• my name is missing (unregistered)

    In the 80's when I worked for General Dynamics, we were required to provide a flow chart for every application we sent to the Air Force. We had a program that generated it after the application was complete, with one symbol per page. The average height was around around a foot (1/3 of a meter or so).

  • (cs) in reply to ceegh
    ceegh:
    Belcat:
    Hmm, don't look now, but there's commies just north of you... In Canada we use meters more than we use feet.

    And don't think that doesn't give us the willies every once in a while. Good thing they're overly concerned with maple syrup, moose, and loons to be much of a threat. (Yes, satire.)

    And thinking about this...Why does the CFL measure the field in yards? If it's a 110 yard field shouldn't they just make it 100 meters? (OK, 100.58 but we'll just forget about the .58...)

    Crap, gotta go. That loony moose is eating my maple syrup!

  • (cs)

    The metric system won't catch on in the US because it's either too specific or too "big" for how we use measurements verbally.

    Hey, where do you want this? a. Oh, set it 1/3m to 2/3m away from the wall. b. About 33-66 cm from the wall. c. Just put it a foot or two from the wall.

    Do people really use decimeter that frequently?

    They taught us the metric system in elementary school, but the only conversion we ever cared about was how to get to feet or inches.

  • Teh dayli WFT (unregistered) in reply to akatherder
    akatherder:
    Hey, where do you want this? a. Oh, set it 1/3m to 2/3m away from the wall. b. About 33-66 cm from the wall. c. Just put it a foot or two from the wall.

    Hey, where do you want this? a. Oh, set it 1/3 foot to 2/3 foot away from the wall. b. About 10-20 cm from the wall. c. Just put it a decimeter or two from the wall.

    Rarely have I seen such a retarded argument.

  • Andrew Clunis (unregistered)

    As silly as it sounds, this one is actually halfway reasonable, despite the arbitrary "eight metres" requirement.

    Now the government in question has a hard copy of all the source code, specs, everything that went into the project, all in a secure facility with their other archives.

    An example of a project that didn't do this is the NASA Apollo project. Huge hunks of data are missing. The source code (and binaries, as well) for the Guidance system is partially missing, for instance. The original recording of Armstrong's famous quote was lost for many years.

  • sf (unregistered) in reply to zip
    zip:
    Well, unlike some stuff here, this one shouldn't have anyone refusing to believe it's real.

    I wouldn't have been too surprised to see the words USA in there somewhere....

    You've got that right. I once worked for a government contractor in the late eighties when contracts were required to follow the ridiculous MIL-STD-2767A (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DOD-STD-2167A), which was a waterfall-based software design specification developed under contract by the DOD.
    It was a fairly large system and the documentation required filled up 2 forklift pallets. Everyone would develop, test, and integrate their assigned software first in the most expediently way possible and THEN write their required design documents, and all the other unread documents, as the last painful step in the development cycle to comply with the specification. Project progress was measured by how many trees were killed.

  • (cs) in reply to stratos
    stratos:
    isn't this why the appedix was created?

    aka

    "This program is written in C, please see appendix A for the complete specifications of the C programming language. The program is written for a x386 processor, please see appendix B for the complete specifications"

    Also, thinking easth europe, thinking reaslistic flight sims, i'm thinking maddog simulations

    See appendix Z for the used value of PI with 8e15 decimal places, and appendix AA for the 2e16 bits public key of this specification's author.

  • (cs) in reply to ZergMortron
    THE REAL WTF here is.. they used meters. We all know ONLY COMMUNISTS USE THE METRIC SYSTEM BY CHOICE!! And communists == enemy to america.

    You're an idiot.

    The US Military uses the metric system. I have a feeling that they would take exception to being tagged communist.

    The CIA? Yep, metric.

    NASA? Metric. In fact, they lost at least one craft in the past as a result of an error that wouldn't have happened if they had been metric at that time.

    Are Canadians communists? Nope.

    Mexicans? Nope.

    Drug dealers? Hell, no. They are capitalists to the point of absurdity.

    As I said, you're an idiot.

  • Anonymous (unregistered)

    If I remember correctly, there are three countries in the world that don't use metric. Liberia, Myanmar, and the United States.

    Captcha: xevious? I think that's the real WTF here.

  • someone from Germany (unregistered)

    Hey! Not everyone who uses the metric system is a communist! There are also the Nazis! </sarcasm>

  • (cs)

    Who is reading the documentation?

    Top men.

    I know every pilot in this country. Who are they?

    Top men.

  • Capttcha: Alarm (unregistered) in reply to bstorer
    bstorer:
    For all my fellow Americans

    8 meters = 314.96063 inches, or 26.2467192 feet, or 8.74890639 yards, or 0.0397677563 furlongs, or 0.00497096954 miles, or 1.59071025 rods, or 4.37445319 fathoms, or 0.00143988481 leagues, or 78.7401575 hands

    Hope that clears things up.

    The US system is probably the largest WTF mentioned. The real WTF is that people still use it...

  • Darwin (unregistered) in reply to akatherder
    akatherder:
    The metric system won't catch on in the US because it's either too specific or too "big" for how we use measurements verbally.

    Hey, where do you want this? a. Oh, set it 1/3m to 2/3m away from the wall. b. About 33-66 cm from the wall. c. Just put it a foot or two from the wall.

    Do people really use decimeter that frequently?

    They taught us the metric system in elementary school, but the only conversion we ever cared about was how to get to feet or inches.

    Since 33cm is almost a foot, I guess you are trying to think of the problem in "feet". It doesn't make sense in your example. Since it doesn't matter if it is placed 33cm or 66cm from the wall, you could just say "put it a half meter from the wall"...

    BTW: Decimeter is used sometimes, but we have no problems with using centimeters. I guess we can imagine a number without looking at our fingers at the same time.

    Captcha = Darwin... I'm glad my country uses the same system as other countries, because we can adapt better.

  • (cs) in reply to Belcat
    Belcat:
    ZergMortron:
    THE REAL WTF here is.. they used meters. We all know ONLY COMMUNISTS USE THE METRIC SYSTEM BY CHOICE!! And communists == enemy to america.

    Hmm, don't look now, but there's commies just north of you... In Canada we use meters more than we use feet. I wonder if Mexico has converted to metric yet? Only the US uses such a cumbersome labour-wasting system. And GM wonders why the Japanese are making better cars.

    We have. Using the Metric System since 1857. (I think we were the first in the Latin American block that started using it.)

    There was some weird "Spanish Imperial measure" in use before that, that seems was even uglier than the "English Imperial measure". There was one measure called "arroba" ... which is who the @ character is called today.

    Hm... I wonder ... give me 2 @'s ...

    @@

    Bootnote: That funky non-metric system is the reason one of the NASA probes crashed. See???

  • George Jansen (unregistered) in reply to Diamonds

    So...

    The Soviets were duking it out with, umm, the Luftwaffe? The Mujaheddin's crack jet jockeys? I'll agree that there were likely some encounters with the PR China during the border disputes of the 1960s. But such police actions as the USSR found necessary during this guy's prime--Hungary and Czechoslovakia--were as far as I recall ground stuff only, and only the former involved much shooting.

  • (cs) in reply to Will
    Will:
    Gedoon:
    FYI the rest of the fucking world uses metric system! It's just the stupid rednecks called the US of A who refuse to convert.
    Doesn't the UK measure highway distances in miles? And beer in pints?
    This brings up another measurement WTF: UK (Imperial) pints are not the same as US pints.
  • Chris OConnor (GrumpyWookie) (unregistered)

    I once had a report that a client insisted on printing - and would've sat in a box somewhere.

    THAT was about 44,000 pages - dunno how many metres it would've been - anyone want to guess ?!?

    More here : It's all about the doco

  • Anonymous (unregistered) in reply to ZergMortron
    ZergMortron:
    THE REAL WTF here is.. they used meters. We all know ONLY COMMUNISTS USE THE METRIC SYSTEM BY CHOICE!! And communists == enemy to america.

    Of course, metric is too simple for us. We need to remember a billion ratios of different quantities, write 100s of lines of code to do trivial taks, etc. Metric would just make our lives too easy, we don't want that.

  • Anonymous commie (unregistered) in reply to freelancer
    freelancer:
    ZergMortron:
    THE REAL WTF here is.. they used meters. We all know ONLY COMMUNISTS USE THE METRIC SYSTEM BY CHOICE!! And communists == enemy to america.
    HEY! I use meters (I live in Sweden), and I am NOT a commie!
    Well, I live in Sweden to, and I'm a commie. So... I guess I'll see you up against the wall when the revolution comes.
  • Strictnein (unregistered) in reply to Critter

    YHBT. YHL. HAND.

    Man, people just don't pickup on trolls like they used to.

  • fanguad (unregistered)

    A word to all my fellow Americans. Please lay off the rest of the world. It's important for them to use the metric - a matter of life and death, in fact. Let me explain.

    Here in the USA, we measure temperatures in degrees Fahrenheit. Excluding Alaska, extreme temperatures range from about -20F to 110F. Now, both -20F and -20C are pretty darn cold, but light a fire and you'll live. However, if the temperature ever reached 110C, everyone in Europe would die as all the water in their bodies boiled away. A pretty grisly death, I'm sure you agree.

    An now you understand why Europe is forced to use the metric system.

  • Zero (unregistered) in reply to Critter
    Critter:
    NASA? Metric. In fact, they lost at least one craft in the past as a result of an error that wouldn't have happened if they had been metric at that time.
    Actually, the error was due to concurrently using the metric and imperial systems. Had they used one or the other exclusively the error would not have occurred.
  • freelancer (unregistered) in reply to Seraph
    Seraph:
    Will:
    Gedoon:
    FYI the rest of the fucking world uses metric system! It's just the stupid rednecks called the US of A who refuse to convert.
    Doesn't the UK measure highway distances in miles? And beer in pints?
    This brings up another measurement WTF: UK (Imperial) pints are not the same as US pints.
    Interesting point there. NASA actually lost a Mars orbiter back in '99 because the UK team working on it used English miles, while NASA used US miles. More about it here: http://www.cnn.com/TECH/space/9909/30/mars.metric.02/
  • ElQuberto (unregistered) in reply to ewhac
    ewhac:
    And they can only do that if they're made part of the original collaborative process. And, like it or not, that's done via... Documentation.

    If you think anyone is going to go to the 8 meters of documentation stored in some offsite facility to see how to change some lines of code you're smoking something.

  • (cs) in reply to Teh dayli WFT
    Teh dayli WFT:
    Hey, where do you want this? a. Oh, set it 1/3 foot to 2/3 foot away from the wall. b. About 10-20 cm from the wall. c. Just put it a decimeter or two from the wall.

    Rarely have I seen such a retarded argument.

    I was wondering how detailed I needed to be. I guess I can just dumb it down a bit. It is quite common to say half a foot or 6 inches. I guess the fact that it seems a lot easier to break something down into inches because it is broad enough that you don't sound like an anal retentive loon.

    If you're speaking in unspecific terms, you can describe where to put something within 6 inches without it sounding awkward. With the metric system you would need to say a fraction of a meter or very specific measurement in cm or make very liberal use of the decimeter.

    As I said, it's the verbal conversion that Americans just can't stomach. If you don't live here, you might not get it.

  • Cubicle67 (unregistered) in reply to Rolf
    Rolf:
    8 meters or 8 feet? 8 meter * 3 feet = 24 FEET! Holy cow!

    That would be 8 yards. A meter's just a bit longer. 1 yard = 3' = 90cm. 1 metre = 3'4" = 100cm.

    This sounds eerily familiar to where I work...

  • deeksy (unregistered) in reply to freelancer

    Er, don't see any difference between English miles and American miles, I'm pretty sure that miles are the same everywhere.

    What the article does say is that NASA use the "more conventional" metric system, which I don't believe has miles in it.

  • Zero (unregistered) in reply to Cubicle67
    Rolf:
    8 meters or 8 feet? 8 meter * 3 feet = 24 FEET! Holy cow!
    8 meters ~ 2 stories (as stated in the story), so yes, more than 24 feet (26.2 ft according to Google).
  • mr_ed (unregistered) in reply to bstorer
    For all my fellow Americans

    8 meters = ... 0.00497096954 miles, or ...

    Hope that clears things up.

    Is that nautical miles, or ground miles?

  • Patrick (unregistered) in reply to obediah
    obediah:
    zip:
    Well, unlike some stuff here, this one shouldn't have anyone refusing to believe it's real.

    I don't know. A game developer that delivers on time and bug free? ;)

    DUKE NUKEM FOREVER!

    captcha: "quake" ...how appropriate

  • (cs) in reply to Critter
    Critter:
    THE REAL WTF here is.. they used meters. We all know ONLY COMMUNISTS USE THE METRIC SYSTEM BY CHOICE!! And communists == enemy to america.

    You're an idiot.

    Oh, the sting of irony.

    Can't anybody recognize f***ing sarcasm anymore? I thought it couldn't possibly have been made more obvious by the OP.

  • burne (unregistered) in reply to Will
    Will:
    Belcat:
    Only the US uses such a cumbersome labour-wasting system.

    Doesn't the UK measure highway distances in miles? And beer in pints?

    And weight in stones. (I always wondered: Big stones? Small stones? )

  • TheRealBill (unregistered) in reply to George Jansen
    George Jansen:
    A couple of the details seem odd. Your basic retired general mid 1990s would have had his prime flying years in during the Cold War. The Russians shot down the odd US reconaissance plane and may have for all I recall mixed it up with US planes in Korea, but "vast experience in aerial warfare"? Aerial warfare training, perhaps. And the rest of the Warsaw Pact got out and about even less.

    You might want to thump your history teacher on the noggin, or yourself for not paying attention. There were air battles in the Korea and Vietnam conflicts where Soviets supplied fighters and pilots to the North Koreans and North Vietnamese. And yes in this case they would have been flying against US pilots - we did the same thing to "our side".

  • (cs) in reply to akatherder
    akatherder:
    Teh dayli WFT:
    Hey, where do you want this? a. Oh, set it 1/3 foot to 2/3 foot away from the wall. b. About 10-20 cm from the wall. c. Just put it a decimeter or two from the wall.

    Rarely have I seen such a retarded argument.

    I was wondering how detailed I needed to be. I guess I can just dumb it down a bit. It is quite common to say half a foot or 6 inches. I guess the fact that it seems a lot easier to break something down into inches because it is broad enough that you don't sound like an anal retentive loon.

    If you're speaking in unspecific terms, you can describe where to put something within 6 inches without it sounding awkward. With the metric system you would need to say a fraction of a meter or very specific measurement in cm or make very liberal use of the decimeter.

    As I said, it's the verbal conversion that Americans just can't stomach. If you don't live here, you might not get it.

    You know I "live here" and I don't get it. How is 6 inches any more/less precises than 10 centimeters?

    So your whole argument is the English System is better because feet is smaller than a meter? And yet a mile is much bigger than a kilometer...

  • AGould (unregistered) in reply to webhamster
    webhamster:
    And thinking about this...Why does the CFL measure the field in yards? If it's a 110 yard field shouldn't they just make it 100 meters? (OK, 100.58 but we'll just forget about the .58...)

    Football was grandfathered in. So much effort to redraw all those lines, you see.. :)

    I'm Canadian, and most folks are bi-lingual for measurements (bi-measural?). Probably from living too close to the US. I can go into a restaurant and choose between a pint of beer, a Coke with an ounce of rum, or a liter of wine. Generally, we just use whichever makes more sense. Personally, I'll use metric for math/sciences and road distances, imperial for rough-measurements.

  • (cs) in reply to ammoQ

    I don't think Viktor Belenko http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Viktor_Belenko would agree with that. When he defected to the West by flying his MIG25 over to Japan, he told people interviewing him that the MIG25 was built to last 25 hours in operations, by which time it would be replaced!!!

    Addendum (2007-03-05 17:27): In response to

    Maybe not with intention, but this is actually a good point. Fighter airplanes are in use for many decades, so in (say) 25 years, it might be quite difficult to find the specification of the version of C that has been used for the project.
  • Loren Pechtel (unregistered)

    Long ago I had a teacher that I drove nuts. He wanted to make sure we actually read over the stuff we were supposed to so we were to turn in our notes. He was expecting something like 10 pages. I turned in 2 or 3 and drove him up the wall because he couldn't find anything wrong with what I did but it was way too short.

    The difference between typed and handwritten didn't occur to him. (This was back before everyone had a computer to do such stuff on.)

  • (cs) in reply to Loren Pechtel

    I never use the metric system for anything. Which reminds me: I need some .1 horsepower light bulbs.

  • Preskooldude (unregistered)
    ...even with big fonts, think paper, and double spacing...
    Did you mean thick paper?
  • AGould (unregistered) in reply to newfweiler
    newfweiler:
    I never use the metric system for anything. Which reminds me: I need some .1 horsepower light bulbs.

    What do Americans use instead of watts? Candlepower? Glow-ness?

    (Actual question, only slightly sarcastic - units of measurement are really muddled these days, that's why we keep flinging expensive spacecraft into planets.)

    CAPTCHA - smile: if we only have to fight about measurements, the world is a good place...

  • TheRealBill (unregistered) in reply to freelancer

    Actually freelancer, yes you do still have a socialist government. Whether the current governors are socialist does not change what your government currently is. But don't feel too isolated. We in the USA have been putting up with socialist governors and government since FDR. Ours just don't like to admit, even to themselves, that they are socialist.

    Does your government "provide" any of the following? Schools Retirement programs "Welfare" programs to those who make less than others (you know, wealth redistribution by another name) A "progressive" income tax? "Health care?"

    If yes, then you have a socialist government, whether the PTB want to admit it or not.

    And yes, my fellow Americans, this means you too.

  • freelancer (unregistered) in reply to deeksy
    deeksy:
    Er, don't see any difference between English miles and American miles, I'm pretty sure that miles are the same everywhere.

    What the article does say is that NASA use the "more conventional" metric system, which I don't believe has miles in it.

    Ok, maybe I was a little off. But still...

  • grg (unregistered) in reply to zip

    There's a saying the the airplane biz, the plane can't be delivered until the paperwork weighs more than the plane.

    And it's pretty well documented that when Lockheed got the contract for the U-2, the contract officer said there would be no problem if the plane didnt fly, as long as all the paperwork was okay.

  • freelancer (unregistered) in reply to TheRealBill
    TheRealBill:
    Actually freelancer, yes you do still have a socialist government. Whether the current governors are socialist does not change what your government currently is. But don't feel too isolated. We in the USA have been putting up with socialist governors and government since FDR. Ours just don't like to admit, even to themselves, that they are socialist.

    Does your government "provide" any of the following? Schools Retirement programs "Welfare" programs to those who make less than others (you know, wealth redistribution by another name) A "progressive" income tax? "Health care?"

    If yes, then you have a socialist government, whether the PTB want to admit it or not.

    And yes, my fellow Americans, this means you too.

    Fair enough, it might be slightly socialistic. But it's not a commusistic (sp?) government, which was actually my point (I think it was lost somewhere). I hate politics :P

    Captcha: tesla... smart guy.

  • (cs)

    Eight meters of documentation. Hmmmm! It might have been cheaper and faster to use eight meters of dollar bills.

  • Curtis (unregistered) in reply to akatherder

    Canada uses the Metric system exclusively.

    Well, not really. I'm five-nine and a-hundred-and-ninety pounds. I eat quarter-pounders and foot-long subs. (Although a "30.5 cm sub" would be awesome.

    For technical work, or any sort of actual specification, though, I wouldn't touch anything but the metric system. It's just easier to deal with.

    Imperial is a vocal system, Metric is a scientific/mathematical system. People tend towards Imperial when describing ("That musta' been ten pounds 'a beef") and towards metric when doing math/computing. This is true in the United States, as well- the only noticeable difference is that they use miles instead of kilometres, gallons instead of litres, and fahrenheit instead of celsius- they learn Chemistry in metric like everybody else, because any other system would just be asinine. So what's the problem? Metric is more mathematically beautiful, Imperial is more complex, but contains a few really solid, memorable units (Because the difference between a teaspoon and a tablespoon is pretty clear).

    So stop all the fussin' and the feudin'. Learn whatever you want, and use Google to convert things if you need to.

  • TheRealBill (unregistered) in reply to Critter
    Critter:
    THE REAL WTF here is.. they used meters. We all know ONLY COMMUNISTS USE THE METRIC SYSTEM BY CHOICE!! And communists == enemy to america.

    You're an idiot.

    The US Military uses the metric system. I have a feeling that they would take exception to being tagged communist.

    The CIA? Yep, metric.

    NASA? Metric. In fact, they lost at least one craft in the past as a result of an error that wouldn't have happened if they had been metric at that time.

    Are Canadians communists? Nope.

    Mexicans? Nope.

    Drug dealers? Hell, no. They are capitalists to the point of absurdity.

    As I said, you're an idiot.

    re: NASA. Not accurate. They use both metric and SAE, still do. The incident you referred could also be stated that had they used SAE thought there would not have been an incident. The problem was not the use or non-use of metric for measurement, it was the improper input of data values. Yeah, human error. An error that a program could have checked but did not.

    By your argument here we could say the Soviets were failing to make successful moon landing attempts due to using metric, because clearly the US using SAE made it just fine. It would be equal WTFery.

    Furthermore, the Canadians, Europeans, Russians, British, etc. also use SAE. It's called Minutes, Seconds, Hours, Days, months, Years. Yup, time is not metricated. How about degrees of an angle? Yup, more non-Metric.

    Switching back and forth isn't that bad, I do it daily. No more than using more than a single programming language as best fits the situation.

    And actually, drug dealers are not capitalist. They are fascists. If you ever were to examine how they run things you would find that out real quick. Further, word has it many have been supporting politicians that want to keep their product illegal. Just because someone sells a service or product at large margins does not make them capitalist or "capitalists to the point of absurdity". Opportunists, perhaps. But not necessarily capitalists.

    The OP was being sarcastic, and you missed it. Then in reply you made some idiotic comments, whist calling the OP an idiot.

    It seems the real WTFs have moved from the stories to the comments

  • (cs) in reply to Henry
    Henry:
    Useful Metric Unit Conversions

    1 trillion microphones = 1 megaphone 2000 mockingbirds = two kilomockingbirds 10 cards = 1 decacards 1 millionth of a fish = 1 microfiche 453.6 graham crackers = 1 pound cake 1 trillion pins = 1 terrapin 10 rations = 1 decoration 100 rations = 1 C-ration 10 millipedes = 1 centipede 3 1/3 tridents = 1 decadent 2 monograms = 1 diagram 8 nickels = 2 paradigms 2 wharves = 1 paradox

    Best laugh I've had all day! Thanks for that. But don't you want to include: diaphragm (two birth control pills, perhaps) 10 Christmas partiers = 1 decahalls (with boughs... okay, forget that one) 1 million beans = 1 teranewasshole

  • jaericho (unregistered)

    I guess I would be an Idiot Redneck Hick Civilian(tm). So to all the USA is Stupid for not Going Metric(tm) crowd: Any good reasons to switch to metric? Since I learned both of them, I can't think of any reasons why my odometer has to measure kilometers instead of miles.

    Only the US uses such a cumbersome labour-wasting system.

    And changing all the road signs, just to switch from a system that seems to be doing just fine wouldn't be a waste?

  • Ken (unregistered) in reply to zip

    In Soviet Russia, flight simulator software documents YOU.

Leave a comment on “Very, Very Well Documented”

Log In or post as a guest

Replying to comment #:

« Return to Article