Please show some sensitivity. I had a son who was American, and I can assure you it was no laughing matter.

    (Sorry, but I'm testing a theory that the best way to kill a bad meme is to use it in the most ridiculous way possible.)

    I am being to try that, but not has werked yet.

  • Born Texas Proud (unregistered) in reply to Matt Westwood
    Matt Westwood:
    C-Octothorpe:
    Born Texas Proud:
    Jay:
    Gordon Freeman:
    Someone is going to say there probably was some code inside that was removed (probably when all of the email list's mail providers moved the company's domain to their antispam filter).

    That someone is then going to say this is not a WTF, because whatever has an explanation cannot be a WTF, for some reason.

    Ditto. I never have understood those comments. If something started out right and then someone changed it to be stupid, that may explain how it got to be stupid, but it doesn't make it not-stupid.

    Like, driving drunk is stupid. If you explain to me that you only drove drunk because you were too intoxicated at the time to realize that this could lead to an accident, that doesn't make it any less stupid.

    I can't believe all of you self-righteous jerks who try to tell me what is and what is not ok to do inside of my own vehicle. You don't see me swerving all over the road while I attempt to send text-messages traveling at highway speed, but it's perfectly acceptable for me to enjoy a cocktail within the confines of my automobile.
    Hell yeah! If I want to take everyone else's life into my own two drunk hands, that is my God given right!

    Sounds good to me. Less Americans in the world.

    Would you rather have a short, happy life or a long dull one?

  • (cs) in reply to Born Texas Proud
    Born Texas Proud:
    Matt Westwood:
    C-Octothorpe:
    Born Texas Proud:
    Jay:
    Gordon Freeman:
    Someone is going to say there probably was some code inside that was removed (probably when all of the email list's mail providers moved the company's domain to their antispam filter).

    That someone is then going to say this is not a WTF, because whatever has an explanation cannot be a WTF, for some reason.

    Ditto. I never have understood those comments. If something started out right and then someone changed it to be stupid, that may explain how it got to be stupid, but it doesn't make it not-stupid.

    Like, driving drunk is stupid. If you explain to me that you only drove drunk because you were too intoxicated at the time to realize that this could lead to an accident, that doesn't make it any less stupid.

    I can't believe all of you self-righteous jerks who try to tell me what is and what is not ok to do inside of my own vehicle. You don't see me swerving all over the road while I attempt to send text-messages traveling at highway speed, but it's perfectly acceptable for me to enjoy a cocktail within the confines of my automobile.
    Hell yeah! If I want to take everyone else's life into my own two drunk hands, that is my God given right!

    Sounds good to me. Less Americans in the world.

    Would you rather have a short, happy life or a long dull one?
    If you want to die young, go shoot yourself in a field somewhere. Just be sure you don't take anybody else down with your selfish ass.

    Quite frankly, the sooner people with your attitude disappear, the better.

  • Born Texas Proud (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    Born Texas Proud:
    Matt Westwood:
    C-Octothorpe:
    Born Texas Proud:
    Jay:
    Gordon Freeman:
    Someone is going to say there probably was some code inside that was removed (probably when all of the email list's mail providers moved the company's domain to their antispam filter).

    That someone is then going to say this is not a WTF, because whatever has an explanation cannot be a WTF, for some reason.

    Ditto. I never have understood those comments. If something started out right and then someone changed it to be stupid, that may explain how it got to be stupid, but it doesn't make it not-stupid.

    Like, driving drunk is stupid. If you explain to me that you only drove drunk because you were too intoxicated at the time to realize that this could lead to an accident, that doesn't make it any less stupid.

    I can't believe all of you self-righteous jerks who try to tell me what is and what is not ok to do inside of my own vehicle. You don't see me swerving all over the road while I attempt to send text-messages traveling at highway speed, but it's perfectly acceptable for me to enjoy a cocktail within the confines of my automobile.
    Hell yeah! If I want to take everyone else's life into my own two drunk hands, that is my God given right!

    Sounds good to me. Less Americans in the world.

    Would you rather have a short, happy life or a long dull one?
    If you want to die young, go shoot yourself in a field somewhere. Just be sure you don't take anybody else down with your selfish ass.

    Quite frankly, the sooner people with your attitude disappear, the better.

    Shoot myself in the field...where does the fun come in?

    Seriously, if you haven't operated a motor vehicle while intoxicated, you haven't lived.

  • (cs) in reply to Born Texas Proud
    Born Texas Proud:
    Shoot myself in the field...where does the fun come in?
    Who said it had to be fun for you? I would giggle a little...
    Born Texas Proud:
    Seriously, if you haven't operated a motor vehicle while intoxicated, you haven't lived.
    I did, years ago, but being reckless with other peoples lives doesn't give me a thrill.

    Seriously, try sky-diving, but before you jump out of the plane, plunge a knife into your parachute bag a couple of times. You get your cheap thrills and nobody else gets hurt.

    Win-win really...

  • Hater (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    Seriously, try sky-diving, but before you jump out of the plane, plunge a knife into your parachute bag a couple of times. You get your cheap thrills and nobody else gets hurt.

    You're most pathetic useless nerd in the world. You should do that to yourself today. Or just jump out of window from top floor

  • LANMind (unregistered) in reply to Matt Westwood
    Matt Westwood:
    C-Octothorpe:
    Born Texas Proud:
    Jay:
    Gordon Freeman:
    Someone is going to say there probably was some code inside that was removed (probably when all of the email list's mail providers moved the company's domain to their antispam filter).

    That someone is then going to say this is not a WTF, because whatever has an explanation cannot be a WTF, for some reason.

    Ditto. I never have understood those comments. If something started out right and then someone changed it to be stupid, that may explain how it got to be stupid, but it doesn't make it not-stupid.

    Like, driving drunk is stupid. If you explain to me that you only drove drunk because you were too intoxicated at the time to realize that this could lead to an accident, that doesn't make it any less stupid.

    I can't believe all of you self-righteous jerks who try to tell me what is and what is not ok to do inside of my own vehicle. You don't see me swerving all over the road while I attempt to send text-messages traveling at highway speed, but it's perfectly acceptable for me to enjoy a cocktail within the confines of my automobile.
    Hell yeah! If I want to take everyone else's life into my own two drunk hands, that is my God given right!

    Sounds good to me. Less Americans in the world.

    As opposed to Europe? b/c europeans never drive drunk, right?

    As for anywhere else, who gives a fuck?

  • Greg (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    Seriously, try sky-diving, but before you jump out of the plane, plunge a knife into your parachute bag a couple of times. You get your cheap thrills and nobody else gets hurt.
    Please try to show some sensitivity. A skydiver with a torn chute landed on my son and killed him. I thought it was a pretty good laughing matter because I was sick and tired of looking after the retard.
  • Born Texas Proud (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    Born Texas Proud:
    Seriously, if you haven't operated a motor vehicle while intoxicated, you haven't lived.
    I did, years ago, but being reckless with other peoples lives doesn't give me a thrill.
    It's an acquired skill.

    Plus, where I'm from, if you're driving sober, you're in the minority and at a severe disadvantage. If you want to think like a drunk driver, be a drunk driver.

  • Joe (unregistered)

    If "return true" throws an exception that must be handled, why wouldn't you also handle the exception that "return false" might also generate?

    Unless...

    the object-oriented language defines false as a primitive, but true needs to be an instantiated object (which as a piece of syntactic sugar happens without an explicit operation - return true works the same as return true() or return new true. Much like what some languages appear to do with numeric constants: 5.ToString() anyone?)

    In which case, TRWTF is the language.

    --Joe

  • Bob's Son (unregistered) in reply to Born Texas Proud
    Born Texas Proud:
    It's an acquired skill.

    Plus, where I'm from, if you're driving sober, you're in the minority and at a severe disadvantage. If you want to think like a drunk driver, be a drunk driver.

    Where are you from, again?

  • (cs) in reply to Hater
    Hater:
    You're most pathetic useless nerd in the world
    Are you projecting, or is that your tourettes acting up again?
    Hater:
    C-Octothorpe:
    Seriously, try sky-diving, but before you jump out of the plane, plunge a knife into your parachute bag a couple of times. You get your cheap thrills and nobody else gets hurt.
    You should do that to yourself today.
    Nah, little too cold for that today...
    Hater:
    Or just jump out of window from top floor
    I would, but my building only has three floors, and I'm on the first... Would that count?
  • Newb (unregistered) in reply to ParkinT
    ParkinT:
    This is obviously VB. With the VB VARIANT type, I would expect TRUE, FALSE and HALF-TRUE.

    This is obviously VB.Net, and using the Boolean type. Joke fail.

  • Hater (unregistered) in reply to C-Octothorpe
    C-Octothorpe:
    Would that count?

    Only thing I projecting is my dick into your ass. Just kill yourself with kitchen knife or something.

  • (cs) in reply to PedanticCurmudgeon
    PedanticCurmudgeon:
    Please show some sensitivity. I had a son who was American, and I can assure you it was no laughing matter.

    (Sorry, but I'm testing a theory that the best way to kill a bad meme is to use it in the most ridiculous way possible.)

    Please show more ridiculousness. It currently is no laughing matter!

    (Feeling a bit zuney about this).

  • (cs) in reply to PedanticCurmudgeon
    PedanticCurmudgeon:
    Hortical:
    No, let him speak. I want to hear how Haskell does it. I'm sure it's very impressive.
    Actually, I was referring to Common Lisp.
    Please show more sensitivity! My son had the common lisp once and i can assure you, it was not very impressive!
  • (cs) in reply to Hater
    Hater:
    C-Octothorpe:
    Would that count?
    Just kill yourself with kitchen knife or something.
    I'm killing myself with time. Slowly. Over the years.

    Eventually it will be too much.

Leave a comment on “The True Alternative”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

Log Out

« Return to Article