- Feature Articles
- CodeSOD
- Error'd
- Forums
-
Other Articles
- Random Article
- Other Series
- Alex's Soapbox
- Announcements
- Best of…
- Best of Email
- Best of the Sidebar
- Bring Your Own Code
- Coded Smorgasbord
- Mandatory Fun Day
- Off Topic
- Representative Line
- News Roundup
- Editor's Soapbox
- Software on the Rocks
- Souvenir Potpourri
- Sponsor Post
- Tales from the Interview
- The Daily WTF: Live
- Virtudyne
Admin
Admin
Wow. I think I might have put in a bug report for that, but I can't remember any longer-- that was back in like 2007 or so. Maybe they actually fixed a bug.
Of course it wasn't really a bug, but more of a "duuuh we're stupid moron idiot open source developers who have absolutely no imagination and have no idea why anybody would use a vector program to design anything large than the output of a printer! Duuuh!" Protip: don't put stupid arbitrary limitations in your program, or I hate you.
Admin
Admin
FOSS: now fixing bugs faster than a bullet kills a man.
Admin
Panini Scanners are notorious for this. The same physical scanner can be purchased for $300 or $1500, depending on if you want it to scan 30/60/90 documents/minute (edited, originally wrote 'second', that was a mental block), if it will take a feeder, if it will read front/back, if it will take 30 documents at a time or only one at a time, if the ink cartridge endorsement will actually work...all software-controller 'features'.
Admin
Sounds like 2-way radios.
Of course, when you figure out that there's no checksum on the file that controls this and you may edit it at will, it becomes much easier to not spend money.
Admin
Admin
Admin